On 2009-11-02 07:28 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
>> Package: capiutils
>> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>>
>> Fresh installation:
>>
>> [...]
>> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4)
Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
> Package: capiutils
> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Fresh installation:
>
> [...]
> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
> Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
> Note: running
Package: gnurobbo
Version: 0.62-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Hi,
Upstream introduced a new font in version 0.62; unfortunately this
font is non-free. The binaries built by 0.62-1 strip out the font
(replacing it with a link to DejaVu fonts), but the files should also
be stripped
Your message dated Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:02:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552879: fixed in unifdef 1.0+20030701-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552879,
regarding unifdef: FTBFS: unifdef.c:204: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 553904 grave
Bug #553904 [samba] samba: Lost accounts on upgrade.
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Package: guessnet
Version: 0.51-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
not only does guessnet fail to build on sparc, but I had to manually
kill the build. Today (Nov 2nd) when I logged into the buildd, it
looked like:
buildd 15653 1 0 Oct26 ?00:00:00
/build/buildd-guessnet_0.51-1-sparc-bpOCFV/gu
Hi,
From the description, it sounds like the bug is rather that the last
upload of gdcm changed the SONAME on libgdcmDICT from
"libgdcmDICT.so.2.0" to "libgdcmDICT.so".
Certainly the latter is what I have installed now (from gdcm 2.0.13-1)
and "ldd /usr/lib/libITKIO.so" indicates it was linked wi
Package: libb-size-perl
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* NPOASR. (Not part of a stable release).
* RC Bug.
* No reverse de
Package: ext2resize
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* NPOASR. (Not part of a stable release).
* Buggy.
* Replaced by resize
Package: gforge-theme-starterpack
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* NPOASR. (Never part of a Stable release).
* Not sure wh
Your message dated Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:53:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553251: fixed in readline5 5.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #553251,
regarding libreadline5-dbg: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./usr/lib/debug/libhistory.so.5.2 and 1 other but the p
Package: directvnc
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead/missing upstream.
* Buggy.
* ITA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse
Package: galternatives
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Missing upstream.
* Buggy.
* ITA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse
Package: rhyme
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead upstream.
* Orphaned for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-dep
Package: hdfview
Version: 2.5-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hdfview should depend on java-wrappers, since /usr/bin/hdfview uses
/usr/lib/java-wrappers/java-wrappers.sh from the java-wrappers package.
Sample execution of hdfview:
$ hdfview
..: 7: Can't open /usr/lib/jav
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 552595 0.6.10
Bug #552595 [python-central] please remove dangling symlinks at upgrade
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #552595 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:17:49 +
with message-id <1257117469.811718.19043.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package etoken-pro-support has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #512151,
regarding [etoken-pro-support] Outdated required drivers informa
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:29:59 +
with message-id <1257114599.300803.18103.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package w3c-libwww has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #430875,
regarding libwww0: When built from source is uninstallable
to be marked
Package: ras
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Inactive upstream.
* Orphaned for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-d
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:29:59 +
with message-id <1257114599.436156.18108.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package w3c-libwww has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #440436,
regarding The maintainer plans to request removal of this package from t
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:34:13 +
with message-id <1257114853.786732.18153.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package xpmumon has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #526457,
regarding xpmumon: FTBFS: Using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev
t
Here are some of the USA contact databases we have for sale:
Physicians
Chiropractors
Alternative Medicine
Dentists
Veterinarians
Hospitals
Nursing Homes
Pharmaceutical Companies
Physical Therapists
Acupuncturists
Massage Therapists
Medical Equipment Suppliers
Mental Health Counselors
Visiting
Package: capiutils
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fresh installation:
[...]
Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
Note: running MAKEDEV to create CAPI devices in /dev...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/capi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 553529 important
Bug #553529 [xscreensaver-data-extra] xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver
should not be enabled by default
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Package: libghttp
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead upstream.
* Orphaned for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-
Package: em8300
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Two RC bugs and several important.
* RFA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse
[Manoj Srivastava]
> Package: libapache2-svn
> Version: 1.6.6dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: dir-or-file-in-var-www
Thanks, the files in libapache2-svn are just example files, so I've
moved them /usr/share/doc/*/examples/.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 553535 pending
Bug #553535 [libapache2-svn] libapache2-svn: dir-or-file-in-var-www
/var/www/apache2-default/svnindex.xsl and two others
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:51:51 +
with message-id <1257112311.193746.17874.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package chpax has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #523319,
regarding chpax: still needed in squeeze?
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:49:12 +
with message-id <1257112152.174578.17808.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package xcin has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #552816,
regarding xcin: FTBFS: ../../../src/include/xcintool.h:205: error: conflicting
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:43:05 +
with message-id <1257111785.654846.17745.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6 has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #518802,
regarding virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-amd64: The ver
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:25:56 +
with message-id <1257110756.220628.17614.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package sfc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #494449,
regarding sfc-source - Fails to build against 2.6.26
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:16:59 +
with message-id <1257110219.111226.17550.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package toolbar-fancy has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #543175,
regarding toolbar-fancy: should this package be removed?
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:15:40 +
with message-id <1257110140.749038.17527.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package python-happydoc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #497703,
regarding python-happydoc: Incomplete debian/copyright
to be marked
Hi Jesse
I'm cc'ing the Debian bugreport (http://bugs.debian.org/549743).
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Jesse via RT wrote:
> So, I'm not the original author of GnuPG::Interface, just its
> caretaker. It looks like the original code is specifically testing
> gnupg's ability to read fr
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:14:36 +
with message-id <1257110076.705295.17509.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package bookmarksftp has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #492837,
regarding mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3
to be marked as d
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:10:18 +
with message-id <1257109818.64.17462.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package exmap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #495335,
regarding exmap-modules-source: Build fails with 2.6.26-2-686
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:10:18 +
with message-id <1257109818.801888.17469.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package exmap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #453852,
regarding exmap: Assertion failure at startup
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:10:18 +
with message-id <1257109818.737525.17467.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package exmap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #550046,
regarding exmap-modules-source: fails to compile with kernel 2.6.26
to be mar
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:10:18 +
with message-id <1257109818.737525.17467.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package exmap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #550046,
regarding exmap-modules-source: Build fails with 2.6.26-2-686
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:10:18 +
with message-id <1257109818.64.17462.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package exmap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #495335,
regarding exmap-modules-source: fails to compile with kernel 2.6.26
to be mar
Package: system-tools-backends
Version: 2.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading from Debian stable "lenny" to testing "squeeze" the *-admin
tools from gnome-system-tools always fail to start under the normal user
account. I have tried force-removal and re
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:41:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552927: fixed in tinc 1.0.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #552927,
regarding tinc: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `doc/tinc/*.html': No such file or
directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Stefano,
I have checked the maintainer address in the package, and it is
correct. I received your message and I currently recive also messages
from ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list.
Could it be a sort of temporary server error?
Fabio
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:37:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#543027: fixed in lineak-kdeplugins 2:0.9-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #543027,
regarding lineak-kdeplugins: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`.libs/jukplugin.so': No such file or directory
to be mark
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:37:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#541225: fixed in miredo 1.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541225,
regarding miredo-server: Incorrect dependencies in init.d scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:37:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#541225: fixed in miredo 1.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541225,
regarding miredo-server: Incorrect runlevels in init.d LSB header
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:45:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#545590: fixed in tkdesk 2.0-9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #545590,
regarding tkdesk: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -litcl3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:38:10 +0100
with message-id <96667c5b0911011138p1c530743t7f9699cac5e05...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#543553: bum: disfunctional maintainer address
has caused the Debian Bug report #543553,
regarding bum: disfunctional maintainer address
to be mark
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:37:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#543009: fixed in lineak-xosdplugin 1:0.9-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #543009,
regarding lineak-xosdplugin: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`.libs/xosdplugin.so': No such file or directory
to be mar
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:36:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#533954: fixed in ksimus-boolean 0.3.6-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #533954,
regarding ksimus-boolean: FTBFS: required file `admin/config.guess' not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:14:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553583: fixed in wireshark 1.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553583,
regarding CVE-2009-3829 CVE-2009-3551 CVE-2009-3550 CVE-2009-3549
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:07:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553568: fixed in set-crontab-perl 1.02-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553568,
regarding set-crontab-perl : no-standards-version-field
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:52:21PM +0100, Adwin Timmer wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> In my system with an empty /etc/resolv.conf, the name resolving issue is
> still not fixed with 2.10.1-3 (my other system with a non-empty
> /etc/resolv.conf doesn't have any problems). I don't know what relevant
> info
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:58:35 +0100
with message-id <4aedda5b.1070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#553017: reportbug-ng: Doesn't start at all in testing;
exception with bts
has caused the Debian Bug report #553017,
regarding reportbug-ng: Doesn't start at all in testing; exc
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:52:27PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Package: bum
> Severity: serious
>
> The maintainer address sends useless replies to valid mail.
> Please fix it or use a different address.
Fabio, ping on this bug report.
It seems that your address does, or at least used to, bounc
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:58:35 +0100
with message-id <4aedda5b.1070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#553017: reportbug-ng: Doesn't start at all in testing;
exception with bts
has caused the Debian Bug report #553017,
regarding reportbug-ng: If I launch repoertbug-ng I got an e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 553017 553178
Bug#553017: reportbug-ng: Doesn't start at all in testing; exception with bts
Bug#553178: reportbug-ng: If I launch repoertbug-ng I got an error
Forcibly Merged 553017 553178.
> fixed 553017 1.7
Bug #553017 [reportbug-ng]
Source: jetty
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in jetty 6.x and 7.x.
The original advisory can be found at
http://www.ush.it/team/ush/hack-jetty6x7x/jetty-adv.txt
When you fix this issue, please mention the CVE ids in the changelog, if they
are
Hi Robert.
I don't understand the problem. Having no new releases in a while
shouldn't be enough to avoid this package. There's others packages in
Debian with few upstream releases or none, even with low responsiveness
and that doesn't hurt as long as there's no severe bugs in them which
need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 527754 + patch pending
Bug #527754 [gsetroot] gsetroot: FTBFS: libtool errors
Bug #527834 [gsetroot] gsetroot: FTBFS: ../libtool: line 2130: mkdir /.libs: No
such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
Added tag(s) pending and pat
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:46:28PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> I tried forcing a link against zlib by adding it to LDFLAGS in
> debian/rules . Unfortunately after doing so I get a segfault.
I can confirm this.
The segfault is reproducible even by a very simple invocation of
./raw_pre_gcl with no a
Hi,
Neil Jerram writes:
> In that case, for the sake of consistency, shouldn't the answer be the
> same as what we will get in 1.9/2.0 from `pkg-config
> --value=extensionsdir guile-2.0` (per Andy's email)?
Yes, good point. That would be ‘$libdir/guile/1.8/extensions’ then.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:49:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#535389: fixed in latex-cjk-chinese-arphic 1.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #535389,
regarding latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: bashism in debian/rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:49:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#543020: fixed in latex-cjk-chinese-arphic 1.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #543020,
regarding latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: bashism in debian/rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
I've just fallen for the same (I hit enter, assuming I would get the
only available option, now have error 15).
Felix, is there any situation where postinst should accept grub2 options
without a boot source? (sorry, I'm not familiar with the postinst/grub2
settings, so this may be the wrong qu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 533888 grave
Bug #533888 [ddclient] ddclient: fails to install in noninteractive mode
("script returned error exit status 30")
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:02:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553567: fixed in asedriveiiie 3.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #553567,
regarding asedriveiiie: invalid-standards-version 3.6.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 553583 wireshark/1.2.2-2
Bug #553583 [wireshark] CVE-2009-3829 CVE-2009-3551 CVE-2009-3550 CVE-2009-3549
Bug Marked as found in versions wireshark/1.2.2-2.
> found 553583 wireshark/1.2.2-1
Bug #553583 [wireshark] CVE-2009-3829 CVE-2009-3551
tags 507204 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lsb-pkgchk3 (versioned as 3.2.1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2, according to devref §5.11.1. The patch is the
one which was posted to the buglog a while ago.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ Po
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:28:21 -0430
Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
>
> Plus, is the intended behavior, the package was made on that sense,
> that's what the screensaver is supposed to do. So it's not a bug but a
> feature!
