Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing these two rc issues in netsurf.
Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
diff -Nru netsurf-2.9/debian/changelog netsurf-2.9/debian/changelog
--- netsurf-2.9/debian/changelog 2012-05-23 09:51:00.0 +
+++ netsurf-2.9/debian/changelog 2014-06-29
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:01:49PM -0400, GUO Yixuan wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 08:27:12PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:18:54 +
with message-id e1x18ry-0004ya...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#745534: fixed in netsurf 2.9-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #745534,
regarding Please migrate to lcms2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:18:54 +
with message-id e1x18ry-0004yg...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#747788: fixed in netsurf 2.9-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #747788,
regarding netsurf: FTBFS: error: openssl/ssl.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
tag -1 help
Bug #749410 [isc-dhcp-client] isc-dhcp-client: shutdown/reboot hangs after
K03rsyslog
Added tag(s) help.
--
749410: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749410
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
control: tag -1 help
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Can'r run /etc/init/umountnfs.sh cleanly at shutdown/reboot. I am using
sysvinit. Umounting nfs3 shares manually before shutdown/reboot runs smooth.
There is no networkmanager or alike running on my systems. The
Dear maintainer,
I have just pushed a NMU in DELAYED+2 fixing this. Let me know if I
should deferred it some more.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:51:58 +0200
with message-id
canqxmqgtva+cx1un_tzze6xczdtutjtmwq2vilghpgp953t...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Closing bug report
has caused the Debian Bug report #749937,
regarding gnuhealth: not installable in sid (needs migration to tryton-server
3.2)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 567210 - patch
Bug #567210 [libsaxonb-java] libsaxonb-java: doc-available always returns false
without network
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
567210:
Control: reassign 752610 lynx-cur 2.8.8dev.12-2
On 2014-06-27 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:05:41PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-26 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:58:04PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
indeed an
Processing control commands:
reassign 752610 lynx-cur 2.8.8dev.12-2
Bug #752610 [lynx-cur, libgnutls26] lynx: Can connect to CVE-2014-1959 test site
Bug reassigned from package 'lynx-cur, libgnutls26' to 'lynx-cur'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #752610 to the same values
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:12:49PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:23:11PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I intend to NMU gdbm to fix bugs #752465 and #752830. Please find the
proposed changes attached. Note that even after applying this patch,
gdbm is not binNMU-able,
Source: haskell-gnutls
Version: 0.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
While checking gnutls rdeps, submitting please switch to gnutls28-bugs I have
stumbled about the build error. haskell-gnutls FTBFS:
[...]
No uhc found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# correct CVE number in title
retitle 752610 lynx: Can connect to CVE-2014-0092 test site
Bug #752610 [lynx-cur] lynx: Can connect to CVE-2014-1959 test site
Changed Bug title to 'lynx: Can connect to CVE-2014-0092 test site' from 'lynx:
Can
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:49:38 +
with message-id e1x1bju-0005kx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#749487: fixed in ginkgocadx 3.6.1.1367.34+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #749487,
regarding ginkgocadx: Please update to use wxwidgets3.0
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# version tracking doesn't work very well for multiple packages
reassign 734865 libapache2-mpm-itk 2.4.7-1
Bug #734865 {Done: Stefan Fritsch s...@debian.org}
[apache2,libapache2-mpm-itk] libapache2-mpm-itk: fails to install: subprocess
Package: ifuse
Version: 1.1.2-0.1+b2
Followup-For: Bug #749661
Same here with iPhone 4 and iOS 7.1.1.
$ gdb --args ifuse ~/ifuse/
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.2 (Debian 7.6.2-1.1+b1)
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:03:43 +
with message-id e1x1ctb-0008sf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#748466: fixed in liblognorm 1.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #748466,
regarding Wrong dependencies, missing libjson-c-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:03:43 +
with message-id e1x1ctb-0008sl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#748467: fixed in liblognorm 1.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #748467,
regarding Broken pkg-config file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:19:45 +
with message-id e1x1d97-00048i...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#670681: fixed in postgrey 1.34-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #670681,
regarding postgrey: stop action of init script does not work
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: flickrbackup
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
flickrbackup does not work at all anymore after:
https://code.flickr.net/2014/04/30/flickr-api-going-ssl-only-on-june-
27th-2014/
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 745521 serious
Bug #745521 [geeqie] Please migrate to lcms2
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
745521:
Source: libvirt
Version: 1.2.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ametz...@debian.org
Usertags: gnutls3
Hello,
libvirt's build-dependencies are uninstallable on current sid:
-
The following packages have unmet
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:11:18AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
You did not present rationale to do extrastep with the second option.
There seems to be something more than ABI break.
librime 1.0 modified several struct
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:48:48 +
with message-id e1x1exi-su...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#748685: fixed in bibletime 2.9.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #748685,
regarding bibletime: FTBFS when rebuilt against libsword10
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + patch
Bug #752949 [xf86-video-glamo] xf86-video-glamo: FTBFS -
patches/ftbfs-gcc-4.7.diff isn't a valid patch
Added tag(s) patch.
--
752949: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752949
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 + patch
Attached is a possible fix for this bug. I would like to get
maintainer's feedback before uploading it because it is quite intrusive
for an NMU.
