* Nathan Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 08:20]:
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:36 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.8
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Hi ifupdown-Maintainer,
I've installed a recent Debian/Testing on two different boxes and on a
virtual qemu-box and the following problem appeard on all of them: After
booting the system the nentwork inteface is not brought up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 400158 grave
Bug#400158: numpy 1.0 available
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403300 serious
Bug#403300: nagios2-common: resource.cfg missing
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:57:00PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hmm, my upload got rejected for some version ... I've sent off some
mail to try figure out why.
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 03:02 +, Debian Installer wrote:
Rejected: libattr1-dev_2.4.36-1_i386.deb: old version (1:2.4.32-1.1)
in
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Release Managers,
do you consider the following scenario release-critical? If yes, we
have more than one RC bug:
- $packagemanager install B X
- package A is unpacked
- package B which Depends: A is unpacked
- package X which is unrelated is
* H. S. Teoh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 06:49]:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:46:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* H. S. Teoh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:39]:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:53:38PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[H. S. Teoh]
Hi, the old patch (currently in
severity 403696 normal
retitle 403696 gtkdialog: Fails to load if MAIN_DIALOG is not defined
thanks
* 2006-12-19 03:26, David Broome wrote:
Package: gtkdialog
Version: 2:0.7.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to run it I get:
** ERROR **: GtkDialog:
[H. S. Teoh]
i686. But it runs on a modified kernel that my colo provider uses for
running virtual servers. I'm not sure if this makes a difference in
the build. All I did was `apt-get source libapr1`, copy the new patch
into debian/patches, and run `dpkg-buildpackage -r fakeroot`.
It makes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403696 normal
Bug#403696: gtkdialog: Fails to load
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
retitle 403696 gtkdialog: Fails to load if MAIN_DIALOG is not defined
Bug#403696: gtkdialog: Fails to load
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping
severity 403398 important
set 403398 -security
thanks
Sam Hocevar ha scritto:
I'm investigating #403398
hi
I investigated this issue, and it is (quite likely) not a security one;
the crash is of this form: when a I-frame, or an header, is damaged,
then mplayer does not allocate memory for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403398 important
Bug#403398: libavcodec: segfault while reading an mpeg file
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
set 403398 -security
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
2006/12/19, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/18/06, Remi Vanicat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up torrentflux (2.1-7) ...
debconf (developer): frontend started
debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is torrentflux
Package: sympa
Version: Please stop kidding
Followup-For: Bug #354355
In install-mysql-db.pl :
$dbh-disconnect();
exit 0;
In prepare-db :
MySQL)
if /usr/share/sympa/db/install-mysql-db $OPTS -d $db_na
me -h $db_hostname -u $userpassfile; then
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:59:01AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
This problem is probably not solveable in ssh as this has to
do with package dependencies.
Incorrect. I have an upload pending to fix this bug.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
Package: sympa
Version: Please stop kidding
Followup-For: Bug #354355
In install-mysql-db.pl :
$dbh-disconnect();
exit 0;
In prepare-db :
MySQL)
if /usr/share/sympa/db/install-mysql-db $OPTS -d $db_na
me -h $db_hostname -u
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403322: fixed in flashrom 0.0+r2526-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 403706 - patch
Bug#403706: (sometimes?) fails to bring up interfaces on bootup by default
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 403706 - patch
thanks
There is no patch for this bug, at least not in the bug submission.
Regards
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 18/12/06 at 20:46 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
tags 403083 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I did try it with 0.16.2.
So this doesn't help at all.
Could you tell me exactly what command you used to build?
I used sbuild, personally.
A good start would be to provide the log of your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403379 important
Bug#403379: mplayer: segfault while reading an mpeg file
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
tag 403379 -security
Bug#403379: mplayer: segfault while reading an mpeg file
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
severity 403379 important
tag 403379 -security
thanks
while looking into the fix of the code, I came to the conclusion that
this bug could not be exploited w.r.t. security
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
Right and sorry, I'll fix that.
Thats not the only problems with your package.
* wwsympa will not start :
## Check effective ID
unless ($ eq (getpwnam('--USER--'))[2]) {
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:06:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Is there some easy way I can reproduce this? Format a disk with LUKS
on one PC, connect it to the slug and do what exactly to trigger the
corruption?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Backup the header of the
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:32:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342377: fixed in em8300 0.16.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
The Debian Project seems to have found a bug in the tar test suite.
The bug appears to be a race condition in tests/append02.at
I could not find mention of the bug in the bug-tar archives at:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/
so I'm reporting it now!
This patch makes the race loose
Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
Right and sorry, I'll fix that.
Thats not the only problems with your package.