Just because I think the issue of what consistutes intended behaviours
is an issue
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 507204 + pending
Bug #507204 [lsb-pkgchk3] lsb-pkgchk3: Missing include of stdlib.h and
instances of printing a string variable directly
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
tags 507201 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lsb-appchk3 (versioned as 3.2.2-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2, in accordance to devref §5.11.1. The patch is
the one which was posted to the bug log a while ago.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 507201 + pending
Bug #507201 [lsb-appchk3] lsb-appchk3: Missing include of stdlib.h and
instances of printing a string variable directly
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 553286 serious
Bug #553286 [debfoster] debfoster: read-in-maintainer-script (postinst:33,
postrm:10, postrm:23)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Hi,
I'm experiencing the same problem and can confirm that GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1
fixed it for me.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:28:03 +0100
with message-id <4aed9af3.9030...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#553457: gnome-screensaver is uninstallable
has caused the Debian Bug report #553457,
regarding gnome-screensaver is uninstallable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:22:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552799: fixed in mopac7 1.14-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #552799,
regarding Wrapper script contains wrong path './fortran/mopac7'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
reassign 553529 xscreensaver-data-extra
quit
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:05:10 +
> "Jose Luis Rivas" wrote:
>
>> Severity 553529 wishlist
>> Quit
>>
>> Haha. This is a problem between the chair and the keyboard, this is
>> not a RC bug. ;-)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 553529 xscreensaver-data-extra
Bug #553529 [xscreensaver] xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver should not be
enabled by default
Bug reassigned from package 'xscreensaver' to 'xscreensaver-data-extra'.
Bug No longer marked as found in ver
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 550440 1.6.0-12+etch2
Bug #550440 [advi] advi: CVE-2009-2295 arbitrary code execution
Bug #551282 [advi] advi: integer overflows in camlimages
There is no source info for the package 'advi' at version '1.6.0-12+etch2' with
architecture ''
U
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags #553562 + patch
Bug #553562 [powerman] powermanL file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile
/etc/powerman/apc.dev and 31 others
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags #553562 + patch
thanks
Hello,
here is a patch. If the files realy should not be conffiles, then they
should be moved.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#549723: fixed in xmlrpc-light 0.6.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #549723,
regarding xmlrpc-light: FTBFS: debian/rules:25:
/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
On 2009-10-31 Philippe Hupé wrote:
> Andreas Metzler a écrit :
>> [...]
>> not really. Did you have this behavior since you installed the hugin
>> package or was it triggered by upgrading something else?
[snip]
> Thank you for your reply.
> I have tried to remove ~/.hugin but the error still re
Quick update:
I'm preparing new upstream release which fixes this bug, but it will
take a little longer because I must assure compatibility with
python-launchpadlib. It also needs another Python module not available
in the archive yet. I plan to fix these issues during the next week.
--
.''`.
Hmmm,
In my system with an empty /etc/resolv.conf, the name resolving issue is
still not fixed with 2.10.1-3 (my other system with a non-empty
/etc/resolv.conf doesn't have any problems). I don't know what relevant
info to give about the system...
Regards,
--
Adwin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:06:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#548073: fixed in otrs2 2.3.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #548073,
regarding installation of otrs2 breaks apache configuration
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
i removed ~/.local/share/mime/mime.cache as said in [1] and it works for me now.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/163764/comments/21
I looked into my ~/.local/share/ and did not find a mime directory.
I had to remove the file /usr/local/share/mime/mime.cache
This solved t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 514015 -1
Bug#514015: cdebootstrap - packages with symlinks to dirs (libc6) can lead to
writes outside the new root
Bug 514015 cloned as bug 553599.
> reassign -1 multistrap
Bug #553599 [cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap - packages with symlinks
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:02:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553575: fixed in sgf2dg 4.026-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #553575,
regarding sgf2dg: missing-build-dependency-for-dh_-command
dh_installtex=tex-common
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-japanese: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The u
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-arabic: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The use
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-european: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The u
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-chinese: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The us
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-asian: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The use
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-japanese-big:
maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly postinst:23 than
using invoke-rc.d.
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-chinese-big: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. Th
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-phonetic: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The u
Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:45:01 +0100
with message-id <20091101104500.ga4...@resivo.wgnet.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#553549: lurker: dir-or-file-in-var-www
/var/www/lurker/imgs/a.png and 31 others
has caused the Debian Bug report #553549,
regarding lurker: dir-or-file-in-var-www /v
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
