Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed
Package: otrs
Version: 2.0.4p01-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
after latest upgrade in testing OTRS became unusable:
http://localhost/cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an
ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) PHP/4.4.0-4 Server at
wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de Port 80
Moreover the cron jobs fail continuousely:
---
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:00:04 +0100
From: Cron Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] test -x $HOME/bin/GenericAgent.pl
$HOME/bin/GenericAgent.pl -c db /dev/null
DBD::Pg::st execute failed: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
ERROR: OTRS-GenericAgent-10 Perl: 5.8.7 OS: linux Time: Fri Dec 9 08:00:04 2005
Message: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
, SQL: 'SELECT process_name, process_id, process_host, process_create FROM
process_id WHERE process_name = 'GenericAgent''
Traceback (14567):
Module: Kernel::System::PID::PIDGet (v1.3) Line: 167
Module: Kernel::System::PID::PIDCreate (v1.3) Line: 100
Module: /usr/share/otrs/bin/GenericAgent.pl (v1.36) Line: 123
DBD::Pg::db do failed: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
ERROR: OTRS-GenericAgent-10 Perl: 5.8.7 OS: linux Time: Fri Dec 9 08:00:04 2005
Message: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
, SQL: 'INSERT INTO process_id (process_name, process_id, process_host,
process_create) VALUES ('GenericAgent', '14567',
'wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de',
1134111604)'
Traceback (14567):
Module: Kernel::System::PID::PIDCreate (v1.3) Line: 129
Module: /usr/share/otrs/bin/GenericAgent.pl (v1.36) Line: 123
---
Tha database ist stored in PostgreSQL. The postgresql server was upgraded in
the same apt-get upgrade process. The database itself looks fine and is
accessible via other clients (psql, pgamdin3).
Feel free to ask me for further information that might be needed to track
down the problem.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages otrs depends on:
ii apache2 2.0.54-5 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2] 2.0.54-5 traditional model for Apache2
ii libauthen-sasl-perl 2.09-1 Authen::SASL - SASL Authentication
ii libdate-pcalc-perl1.2-2 Perl module for Gregorian calendar
ii libdbi-perl 1.48-2 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu
ii libemail-valid-perl 0.15-3 Check validity of Internet email a
ii libio-stringy-perl2.110-1Perl5 modules for IO from scalars
ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs
ii libmime-perl 5.418-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m
ii perl 5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
Versions of packages otrs recommends:
ii aspell0.60.3-5 GNU Aspell spell-checker
ii ispell3.1.20.0-4 International Ispell (an interacti
pn libapache2-mod-perl2 | libapa none (no description available)
ii libdbd-mysql-perl 3.0002-1 A Perl5 database interface to the
ii libdbd-pg-perl1.43-1 a PostgreSQL interface for Perl 5
pn libgd-graph-perl none (no description available)
pn libgd-text-perl none (no description available)
ii mysql-server 4.1.14-6 mysql database server (transitiona
ii mysql-server-4.1 [mysql-serve 4.1.14-6 mysql database server binaries
ii postgresql7.5.13 object-relational SQL database man
ii procmail 3.22-11Versatile e-mail processor
-- debconf-show failed
Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed
hi,
Are the owner ship promissions set right on all otrs file?
use ~otrs/bin/SetPermissions.sh
i used otrs:www-data (that should work on debian as default) but it
didn't work until i used www-data:www-data ;
Good luck!
Thomas Wouters
Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: otrs
Version: 2.0.4p01-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
after latest upgrade in testing OTRS became unusable:
http://localhost/cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an
ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) PHP/4.4.0-4 Server at
wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de Port 80
Moreover the cron jobs fail continuousely:
---
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:00:04 +0100
From: Cron Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] test -x $HOME/bin/GenericAgent.pl
$HOME/bin/GenericAgent.pl -c db /dev/null
DBD::Pg::st execute failed: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
ERROR: OTRS-GenericAgent-10 Perl: 5.8.7 OS: linux Time: Fri Dec 9 08:00:04 2005
Message: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
, SQL: 'SELECT process_name, process_id, process_host, process_create FROM
process_id WHERE process_name = 'GenericAgent''
Traceback (14567):
Module: Kernel::System::PID::PIDGet (v1.3) Line: 167
Module: Kernel::System::PID::PIDCreate (v1.3) Line: 100
Module: /usr/share/otrs/bin/GenericAgent.pl (v1.36) Line: 123
DBD::Pg::db do failed: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
ERROR: OTRS-GenericAgent-10 Perl: 5.8.7 OS: linux Time: Fri Dec 9 08:00:04 2005
Message: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht
, SQL: 'INSERT INTO process_id (process_name, process_id, process_host,
process_create) VALUES ('GenericAgent', '14567',
'wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de',
1134111604)'
Traceback (14567):
Module: Kernel::System::PID::PIDCreate (v1.3) Line: 129
Module: /usr/share/otrs/bin/GenericAgent.pl (v1.36) Line: 123
---
Tha database ist stored in PostgreSQL. The postgresql server was upgraded in
the same apt-get upgrade process. The database itself looks fine and is
accessible via other clients (psql, pgamdin3).
Feel free to ask me for further information that might be needed to track
down the problem.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages otrs depends on:
ii apache2 2.0.54-5 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2] 2.0.54-5 traditional model for Apache2
ii libauthen-sasl-perl 2.09-1 Authen::SASL - SASL Authentication
ii libdate-pcalc-perl1.2-2 Perl module for Gregorian calendar
ii libdbi-perl 1.48-2 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu
ii libemail-valid-perl 0.15-3 Check validity of Internet email a
ii libio-stringy-perl2.110-1Perl5 modules for IO from scalars
ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs
ii libmime-perl 5.418-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m
ii perl 5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
Versions of packages otrs recommends:
ii aspell0.60.3-5 GNU Aspell spell-checker
ii ispell3.1.20.0-4 International Ispell (an interacti
pn libapache2-mod-perl2 | libapa none (no description available)
ii libdbd-mysql-perl 3.0002-1 A Perl5 database interface to the
ii libdbd-pg-perl1.43-1 a PostgreSQL interface for Perl 5
pn libgd-graph-perl none (no description available)
pn libgd-text-perl none (no description available)
ii mysql-server 4.1.14-6 mysql database server (transitiona
ii mysql-server-4.1 [mysql-serve 4.1.14-6 mysql database server binaries
ii postgresql7.5.13 object-relational SQL database man
ii procmail 3.22-11Versatile e-mail processor
-- debconf-show failed
--
Thomas Wouters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIJN
Veerpoortstraat 28
6981 BN Doesburg
Tel: 062-33 89 144
Fax: 084-22 02 007
www: www.sijn.nl
Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:15:21PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote: Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed it? Hi! No, I am sorry, I already purged the tetex packages and reinstalled. It's now working for me. Thanks for your effort. Greetings -- Robert Sander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338437: marked as done ([alpha] ocamlopt is broken due to broken binutils on alpha, fixed in binNMU, but should be rebuilt)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338437: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2005 09:20:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 10 01:20:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.23]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ea8br-0003SN-HD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:20:43 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0809.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D48A71C001CE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:20:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-43-198.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.216.198]) by mwinf0809.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4C04E1C001FB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:20:11 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ea8Wl-0002Bc-Ds for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:15:27 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [alpha] ocamlopt is broken due to broken binutils on alpha, fixed in binNMU, but should be rebuilt X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:15:20 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ocaml Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Well, as asked by the RMs, this bug is here to trackthe fact that binNMU with the older non-broken binutils was done, but needs to be fixed before ocaml gets into etch. Friendly, Sven Luther -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 338437-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 08:41:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 00:41:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekdfm-0005xd-Vs; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:32:10 -0800 From: Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#338437: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:32:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ocaml Source-Version: 3.09.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ocaml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ocaml-base-nox_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-base-nox_3.09.0-2_i386.deb ocaml-base_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-base_3.09.0-2_i386.deb ocaml-compiler-libs_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-compiler-libs_3.09.0-2_i386.deb ocaml-interp_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-interp_3.09.0-2_i386.deb ocaml-mode_3.09.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-mode_3.09.0-2_all.deb ocaml-native-compilers_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-native-compilers_3.09.0-2_i386.deb ocaml-nox_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-nox_3.09.0-2_i386.deb ocaml-source_3.09.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml-source_3.09.0-2_all.deb ocaml_3.09.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml_3.09.0-2.diff.gz ocaml_3.09.0-2.dsc to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml_3.09.0-2.dsc ocaml_3.09.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml/ocaml_3.09.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp.
