Package: otrs
Version: 2.0.4p01-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
after latest upgrade in testing OTRS became unusable:
http://localhost/cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl on this server.
hi,
Are the owner ship promissions set right on all otrs file?
use ~otrs/bin/SetPermissions.sh
i used otrs:www-data (that should work on debian as default) but it
didn't work until i used www-data:www-data ;
Good luck!
Thomas Wouters
Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: otrs
Version:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:15:21PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed
it?
Hi!
No, I am sorry, I already purged the tetex packages and reinstalled.
It's now working for me.
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338437: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line testing, we're coming
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Hi!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 15:54 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles *
-sizeof(JPXTile));
+ nTiles = img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles;
+ // check for overflow before allocating
Hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and
I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail
below to upstream (and some others).
Can you please
* Mike Hommey:
Even if the browser cannot be restarted after the attack has been
carried out? The impact of this bug is slightly different from other
crash bugs.
Are you sure the firefox process was not still running ? That would
explain the browser not being able to restart...
According
Hi Florian, hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer
overflow, too:
void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) {
int n;
n = nObjs * objSize;
if (objSize == 0 || n /
tags 339120 - fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Reappeared in 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florian, hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer
overflow, too:
void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) {
int n;
n = nObjs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 339120 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Hi!
Frank Küster [2005-12-09 11:09 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florian, hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer
overflow, too:
void
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unblock 342326 with 342521
Bug#342326: mh-e fails to load, void-variable message-mark-insert-begin
Was blocked by: 342521
Blocking bugs removed: 342521
severity 342647 grave
Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot
Severity set to
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339269: fixed in sword 1.5.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
* Martin Pitt:
- For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs
overflow an int, we have two cases:
But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case.
Overflow is undefined, period.
You can pass -fwrapv to gcc if you want modulo arithmetic for
Bernd Eckenfels writes (adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4):
Hello Ian, me again :)
Thanks for all your work :-).
there is a last problem, hcommon.c.m4 is missing ENOTSOCK, which will cause
a false regression failure. However since it is shipping hcommon.c, it
depends on the file timestamps on
Hi Florian!
Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]:
* Martin Pitt:
- For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with
nObjs
overflow an int, we have two cases:
But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case.
Overflow is undefined, period.
This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal
handlers. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and
I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd).
What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing
somehow...
--
* Martin Pitt:
Hi Florian!
Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]:
* Martin Pitt:
- For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with
nObjs
overflow an int, we have two cases:
But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case.
Overflow is
Package: xpuyopuyo
Version: 0.9.8-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), libgtk1.2-dev,
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Thomas Wouters wrote:
Are the owner ship promissions set right on all otrs file?
use ~otrs/bin/SetPermissions.sh
i used otrs:www-data (that should work on debian as default) but it didn't
work until i used www-data:www-data ;
Well, I think I used www-data:www-data
0.99.2 does indeed fix the segfault, i have not tested an earlier version.
there are some caveats.
at first nothing was enabled, i had to remove the config and restart quagga.
some ospf commands (redistribute static) didn't take effect immediatly
and required a restart as well.
i am only using
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 342229 + fixed
Bug#342229: kile-i18n: cannot install: broken dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Frank Küster wrote:
The upstream patch applies cleanly to xpdf/Stream.{cc,h} in sarge, but
JPXStream.cc does not exist. But the functions might still be defined
elsewhere.
The patch does not apply cleanly, except for Stream.h, in woody, but at
least one affected line in Stream.cc *does*
67841158 59 8367645733232 26 98668 314793 2381
98 79 24 29 22 22 64 68 759 272 72 34 2268 98 16
89 62 35 19 16 18 35 78 3239 3479 79 92 17 6617
25695728 558811163 23 74 42177111 39 644 86 98 95
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.1.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Hi!
According to the package debian/copyright file, Eclipse seems to be released
under the CPL.
