Note that a binNMU of vlc has been done but builds failed everywhere.
This most likely means that vlc will be uninstallable in sid until a
source upload is done, but the maintainer appears to be missing lately
(not sure). In the meantime sid's vlc could still be useful on Etch
where it seems
Hi,
could you please check whether the problem persists after a package
lists update (aka apt-get update). If this is the case, please paste the
output of the following command:
# LANG=C apt-cache policy bluez-utils; LANG=C apt-cache policy libdbus-1-2;
It may also be interesting to have the
Could you please check whether the workaroud mentionned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/09/msg00827.html helps.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 315881 moreinfo
severity 315881 normal
thanks
As was said, this won't be caused by freeciv. Try reproducing this with
a non-tainted kernel, and ideally with a stock sarge kernel or one from
etch/sid.
Also, as you mentioned HDD oddities, do check your drive, and if you
can't find anything
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: serious
The header of the security page explains Debian's consideration of
security issues and mentions an average security issues response time
under 48 hours.
I am certainly not the first person to notice this, but I have seen
nothing about this issue since
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit :
I don't know what that data comes from, but I did produce some statistics a
while back:
http://www.debian.org/News/2004/20040406
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2001/12/msg00257.html
I guess that whomever disagrees with the current claim should
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:03:13PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Javier,
I'd like to be sure about which claim you refer to. The current claim is
the one that says that Debian *does* issue fixes for most problems under
48 hours, right? I'm
Christopher, this was reported against 3.3.
I can confirm at first try.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
0.57.6's i386 build was uploaded by the maintainer and depends on a GTK
version greater than sid's (libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0)). The sparc build
has libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.6.0) so this seems to be due to a bad build
Hi Frank,
Gustavo fixed this in 1.8.10, The changelog reads
- relicensed to GPL, some other translations still missing
after all of them are updated, this will close bug 280673.
From what I see, everything in Sarge is at 1.8.10.3-1 (quite astonishing!)
So, I believe this bug can be closed.
--
This bug is tagged both experimental and fixed-in-experimental. Should
we understand that it's fixed in the only release it affects?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've seen swf-player break poorly related software already, like making
gqview segfault at startup in some occasions.
The responsibility of the crash (in that example) can be discussed, but
swf-player is definitely very broken (I didn't even care to report the
gqview segfault). Since sqf-player
severity 324153 important
severity 323970 important
severity 325102 important
merge 325102 323970 324153 307833
merge 322408 317964
thanks
Please check the bugs already opened before submitting one,
*particularly* when opening a grave one. You can use reportbug(1) to
help you submit bug
Although I have no difficulty to believe that the bug report is valid, AFAIK
Alvaro (who committed these files) himself doesn't remember where/who these
icons are from. I would be interested to know what evidence you have that the
icons are based on Microsoft's.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Friday 10 November 2006 05:54, Goneri Le Bouder wrote:
Le 10/11/2006, Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit:
Although I have no difficulty to believe that the bug report is valid,
AFAIK Alvaro (who committed these files) himself doesn't remember
where/who these icons are from. I
reassign 397879 kdesdk
severity 397879 grave
thanks
This bug should be fixed now, as long as the next kdesdk upload removes
svn-clean. However, with the conflict added I suppose that kdesdk will become
uninstallable in unstable due to its dependency on both kdesdk-scripts and
Would you be willing to help do this, find replacement icons, etc.? The
rest of the team is pretty much swamped right now, so help would be
much appreciated, especially with the Etch freeze coming. I have
kde-svn access, so I can ensure that good fixes make 3.5.5.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Hi Andreas,
I am unable to reproduce on my Etch box. Please justify grave severity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tested with your sources.list but I can't reproduce. Could this be
amd64-specific? Does Michael Ablassmeier use an amd64? Is anyone able to
reproduce this on i386?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Justin,
it could be helpful if you'd provide an example of this bug.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Subject: Re: aMSN licensing check - ctadverts.tcl
Date: Thursday 30 November 2006 13:54
From: Álvaro J. Iradier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
that file can be safely removed (and so I did in the latest
subversion), as it's unused.