* wwsympa will not start :
## Check effective ID
unless ($ eq (getpwnam('--USER--'))[2]) {
It seems that a suprisingly simmilar report is being tracked upstream
STR #2166 at:
http://www.cups.org/str.php?L2166
Regards
Alex Owen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: openoffice.org-style-default
Version: 2.1~rc2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package uninstallable
When I try to upgrade to openoffice.org in experimental, I get
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-style-default_2.1~rc2-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 399214 important
Bug#399214: solfege: Fails to upgrade (3.0.6-1 - 3.6.3-1); cannot remove it as
well
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Same problem here.
Removing ~/.config/menus/ and ~/.local/ solved the problem (don't know
if both are needed).
Regards,
--
Paulo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
Right and sorry, I'll fix that.
Thats not the only problems with your package.
* wwsympa will not start :
## Check effective ID
unless ($ eq (getpwnam('--USER--'))[2]) {
Package: grip
Version:: 3.3.1-11 (testing)
Severity: critical
Package: ripperx
Version: 2.7.0-3 (testing)
Severity: critical
I'm using debian etch, with latest updates(i386) on IBM R52 lap. I've
tried grip, sound juicer and ripperX and noticed that they all freeze
(everything stops including
This is probably a debian-installer issue?
but is affects udev/hotplug/initscripts also!
Regards
Alex Owen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package aide
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: aide
severity #403437 serious
Bug#403437: Cronscript broken
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
tags #403437 confirmed pending
Bug#403437: Cronscript broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:43:58PM -0500, Tom wrote:
Package: ktrack
Version: 0.3.0-alpha1-8.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package ktrack crashes upon startup from the command line with the
signal 11 (SIGSEV). The shell prints out ktrack: ERROR:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 403706 netcfg
Bug#403706: (sometimes?) fails to bring up interfaces on bootup by default
Bug reassigned from package `ifupdown' to `netcfg'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, this problem is taken care of by the dh_installtex snippets,
and the approach is closer to ignore errors but display a warning than
to run the commands iff tex-common is configured, not ignoring errors:
,[ From lmodern's current postrm ]
reassign 403706 netcfg
thanks
This bug/issue seems to be due (in part) to the code in
d-i/trunk/packages/netcfg/[static.c|dhcp.c]
---8---
if (!iface_is_hotpluggable(iface) !find_in_stab(iface))
fprintf(fp, auto %s\n, iface);
else
fprintf(fp, allow-hotplug
Package: base
Severity: critical
If you create more than one lvm snaptshot of a logical volume the system hangs.
To reproduce this problem use lvcreate to create a logical volume and try to
create two
snapshots of this lv. When invoking the second lvcreate the system should hang.
This behavior
tags 402316 security
thanks
Your failure to read the code in /usr/bin/hinfo that parses
/etc/hinfo.conf does not make this a security bug.
Code injection is still possible via the $pager variable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 402316 security
Bug#402316: blars.org is down; hinfo-update fails miserably as a result
Tags were: sid etch sarge
Tags added: security
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 09:06]:
But I'd still like to have advice from the release team: Should we
upload tetex-base (currently 7 days old, unblocked) now, with
urgency=high, or is the bug not RC and we should wait until the current
sid version has migrated?
tetex-base has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403565 serious
Bug#403565: tig: Segmentation fault when navigating in tree mode
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 400158 normal
Bug#400158: numpy 1.0 available
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
severity 400158 normal
thanks
New upstream versions are not RC bugs. If you can get the package into
etch, then cool, but it doesn't need an RC bug to do that. grave is for
makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data
loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 09:06]:
But I'd still like to have advice from the release team: Should we
upload tetex-base (currently 7 days old, unblocked) now, with
urgency=high, or is the bug not RC and we should wait until the current
Alex Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian Project seems to have found a bug in the tar test suite.
The bug appears to be a race condition in tests/append02.at
It was fixed in version 1.16.1
Regards,
Sergey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 370132 + help moreinfo
Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [ia64 s390]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help, moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
I'll take this out. It is more hassle than it is really worth.
We need, now, a workable package for etch. 5.2.3-0.2 is not that
package, 5.2.3-0.3 will have bugs not in my 5.2.3-0.7.
Please upload to unstable 5.2.3-0.8 which will be
Remi Vanicat wrote:
2006/12/19, Cameron Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/18/06, Remi Vanicat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up torrentflux (2.1-7) ...
debconf (developer): frontend started
debconf (developer): frontend running,
Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
I'll take this out. It is more hassle than it is really worth.
We need, now, a workable package for etch. 5.2.3-0.2 is not that
package, 5.2.3-0.3 will have bugs not in my 5.2.3-0.7.