Bug#340709: marked as done (Don't let rapple into testing)
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line testing, we're coming has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 10:37:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 02:37:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch ([193.138.215.60]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Efaxi-0006UN-Gv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:37:50 -0800 Received: from papillon.fortytwo.ch (unknown [10.48.13.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN gluggsi.fortytwo.ch, Issuer fortytwo.ch - MAIL CA (verified OK)) by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4B78F9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from kmail-papillion.fortytwo.ch (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by papillon.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1CA488EF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:43 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Don't let rapple into testing Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 X-Face: j~5v(Bp|w-}vlu`qRSq`vW-^x(PbHz\0k(_hhT~Nn|%e\0cGUJMbW^V}}1HD019u8 XGq=[NV[8]$jwG)[EMAIL PROTECTED])Geu})D+lw_C$#$M^MNTIIRUZ!m MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Package: rapple Version: 0.99cvs20051120-1 Severity: grave Justification: hold-rapple-in-unstable marker bug This package is based off a cvs snapshot, testing migration should wait=20 until an official release is out. =2D- vbi =2D-=20 He's dead, Jim. --nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481 iKcEABECAGcFAkOG6XNgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6PvMAoJbJ8Pp5A+H5FpZ/ZHa641g5 bqLZAJ0TpyX8yi3mqhjUh5Ox0d6M1+XRIw== =1pyf -END PGP SIGNATURE- --nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN-- --- Received: (at 340709-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 08:55:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 00:55:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch ([193.138.215.60]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eke2c-0007fp-Jk for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:55:46 -0800 Received: from gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (zux221-140-086.adsl.green.ch [81.221.140.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN gluggsi.fortytwo.ch, Issuer fortytwo.ch - MAIL CA (verified OK)) by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89017198 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.1.17]) by gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A97848DB8A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21E5C0BA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: testing, we're coming Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 X-Face: j~5v(Bp|w-}vlu`qRSq`vW-^x(PbHz\0k(_hhT~Nn|%e\0cGUJMbW^V}}1HD0=?utf-8?q?19u8=0A=09XGq=3D=5BNV=5B8=5D=24jwG?=)[EMAIL PROTECTED])Geu})D+lw_C$#$M^MNTIIRUZ!m MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2970892.T5XA8d1cQh; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Hi!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 15:54 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles *
-sizeof(JPXTile));
+ nTiles = img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles;
+ // check for overflow before allocating memory
+ if (nTiles == 0 || nTiles / img.nXTiles != img.nYTiles) {
+ error(getPos(), Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment);
+ return gFalse;
+ }
+ img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(nTiles * sizeof(JPXTile));
gmalloc does a multiplication which is not checked for integer
overflows. xpdf uses gmallocn() which does that check.
xpdf has gmallocn only since 3.01, but tetex-bin uses 3.00. I wouldn't
want to update parts of the code, or all of it to 3.01, without
understanding the differences. On the other hand, maybe the xpdf code
in tetex-bin has *more* unchecked buffer overflows exactly because it
does not yet use gmallocn...
Possibly. gmallocn() is just a shallow wrapper around gmalloc() with
integer overflow checking, so it's not a big deal.
Would
if (nTiles = INT_MAX / sizeof(JPXTile) {
error(getPos(), Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment);
return gFalse;
be okay?
This is the standard way of checking for multiplicative overflows,
that looks fine.
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and
I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail
below to upstream (and some others).
Can you please check that you indeed fixed (tetex-bin)/will fix
(poppler) DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF(), too?
[...]
It seems that the patch linked from these advisories [1] is a little
bit flawed: it checks numComps twice in DCTStream::readBaselineSOF(),
but does not check it in DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF().
We have the same flaw in our upload. Would you be so kind and check the
updated patch at
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-tetex/tetex-bin/trunk/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3?op=filerev=0sc=0
I'm completely illerate in C++, and would like to make sure this is
correct.
Bad news. A further review of Streams.cc revealed a third place where
numComps goes unchecked (I checked the whole file now, it's really the
last one). So you additionally need this hunk:
@@ -2947,6 +2974,10 @@ GBool DCTStream::readScanInfo() {
length = read16() - 2;
scanInfo.numComps = str-getChar();
+ if (scanInfo.numComps = 0 || scanInfo.numComps 4) {
+error(getPos(), Bad number of components in DCT stream);
+return gFalse;
+ }
--length;
if (length != 2 * scanInfo.numComps + 3) {
error(getPos(), Bad DCT scan info block);
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#342550: firefox: Javascript, history.dat DoS
* Mike Hommey: Even if the browser cannot be restarted after the attack has been carried out? The impact of this bug is slightly different from other crash bugs. Are you sure the firefox process was not still running ? That would explain the browser not being able to restart... According to the Mozilla Foundation, the exploit causes Firefox to spent a lot of CPU cycles on startup. The browser eventually starts, but it will take a long time (several minutes) on some machines. Here'se the analysis: http://www.mozilla.org/security/history-title.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Hi Florian, hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer
overflow, too:
void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) {
int n;
n = nObjs * objSize;
if (objSize == 0 || n / objSize != nObjs) {
fprintf(stderr, Bogus memory allocation size\n);
exit(1);
}
return gmalloc(n);
}
What's the problem here? That the value in n is undefined, and
therefore the comparison n / objSize != nObjs is undefined, too?
n is not 'undefined' here. For every given nObjs and objSize input, it
always gets the same well-defined value.
We can assume that objSize is a small positive number, since it is not
user defined (just a sizeof value). The function works correctly for
positive number of nObjs (both valid and invalid), but there is a
corner case for negative nOjbs. Since gmalloc() takes a size_t
(unsigned), in most cases gmalloc() will allocate more memory than
required for a negative argument. However, when n is exactly -2^31 you
could see an off-by-one memory allocation error.
Indeed the function should completely be written using unsigned
arithmetics, otherwise your head will just explode.
Florian, is that what you meant?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#339120: reopen
tags 339120 - fixed-in-experimental thanks Reappeared in 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florian, hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer
overflow, too:
void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) {
int n;
n = nObjs * objSize;
if (objSize == 0 || n / objSize != nObjs) {
fprintf(stderr, Bogus memory allocation size\n);
exit(1);
}
return gmalloc(n);
}
What's the problem here? That the value in n is undefined, and
therefore the comparison n / objSize != nObjs is undefined, too?
n is not 'undefined' here. For every given nObjs and objSize input, it
always gets the same well-defined value.
We can assume that objSize is a small positive number, since it is not
user defined (just a sizeof value). The function works correctly for
positive number of nObjs (both valid and invalid),
But what if nObjs * objSize is larger than fits into an int?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Processed: reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 339120 - fixed-in-experimental Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Hi!
Frank Küster [2005-12-09 11:09 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florian, hi Frank!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer
overflow, too:
void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) {
int n;
n = nObjs * objSize;
if (objSize == 0 || n / objSize != nObjs) {
fprintf(stderr, Bogus memory allocation size\n);
exit(1);
}
return gmalloc(n);
}
What's the problem here? That the value in n is undefined, and
therefore the comparison n / objSize != nObjs is undefined, too?
n is not 'undefined' here. For every given nObjs and objSize input, it
always gets the same well-defined value.
We can assume that objSize is a small positive number, since it is not
user defined (just a sizeof value). The function works correctly for
positive number of nObjs (both valid and invalid),
But what if nObjs * objSize is larger than fits into an int?
Handling this case is the sole purpose of this gmallocn() wrapper.
Let N be the product of nObjs * objSize in the naturals.
- For valid (small) positive values of nObjs, n == N and the division is ok.
- For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs
overflow an int, we have two cases:
* n == N mod 2^31 (i. e. product overflows into the positive half of int
space)
= n N
= n/objSize N/objSize
= n/objSize nObjs
= n/objSize != nObjs
= check fails.
* n 0
= n/objSize 0
= since by assumption nObjs 0: n/objSize != nObjs
= check fails.
As I already said, the function will cause trouble (allocating
insanely amounts of memory, but probably not an overflow) for negative
nObjs. Thus, the function should either use unsigneds, or at least
check that nObjs and objSize 0.