So I'd suggest you just remove
Thank you. I can reproduce your problem with your file.
Unless just waiting for the user to call dpkg-reconfigure ddclient is
considered as asking, ddclient seems to violate the requirement These
scripts [...]
must not overwrite or otherwise mangle the user's configuration without asking
Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.1
This bug still applies in 0.95+dfsg2-0.1. The difference is that the
problematic file is now provided by the Debian-specific diff rather than the
original tarball.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
I'm unable to reproduce this with a single test on an Etch box. I'm
downgrading to important, although serious might be appropriate if this
is reproducible. Please attach the original sources.list and the broken one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security, upstream
Justification: user security hole
An upstream vulnerability rated as critical by upstream (bug #6213) was
fixed in 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5, which was uploaded with urgency high. I'm
opening this bug to track this
Steve Langasek a écrit :
Then you should also mark it as *closed* in -5, otherwise you're
*complicating* the transition to testing.
Hi Steve,
you're right. The mail you just sent should do that for me. Thanks.
P.S. : If your mail implies there's a way to mark a bug as fixed at the
same
(Javier, I am CC:ing you to ping you for the last time, hoping you are
still alive and could provide some input on this issue.)
After seeing this bug stalling for monthes, I have looked at www.d.o's
CVS and tracked these statements back to the initial revision of
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 360131 + gslice
thanks
Hi,
somebody came asking today on #debian whether a bug they experienced was
the same as this one. I had never used granule, so couldn't really say,
but noticed reading the report that this is quite certainly an impact of
the recent glib
Package: openjade1.3
Version: 1.3.2-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Both openjade1.3 and openjade segfault when called with the example
usage in Using OpenJade from the documentation index. The first
openjade command I tried segfaulted, and I didn't find any command that
Hi, could you please check this against #340066.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386
Version: 1.0.8178+2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
This package Build-Deps on nvidia-kernel-source, which was removed from
testing.
This only affects testing, but makes this package RC-buggy in all
releases together with #362424
Package: nvidia-modules-i386
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
This package Build-Deps on nvidia-kernel-source, which was removed from
testing. This only affects testing.
If #355117 was not enough to remove this package, here is another
reason. There is apparently no
Hi,
could you tell us a bit about the reproducability conditions? Are you
able to reproduce this if you create a new user on the affected system
and try starting kmail with that user, or only 1 user is affected?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
severity 364626 minor
thanks
Hi,
I'm downgrading this to minor. I don't believe there is data loss, as
you should be able to copy-paste what you entered from the shell.
In any case, note that despite the very relative severity descriptions
we use, severities over important mean that the
Hi Christophe,
I don't think I can help with this, but I'd be interested to know:
* whether the problem affects all users of the affected system
* whether downgrading to the previous vlc version fixes the problem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.37-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Several binary packages built from sqlrelay such as libdbd-sqlrelay-perl
are currently uninstallable in unstable on most arches due to a
dependency on sqlrelay (= 1:0.37-1), including i386. This problem
Just in case the maintainers didn't find the cause yet, this looks like
a result of #365085, given that sqlite3 Build-Deps on cdbs, the moment
the last upload happened, and that this bug doesn't exist in stable. The
only other easy verification I didn't do is to check whether 3.3.5-0.1
was
sqlrelay now misses a dependency on libsqlrelay-0.37 (I don't know why).
However, even installing it won't fix this bug, since libsqlrelay-0.37
is unusable. I just upgraded #360272 to grave to reflect this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
reopen 365547
reassign 365547 manpages-dev
thanks
This bug moved to Etch.
manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc ( 2.3.6-8)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jim and Vladimir,
Jurij Smakov wrote a patch for this issue and built packages, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2006/05/msg00051.html
Please confirm that this fixes your problem, then these reports can be
merged.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:56:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This bug moved to Etch.
manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc ( 2.3.6-8)
You mean Replaces.