And vice versa.
tag 403728 + pending
thanks
Am Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2006 13:06 schrieb Martin Orr:
When I try to upgrade to openoffice.org in experimental, I get
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-style-default_2.1~rc2-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 403728 + pending
Bug#403728: Needs Replaces: openoffice.org-common ( 2.1~rc2-1)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi John,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:46:51PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
tags 403083 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I did try it with 0.16.2.
So this doesn't help at all.
Could you tell me exactly what command you used to build?
It is sounding like this is a Haddock bug anyway.
Package: libsvm
Severity: serious
Version: 2.82.0-2
Tags: patch
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, alpha, ia64.
Please, just drop extraneous Build-Depends.
The packages implicitely pulled by build-essential are the right one.
Thanks
Petr
--- debian/control~
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403437: fixed in aide 0.13.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
severity 403728 serious
reassign 403728
openoffice.org-style-default,openoffice.org-style-industrial,openoffice.org-style-hicontrast,openoffice.org-style-crystal
thanks
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2006 13:06 schrieb Martin Orr:
Package: openoffice.org-style-default
Version: 2.1~rc2-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 403728 serious
Bug#403728: Needs Replaces: openoffice.org-common ( 2.1~rc2-1)
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
reassign 403728
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:15:31 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403729: System is freesing to the point of hard reset
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Thanks to Ana for tracking this down.
This problem is a cpphs problem that only occurs in version 0.7-3.
cpphs 0.7-4 does not cause the problem, nor does 0.7-2.1.
0.7-4 fixes serious bug #403110. Ian Lynagh, maintainer of cpphs, has
indicated that he will be asking debian-release to push it to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 403083 by 403110
Bug#403083: missingh: FTBFS:
dist/build/tmp/MissingH/IO/Binary.hs:dist/build/tmp/MissingH/IO/Binary.hs:
219:1: Parse error
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 403083 added: 403110
End of message, stopping processing
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:19:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 18/12/06 at 20:46 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
tags 403083 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I did try it with 0.16.2.
So this doesn't help at all.
Could you tell me exactly what command you used to build?
I used
2006/12/19, Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just created a sid chroot and attempted to install torrentflux, I did
not encounter this problem.
I tried a few different failure scenarios (mysql-client not available,
mysql-server not installed, database password incorrect, database server
not
Package: addresses-goodies-for-gnustep
Version: 0.4.6-7
Severity: serious
Hello Eric,
The package addresses-goodies-for-gnustep includes the file
/usr/share/man/man1/adtool.1.gz which is also part of the
package 'adtool'.
adtool in Sarge also includes /usr/share/man/man1/adtool.1.gz.
Cheers,
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:42:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: missingh
Version: 0.16.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 402179 + patch upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#402179: tar: FTBFS: race condition in test-suite
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, upstream, fixed-upstream
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 403703 + upstream fixed-upstream patch
Bug#403703: cupsys: pstops incorrectly outputs stop+start JCL after setup
section if outputorder!=normal
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream, patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
tags 403703 + upstream fixed-upstream patch
thanks
Loooking again at upstream bug STR #2166 the developers think this is
a duplicate of upstream bug STR #2111:
http://www.cups.org/str.php?L2111
STR #2111 has been fixed upstream... patch can be found here:
Hi,
On Friday 15 December 2006 01:14, Thomas K. wrote:
Package: boinc-client
Version: 5.4.11-4
Followup-For: Bug #379137
boinc_client gets segfault on launch.
version from boinc-website works fine.
[...]
2006-12-15 01:04:50 [---] No general preferences found - using BOINC
defaults
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:32:18 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403641: fixed in tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 402179 + patch upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
Attached is the diff for tests/append02 between upstream released
versions 1.16 and 1.16.1.
This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply
this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is
the better
* Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-20 19:17]:
From a recent run of the LSB 3.1 tests:
10|852 /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/msync_P/T.msync_P 22:58:49|TC Start, scenario ref
858-0
FSG internal testing showed that Fedora Core 5's 2.6.18 kernel does not
fail in the same way. I believe I've
Upstream bug #2166 has been marked as a duplicate of bug #2111
(http://www.cups.org/str.php?L2111).
The fix for bug #2111 ((http://www.cups.org/strfiles/2111/str2111.patch)
did fix the problem for me.
--
Patrice Fournier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Forwarding this message from debian-legal since it shows what is being done
about this bug:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: IEEE copyrighted files in vhdl tools
Date: Tuesday 19 December 2006 09:06
From: Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 402191 important
Bug#402191: hercules cannot work with 2.6.18 host kernel, except as root
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
severity 402191 important
thanks
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061208 12:00]:
hercules tries to setup tun device by itself. However, since 2.6.18,
this change has happend in the kernel:
[NET]: Require CAP_NET_ADMIN to create tuntap devices.