But eclipse.org website states that, from version 3.1 on, Eclipse has
completed the migration[1] from the CPL to the
Package: zaptel
Version: 1:1.0.7-4.1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
zaptel's postinst uses the ps command from the non-essential procps
package, but the zaptel package does not declare a dependency.
Simon
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
tags 332682 + patch
thanks
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Aleksey Kliger wrote:
As far as I can tell, the build problems in vnc4 happen because
rfb/Rect.h provides its
own definitions of min() and max() as macros which interact badly with
the guts
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 332682 + patch
Bug#332682: vnc4 - don't build with gcc 4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:17:06 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#340078: fixed in junior-games-gl 1.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 342610 + pending
Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 - 2.0.0-4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 341271 + pending
Bug#341271: openoffice.org-dev: possible unexpanded @FOO@ substitutions
There were no tags set.
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 325449 elserv: support emacs-snapshot
Bug#325449: wysihtml-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot-gtk
Changed Bug title.
severity 325449 grave
Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
package clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc
tags 342552 + pending
Bug#342552: clisp: FTBFS without xmkmf
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.09.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log):
../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../boot -c -impl
pa_o_fast.ppo
[...]
/tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s: Assembler messages:
Hi Frank, hi Florian!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and
I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail
below to upstream (and some others).
Hi,
elserv.el
elserv-url-decode-string()
(push ?\ decoded)
is breaking in emacs-snapshot.
emacs-snapshot probably wants
(push ?\\ decoded)
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter, didn't we agree that mh-e should skip byte-compilation for
emacs-snapshot anyway?
Yes we did. Sorry, I was in Montreal for the Climate Change Conference
and I've been very busy. The next mh-e upload will correct this.
Peter
--
To
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0
Version: 2.0.9.2-12
Severity: serious
This from a thread on d-release.
Alastair, could you please look into this?
As it is keeping cdebconf from building on 2 arches, it's pretty important.
On Friday 09 December 2005 17:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 342706 Causes cdebconf build failures on alpha and ia64
Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi Joey,
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
sid as well.
Did you see Martin Pitt's enhanced patch - do both address the same
problems?
TIA,
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present
in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the
patch.
I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you
can peer-review the patch?
Martin and
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342657: fixed in xpuyopuyo 0.9.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
mkdir /etc/gconf/schemas/
and cd /etc/gconf/schemas/ ln
-s /usr/share/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas solved my problem.
Joh
On Monday 05 December 2005 10:11, Stefan Völkel wrote:
Hello,
please try to locate the file: revelation.schemas
seems like your installation tries to, find it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 333708
Bug#333708: mldonkey - fails to build
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
reopen 333708
thanks
Changes:
mldonkey (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #333708, #337856, #328131, #337313)
This is no new release bug.
Bastian
--
Live long and prosper.
-- Spock, Amok Time, stardate 3372.7
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:07:10AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
arrangements are supposed to make sure that the timestamps are correct
and I will have to check this since obviously the shipped hcommon.c
was out of date.
well... this might be related to the fact that i had patched both in the
Can we get a bug status update on this? Are the relevant packages going
to be modified to have the right files in them? Is there an interim
workaround? What projections do we have a fix being uploaded?
Matt (still waiting for gnucash to be working again)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Matt Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we get a bug status update on this? Are the relevant packages going
to be modified to have the right files in them? Is there an interim
workaround? What projections do we have a fix being uploaded?
Matt (still waiting for gnucash to be working
Frank Küster wrote:
Hi Joey,
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
sid as well.
Did you see Martin Pitt's enhanced patch - do both
Package: mysql-admin
Version: 1.1.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install mysql-admin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an
Package: wvdial
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
wvdial: Depends: libwvstreams4.0-base which is a virtual package.
Depends: libwvstreams4.0-extras which is a virtual package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:47:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342291: fixed in ocaml-ssl 0.3.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: debtags
Version: 1.5.2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I am running testing and recently upgraded apt to unstable (to test a bug
fix for apt-build). When running apt-get upgrade everything got upgraded
but debtag.
