Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This doesn't affect building chromium but running chromium, so it affects
> the binary and not the source package
> affects 963035 - src:chromium + chromium
Bug #963035 [ffmpeg] ffmpeg: 4.3 breaks chromium
Removed indication that 963035
*Dear,I hope my email finds you in good health.Finally, i made it to
success with another partner after you couldn't complete the transaction
with me. But i did not forget your effort then, it was part of my success
still. So i left a bank cheque with the Catholic Reverend sister whom i
told you
*Dear,I hope my email finds you in good health.Finally, i made it to
success with another partner after you couldn't complete the transaction
with me. But i did not forget your effort then, it was part of my success
still. So i left a bank cheque with the Catholic Reverend sister whom i
told you
*Dear,I hope my email finds you in good health.Finally, i made it to
success with another partner after you couldn't complete the transaction
with me. But i did not forget your effort then, it was part of my success
still. So i left a bank cheque with the Catholic Reverend sister whom i
told you
*Dear,I hope my email finds you in good health.Finally, i made it to
success with another partner after you couldn't complete the transaction
with me. But i did not forget your effort then, it was part of my success
still. So i left a bank cheque with the Catholic Reverend sister whom i
told you
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932749: fixed in eclipselink 2.6.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932749,
regarding Debian packaging of EclipseLink is missing essential classes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #932749 [libeclipselink-java] Debian packaging of EclipseLink is missing
essential classes
Added tag(s) pending.
--
932749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:44:13PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 request-tracker4: FTBFS with newer libmojolicious-perl:
> t/web/ticket_owner.t
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:34:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 963387 https://rt.bestpractical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=36426
Bug #963387 [src:request-tracker4] request-tracker4: FTBFS with newer
libmojolicious-perl: t/web/ticket_owner.t
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #932749 in eclipselink reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:48:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938605: fixed in svgtune 0.3.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #938605,
regarding svgtune: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 request-tracker4: FTBFS with newer libmojolicious-perl:
> t/web/ticket_owner.t
Bug #963387 [src:request-tracker4] request-tracker4: FTBFS: CORE missing
dependencies: Plack::Handler::Starlet ...MISSING
Changed Bug title to 'request-tracker4: FTBFS with
Control: retitle -1 request-tracker4: FTBFS with newer libmojolicious-perl:
t/web/ticket_owner.t
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:34:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 963353 = src:mcl
Bug #963353 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [mcl]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Removed indication that 963353 affects src:mp3info, src:calc, src:ocp,
src:sendmail, src:apcupsd, src:glhack, src:slashem,
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2020 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> Hi,
>
> Il 20/06/20 19:01, Mike Gabriel ha scritto:
> > Thanks for patching libzypp. Your NMU is ok, I will include your
> > .debdiff on its VCS. In fact, I am considering orphaning libzypp and
> > zypper in Debian. Do you have interest
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 963349 - src:latex2rtf
Bug #963349 {Done: Michael Meskes } [libdap] bsdmainutils
must depend on bsdextrautils
Removed indication that 963349 affects src:latex2rtf
> affects 966353 - src:latex2rtf
Failed to mark 966353 as affecting
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:58:17 -0400
with message-id <20200622205817.ga811...@home.cnlawrence.com>
and subject line Ugh
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding latex2rtf: FTBFS: man: can't execute col: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 963414 = latex2rtf
Bug #963414 [bsdmainutils] latex2rtf: FTBFS: man: can't execute col: No such
file or directory
Removed indication that 963414 affects src:latex2rtf, src:hub, src:libstorj,
src:mcl, src:ocp, src:console-setup,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:18:59PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm going to upload man-db with a dependency on bsdextrautils |
> bsdmainutils (<< 12.1.1~) shortly. (There's been a bit of a delay
> because of some unrelated po4a-induced breakage that I had to stop and
> fix upstream first.)
Done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 963158 with 963414
Bug #963158 [src:re2c] re2c: CVE-2020-11958
963158 was blocked by: 963372 963327 963377 963376 963383 963448 963395 963349
963378 963361 963365 963359 963375 963355 963306 963451 963442 963414 963413
963403 963350
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:04:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963441: fixed in capstats 0.28-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #963441,
regarding capstats: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules
clean subprocess returned exit status 2
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:00:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941557: fixed in gri 2.12.26-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #941557,
regarding gri: texi file need @documentencoding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:00:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932949: fixed in gri 2.12.26-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #932949,
regarding gri build-depends on cruft package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:00:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941557: fixed in gri 2.12.26-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #941557,
regarding gri: texi file need @documentencoding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 963414 2.3.18-1
Bug #963414 [bsdmainutils] latex2rtf: FTBFS: man: can't execute col: No such
file or directory
There is no source info for the package 'bsdmainutils' at version '2.3.18-1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 963306 - src:latex2rtf
Bug #963306 [bsdmainutils] re2c: FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: expected
primary-expression before ‘;’ token
Bug #963327 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug #963350 [bsdmainutils]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 963414 latex2rtf: FTBFS: man: can't execute col: No such file or
> directory
Bug #963414 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Changed Bug title to 'latex2rtf: FTBFS: man: can't execute col: No such file or
directory'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 963414
Bug #963414 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Ignoring request to unmerge a bug which is not merged with any others.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
963414:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 963414
Bug #963414 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug #963306 [bsdmainutils] re2c: FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: expected
primary-expression before ‘;’ token
Bug #963327 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 963451
Bug #963451 {Done: Chris Lawrence } [bsdmainutils]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug #963306 {Done: Chris Lawrence } [bsdmainutils] re2c:
FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: expected primary-expression before ‘;’ token
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding re2c: FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: expected primary-expression
before ‘;’ token
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963414: fixed in latex2rtf 2.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963414,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:56:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/06/20 at 21:35 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > The reason for this move is moving from the old and heavily patched BSD
> > source to the more up-to-date GNU version.