Date: Thu Jun 22 16:07:52 2006
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ru ../gforth-0.6.2~/arch/hppa/cache.c ../gforth-0.6.2/arch/hppa/cache.c
--- ../gforth-0.6.2~/arch/hppa/cache.c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 365829 + patch
Bug#365829: kwin crashed (in
KWinInternal::Workspace::updateMinimizedOfTransients ())
Tags were: fixed-upstream moreinfo
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tags 365829 + patch
thanks
* Juergen Doenitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061217 05:31]:
[...]
There is a patch upstream in http://bugs.kde.org/117677#c65
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
cdbs (0.4.48) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Reverse patches before cleaning build directory (simple-patchsys.mk)
(closes: #387103)
Urgh, this is pretty ugly. One of the great things about tarball.mk is that you
don't need to jump through hoops to get a clean source tarball.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:55:39AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
[...]
I uploaded packages for this architecture now on
http://people.debian.org/~aba/apr/ - the changes-file is signed by me
so that you know it was really me.
[...]
I just tested it. It works flawlessly!
I'm not sure why building
Package: sqlalchemy
Severity: serious
Hi,
debian/copyright only references the LICENSE:
--8--
SQLAlchemy is licensed under an MIT-style license (see LICENSE).
Other incorporated projects may be licensed under different licenses.
All licenses allow for non-commercial and
I'm just a bit puzzled by such strange collaborative work...
Couldn't it be better to try and work on the same source code base ?
I know that ego is important in volunteer work, but it looks rather an
unproductive way to go from the outside.
Thanks anyway for the recent progress on Sympa.
Just
You are aware that this bug has resulted in package 'john' from being
removed from testing, and isn't presently being considered for inclusion
in etch?
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#389236: fixed in gforth 0.6.2-7.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, December 19, 2006 1:09 am, Andreas Barth said:
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061214 08:41]:
I uploaded an NMU of your package to experimental to see if the test
case really works on buildds.
It failed as expected on powerpc and also on sparc, and worked on at
least amd64 and
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 17:08 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
So it seems that the patches needed for msync() conformance we applied
from 2.6.19 to our 2.6.18 cause filesystem corruption, see the current
discussion on this on lkml. From what I understand it, plain 2.6.18
is not LSB 3.1 conform
Package: evolution
Version: 2.6.3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ evolution
CalDAV Eplugin starting up ...
libnm_glib_nm_state_cb: dbus returned an error.
(org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown) The name
org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any
Quoting Patrice Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The fix for bug #2111 ((http://www.cups.org/strfiles/2111/str2111.patch)
did fix the problem for me.
Seems I spoke too soon... the fix works fine on single page jobs, but
multiple pages jobs still produce errors. I will do more tests and confirm
Le mardi 19 décembre 2006 à 11:37 +, Paulo Silva a écrit :
Same problem here.
Removing ~/.config/menus/ and ~/.local/ solved the problem (don't know
if both are needed).
Do you remember what was in the .config/menus directory?
Paolo, Jean-Luc: if you have a .config/menus directory, I'd
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:33:58 +0100
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What worry me about the patch is the fact that create_lock() and
check_dpkglock() are not performed in the same order. In particular, if
Dear maintainer of proofgeneral,
Your package was recently reported with a RC bug (FTBFS). Therefore, I send
this NMU to fix the RC issue, given the lack of input about this bug,
the easiness of the fix
I used this occasion to fix trivial lintian warnings as I don't doubt
this will make the
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is --quiet only used for update-updmap? It's the same script behind
the three, and with -v it always says
IMHO, it's a bug that --quiet isn't used for all three calls. But this
--quiet here dates from before we introduced
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:47:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403572: fixed in proofgeneral 3.5-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libattr1
Followup-For: Bug #403645
Installed libattr1_2.4.35-1_i386 via aptitude ugrade and saw above
symptom. Rolled back to 2.4.32-1 and problem went away.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
So it seems that the patches needed for msync() conformance we applied
from 2.6.19 to our 2.6.18 cause filesystem corruption, see the current
discussion on this on lkml. From what I understand it, plain 2.6.18
is not LSB 3.1
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote:
This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply
this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is
the better option if we wnat to fix this for etch.
It's not clear to me that we need to disturb etch to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 400879 389579
Bug#389579: libapache-mod-auth-mysql: FTBFS against apache 2.2
Bug#400879: libapache2-mod-auth-mysql not installable on etch or unstable
Merged 389579 400879.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi Colin
Good to know. Just of couriousity, what was the problem?
Regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:45:36AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:59:01AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
This problem is probably not solveable in ssh as this has to
do with package
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
