Package: gmpc
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
Latest gmpc upload fails to buils on all architectures (you can check the
build logs on buildd.debian.org). AFAICT, it fails to find the header
files supplied by libmpd-dev. libmpd-dev installs
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:01:35AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Fwiw, the Release.gpg file contains two signatures now, both one with the
2005 key and the 2006 key, to have a short transition period. The archive
still validates with the 2005 key, which isn't expired yet, and I think APT
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
when I install xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.deb, X work.
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xorg
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installing grub 0.97 and doing a simple setup the system is
unbootable.
The same behaviour was observed on an old Dell Dimension 4100 and a new
Dell Optiplex GX270.
This may be the same as bug
tag 344029 patch
thanks
Attached is the patch for the NMU that I am preparing; I will upload
it to a delay queue sometime tomorrow (assuming it checks out when
I've had more sleep.)
Don Armstrong
--
A one-question geek test. If you get the joke, you're a geek: Seen on
a California license
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: grave
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 (2.6.15-1) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
initrd.img(/boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686) points to
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686
reopen 345868
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I don't know how much we care about that...
cvm
mailfront
are in
I came across the same error this morning. The part that was rather
frustrating is that I had no idea where to find the new key. Only by
returning to the bug report (where Joey H provided a link) was I able to
find it.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc
Most users do not think to
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:41:30AM -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:01:35AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Fwiw, the Release.gpg file contains two signatures now, both one with the
2005 key and the 2006 key, to have a short transition period. The archive
still
Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2006, 03:47 -0800 schrieb Edward Buck:
xpost to #345823 and #316344
[..]
I tried to download the new key from the above key server using the key
id and found none.
Also, 'apt-key update' gives one the impression that the problem is
easily fixable but it leads to
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-30 05:02:37 +0100]:
Package: mantis
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi all,
I'm just taking over this package. I currently working on new upload.
Please, be a little bit more patient :)
--
Igor Genibel
«Non
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.47.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
After upgrade my system and installing a new kernel my system would fail while
booting because the initramfs image was missing the klibc library.
The last version of libklibc has moved the
Maximilian Attems wrote:
severity 343686 normal
tags 343686 moreinfo
tags 343686 unreproducible
stop
downgrading severity as kernel-package doesn't yet build with debsums.
can you please tell how you hooked debsums into your image?
perhaps you are invoking debsums in apt's post install
Package: endeavour
Version: 2.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build dependency on xlibs-dev. This has
been removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To
Package: rfb
Version: 0.6.1-11.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build dependency on xlibs-dev. This has
been removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To
hello luk!
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel bug.
ok reportbug checks if there are debsums for a packet,
currently we don't add them so i'm still curious where do you get them
from?
please post the
On 1/4/06, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Remigiusz ??wic said:
Package: hdparm
Version: 6.3-3
Severity: grave
This seems a bit inflated to me - do you actually lose data, or is it
just that you heard someone with similar error mesages lost data?
Ok,
tags 345949 pending
stop
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:41:45PM +0100, Arjan Oosting wrote:
Hi,
After upgrade my system and installing a new kernel my system would fail
while
booting because the initramfs image was missing the klibc library.
The last version of libklibc has moved the
Package: wesnoth
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
ai_python.cpp: In function 'int unittype_internal_compare(wesnoth_unittype*, we
snoth_unittype*)':
ai_python.cpp:135: error: cast from 'const unit_type*' to 'int'
Package: fvwm1
Version: 1.24r-48
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build dependency on xlibs-dev. This has
been removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To
Package: libopenal0
Version: 0.2005080600-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
[I tried to contact you via private mail, but I don't answer
challenge/response messages (and consider them inappropriate for a
Package Maintainer address, it's blocking out
Package: csync2
Version: 1.29-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/bin/sh /build/buildd/csync2-1.29/missing --run flex `test -f cfgfile_scanner
.l || echo './'`cfgfile_scanner.l
/build/buildd/csync2-1.29/missing: line 46: flex: command not found
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.029
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux$ sudo make-kpkg modules
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.8-10.00.Custom modules
== making .config because of ==
test -f .config || test ! -f
Hello Micha.