The patch changes upstream's mkesmtpdcert, which is used by the
currently failing maintainer script, to allow specification of
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + patch
Bug #749129 [courier-mta-ssl] courier-mta-ssl: fails to install
Added tag(s) patch.
--
749129: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear maintainer,
The patch in question can be fixed like this:
--- a/debian/patches/ftbfs-gcc-4.7.diff.orig
+++ b/debian/patches/ftbfs-gcc-4.7.diff
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
Description: Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.7
Index:
Package: postr
Version: 0.13-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
API went SSL only today:
https://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157645440333073/
My basic little patch seems to work for the handful of things I've
tried, but I've probably missed something.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 13:49:16 +
with message-id e1x1fto-0007en...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#753094: fixed in haskell-gnutls 0.1.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #753094,
regarding FTBFS: hlibrary.setup: Missing dependencies on foreign libraries:
Missing C
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear maintainer,
The patch in question is missing a line separator and can be fixed like
this:
--- a/debian/patches/fix-spelling-error-in-manpage.patch.orig
+++ b/debian/patches/fix-spelling-error-in-manpage.patch
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-Fix typo--- a/data/spice-vdagent.1.in
Processing control commands:
tags -1 patch
Bug #752953 [spice-vdagent] spice-vdagent: FTBFS -
fix-spelling-error-in-manpage.patch isn't a valid patch
Added tag(s) patch.
--
752953: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hello,
upstream does not intend to support wxWidgets anymore, he's already
working on a Qt-based port.
In the meanwhile, I'd be happy to remove the package from Jessie.
Cheers.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 719468 binutils-h8300-hms hms2.16.1-9
Bug #719468 [src:gcc-h8300-hms] gcc-h8300-hms: FTBFS: *** buffer overflow
detected ***: h8300-hitachi-coff-ar terminated
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-h8300-hms' to 'binutils-h8300-hms'.
No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 752988 + pending
Bug #752988 [mail-spf-perl] mail-spf-perl: FTBFS: Unknown error on DNS 'A'
lookup of 'example.com' (EDNSError)
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
752988:
tag 752988 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl package are
closed in revision fc6a4bafc7c5d0395f379977456d2c1a51e3af50 in branch
'master' by gregor herrmann
The full diff can be seen at
Package: u1db
Version: 13.10-2
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
Thanks a lot for fixing the pkg-config error. Yet during another rebuild in a
clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder and pbuilder) the build failed again, with
the following error.
[...]
-- Found PkgConfig: /usr/bin/pkg-config (found
Control: reassign -1 libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl
Control: retitle -1 libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl: broken with newer
Net::DNS
Control: tag -1 + upstream patch
Control: affects -1 mail-spf-perl
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:55:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Saturday, June 28,
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl
Bug #752988 [mail-spf-perl] mail-spf-perl: FTBFS: Unknown error on DNS 'A'
lookup of 'example.com' (EDNSError)
Bug reassigned from package 'mail-spf-perl' to
'libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl'.
No longer marked
Package: nkf
Version: 2.13-2
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...]
dpkg-source --before-build nkf-2.13
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:23:11PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I intend to NMU gdbm to fix bugs #752465 and #752830.
I retract my intent to NMU, because Anibal privately indicated that he
is not happy with the patch as is.
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Kelson,
On Fr 27 Jun 2014 10:13:53 CEST, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
On 27.06.2014 05:38, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Kelson it looks like the package we are depending on xulrunner-dev is
no longer provided, do you know which of above packages we can use?. I
think this also has to be taken care
Package: mutagen
Version: 1.23-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...]
TMid3v2 (21):E 20
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:11:18AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
You did not present rationale to do extrastep with the second option.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:36:35 +
with message-id e1x1h9f-0003lk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#752988: fixed in libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl
0.003-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #752988,
regarding libnet-dns-resolver-programmable-perl: broken with newer
Source: net-snmp
Version: 5.7.2.1~dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 (but not kfreebsd-i386) with the following
errors (see [LOG]):
libtool: compile: gcc -I../../include -I. -I../../agent -I../../agent/mibgroup
-I../../snmplib -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Hello,
I am packaging ACE+TAO 6.2.7, which should solve #746825
Packaging is done. Now I need to do some QA. There are hundreds of
lintian issues, some of them serious (e. g. a licensing problem with
OpenSSL).
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10
Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de writes:
Hi Kelson,
On Fr 27 Jun 2014 10:13:53 CEST, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
On 27.06.2014 05:38, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Kelson it looks like the package we are depending on xulrunner-dev is
no longer provided, do you know which of above
Hi,
Great, did you use the branch I created earlier this week?