Yes, sorry. I didn't know before you made me investigate this that a
Replaces
Hi,
I'm unable to reproduce this on a i386 Etch. The versions of kooka and
its direct dependencies are identical to yours, except for libc6
2.3.6-7, which unlikely explains the difference.
Could you help doing a preliminary triaging to see if this needs
immediate investigation? Does this
retitle 368556 crashes with SIGABRT on startup with a certain configuration
severity 368556 important
thanks
Thanks for the additional information. I'm downgrading to important
since this doesn't seem to affect several machines. If other people
experience this bug, please report.
Alberto, is
Hi, is it possible to confirm that this is a 1.5 regression, and that
the issue didn't exist in 1.4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show spca5xx-modules-2.6-k7|grep Maintainer
Maintainer: Debian spca5xx Maintainers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show spca5xx-modules-2.6.15-1-k7|grep Maintainer
Maintainer: Debian spca5xx Maintainers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
notfound 352074 5.8.7-10
thanks
Sune Vuorela confirmed experiencing this with 5.8.8-1, not 5.8.7-10.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Assuming you mean 3.1.2-1, could you indicate the command which
generates that output?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 352243 Uninstallable on i386/FTBFS elsewhere: depends on
experimental libsysfs
found 352243 1.1-1
notfound 352243 1.1.1-1
thanks
Santiago, I guess Martin was asking to address 347634 in experimental
until libsysfs2 itself enters unstable :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
The generation of ambiguous puzzles is a known bug. None of the authors
has the time to do anything about it at this time.
OK, well, at least that simplifies determining this bug's severity.
However, I would argue that the poster overestimates the seriousness of
it.
1. Nowhere I can
Hi,
thanks for fixing this, but did somebody investigate why kernel 2.4
dealt so badly with this segfault, and whether 3.1r2's 2.4 kernels have
this fixed? That issue is largely more worrying to me than the previous
xdialog's SEGV on 2.6 :/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Justin Pryzby a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:32AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
thanks for fixing this, but did somebody investigate why kernel 2.4
dealt so badly with this segfault, and whether 3.1r2's 2.4 kernels have
this fixed? That issue is largely more worrying to me
Package: nvidia-glx
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
I don't see how nvidia-glx could be usable without xserver-xorg.
nvidia-glx currently depends on xserver-common and libx11-6, but I don't
think this is enough.
For example, fglrx-driver depends on xserver-xorg.
One problem this
I forgot to say something about forcing nvidia-graphics-driver 8178 in
testing. If this is the RMs' choice, please also consider forcing
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy at the same time. 8178 supports less
cards than 7174 and the legacy package addresses that issue.
Package: python-twisted-conch
Version: 1:0.6.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.9
python-twisted-conch installs a /usr/bin/cftp - cftp2.3 symlink and a
/usr/share/man/man1/cftp.1.gz - cftp2.3.1.gz symlink as a manpage to
cftp. The second symlink directly conflicts with the manpage from
severity 352560 important
thanks
I've just upgraded both of my Etch boxes and tested amarok. I have
opened #353082 about a crash when trying to switch to xine/esd, but this
crash doesn't keep amarok from starting with a working backend after. I
have not seen important problems during the
clone 317435 -1
retitle 317435 FTBFS: needs a versioned dependency on gcc-3.3
severity 317435 serious
retitle -1 Multiple security holes (no security update since 20050118)
severity -1 critical
tags -1 - patch
tags -1 + security
thanks
Just to clarify the situation a bit and make sure this is on
Package: nvidia-modules-i386
Version: 1.0.7174+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The NVIDIA graphics drivers prebuilt modules for kernel 2.4 are built
from version 1.0.7174, while 1.0.8178 X libs are in Etch. The purpose of these
packages is to provide
Package: aptconf
Version: 0.8-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This report should normally be sent as 2 important bug reports, but these
add up to make aptconf unusable, and I don't see any fixes other than removal
coming, so I'm opening a single grave bug.
aptconf's
Paul Johnson a écrit :
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 14:14, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
note that there is not much that can be done about this without a
backtrace.