The output actually is:
# apt-get
Hello,
I upgraded apt to unstable: apt-get upgrade -t unstable apt
and apt-build no more segfault
--
Ashar Voultoiz
pgp keyid: 0x63B820D1
IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15325080
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:21:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332835: fixed in xdb 1.2.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:30:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337257: unstable ok
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
severity 341945 grave
Bug#341945: debtags: segfault in postinst
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 341945 342734
Bug#341945: debtags: segfault in postinst
Bug#342734: debtags: glibc
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:32:16 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342217: fixed in openh323 1.15.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: superkaramba
Version: 0.37-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
due to the current C++ allocator transition superkaramba needs to be
rebuilt against kdelibs4c2a.
Andreas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:03:18PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to
be installed
That's because someone did a binary only upload so that the package
does not depend on the
package doc++
tags 339921 - unreproducible
severity 339921 minor
retitle 339921 docify.ll:318: warning: unknown escape sequence '\]'
thanks bts
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 18:19 -0500, Jeremy Nimmer wrote:
I am not able to reproduce this on sid now:
[...]
It's a warning now, not an error. Does
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package doc++
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: doc++
tags 339921 - unreproducible
Bug#339921: doc++: FTBFS: docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]'
Tags were: patch unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
severity 339921 minor
Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 01:19 +0100 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
I think the postgresql-server-dev packages should not need libpq-dev at
all, at least for the header files. (I think the reason for the
dependency might be something to do with pg_config.) At least if you
compile a
I think the postgresql-server-dev packages should not need libpq-dev at
all, at least for the header files. (I think the reason for the
dependency might be something to do with pg_config.) At least if you
compile a server-side module, you should be able to compile that using
only
Hello all,
I strongly suspect that these two failures are linked. The failure in the
fork test is most likely caused by a failure in the rand calls in that
test (why use rand, anyway?) We only want to test fork, and rand has
a non-zero chance of collision, which makes it a false positive
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 06:43:35PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:03:18PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to
be installed
That's because someone did
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
elserv.el
elserv-url-decode-string()
(push ?\ decoded)
is breaking in emacs-snapshot.
emacs-snapshot probably wants
(push ?\\ decoded)
In emacs21, the following S expressions return the value of
* Bastian Blank [Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:32:53 +0100]:
reopen 333708
thanks
Changes:
mldonkey (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #333708, #337856, #328131, #337313)
This is no new release bug.
Sylvain, in case it's not clear enough, waldi means
clone 325449 -1
clone 325449 -2
reassign -1 emacs-wiki
reassign -2 muse-el
retitle -1 emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22
retitle -2 muse-el: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22
thanks
I'm cloning the bugreport to the respective packages,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 325449 -1
Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot
Bug 325449 cloned as bug 342749.
clone 325449 -2
Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot
Bug 325449 cloned as bug 342750.
reassign -1 emacs-wiki
Bug#342749: elserv: support emacs-snapshot
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.09.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log):
../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../boot -c
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-8.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
glibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
gcc-4.0 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S -c -I../include -I.
-I/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket -I..
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:17:05 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325449: fixed in elserv 0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: haskell-cabal
Version: 1.1.3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
haskell-cabal failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my
sparc pbuilder.
./Distribution/Simple/Utils.hs:217:4:
Warning: This binding for `paths' shadows an existing binding
Package: haskell-hsql
Version: 1.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
haskell-hsql failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.
cd doctmp haddock -h -o ../doc -t HSQL \
Database/HSQL.hs Database/HSQL/Types.hs \
Package: missingh
Version: 0.12.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
missingh failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
Running: ./setup build
Chasing modules from:
Package: haskell-src-exts
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
haskell-src-exts failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my
sparc pbuilder.
Running: ./setup build
shift/reduce conflicts: 5
Chasing modules from:
Package: bayonne
Version: 1.2.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
bayonne failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/bayonne-1.2.15/drivers/phonedev'
sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
79 matches
Mail list logo