>
> I did a partial archive rebuild reverting to the
On 22/06/20 at 21:35 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 20:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 19:46:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> >
> > > > Depending on bsdmainutils to get col et al seems entirely right,
> > > > it's
> > > > been right forever,
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:48:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963211: fixed in mailutils 1:3.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #963211,
regarding libmu-dbm6: Tries to overwrite `libmu_dbm.so.6.0.0` from
`libmailutils6`
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 963349
Bug #963349 {Done: Michael Meskes } [libdap] bsdmainutils
must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug 963349 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 963427
Bug #963427 {Done: Roland Rosenfeld } [ding] bsdmainutils
must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug 963427 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 963353
Bug #963353 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [mcl]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug 963353 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 963349 libdap
Bug #963349 {Done: Michael Meskes } [libldap] bsdmainutils
must depend on bsdextrautils
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap'
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap' to 'libdap'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 963349
Bug #963349 [libldap] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap'
Marked Bug as done
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 20:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 19:46:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> > > Depending on bsdmainutils to get col et al seems entirely right,
> > > it's
> > > been right forever, there doesn't seem to be a reason to break
> > > that
> > > both
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 963349 libldap
Bug #963349 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug reassigned from package 'bsdmainutils' to 'libldap'.
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap'
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap'
No longer marked as found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 963427 ding
Bug #963427 {Done: Roland Rosenfeld } [bsdmainutils]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug reassigned from package 'bsdmainutils' to 'ding'.
No longer marked as found in versions bsdmainutils/12.1.1.
No longer marked
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 963353 mcl
Bug #963353 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [bsdmainutils]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug reassigned from package 'bsdmainutils' to 'mcl'.
No longer marked as found in versions bsdmainutils/12.1.1.
No longer marked
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your fix.
Le 22/06/2020 à 09:02, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> As announced I've prepared an upload for libphp-phpmailer (versioned as
> 6.1.6-1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. If anybody objects against me
> adding myself as uploader, please tell me and I'll cancel the upload.
Em sáb., 20 de jun. de 2020 às 10:00, Adrian Bunk escreveu:
>
> There are plenty of packages in the archive whose build dependencies
> cannot be fulfilled on all release architectures.
>
> This is not a problem.
Ok, thanks Adrian. I fixed forensics-all, affected by this change.
Regards,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:35:22PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:11:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > # 'pod2text: unable to format
> > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/Carp.pm
> Interesting bug, and not found in cpantesters.
>
> I note that
Package: libphp-phpmailer
Version: 6.1.5-0.1
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
As announced I've prepared an upload for libphp-phpmailer (versioned as
6.1.6-1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. If anybody objects against me
adding myself as uploader, please tell me and I'll cancel the upload.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 19:46:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Depending on bsdmainutils to get col et al seems entirely right, it's
> > been right forever, there doesn't seem to be a reason to break that
> > both
> > for dependent packages and for end users. Especially not without
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 947551 with 963509
Bug #947551 [prospector] prospector: please, tighten the dependency of
prospector on python3-pep8-naming
947551 was not blocked by any bugs.
947551 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 947551: 963509
>
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:33:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962781: fixed in golang-github-containernetworking-plugins
0.8.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #962781,
regarding containernetworking-plugins: may need Breaks+Replaces: rkt (<< ???)
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:33:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963489: fixed in dgit 9.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #963489,
regarding dgit mirror ssh wrapper breaks due to rsync update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
control: affects 963497 certbot
thanks
Processing control commands:
> affects 963497 certbot
Bug #963497 [selinux-policy-default] selinux-policy-default: Let's Encrypt
certbot tools crashed into Segmentation fault with SELinux Enforcing mode
Added indication that 963497 affects certbot
--
963497:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 947551 grave
Bug #947551 [prospector] prospector: please, tighten the dependency of
prospector on python3-pep8-naming
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 963353
Bug #963353 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [bsdmainutils]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Ignoring request to unmerge a bug which is not merged with any others.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 963427
Bug #963427 {Done: Roland Rosenfeld } [bsdmainutils]
bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Ignoring request to unmerge a bug which is not merged with any others.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 963349
Bug #963349 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug #963306 [bsdmainutils] re2c: FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: expected
primary-expression before ‘;’ token
Bug #963327 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must
control: affects 963495 reportbug
thanks
Processing control commands:
> affects 963495 reportbug
Bug #963495 [selinux-policy-default] selinux-policy-default: reportbug
Segmentation faulted when Selinux is in Enforcing mode
Added indication that 963495 affects reportbug
--
963495:
Control: owner -1 !
Dear Debian PHP PEAR Maintainers,
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 21:23:30 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Source: libphp-phpmailer
> Version: 6.1.5-0.1
> Severity: grave
As it seems the team doesn't really care about libphp-phpmailer a lot, I
intend to work on fixing this issue
Processing control commands:
> owner -1 !
Bug #962827 [src:libphp-phpmailer] libphp-phpmailer: CVE-2020-13625
Owner recorded as Paul Gevers .
--
962827: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962827
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Quoting Giovanni Mascellani (2020-06-22 18:40:50)
> Bitcoin is FTBFSing again because of a missing dependency on
> bsdextrautils (from which hexdump is used). Therefore I am uploading
> another NMU fixing this. I am not delaying it, since I had no objections
> on the first NMU and I believe this
> Depending on bsdmainutils to get col et al seems entirely right, it's
> been right forever, there doesn't seem to be a reason to break that
> both
> for dependent packages and for end users. Especially not without
> notice.
There is no point arguing against your "do not change anything"
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:haskell-http-conduit
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:18:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963285: fixed in libfreehand 0.1.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #963285,
regarding libfreehand: FTBFS: libfreehand_utils.cpp:166:5: error: expected ‘;’
before ‘unsigned’
to be marked as done.
This
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 19:04:49 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > I think it's probably best at this point to have bsdmainutils depend
> > on
> > bsdextrautils. That gets rid of the breakage in the place where it
> > originated, and doesn't leave things without a transition path.
>
> I beg to
On 2020-06-21 17:11 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:13:41PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Source: xterm
>> Version: 356-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
>> Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
> I think it's probably best at this point to have bsdmainutils depend
> on
> bsdextrautils. That gets rid of the breakage in the place where it
> originated, and doesn't leave things without a transition path.
I beg to disagree, there is a transition plan, namely depending on the
right package.
> I don't know what Julien had in mind, presumably worried about other
> breakage to surface. Note that obvious fix to man-db will all
> debhelper
> using packages transitively build-depending on bsdextrautils.
Instead of bsdmainutils, yes.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 963158 with 963327
Bug #963158 [src:re2c] re2c: CVE-2020-11958
963158 was not blocked by any bugs.
963158 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 963158: 963350, 963403, 963413, 963414, 963442,
963306, 963451, 963375, 963355,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 13:37:56 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Michael Meskes writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:37 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> >> Michael Meskes writes:
> >>
> >> > > IMO the move of col needs to be rolled back ASAP. And, if it is
> >> > > to
> >> >
> >> > Why? Care
Bitcoin is FTBFSing again because of a missing dependency on
bsdextrautils (from which hexdump is used). Therefore I am uploading
another NMU fixing this. I am not delaying it, since I had no objections
on the first NMU and I believe this one to be uncontroversial.
Giovanni.
--
Giovanni
Michael Meskes writes:
> On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:37 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> Michael Meskes writes:
>>
>> > > IMO the move of col needs to be rolled back ASAP. And, if it is
>> > > to
>> >
>> > Why? Care to give a reason?
>> >
>>
>> The change broke man-db, as I explained in a
Hi,
Il 20/06/20 19:01, Mike Gabriel ha scritto:
> Thanks for patching libzypp. Your NMU is ok, I will include your
> .debdiff on its VCS. In fact, I am considering orphaning libzypp and
> zypper in Debian. Do you have interest in taking over?
Ugh, I just realized I stupidly embedded the amd64
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #963211 [libmu-dbm6] libmu-dbm6: Tries to overwrite `libmu_dbm.so.6.0.0`
from `libmailutils6`
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
963211: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963211
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:49:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963481: fixed in spdlog 1:1.5.0+ds-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #963481,
regarding FTBFS: Missing symbols on buster-backports/amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi Emmanuel,
Le 22/06/2020 à 16:30, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:57:15AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>> I would be happy to help on artemis. Obviously I will need
>> a more experienced developer helping me. :)
>
> I'll try hard to answer any question
Source: haskell-wl-pprint-terminfo
Version: 3.7.1.4-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package seems to be unmaintained (last upstream upload in 2016).
It depends on the (broken) haskell-wl-pprint-extras, is not part of
Stackage and has no rev dependencies.
I intend
Source: haskell-wl-pprint-extras
Version: 3.5.0.5-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package seems to be unmaintained (last upstream upload in 2015).
Does not build with GHC 8.8 and is not part of Stackage.
Its only rev-dep (haskell-wl-pprint-terminfo) is also
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:36:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949196: fixed in libzypp 17.7.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949196,
regarding libzypp: FTBFS: cmake can't locate LibSolv
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