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:19, you wrote:
Could you please checkout the new packages of libgwenhywfar and
libaqbanking on http://aqbanking.alioth.debian.org/unstable/
Do the new packages solve your problem?
Unfortunately not. I upgraded all packages I had installed to the
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:19:47PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
indeed sorry for the trouble.
why on earth did my test work, anyway fix will be uploaded soonest.
as quick workaround install libklibc-dev,
then current initramfs-tools work too.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 4 Jan 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
/build/buildd/csync2-1.29/missing: line 46: flex: command not found
I assume this is a timestamp skew issue.
I think it's a bug in the build deps.
Fixing...
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpwyeLBDegKc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Your package still has a build dependency on xlibs-dev. This has
been removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Thanks for the reminder -- it seems to
Package: bsdgames
Version: 2.17-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
bsdgames build-depends on wenglish. However, this package no longer
exists; you may want to modify that to say wbritish or wamerican
instead.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Hi
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: rfb
Version: 0.6.1-11.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build dependency on xlibs-dev. This has
been removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:46:13PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
Compiling Database.HDBC.Sqlite3.Utils ( ../Database/HDBC/Sqlite3/Utils.hs,
../Database/HDBC/Sqlite3/Utils.o )
/tmp/ghc4262.hc:5:33: error: hdbc-sqlite3-helper.h: No such
This one time, at band camp, Remigiusz ??wic said:
Severity: grave
This seems a bit inflated to me - do you actually lose data, or is it
just that you heard someone with similar error mesages lost data?
Ok, my mistake. Sorry.
No problem. Just pointing it out.
During boot I see
On Jan 04, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco, can you take a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345864 and see what you
think?
Blame the kernel. When the event is sent, the drive is supposed to be
ready to be used.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
The same code is repeated in blob.c. Here is a more complete fix.
--- ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/image.c.format-string-again 2005-10-22 12:17:39.0 -0400
+++ ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/image.c 2006-01-04 11:37:30.0 -0500
@@ -2861,8 +2861,16 @@
char
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Hello,
While in the NM process, I'm looking for some RC bugs to close and I
found that one.
...
Thanks for doing this NMU! Sorry for not responding earlier to tell you
it's ok...
I'm currently working on figuring out how to un-delay it.
Thanks again,
Thomas
--
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2006, Michael Biebl wrote:
I can confirm this bug.
Did you confirm it with version 3.8.2005-12-06-2 ?
Unfortunately 3.8.2005-12-06-2 doesn't fix the problem. libcapi20-3 is
still missing the so files.
Please test your package more thoroughly before
Package: anjuta
Version: 1.2.4-1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #343998
anjuta 1.2.4a fixes this crash bug and is available on sourceforge.net. can
the debian anjuta package be updated to this version?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Paul Slootman wrote:
As it's a team effort, sending such things as wishlist bugs is the best,
so that there's a record of it, and anyone can see it. I'm afraid that
that message is probably lost in the 4000 messages in my inbox :-(
If you happen to still have your sent copy, please do send it
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Just to tell you that after doing an install of etch (using the beta1
installer) yesterday, and immediately upgrading that to sid, I've got
the same problem. If you'd want to test that, it should be easy :-)
A data point: I tried this with an etch chroot, and also with
On 4 Jan 2006, at 6:11 pm, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
package am-utils
tags 344229 + patch
thanks
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
This package violates the FHS by shipping a file in /usr/man.
I've attached a patch to fix this. Since I can't test the package, I
won't do an NMU. I know the package
I don't doubt that there are more vulnerabilities lurking in
ImageMagick, but I don't see how this same problem occurs in
animate.c...
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have exactly the same problem (among which maj, alt and alt-gr keys
not working, as you can see) after upgrading, and a few hours of testing
to solve it changed nothing.
it got even worse when after changing xorg.conf, gnome would freeze
while loading, and since ctrl+alt+f1 wasn't working any
Package: gsl
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gsl 1.7-3 does not build on Alpha:
[...]
mv libtool-2 libtool
chmod 755 libtool
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
/usr/bin/make CFLAGS=-g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -mieee
make[1]: Entering
Sorry, you also need
$(MAKE) CFLAGS=$(compilerflags)
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mozilla
Version: 1.7.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
The p3p extension in mozilla fails to build due to faulty Makefile.in, at
least on my mixed etch / sid system. The attached patch fixes this, when
dropped to debian/patches (although the
# BTS control commands
package apt
# Raising severities as per the rationale in #345891
severity 346002 serious
severity 345823 serious
severity 345956 serious
merge 346002 345823 345956 345891
thanks
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 20:25 +0100, Ferenczi Viktor wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Hi,
Please check your menu.lst for a splashimage line. If one or more exists
comment them out and try to boot again.
How where the menu.lst files created?
You could also try pressing 'c' for the command line interface, when the
random garbage is on the screen. But I've no idea if that will
Subject: trayer: Does not show
Package: trayer
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trayer doesnt show up. It runs nicely and even gaim (apparently) is
able to tray himself
but there are no signs of trayer.
Im running trayer under fvwm-crystal with the same
severity important
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Yannick Beynet wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
when I install xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.deb, X work.
So, X *does* work? If not,
On 4 January 2006 at 21:21, Falk Hueffner wrote:
| Sorry, you also need
|
| $(MAKE) CFLAGS=$(compilerflags)
Thanks for the bug report, and the detailed patch. A fixed version will be
available shortly.
Tschoe, Dirk
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: Won't uninstall cleanly
It hangs on this line of the postrm script:
my $ret = purge();
I can get it to work by deleting this line. Perhaps this is because a
debconf routine is being called after stop has been called? I don't know,
but
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:21:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'd rather see some analysis to show where the bug actually belongs instead
of guessing and reassigning.
Well, some analysis you asked for. I use glibc-2.3.5-11 with libc6-dbg
installed.
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug
gdb
I use aptitude and I'm sure I don't know all the ins and outs here. But I do
have a suggestion for your consideration:
Stop signing the archives with the 2006 key for now. That will allow those who
have been using the 2005 key to continue getting updates.
After you have your fixes in
Sven Luther wrote:
It would be great if you could confirm the exact version of those two
packages, and could provide us some log of what is happening, as this bug
report doesn't seem to be very informative.
For me, i have provided information in bug #344767, as i explained in
the previous
severity 344519 normal
tags 344519 - moreinfo
thanks
hi eppie,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:37:44PM +0100, Eppie 1305 wrote:
I've done some more testing and it seems that it wasn't Cacti.
adding a variable thread_cache_size 0 in my.cnf did the trick for me.
This bug can be closed.
thanks
Hi,
that's what I got when building 6.9.0-1+SVN revision 1007 (from trunk/debian)
on amd64 box. I used up-to-date pbuilder for building. It's really strage but
it seems the file 'Xprint_FAQ.html' must be readded. I'll test if 6.9.0-1
builds with my pbuilder environment (it shouldn't though).
Package: libvte-dev
Version: 1:0.11.15-4
Severity: serious
gtk-sharp2 fails to compile because of a bug in libvte-dev.
if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
-I../.. -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I../..-g -Wall -Wunused
-Wmissing-prototypes
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
I haven't tested 2.6.15 because it isn't available in my mirror yet. But
the Nathanael posts tell us that the problem is still present in the
latest kernel.
As soon as it will be available on the mirror i use, i'll test 2.6.15.
Ok, 2.6.15 is arrived.
I've tryed to
Package: cons
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
I just found out that the dependency code in Cons 2.3.0 is broken. It
was working in 2.2.0. If anyone has any dependency problems with cons,
downgrade to 2.2.0-4.
--T
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
found 346041 2.3.0-1 2.3.0-2
thanks
Prevent bad version of cons from making it into a release. :-/
--T
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: quota
Version: 3.13-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When attempting to install quota into a new sid chroot, the following
error occurs:
Setting up quota (3.13-4) ...
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x080923a0 ***
dpkg: error processing quota
reassign 344767 grub
thanks
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:19:17AM +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
It would be great if you could confirm the exact version of those two
packages, and could provide us some log of what is happening, as this bug
report doesn't seem to be very
61 matches
Mail list logo