Might as well close it...I can't reproduce it anymore now.
Does this mean you're letting the decision to close
Package: kmerlin
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't connect to MSN with my account, [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
nickname Test. My sister couldn't when I asked her to test her
account. I couldn't connect either on my other sarge machine. This
machine was
I have no clue what's the problem, but could you tell whether this is an
IRC or Yahoo issue? Could you run gaim with -d?
Can you reproduce with a fresh profile?
If not, can you make a new profile that will keep gaim from starting? If
not, this bug shouldn't be grave.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
OK...thanks for your reply. So there are 2 projects named KMerlin on SF.
The good one is http://sourceforge.net/projects/kmerlin/
The homepage of this project points to http://www.olsd.de/portal which
is also a 404. If upstream's bug tracker is at SF, there are 2 bugs, the
last one is over a
I tested this but was unable to reproduce. In case I'd misunderstand the
problem you describe, could you provide a reproduction procedure?
Does this bug happen for more than 1 user on the affected system?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I don't want hal depending on acpid. I will patch the hal acpi addon
to not
directly use the proc interface iff /usr/sbin/acpid exists.
The hal ACPI addon already won't directly use the proc interface iff
/usr/sbin/acpid exists and acpid is started. The other case is
/usr/sbin/acpid exists
Package: nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
Version: 1.0.7174-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The prebuilt modules packages are uninstallable since Linux 2.6.15 is no longer
in testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
reopen 380520
severity 380520 normal
thanks
[Sorry for the delay, had to learn a bit what's a socket before replying]
Sjoerd Simons a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:34:10PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I don't want hal depending on acpid. I will patch the hal acpi addon
Package: app-install-data
Version: 0.1.32.0debian
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Icons such as /usr/share/app-install/icons/ realplayer-icon.xpm and
AdobeReader.png are unlikely modifiable, and therefore fail the DFSG. Of
course, it would be easier to tell if there was a copyright
Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
[...]
On that basis, this is just a quick ping to confirm that these bugs will not
be actioned until mozilla has actually been removed.
If it's not obvious that the blocking is the other way around, see what
happened in testing.
Sorry, I'm confused
Package: awstats
Version: 6.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
/usr/share/awstats/icon/browser/firefox.png is Mozilla Firefox's
official logo, which is not modifiable. I don't know if just including
that icon can be a trademark violation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: bbclone
Version: 0.4.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
bbclone's copyright file indicates that the package is under the GPL,
but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included.
Additionnally, bbclone is in main and the Firefox icon is not
modifiable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: rest2web-doc
Version: 0.5.0~beta~svn-r210-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
rest2web-doc's copyright file indicates that the package's content is by
default under the BSD, but a non-BSD Firefox icon is included in
/usr/share/doc/rest2web/html/images/firefox.gif.
Package: gdesklets-data
Version: 0.35.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
gdesklets-data's copyright file indicates that the package is under the
GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/gnomebar/gfx/firefox.png.
Additionally, gdesklets-data is in
Package: fvwm-crystal
Version: 3.0.3-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
fvwm-crystal's copyright file indicates that the package is under the
GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/fvwm-crystal/fvwm-crystal/fvwm/icons/Default/22x22/apps/firefox.png
(and others).
Package: gnome-themes-extras
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
gnome-themes-extras's copyright file indicates that the package is under
the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/icons/Nuvola/scalable/apps/firefox.svg. Additionally,
Package: sisu
Version: 0.37.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
sisu's copyright file states that the package's content is by default
under the GPL 2, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/sisu/image/firefox.png. Additionally, sisu is in main but the
Firefox icon is
Package: kde-icons-crystalclear
Version: 0.0.20050623-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
kde-icons-crystalclear's copyright file indicates that the package is
under the LGPL, but a non-LGPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/icons/crystalclear/48x48/apps/firefox.png (and others).
severity 389885 important
retitle 389885 simple install tries to malloc abusively large memory (2 GB)
thanks
Justification: renders package unusable
While this bug may render dpkg unusable on your system, it doesn't make
the package unusable, so I'm downgrading the bug to important.
--
To
Given that you found this is due to ColorZilla, and assuming that this plugin
isn't in Debian, do you see any reason to not close this report?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
notfound 375088 2.6.16-15
close 375088 2.6.17-1
thanks
There is no version 2.6.16-15 of linux-2.6, but rather a version 2.6.16-15 of
linux-2.6.16. I guess the changelog was a bit quiet about that so I got
confused, sorry.
This is not really a bug in either linux-2.6 or linux-2.6.16, but more
reassign 375549 python-twisted
close 375549 2.4.0-1
thanks
Welcome to unstable.
This is not a bug in apt-proxy, but in python-twisted which is currently
uninstallable in sid. This should be fixed next dinstall.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
reassign 369517 linux-2.6,linux-2.6.16
thanks
It might be similarly useful to know whether this affects 2.6.16-15.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which xine Output plugin do you use?
Do these crashes reproduce with a newly created user on the system?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure this wouldn't be due to python-twisted being uninstallable on
your system?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 376290 linux-2.6
reassign 376305 linux-2.6
forcemerge 368544 376290
forcemerge 368544 376305
found 368544 2.6.17-2
thanks
I reported this error already in experimental for package
linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686, (Bug#368937) but somehow it made its way to
the current package in
Le juillet 4, 2006 05:00 AM, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Gordon Haverland:
Bug marked as not found in version 1.9.33-0.1.0. Request was from
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full text and rfc822 format available.
I am seeing this as well, and I have 1.9.33-0.1
found 359065 2.1
thanks
According to the behavior of my main Etch box, adept 2.1 will hit this bug
unless unstable's debtags is installed. A dependency on it is missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 377508 libwine
forcemerge 332580 377508
thanks
Mmm, this bug is a duplicate of #332580.
Merging then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tikiwiki
Version: 1.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
lib/graph2/ARIALDB.TTF contains a font named Houndtime. This file is
binary-identical to the Houndtim.ttf file contained in the zip archive
at http://moorstation.org/typoasis/designers/gort/fonts/houndtme.zip
The
As I assumed that no one would care to open a separate grave bug about
www-mysql being uninstallable in unstable, I've upgraded this directly
related bug to grave. Of course, the proper severity for this bug
would be serious.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Michael, this bug report is pretty long, and opened at critical severity
against a required package since many monthes, and has also reached
testing by error. Would you please send an update summarizing what you
think should be done before closing this bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
reopen 339085
close 339085
thanks
Michael Stone a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:20:49PM -0400, you wrote:
Michael, this bug report is pretty long, and opened at critical
severity against a required package since many monthes, and has also
reached testing by error. Would you please send
severity 379563 normal
thanks
Having an associated manual page is a should directive, not a must.
Downgrading to the proper severity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
this was tagged pending already some time ago, and fixed since, but only
in experimental.
Is a fix for testing expected soon?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ido (whatever that means),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ido
please be correct. The report was missing an experimental tag.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
The experimental tag is not more needed than the sid tag would have been
if this bug would have been against unstable.
severity 381572 important
thanks
If I understand correctly, this bug only applies to m68k, non-release
architecture, so I'm downgrading to important.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which versions of libcairo2 and libfreetype6 do you use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't reproduce this. What evidence do you have that the package is
unusable?
kontact is crashing on startup. Attached is the backtrace.
Is there anything else, like console output, that could be useful?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Justification: renders package unusable
xchat 2.6.4-2 starts fine for me without at-spi installed. What evidence
do you have that the package is unusable?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mozilla-locale-fr
Severity: serious
mozilla-locale-fr depends on mozilla-browser, which is scheduled to be
removed from Etch. You should most likely request removal from
ftp-master.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: mozilla-locale-hu
Severity: serious
mozilla-locale-hu depends on mozilla-browser, which is scheduled to be
removed from Etch. You should most likely request removal from
ftp-master.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