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Reassigning to Gnus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 342326 with 342521 Bug#342326: mh-e fails to load, void-variable message-mark-insert-begin Was blocked by: 342521 Blocking bugs removed: 342521 severity 342647 grave Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot Severity set to `grave'. reassign 342647 gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1 Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot Bug reassigned from package `mh-e' to `gnus'. reassign 342326 gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1 Bug#342326: mh-e fails to load, void-variable message-mark-insert-begin Bug reassigned from package `mh-e' to `gnus'. merge 342647 342326 342521 Bug#342326: mh-e fails to load, void-variable message-mark-insert-begin Bug#342521: gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot Merged 342326 342521 342647. thanks, control Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339269: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339269: fixed in sword 1.5.8-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:57:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:57:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebuku-0007ED-Mv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:57:25 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25686 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47AF212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 22096-14 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:22 +0100 (MET) 13911 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6vM3U009317 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:22 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:22 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sword Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339269-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 10:41:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 02:41:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EkfXs-0007W2-Hw; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 From: Daniel Glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#339269: fixed in sword 1.5.8-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sword Source-Version: 1.5.8-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sword, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: diatheke_1.5.8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sword/diatheke_1.5.8-7_i386.deb libsword-dev_1.5.8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sword/libsword-dev_1.5.8-7_i386.deb libsword5c2a_1.5.8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sword/libsword5c2a_1.5.8-7_i386.deb sword_1.5.8-7.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sword/sword_1.5.8-7.diff.gz sword_1.5.8-7.dsc to pool/main/s/sword/sword_1.5.8-7.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
* Martin Pitt: - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs overflow an int, we have two cases: But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case. Overflow is undefined, period. You can pass -fwrapv to gcc if you want modulo arithmetic for ints. In general, this decreases code quality, that's why it's not the default. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236243: adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4
Bernd Eckenfels writes (adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4): Hello Ian, me again :) Thanks for all your work :-). there is a last problem, hcommon.c.m4 is missing ENOTSOCK, which will cause a false regression failure. However since it is shipping hcommon.c, it depends on the file timestamps on which system it will be used. I just uploaded an 1.1-3 which adds ENOTSOCK to .c.m4. So this means no matter if the generated or shipped file is used, the tests suceed. I had noticed this myself. It's very silly of me. However, as already discussed in Bug #236243 it might be good to actually remove hcommon.c on clean, and/or not ship it? No, I don't think so. I wanted it to be possible to build it even if you had a broken `m4' (or none at all). The build-for-release arrangements are supposed to make sure that the timestamps are correct and I will have to check this since obviously the shipped hcommon.c was out of date. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Hi Florian! Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]: * Martin Pitt: - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs overflow an int, we have two cases: But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case. Overflow is undefined, period. Ah, right, I mixed that up with additive overflow (which is defined). Thanks for the cluebat. Well, in terms of the current security update this is irrelevant anyway since gmalloc() is not yet used. Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork
This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing somehow... -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
* Martin Pitt: Hi Florian! Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]: * Martin Pitt: - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs overflow an int, we have two cases: But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case. Overflow is undefined, period. Ah, right, I mixed that up with additive overflow (which is defined). I think you mean unsigned arithmetic, which is performed module 2^k for some k. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342657: xpuyopuyo - FTBFS: missing build dependency
Package: xpuyopuyo Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), libgtk1.2-dev, libmikmod2-dev, libgnome-dev [...] Making all in doc make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8/doc' cat xpuyopuyo.6 | groff -Tascii -mandoc xpuyopuyo.txt /bin/sh: groff: command not found make[3]: *** [xpuyopuyo.txt] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8/doc' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051207-1339 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Thomas Wouters wrote: Are the owner ship promissions set right on all otrs file? use ~otrs/bin/SetPermissions.sh i used otrs:www-data (that should work on debian as default) but it didn't work until i used www-data:www-data ; Well, I think I used www-data:www-data before and now (after the upgrade) most files are really set to www-data:www-data. Loocking at it there are a few exceptions: /usr/share/otrs/var : Most directories are otrs:www-data (/usr/share/otrs/var/sessions is www-data:www-data) -- do you mean I should changes these all to www-data:www-data /usr/share/otrs/bin : /usr/share/otrs/bin/DeleteSessionIDs.pl /usr/share/otrs/bin/UnlockTickets.pl /usr/share/otrs/bin/otrs.getConfig -- These three files are otrs:root (everything else www-data:www-data) So the permissions in fact seem to be a little bit funny and I would love to see a systematic solution to fix the problem inside the package. Thanks for the hint anyway and kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341444: quagga (0.98-3-7) ospfd segfault on interface with vlans
0.99.2 does indeed fix the segfault, i have not tested an earlier version. there are some caveats. at first nothing was enabled, i had to remove the config and restart quagga. some ospf commands (redistribute static) didn't take effect immediatly and required a restart as well. i am only using the zebra and ospfd daemons -- Daniel Higgins Netcommunications Inc. Administrateur Systèmes et Réseaux / Networks and Systems Administrator Tel: 450-346-3401 Fax: 450-346-3587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netc.net
Processed: Fixed in NMU of kile 1:1.8.1-3.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 342229 + fixed Bug#342229: kile-i18n: cannot install: broken dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Frank Küster wrote:
The upstream patch applies cleanly to xpdf/Stream.{cc,h} in sarge, but
JPXStream.cc does not exist. But the functions might still be defined
elsewhere.
The patch does not apply cleanly, except for Stream.h, in woody, but at
least one affected line in Stream.cc *does* exist.
As I said previously, I will not be able to work on this.
The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
sid as well.
Regards,
Joey
--
Have you ever noticed that General Public Licence contains the word Pub?
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
diff -u tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/changelog tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/changelog
--- tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/changelog
+++ tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+tetex-bin (2.0.2-30sarge2) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team
+ * Adjusted the former patch
+ * Applied missing bits found by Ludwig Nussel
+
+ -- Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:25:16 +0100
+
+tetex-bin (2.0.2-30sarge1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team
+ * Partially applied patch from xpdf upstream to fix buffer overflows
+[libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.cc, libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.h, CAN-2005-3191,
+debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191]
+
+ -- Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:19:45 +0100
+
tetex-bin (2.0.2-30) unstable; urgency=low
* Restore debian/watch and don't keep the recovered control file in
diff -u tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/rules tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/rules
--- tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/rules
+++ tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/rules
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
patch -p1 -Ni debian/patches/patch-CAN-2005-0064
patch -p1 -NRi debian/patches/patch-mandash || true
patch -p1 -Ni debian/patches/patch-mandash
+ patch -p1 -NRi debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191 || true
+ patch -p1 -Ni debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess /usr/share/misc/config.sub ./texk/
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess /usr/share/misc/config.sub
./utils/texinfo/
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess /usr/share/misc/config.sub ./config/
@@ -95,6 +97,7 @@
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
# Make sure all of our expected symlinks are in place
sh debian/restore-symlinks
+ patch -p1 -NRi debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191 || true
patch -p1 -NRi debian/patches/patch-mandash || true
patch -p1 -NRi debian/patches/patch-CAN-2005-0064 || true
patch -p1 -NRi debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-1125 || true
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tetex-bin-2.0.2.orig/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191
+++ tetex-bin-2.0.2/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+--- tetex-bin-2.0.2.orig/libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.h
tetex-bin-2.0.2/libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.h
+@@ -225,6 +225,8 @@
+
+ ~StreamPredictor();
+
++ GBool isOk() { return ok; }
++
+ int lookChar();
+ int getChar();
+
+@@ -242,6 +244,7 @@
+ int rowBytes; // bytes per line
+ Guchar *predLine; // line buffer
+ int predIdx;// current index in predLine
++ GBool ok;
+ };
+
+ //
+only in patch2:
+unchanged:
+--- tetex-bin-2.0.2.orig/libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.cc
tetex-bin-2.0.2/libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.cc
+@@ -404,18 +404,33 @@ void ImageStream::skipLine() {
+
+ StreamPredictor::StreamPredictor(Stream *strA, int predictorA,
+int widthA, int nCompsA, int nBitsA) {
++ int totalBits;
++
+ str = strA;
+ predictor = predictorA;
+ width = widthA;
+ nComps = nCompsA;
+ nBits = nBitsA;
++ predLine = NULL;
++ ok = gFalse;
+
+ nVals = width * nComps;
++ totalBits = nVals * nBits;
++ if (totalBits == 0 ||
++ (totalBits / nBits) / nComps != width ||
++ totalBits + 7 0) {
++return;
++ }
+ pixBytes = (nComps * nBits + 7) 3;
+- rowBytes = ((nVals * nBits + 7) 3) + pixBytes;
++ rowBytes = ((totalBits + 7) 3) + pixBytes;
++ if (rowBytes 0) {
++return;
++ }
+ predLine = (Guchar *)gmalloc(rowBytes);
+ memset(predLine, 0, rowBytes);
+ predIdx = rowBytes;
++
++ ok = gTrue;
+ }
+
+ StreamPredictor::~StreamPredictor() {
+@@ -981,6 +996,10 @@ LZWStream::LZWStream(Stream *strA, int p
+ FilterStream(strA) {
+ if (predictor != 1) {
+ pred = new StreamPredictor(this, predictor, columns, colors, bits);
++if (!pred-isOk()) {
++ delete pred;
++ pred = NULL;
++}
+ } else {
+ pred = NULL;
+ }
+@@ -2860,6 +2879,10 @@ GBool DCTStream::readBaselineSOF() {
+ height = read16();
+ width = read16();
+ numComps = str-getChar();
++ if (numComps = 0 || numComps 4) {
++error(getPos(), Bad number of components in DCT stream, prec);
++return gFalse;
++ }
+
Bug#76918: Hey, meritorious publication
67841158 59 8367645733232 26 98668 314793 2381 98 79 24 29 22 22 64 68 759 272 72 34 2268 98 16 89 62 35 19 16 18 35 78 3239 3479 79 92 17 6617 25695728 558811163 23 74 42177111 39 644 86 98 95 71 41 6933 25 282699328 38 87 58 14 975686642 11 45 3957 44 51 57 6391 54 84 29 72 357726 8183 35 11 63 59 17 99 44 45 88 712734 76 http://uk.geocities.com/fsdgdgffdssasadsggd/ You will never find a better deal anywhere else Low prices, high Quality Find over 80% in savings, on all products We don't need a perscription http://uk.geocities.com/fsdgdgffdssasadsggd/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342695: eclipse: debian/copyright file doesn't seem to be accurate anymore
Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hi! According to the package debian/copyright file, Eclipse seems to be released under the CPL. But eclipse.org website states that, from version 3.1 on, Eclipse has completed the migration[1] from the CPL to the EPL[2]. [1] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl2epl/ [2] http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html IIUC, you should update the debian/copyright file accordingly. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342699: does not depend on procps
Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-4.1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, zaptel's postinst uses the ps command from the non-essential procps package, but the zaptel package does not declare a dependency. Simon - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBQ5mexVYr4CN7gCINAQKiJwP7BfXRAlC/fUbf0behJdr51lxUSlyc+hco KejIhYuW54rJ+lpLFf5DYNOtQFzFcnytGVAIYy14AgfmlcxHTVdyntzfUMjSsoWt EZrtMPTHf9/TAMUeWJcS41bagylbTERFhvEtD2WaQTiJJZGdqiLiFjLmER7trvbi kRfE/EF13s4= =ijxE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332682: vnc4 with gcc-4.0
tags 332682 + patch
thanks
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Aleksey Kliger wrote:
As far as I can tell, the build problems in vnc4 happen because
rfb/Rect.h provides its
own definitions of min() and max() as macros which interact badly with
the guts of the C++ standard library (in particular with some
functions in vectorbool). On my system locally, I applied the
following changes, and the program seemed to compile fine.
cheers,
Aleksey Kliger
===
--- rfb/Rect.h.old2005-12-08 16:16:01.0 -0500
+++ rfb/Rect.h2005-12-08 15:57:58.0 -0500
@@ -21,13 +21,17 @@
#ifndef __RFB_RECT_INCLUDED__
#define __RFB_RECT_INCLUDED__
-#ifndef max
-#define max(a,b)(((a) (b)) ? (a) : (b))
-#endif
-
-#ifndef min
-#define min(a,b)(((a) (b)) ? (a) : (b))
-#endif
+#include algorithm
+
+using std::min;
+using std::max;
+// #ifndef max
+// #define max(a,b)(((a) (b)) ? (a) : (b))
+// #endif
+
+// #ifndef min
+// #define min(a,b)(((a) (b)) ? (a) : (b))
+// #endif
namespace rfb {
===
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#332682: vnc4 with gcc-4.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332682 + patch Bug#332682: vnc4 - don't build with gcc 4.0 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340078: marked as done (junior-games-gl: fails to install: depends on no longer existing package tuxracer)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340078: fixed in junior-games-gl 1.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 18:59:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 10:59:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de ([212.112.246.221]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EduPG-0004LF-Qo for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:59:19 -0800 Received: from localhost (localimap [192.168.2.3]) by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F56DF57924 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:59:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de ([192.168.2.3]) by localhost (frigg.ftbfs.de [192.168.2.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05544-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:59:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from vinyamar.schmehl.info (dslb-084-058-097-137.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.58.97.137]) by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA47F58F78 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:59:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by vinyamar.schmehl.info (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9BA2B2AFC; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:57:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1681163198== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: junior-games-gl: fails to install: depends on no longer existing package tuxracer X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:57:06 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-ftbfs-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frigg.ftbfs.de (config: 0.1a) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1681163198== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: junior-games-gl Version: 1.6 Severity: grave Tags: Patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi! Your package depends on tuxracer which has been replaced by planetpenguin-racer (tuxracer in sarge has been an transition package). Now tuxracer has just been removed from sid, since it wasn't needed anymorw, which renders your package uninstallable. The attached patch solves the missing dependency and the package description. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-vinyamar Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --===1681163198== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=junior-games-gl-ppracer-transition.patch diff -Nur junior-games-gl-1.6-old/debian/control junior-games-gl-1.6/debian/control --- junior-games-gl-1.6-old/debian/control 2005-11-20 19:47:50.0 +0100 +++ junior-games-gl-1.6/debian/control 2005-11-20 19:49:27.0 +0100 @@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Package: junior-games-gl Architecture: all -Depends: armagetron, bzflag, gltron, tuxkart, tuxracer +Depends: armagetron, bzflag, gltron, tuxkart, planetpenguin-racer Description: Debian Jr. 3D Games (hardware acceleration required) These games all use OpenGL libraries. They will not work without decent 3D graphics cards providing hardware-accelerated OpenGL. . While armagetron and gltron are different interpretations of the - game depicted in the classic 3D-animated movie Tron, Tux Racer + game depicted in the classic 3D-animated movie Tron, ppracer is an all-original made-for-Linux 3D racing game. Unlike the standard blood-and-guts fare in the 3D games universe, all of these games are suitable for children. --===1681163198==-- --- Received: (at 340078-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 15:21:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 07:21:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekjze-0006sI-0P; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:17:06 -0800 From: Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
Processed: tagging 342610, tagging 341271
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 342610 + pending Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 - 2.0.0-4 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 341271 + pending Bug#341271: openoffice.org-dev: possible unexpanded @FOO@ substitutions There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Please support emacs-snapshot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 325449 elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug#325449: wysihtml-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot-gtk Changed Bug title. severity 325449 grave Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc, tagging 342552, tagging 342640
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 package clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc tags 342552 + pending Bug#342552: clisp: FTBFS without xmkmf Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 342640 + pending Bug#342640: clisp(GNU/kFreeBSD): FTBFS: kfreebsd-i386 not in the architecture list There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528).
Package: ocaml Version: 3.09.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log): ../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../boot -c -impl pa_o_fast.ppo [...] /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s:97621: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528). Assembler error, input left in file /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s make[3]: *** [pa_o_fast.cmx] Error 2 Full build log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=ocamlver=3.09.0-3arch=hppastamp=1134140171file=logas=raw 3.09.0-1 built fine, so this might be yet another toolchain problem :( Cheers, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Hi Frank, hi Florian!
Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]:
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and
I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail
below to upstream (and some others).
Can you please check that you indeed fixed (tetex-bin)/will fix
(poppler) DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF(), too?
[...]
It seems that the patch linked from these advisories [1] is a little
bit flawed: it checks numComps twice in DCTStream::readBaselineSOF(),
but does not check it in DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF().
We have the same flaw in our upload. Would you be so kind and check the
updated patch at
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-tetex/tetex-bin/trunk/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3?op=filerev=0sc=0
After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present
in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the
patch.
I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you
can peer-review the patch?
Thanks!
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
* SECURITY UPDATE: Multiple integer/buffer overflows in embedded xpdf code.
* Add debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3.patch:
* xpdf/Stream.cc, DCTStream::readBaselineSOF(),
DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF(), DCTStream::readScanInfo():
- Check numComps for invalid values.
- http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=342type=vulnerabilities
- CVE-2005-3191
* xpdf/Stream.cc, StreamPredictor::StreamPredictor():
- Check rowBytes for invalid values.
- http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=344type=vulnerabilities
- CVE-2005-3192
* xpdf/JPXStream.cc, JPXStream::readCodestream():
- Check img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles * sizeof for integer overflow.
-
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=345type=vulnerabilities
- CVE-2005-3193
diff -u tetex-bin-3.0/debian/patches/series tetex-bin-3.0/debian/patches/series
--- tetex-bin-3.0/debian/patches/series
+++ tetex-bin-3.0/debian/patches/series
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3
--- tetex-bin-3.0.orig/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3
+++ tetex-bin-3.0/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+--- tetex-bin-3.0/libs/xpdf/xpdf/JPXStream.cc
tetex-bin-3.0.new/libs/xpdf/xpdf/JPXStream.cc
+@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
+ //
+
+ #include aconf.h
++#include limits.h
+
+ #ifdef USE_GCC_PRAGMAS
+ #pragma implementation
+@@ -666,7 +667,7 @@ GBool JPXStream::readCodestream(Guint le
+ int segType;
+ GBool haveSIZ, haveCOD, haveQCD, haveSOT;
+ Guint precinctSize, style;
+- Guint segLen, capabilities, comp, i, j, r;
++ Guint segLen, capabilities, nTiles, comp, i, j, r;
+
+ //- main header
+ haveSIZ = haveCOD = haveQCD = haveSOT = gFalse;
+@@ -701,8 +702,18 @@ GBool JPXStream::readCodestream(Guint le
+ / img.xTileSize;
+ img.nYTiles = (img.ySize - img.yTileOffset + img.yTileSize - 1)
+ / img.yTileSize;
+- img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles *
+- sizeof(JPXTile));
++ // check for overflow before allocating memory
++ if (img.nXTiles = 0 || img.nYTiles = 0 ||
++ img.nXTiles = INT_MAX/img.nYTiles) {
++ error(getPos(), Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment);
++ return gFalse;
++ }
++ nTiles = img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles;
++ if (nTiles = INT_MAX/sizeof(JPXTile)) {
++ error(getPos(), Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment);
++ return gFalse;
++ }
++ img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(nTiles * sizeof(JPXTile));
+ for (i = 0; i img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles; ++i) {
+ img.tiles[i].tileComps = (JPXTileComp *)gmalloc(img.nComps *
+ sizeof(JPXTileComp));
+--- tetex-bin-3.0/libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.cc
tetex-bin-3.0.new/libs/xpdf/xpdf/Stream.cc
+@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
+ #include stdio.h
+ #include stdlib.h
+ #include stddef.h
++#include limits.h
+ #ifndef WIN32
+ #include unistd.h
+ #endif
+@@ -412,13 +413,28 @@ StreamPredictor::StreamPredictor(Stream
+ width = widthA;
+ nComps = nCompsA;
+ nBits = nBitsA;
++ predLine = NULL;
++ ok = gFalse;
+
++ if (width = 0 || nComps = 0 || nBits = 0 ||
++ nComps = INT_MAX/nBits ||
++ width = INT_MAX/nComps/nBits) {
++return;
++ }
+ nVals = width * nComps;
++ if (nVals + 7 = 0) {
++return;
++ }
+ pixBytes = (nComps * nBits + 7) 3;
+ rowBytes = ((nVals * nBits + 7) 3) + pixBytes;
++ if (rowBytes 0) {
++return;
++ }
+ predLine = (Guchar *)gmalloc(rowBytes);
+ memset(predLine, 0, rowBytes);
+ predIdx = rowBytes;
++
++ ok = gTrue;
+ }
+
+
Bug#325449: update info
Hi, elserv.el elserv-url-decode-string() (push ?\ decoded) is breaking in emacs-snapshot. emacs-snapshot probably wants (push ?\\ decoded) regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot
Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter, didn't we agree that mh-e should skip byte-compilation for emacs-snapshot anyway? Yes we did. Sorry, I was in Montreal for the Climate Change Conference and I've been very busy. The next mh-e upload will correct this. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0 Version: 2.0.9.2-12 Severity: serious This from a thread on d-release. Alastair, could you please look into this? As it is keeping cdebconf from building on 2 arches, it's pretty important. On Friday 09 December 2005 17:03, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:17:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: There are several packages relevant for the installer that have what looks like minor problems keeping them from being built on some arches. - cdebconf (0.91) Failed on alpha and ia64 with strange build dep error; a simple retry may fix this. No, this is someone trying to be clever and hard-coding a dependency on libc6 into libgtk+2.0-directfb0. The correct dependency on alpha and ia64 is libc6.1. (I have no idea what the alternative on | libc is supposed to do; *nothing* provides libc on alpha, and even if it did, it'd be bloody worthless as a dependency. We have sonames in our lib package names for a reason!) pgpQZECYSGx71.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 342706 Causes cdebconf build failures on alpha and ia64 Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Hi Joey, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in sid as well. Did you see Martin Pitt's enhanced patch - do both address the same problems? TIA, Frank P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to stable/proposed-updates? -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the patch. I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you can peer-review the patch? Martin and Florian, Joey Schulze also sent a fixed patch to the bug, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342292;msg=131 Would you be so kind and review it? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#342657: marked as done (xpuyopuyo - FTBFS: missing build dependency)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:47:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342657: fixed in xpuyopuyo 0.9.8-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 12:14:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 04:14:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx02.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.3.12]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekh94-0006HH-EH for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 04:14:38 -0800 Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (vpn0267.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.165.17]) by mx02.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id jB9CEZYs021799 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:14:35 +0100 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD89718478; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:13:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:13:36 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xpuyopuyo - FTBFS: missing build dependency Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.33.0.11; VDF: 6.33.0.16; host: mx02) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xpuyopuyo Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), libgtk1.2-dev, libmikmod2-dev, libgnome-dev [...] Making all in doc make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8/doc' cat xpuyopuyo.6 | groff -Tascii -mandoc xpuyopuyo.txt /bin/sh: groff: command not found make[3]: *** [xpuyopuyo.txt] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8/doc' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xpuyopuyo-0.9.8' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051207-1339 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 342657-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 17:51:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 09:51:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EkmKv-0003AD-Tv; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:47:13 -0800 From: Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342657: fixed in xpuyopuyo 0.9.8-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:47:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xpuyopuyo Source-Version: 0.9.8-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xpuyopuyo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-3.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xpuyopuyo/xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-3.diff.gz xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-3.dsc to pool/main/x/xpuyopuyo/xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-3.dsc xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xpuyopuyo/xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xpuyopuyo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Bug#341756: revelation: Not startable after upgrade
mkdir /etc/gconf/schemas/ and cd /etc/gconf/schemas/ ln -s /usr/share/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas solved my problem. Joh On Monday 05 December 2005 10:11, Stefan Völkel wrote: Hello, please try to locate the file: revelation.schemas seems like your installation tries to, find it here: 29072 access(/etc/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) the location where it should be is: /usr/share/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas What Window Manager are you using? regards Stefan
Processed: Re: Bug#333708 acknowledged by developer (Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 333708 Bug#333708: mldonkey - fails to build Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333708: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1)
reopen 333708 thanks Changes: mldonkey (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (Closes: #333708, #337856, #328131, #337313) This is no new release bug. Bastian -- Live long and prosper. -- Spock, Amok Time, stardate 3372.7
Bug#236243: adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:07:10AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: arrangements are supposed to make sure that the timestamps are correct and I will have to check this since obviously the shipped hcommon.c was out of date. well... this might be related to the fact that i had patched both in the debian package. :) So perhaps I should delete the file in the build rule for debian, only? I havent looked in detail what the m4 does, is it platform specific? wil lthe result be the same on all linux systems? Otherwise I will enforce the delete on clean. Gruss Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ( .. )[EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/ o--o 1024D/E383CD7E [EMAIL PROTECTED] v:+497211603874 f:+49721151516129 (OO) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337346: Bug update status
Can we get a bug status update on this? Are the relevant packages going to be modified to have the right files in them? Is there an interim workaround? What projections do we have a fix being uploaded? Matt (still waiting for gnucash to be working again) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337346: Bug update status
Matt Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can we get a bug status update on this? Are the relevant packages going to be modified to have the right files in them? Is there an interim workaround? What projections do we have a fix being uploaded? Matt (still waiting for gnucash to be working again) There should be a full fix soon (i.e. within the next few days, within a day or so if all goes well), but as an intermediate solution, I think you can probably just install the older slib from testing. i.e. apt-get install slib/testing -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Frank Küster wrote: Hi Joey, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in sid as well. Did you see Martin Pitt's enhanced patch - do both address the same problems? The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes. P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to stable/proposed-updates? No. Could you forward it? Regards, Joey -- Have you ever noticed that General Public Licence contains the word Pub? Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Bug#342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid
Package: mysql-admin Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install mysql-admin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mysql-admin depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.1-0exp0 GCC support library ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines pn libglibmm-2.4-1c2none (no description available) ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.8-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface pn libgtkmm-2.4-1c2 none (no description available) ii libmysqlclient15 5.0.16-1mysql database client library ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpcre3 6.4-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi pn libsigc++-2.0-0c2none (no description available) ii libstdc++6 4.1-0exp0 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml2 2.6.22-2GNOME XML library ii mysql-admin-common 1.1.4-2 Architecture independent files for ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime Versions of packages mysql-admin recommends: pn mysql-query-browser none (no description available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342731: wvdial uninstallable due dependancies
Package: wvdial Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable wvdial: Depends: libwvstreams4.0-base which is a virtual package. Depends: libwvstreams4.0-extras which is a virtual package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342291: marked as done (ocaml-ssl: Need to be rebuild with findlib 1.1-3)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:47:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342291: fixed in ocaml-ssl 0.3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2005 22:10:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 14:10:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smarthost170.mail.easynet.fr ([212.180.1.170] helo=smtp4.mail.easynet.fr) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejl1P-0001R1-0e for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:10:51 -0800 Received: from asi-62.asi256ip.easynet.fr ([212.180.39.62] helo=micro) by smtp4.mail.easynet.fr with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejl1P-00073G-65; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:10:51 +0100 Received: from grand.gallu.homelinux.org ([192.168.0.14]) by micro with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejl1L-00038k-9B; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:10:48 +0100 Received: by grand.gallu.homelinux.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:10:47 +0100 From: Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ocaml-ssl: Need to be rebuild with findlib 1.1-3 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:10:47 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ocaml-ssl Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello, Well in fact, it is mostly a problem of findlib. The package needs to be rebuild for mips, mipsel, m68k, arm against findlib 1.1-3. Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-grand Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 342291-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 21:51:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 13:51:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekq5C-0006t8-G1; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:47:14 -0800 From: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342291: fixed in ocaml-ssl 0.3.1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:47:14 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ocaml-ssl Source-Version: 0.3.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ocaml-ssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libssl-ocaml-dev_0.3.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml-ssl/libssl-ocaml-dev_0.3.1-3_i386.deb libssl-ocaml_0.3.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocaml-ssl/libssl-ocaml_0.3.1-3_i386.deb ocaml-ssl_0.3.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocaml-ssl/ocaml-ssl_0.3.1-3.diff.gz ocaml-ssl_0.3.1-3.dsc to pool/main/o/ocaml-ssl/ocaml-ssl_0.3.1-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ocaml-ssl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:05:30 +0100 Source: ocaml-ssl Binary: libssl-ocaml libssl-ocaml-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libssl-ocaml - OCaml
Bug#342734: debtags: glibc invalid pointer
Package: debtags Version: 1.5.2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I am running testing and recently upgraded apt to unstable (to test a bug fix for apt-build). When running apt-get upgrade everything got upgraded but debtag. The output actually is: # apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? YES Setting up debtags (1.5.2+b1) ... Get:1 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/tags-current.gz [208kB] Get:2 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/vocabulary.gz [13.9kB] Fetched 222kB in 2s (100.0kB/s) Reading tag data and vocabulary for http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/... Tag data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_tags-current.gz... Voc data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_vocabulary.gz... Writing system vocabulary... Writing merged tag database... *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08599e80 *** /var/lib/dpkg/info/debtags.postinst: line 22: 8138 Aborted debtags update dpkg: error processing debtags (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134 Errors were encountered while processing: debtags E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) # Might be cause the glibc need to be upgraded to unstable version too. I also have libc6-i686 package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages debtags depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.43 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtdb1 1.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime debtags recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337257: unstable ok
Hello, I upgraded apt to unstable: apt-get upgrade -t unstable apt and apt-build no more segfault -- Ashar Voultoiz pgp keyid: 0x63B820D1 IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15325080 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332835: marked as done (xdb: Please undergo the C++ 'c2' transition)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:21:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332835: fixed in xdb 1.2.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 21:02:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 14:02:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOLpS-00021j-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:02:02 -0700 Received: from pearl (cpe-24-59-102-129.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.129]) by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j98L20V2022795 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pearl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6234A11E30; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:01:57 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xdb: Please undergo the C++ 'c2' transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:01:57 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xdb Severity: wishlist Details about the transition are available at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html. This is one of the last libraries which has not transitioned. It prevents oleo from transitioning. --- Received: (at 332835-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 22:22:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 14:22:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekqc4-sD-Ao; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:21:12 -0800 From: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#332835: fixed in xdb 1.2.0-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:21:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: xdb Source-Version: 1.2.0-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xdb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxdb-dev_1.2.0-6_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xdb/libxdb-dev_1.2.0-6_i386.deb libxdb1_1.2.0-6_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xdb/libxdb1_1.2.0-6_i386.deb xdb_1.2.0-6.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xdb/xdb_1.2.0-6.diff.gz xdb_1.2.0-6.dsc to pool/main/x/xdb/xdb_1.2.0-6.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xdb package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:05:57 +0100 Source: xdb Binary: libxdb1 libxdb-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.0-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libxdb-dev - xbase compatible C++ class library libxdb1- xbase compatible C++ class library Closes: 299380 332835 Changes: xdb (1.2.0-6) unstable; urgency=low . * patch applied by Philipp Hug: C++ 'c2' transition (Closes: #332835) * fix FTBFS on ppc64, thanks to Andreas Jochens (closes: #299380) Files: 79b4691949ba56e6592b7885fe383f8c 564 libs optional xdb_1.2.0-6.dsc fc0d72e15f961b4696d3fe6f9ba3d30c 26791 libs optional xdb_1.2.0-6.diff.gz 08e0c756ce8ccabf347807057fec3279 213172 devel optional libxdb-dev_1.2.0-6_i386.deb
Bug#337257: marked as done (apt-build: apt-build segfaults)
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:30:30 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337257: unstable ok has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 15:12:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 07:12:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate2.zdv.uni-mainz.de [134.93.178.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXgld-0003wd-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 07:12:41 -0800 Received: from rivendell (p54A849EE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.168.73.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A8B30003BB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:12:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from rainer by rivendell with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EXgla-0001di-Au for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:12:38 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apt-build: apt-build segfaults X-Debbugs-CC: Rainer Trusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Rainer Trusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:12:38 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: Rainer Trusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.13 Severity: grave I just wanted to try apt-build, but get a segmentation fault straight after starting apt-build. It looks like the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-build install grass Segmentation fault My configuration is: build-dir = /files/apt-build/build repository-dir = /files/apt-build/repository Olevel = -O2 mtune = -mtune=athlon-xp options = make_options = As you might notice, I did a dist-upgrade a few days ago. I don't think it's relevant, but the grass source is built from CVS and is stored in a local source archive. It builds with 'apt-get source + dpkg-buildpackage' without a problem. Don't know what else to tell, since my tecnical level is pretty low. If you need other information, tell me what you need and perhaps how to gain it. Rainer -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rivendell Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages apt-build depends on: ii apt 0.6.42.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-utils 0.6.42.1 APT utility programs ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii devscripts2.9.8 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-dev 1.13.11package building tools for Debian ii g++ 4:4.0.2-1 The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.0.2-1 The GNU C compiler ii libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.17 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii perl 5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages apt-build recommends: ii build-essential 11.1 informational list of build-essent ii fakeroot 1.5.4 Gives a fake root environment -- debconf information: * apt-build/arch_amd: athlon-xp apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4 * apt-build/options: -mfpmath=sse -msse -mmmx -pipe apt-build/arch_intel: pentium apt-build/arch_arm: armv2 * apt-build/make_options: * apt-build/olevel: Medium * apt-build/build_dir: /files/apt-build/build * apt-build/repository_dir: /files/apt-build/repository apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64 * apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: false --- Received: (at 337257-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 22:30:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 14:30:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by
Processed: severity of 341945 is grave, merging 341945 342734
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 341945 grave Bug#341945: debtags: segfault in postinst Severity set to `grave'. merge 341945 342734 Bug#341945: debtags: segfault in postinst Bug#342734: debtags: glibc invalid pointer Merged 341945 342734. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342217: marked as done (libopenh323-1.15.6: File conflict)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:32:16 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342217: fixed in openh323 1.15.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2005 10:53:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 02:53:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 85-124-111-118.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at ([85.124.111.118] helo=wmiwilli) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EjaRc-0007gO-Nb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:53:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by wmiwilli with local; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:53:25 +0100 id 00080BFA.43956DA5.2979 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Willi Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libopenh323-1.15.6: File conflict Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:53:24 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libopenh323-1.15.6 Version: 1.15.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: File conflict # apt-get dist-upgrade . The following NEW packages will be installed: libopenh323-1.15.6 (1.15.6-2) The following packages have been kept back: 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2527kB of archives. After unpacking 9839kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 215034 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libopenh323-1.15.6 (from .../libopenh323-1.15.6_1.15.6-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenh323-1.15.6_1.15.6-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libopenh323.so.1.15.6', which is also in package libopenh323-1.15.3c2 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenh323-1.15.6_1.15.6-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) # -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 342217-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 22:46:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 14:46:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekqmm-0001RX-5v; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:32:16 -0800 From: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342217: fixed in openh323 1.15.6-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:32:16 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openh323 Source-Version: 1.15.6-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openh323, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libopenh323-1.15.6_1.15.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openh323/libopenh323-1.15.6_1.15.6-3_i386.deb libopenh323-dbg_1.15.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openh323/libopenh323-dbg_1.15.6-3_i386.deb libopenh323-dev_1.15.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openh323/libopenh323-dev_1.15.6-3_i386.deb libopenh323-doc_1.15.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openh323/libopenh323-doc_1.15.6-3_all.deb openh323_1.15.6-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openh323/openh323_1.15.6-3.diff.gz openh323_1.15.6-3.dsc to pool/main/o/openh323/openh323_1.15.6-3.dsc simph323_1.15.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openh323/simph323_1.15.6-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please
Bug#342741: superkaramba is uninstallable in sid
Package: superkaramba Version: 0.37-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, due to the current C++ allocator transition superkaramba needs to be rebuilt against kdelibs4c2a. Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages superkaramba depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.4.3-2 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0 2.7.0-8 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt3:3.3.5-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii python2.32.3.5-9 An interactive high-level object-o ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime superkaramba recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:03:18PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to be installed That's because someone did a binary only upload so that the package does not depend on the c2 but the c2a libraries (ABI change), but the arch all package is not available (yet?) - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339921: Not reproducible, but still can be fixed
package doc++ tags 339921 - unreproducible severity 339921 minor retitle 339921 docify.ll:318: warning: unknown escape sequence '\]' thanks bts On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 18:19 -0500, Jeremy Nimmer wrote: I am not able to reproduce this on sid now: [...] It's a warning now, not an error. Does DARTS use different error settings that the defaults? Was this a transient gcc regression? Yup, this was a transient g++-4.0 bug. Given the similar problem in #342381, I downgraded my chroot to g++-4.0 4.0.2-4 from snapshot.debian.net, and was able to reproduce the problem: ~/tmp/339921/doc++-3.4.10/src$ rm -f docify.o make docify.o source='docify.cc' object='docify.o' libtool=no \ depfile='.deps/docify.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/docify.TPo' \ depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \ g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../intl -DLOCALEDIR= \/usr/share/locale\ -c -o docify.o `test -f 'docify.cc' || echo './'`docify.cc docify.ll: In function 'int main(int, char**)': docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]' docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]' make: *** [docify.o] Error 1 ~/tmp/339921/doc++-3.4.10/src$ g++-4.0 --version g++-4.0 (GCC) 4.0.3 2005 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-4) [...] In any case, this warning occurs because gcc33_build_fix.patch in debian/patches is wrong. The fix is attached, and should probably be applied whether or not this actually causes a build failure. Right, so this is a compiler warning from a bad debian patch, no longer a FTBTS. Severity and title adjusted accordingly. Thanks, - Jeremy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Not reproducible, but still can be fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package doc++ Ignoring bugs not assigned to: doc++ tags 339921 - unreproducible Bug#339921: doc++: FTBFS: docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]' Tags were: patch unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible severity 339921 minor Bug#339921: doc++: FTBFS: docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]' Severity set to `minor'. retitle 339921 docify.ll:318: warning: unknown escape sequence '\]' Bug#339921: doc++: FTBFS: docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]' Changed Bug title. thanks bts Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.
Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 01:19 +0100 schrieb Peter Eisentraut: I think the postgresql-server-dev packages should not need libpq-dev at all, at least for the header files. (I think the reason for the dependency might be something to do with pg_config.) At least if you compile a server-side module, you should be able to compile that using only -I$(pg_config --includedir-server), which does not refer to any libpq-dev files. I agree that the dependency is at least weird, if not a bug, but could you provide an example where an actual build failure happens because of this? Well, the failure in the Sparc build produced the errors that I recognized: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/slony1-1.1.2/src' make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/slony1-1.1.2/src/xxid' gcc -g -O2 -fpic -I../.. -I/usr/include/postgresql/ -I/usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/ -c -o xxid.o xxid.c In file included from /usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/nodes/relation.h:19, from /usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/executor/spi.h:23, from xxid.c:20: /usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/nodes/parsenodes.h:547: error: syntax error before 'AclId' /usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/nodes/parsenodes.h:547: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union /usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/nodes/parsenodes.h:548: warning: data definition has no type or storage class In file included from /usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/access/tupdesc.h:18, ... Actually it libpq-dev makes it difficult, as the pg_config it supplies gives a 8.1 version number, so you to specify additional options to configure. Basically I consider postgresql-server-dev-8.0 to depend upon 8.1 libpq-dev a bug. Two different sets of headers, that do not match. The compilation errors go away when I install a libpq-dev based on 8.0(.3) from Ubuntu, but it won't link. And it doesn't want to load into the server either. I know the PostgreSQL maintainer considers 8.0 to be deprecated, but there are still 8.0 packages available, AND upgrading a database server is not a trivial thing in many cases. Even if I'd be at liberty to upgrade the db server, I might need the ability to compile tools like slony to faciliate the upgrade. So it's a showstopper bug, and I think it's cause for the sparc build bug reported. (I guess you built it with an 8.0 libpq-dev installed, while the sparc box had a new libpq-dev based on 8.1 installed) Andreas signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.
I think the postgresql-server-dev packages should not need libpq-dev at all, at least for the header files. (I think the reason for the dependency might be something to do with pg_config.) At least if you compile a server-side module, you should be able to compile that using only -I$(pg_config --includedir-server), which does not refer to any libpq-dev files. I agree that the dependency is at least weird, if not a bug, but could you provide an example where an actual build failure happens because of this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()
Hello all,
I strongly suspect that these two failures are linked. The failure in the
fork test is most likely caused by a failure in the rand calls in that
test (why use rand, anyway?) We only want to test fork, and rand has
a non-zero chance of collision, which makes it a false positive failure.
So, with this test:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use POSIX :sys_wait_h;
my $count = 0;
for (0.. 99) {
do_test(1);
}
print Test (rand) passed $count % of the time\n;
$count = 0;
for (0.. 99) {
do_test(0);
}
print Test (fixed) passed $count % of the time\n;
sub do_test {
my $try = shift;
pipe(RDR,WTR) or die $!;
my $pid = fork;
die fork: $! if !defined $pid;
if ($pid == 0) {
my $rand_child;
if ($try == 1) {
$rand_child = rand;
} else {
$rand_child = 2;
}
close RDR;
print WTR $rand_child, \n;
close WTR;
exit 0;
} elsif ($pid 0) {
my $rand_parent;
if ($try == 1) {
$rand_parent = rand;
} else {
$rand_parent = 1;
}
close WTR;
chomp(my $rand_child = RDR);
close RDR;
my $kid;
do {
$kid = waitpid($pid, 0);
} until $kid 0;
$count++ if ($rand_child ne $rand_parent);
} else {
die Can't fork: $!\n;
}
}
I get:
Test (rand) passed 1 % of the time
Test (fixed) passed 100 % of the time
This is because the parent and the child get the same value for rand()
almost every time (although oddly, the first time almost always succeeds
in getting different values, so the original test passed most of the
time).
I suggest changing the fork test to something using predefined values,
as above. As for why rand fails so often when called so close
together, I haven't looked at that yet.
--
-
| ,''`.Stephen Gran |
| : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 06:43:35PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:03:18PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to be installed That's because someone did a binary only upload so that the package does not depend on the c2 but the c2a libraries (ABI change), but the arch all package is not available (yet?) Arch: all packages are never rebuilt for binNMUs. This needs to be fixed with a sourceful upload of mysql-admin. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325449: update info
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: elserv.el elserv-url-decode-string() (push ?\ decoded) is breaking in emacs-snapshot. emacs-snapshot probably wants (push ?\\ decoded) In emacs21, the following S expressions return the value of `(32)'. But in emacs-snapshot (of course it was changed from `?\' to `?\\' as you say) the value is `(92)'. (let (decode) (push ?\ decode)) Is it really a solution? Regards, -- OHASHI Akira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Share what you know. Learn what you don't. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333708: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1)
* Bastian Blank [Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:32:53 +0100]: reopen 333708 thanks Changes: mldonkey (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (Closes: #333708, #337856, #328131, #337313) This is no new release bug. Sylvain, in case it's not clear enough, waldi means this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/04/msg00291.html Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Man is certainly stark mad; he cannot make a flea, yet he makes gods by the dozens. -- Michel de Montaigne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325449: update info
clone 325449 -1 clone 325449 -2 reassign -1 emacs-wiki reassign -2 muse-el retitle -1 emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 retitle -2 muse-el: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 thanks I'm cloning the bugreport to the respective packages, since they contain the same code. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#325449: update info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 325449 -1 Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug 325449 cloned as bug 342749. clone 325449 -2 Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug 325449 cloned as bug 342750. reassign -1 emacs-wiki Bug#342749: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug reassigned from package `elserv' to `emacs-wiki'. reassign -2 muse-el Bug#342750: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug reassigned from package `elserv' to `muse-el'. retitle -1 emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 Bug#342749: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Changed Bug title. retitle -2 muse-el: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 Bug#342750: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528).
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Package: ocaml Version: 3.09.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log): ../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../boot -c -impl pa_o_fast.ppo [...] /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s:97621: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528). Assembler error, input left in file /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s make[3]: *** [pa_o_fast.cmx] Error 2 Full build log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=ocamlver=3.09.0-3arch=hppastamp=1134140171file=logas=raw 3.09.0-1 built fine, so this might be yet another toolchain problem :( Could this be related to the problem some package had with regard to hppa ? I don't remember the package out of hand now, but a fixed upload was done a few days ago. Not sure if it was a workaround or just a quick hack though. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342755: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined
Package: glibc Version: 2.3.5-8.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source glibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. gcc-4.0 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S -c -I../include -I. -I/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket -I.. -I../libio -I/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/elf -I../libidn/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32 -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/sparc/sparc32 -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/sparc -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/sparc -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/sparcv8 -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/fpu -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/soft-fp -I../sysdeps/sparc/fpu -I../sysdeps/sparc -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include -isystem /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/debian/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -DASSEMBLER -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g -Wa,--noexecstack -o /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o -MD -MP -MF /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o.dt -MT /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S: Assembler messages: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S:5: Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined make[3]: *** [/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/glibc-2.3.5/socket' make[2]: *** [socket/subdir_lib] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/glibc-2.3.5' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc' make: *** [/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/stamp-dir/build_libc] Error 2
Bug#325449: marked as done (elserv: support emacs-snapshot)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:17:05 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325449: fixed in elserv 0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 19:39:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 12:39:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E9Szi-0004RP-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:39:06 -0700 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1653067C2; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:38:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26F82C80E3; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:38:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22254-08; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D93932C80DA; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:38:22 +0200 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wysihtml-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot-gtk X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16 Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:38:22 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wysihtml-el Version: 0.12-1 Severity: important Hi, # apt-get install wysihtml-el [...] In toplevel form: wysidocbookxml.el:19:1:Error: Cannot open load file: elserv In toplevel form: wysihtml.el:51:1:Error: Cannot open load file: elserv emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/wysihtml-el emacs-snapshot emacs-snapshot emacs21 xemacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, TSORT line 4. dpkg: error processing wysihtml-el (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: wysihtml-el E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 325449-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 05:21:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 21:21:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekx6X-0007az-Ac; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:17:05 -0800 From: OHASHI Akira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#325449: fixed in elserv 0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:17:05 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: elserv Source-Version: 0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of elserv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: elserv_0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elserv/elserv_0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10.diff.gz elserv_0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10.dsc to pool/main/e/elserv/elserv_0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10.dsc elserv_0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10_all.deb to pool/main/e/elserv/elserv_0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the
Bug#342757: haskell-cabal: ftbfs [sparc] make[1]: *** [setup] Bus error
Package: haskell-cabal Version: 1.1.3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source haskell-cabal failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. ./Distribution/Simple/Utils.hs:217:4: Warning: This binding for `paths' shadows an existing binding In a case alternative Compiling Distribution.PreProcess.Unlit ( ./Distribution/PreProcess/Unlit.hs, dist/tmp/Distribution/PreProcess/Unlit.o ) Compiling Distribution.License ( ./Distribution/License.hs, dist/tmp/Distribution/License.o ) Compiling Distribution.GetOpt ( ./Distribution/GetOpt.hs, dist/tmp/Distribution/GetOpt.o ) make[1]: *** [setup] Bus error make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/haskell-cabal-1.1.3' make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342758: haskell-hsql: ftbfs [sparc] haddock.bin: Database/HSQL/SQLite.hs: openFile: does not exist
Package: haskell-hsql
Version: 1.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
haskell-hsql failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.
cd doctmp haddock -h -o ../doc -t HSQL \
Database/HSQL.hs Database/HSQL/Types.hs \
Database/HSQL/{MySQL,ODBC,PostgreSQL,SQLite,SQLite3}.hs
haddock.bin: Database/HSQL/SQLite.hs: openFile: does not exist (No such file or
directory)
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342759: missingh: ftbfs [sparc] setup: waitForProcess: interrupted
Package: missingh Version: 0.12.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source missingh failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Running: ./setup build Chasing modules from: MissingH.Str,MissingH.IO,MissingH.IO.Binary,MissingH.List,MissingH.Daemon,MissingH.Parsec,MissingH.Email.Mailbox,MissingH.Logging,MissingH.Logging.Handler,MissingH.Logging.Handler.Simple,MissingH.Logging.Handler.Syslog,MissingH.Logging.Logger,MissingH.Threads,MissingH.Email.Sendmail,MissingH.Hsemail.Rfc2234,MissingH.Hsemail.Rfc2821,MissingH.Hsemail.Rfc2822,MissingH.Regex.Pesco,MissingH.Str.CSV,MissingH.Cmd,MissingH.FiniteMap,MissingH.Path,MissingH.Path.NameManip,MissingH.Path.FilePath,MissingH.Time,MissingH.Time.ParseDate,MissingH.Network,MissingH.Network.FTP.Client,MissingH.Network.FTP.ParserClient,MissingH.Network.FTP.Server,MissingH.Network.FTP.ParserServer,MissingH.Network.SocketServer,MissingH.Either,MissingH.Maybe,MissingH.ConfigParser,MissingH.ConfigParser.Types,MissingH.ConfigParser.Parser,MissingH.ConfigParser.Lexer,MissingH.Printf,MissingH.Printf.Types,MissingH.Printf.Printer,MissingH.Bits,MissingH.Checksum.CRC32.Posix,MissingH.Checksum.CRC32.GZip,MissingH.Compression.Inflate,MissingH.FileArchive.GZip,MissingH.Threads.Child,MissingH.Threads.Timeout,MissingH.IO.BlockIO,MissingH.IO.HVFS,MissingH.IO.HVFS.Combinators,MissingH.IO.HVFS.InstanceHelpers,MissingH.IO.HVFS.Utils,MissingH.IO.HVIO,MissingH.IO.StatCompat,MissingH.IO.WindowsCompat,MissingH.IO.PlafCompat,MissingH.IO.PosixConsts,MissingH.Email.Parser,MissingH.Debian,MissingH.Debian.ControlParser,MissingH.MIMETypes,MissingH.Wash.Mail.Email,MissingH.Wash.Mail.EmailConfig,MissingH.Wash.Mail.HeaderField,MissingH.Wash.Mail.MIME,MissingH.Wash.Mail.MailParser,MissingH.Wash.Mail.Message,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Auxiliary,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Base32,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Base64,MissingH.Wash.Utility.FileNames,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Hex,MissingH.Wash.Utility.ISO8601,MissingH.Wash.Utility.IntToString,MissingH.Wash.Utility.JavaScript,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Locking,MissingH.Wash.Utility.QuotedPrintable,MissingH.Wash.Utility.RFC2047,MissingH.Wash.Utility.RFC2279,MissingH.Wash.Utility.RFC2397,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Shell,MissingH.Wash.Utility.SimpleParser,MissingH.Wash.Utility.URLCoding,MissingH.Wash.Utility.Unique,MissingH.AnyDBM,MissingH.AnyDBM.FiniteMapDBM,MissingH.AnyDBM.StringDBM,MissingH.GetOpt Compiling MissingH.GetOpt ( ./MissingH/GetOpt.hs, dist/build/./MissingH/GetOpt.o ) Compiling MissingH.Wash.Utility.SimpleParser ( ./MissingH/Wash/Utility/SimpleParser.hs, dist/build/./MissingH/Wash/Utility/SimpleParser.o ) Compiling MissingH.Wash.Utility.Shell ( ./MissingH/Wash/Utility/Shell.hs, dist/build/./MissingH/Wash/Utility/Shell.o ) Compiling MissingH.Wash.Utility.RFC2279 ( ./MissingH/Wash/Utility/RFC2279.hs, dist/build/./MissingH/Wash/Utility/RFC2279.o ) Preprocessing library MissingH-0.12.0... Preprocessing executables for MissingH-0.12.0... Building MissingH-0.12.0... setup: waitForProcess: interrupted (Interrupted system call) ./setup build files: 256 at /usr/bin/dh_haskell_buildinst line 167, COMPAT_IN line 1. make: *** [install] Error 9
Bug#342760: haskell-src-exts: setup: waitForProcess: interrupted
Package: haskell-src-exts Version: 0.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source haskell-src-exts failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Running: ./setup build shift/reduce conflicts: 5 Chasing modules from: Language.Haskell.Hsx,Language.Haskell.Hsx.Parser,Language.Haskell.Hsx.Pretty,Language.Haskell.Hsx.Transform,Language.Haskell.Hsx.Syntax,Language.Haskell.Hsx.Build,Language.Haskell.Hsx.ParseMonad,Language.Haskell.Hsx.Lexer,Language.Haskell.Hsx.ParseUtils ./Language/Haskell/Hsx/Syntax.hs:756: warning: no newline at end of file Compiling Language.Haskell.Hsx.Syntax ( ./Language/Haskell/Hsx/Syntax.hs, dist/build/./Language/Haskell/Hsx/Syntax.o ) Preprocessing library haskell-src-exts-0.2... Building haskell-src-exts-0.2... setup: waitForProcess: interrupted (Interrupted system call) ./setup build files: 256 at /usr/bin/dh_haskell_build line 167, COMPAT_IN line 1. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342763: bayonne: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected ';' before '*' token
Package: bayonne Version: 1.2.15-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source bayonne failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/bayonne-1.2.15/drivers/phonedev' sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../server -DIXJ_PHONEDEV -g -O2 -I/usr/include/cc++2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DXML_SCRIPTS -c driver.cpp /usr/include/linux/ixjuser.h:351: error: expected ';' before '*' token make[3]: *** [driver.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bayonne-1.2.15/drivers/phonedev' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bayonne-1.2.15/drivers' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bayonne-1.2.15' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