Johnny
Op zondag 29 juni 2014 heeft Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org het
volgende geschreven:
Hello,
I am packaging ACE+TAO 6.2.7, which should solve #746825
Packaging is done. Now I need to do some QA. There are
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:30:52AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
For this, I think it's easier to add a Files-Excluded line to
debian/copyright
header, and let uscan do the repacking: [1]
Files-Excluded: thirdparty/bin/curl.exe
thirdparty/src/opencc-windows/opencc.dll
Package: mail-notification
Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-11
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...]
building program mail-notification
cc -o
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:57:46 +0100
with message-id 20140629165746.ga11...@l04.home
and subject line Fixed in binutils-h8300-hms 2.16.1-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #720001,
regarding brickos: FTBFS: *** buffer overflow detected ***:
/usr/bin/h8300-hms-ar terminated
to be
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:57:46 +0100
with message-id 20140629165746.ga11...@l04.home
and subject line Fixed in binutils-h8300-hms 2.16.1-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #719468,
regarding gcc-h8300-hms: FTBFS: *** buffer overflow detected ***:
h8300-hitachi-coff-ar terminated
to
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.24
Severity: serious
-- snip --
Unpacking lintian (2.5.24) over (2.5.21) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/lintian_2.5.24_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/lintian/overrides/lintian', which is also in
package
Source: weechat
Version: 0.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hello,
trying to rebuild weechat to check gnutls28 compatibility I have
stumbled over this build error:
---
Scanning dependencies of target
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:30:52AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
For this, I think it's easier to add a Files-Excluded line to
debian/copyright
header, and let uscan do the repacking: [1]
Files-Excluded:
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:33:43 +
with message-id e1x1iz1-00037s...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#753155: fixed in mail-notification 5.4.dfsg.1-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #753155,
regarding mail-notification: FTBFS - libbsd-compat no longer shipped by eglibc
to
Control: tags -1 + patch
This vulnerability appears to be very hard to fix and the buggy part
appears to be the Linux kernel. Currently vlock therefore is not part of
Debian jessie. Rather than releasing jessie without vlock, I am
proposing to reduce its functionality in a way the removes this
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + patch
Bug #702705 [vlock] vlock: sometimes does not exit therefore xautolock does not
lock screen again after idle time
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702705 to the same tags previously set
--
702705:
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 20:20 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Unpacking lintian (2.5.24) over (2.5.21) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/lintian_2.5.24_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/lintian/overrides/lintian', which is also in
package funny-manpages
retitle 753165 lintian needs Replaces: funny-manpages ( 1.3-5.1)
thanks
brownpaperbag
It is of course Replaces: not Provides:
/brownpaperbag
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:49:08 +
with message-id e1x1jdw-0004q7...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#752738: fixed in sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #752738,
regarding sikuli-ide throws java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError on start
to be
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:49:08 +
with message-id e1x1jdw-0004q1...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#750297: fixed in sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #750297,
regarding sikuli: FTBFS:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 753165 lintian needs Replaces: funny-manpages ( 1.3-5.1)
Bug #753165 [lintian] lintian needs Provides: funny-manpages ( 1.3-5.1)
Changed Bug title to 'lintian needs Replaces: funny-manpages ( 1.3-5.1)'
from 'lintian needs Provides:
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:03:54 +
with message-id e1x1jse-0006tw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#751044: fixed in packaging-tutorial 0.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #751044,
regarding packaging-tutorial: FTBFS - File `bxcjkjatype.sty' not found.
to be marked as
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:30:52AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
For this, I think it's easier to add a Files-Excluded line to
debian/copyright
Source: sagan
Version: 0.2.1.r1-1
Severity: serious
Due to the latest updates in liblognorm, sagan now FTBFS
configure:2701: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:2723: gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Hello,
No, I started from the 6.1.2 packaging. I didn't know you had started
work on a branch :-/ I'll check
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Johnny Willemsen jwillem...@remedy.nl wrote:
Hi,
Great, did you use the branch I created earlier this week?
Johnny
Op zondag 29 juni 2014 heeft Pau
Source: kvpm
Version: 0.8.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Unpack source
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20140618-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: cabal-debian
Version: 3.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: festvox-czech-machac
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: avian
Version: 0.7+20140401-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
gcc -m64
Source: necpp
Version: 1.5.0+cvs20101003-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: golang-go.tools
Version: 0.0~hg20131126-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: lmms
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3]: Entering
Source: kimwitu-doc
Version: 10a+1-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
!
Source: hfsutils
Version: 3.2.6-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Unpack source
Source: foremost
Version: 1.5.7-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Unpack source
Source: ncbi-blast+
Version: 2.2.29-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: basemap
Version: 1.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: flite
Version: 1.4-release-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: festvox-czech-krb
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
mkdir
Source: ruby-hdfeos5
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
fakeroot
Source: libkpeople
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2]:
Source: cardstories
Version: 1.0.6-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3]:
Source: r-bioc-cummerbund
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: geant321
Version: 1:3.21.14.dfsg-11
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: mesa-demos
Version: 8.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
gcc
Source: xine-lib-1.2
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]:
Source: acl2
Version: 6.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2]: Entering
Source: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.25+dfsg1-3.4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
gcc
Source: php-guzzle
Version: 3.9.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: php-texy
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]:
Source: mysql-5.5
Version: 5.5.37-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: sagan
Version: 0.2.1.r1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
---
Source: hol88
Version: 2.02.19940316-19
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
===
Source: gimp-dimage-color
Version: 1.1.0-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: libconfig-model-perl
Version: 2.058-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo