# actually I disagree with that but the handling for this should be consistent
# and the netbase maintainer handled the other bugs the same way
block 560238 by 562954
# merge, 560142 has important, so downgrading this, too
severity 562954 important
forcemerge 560142 562954
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Dec
clone 558240 -1
severity -1 important
reassign -1 libmysqlcppconn4,libmysqlcppconn-stlport4
found -1 1.1.0~r786-2
retitle -1 missing visibility markup makes OOo unable to catch exception ->
crash
block 558240 by -1
tag -1 + pending
tag 558240 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:27:49PM +1
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:19:17PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote:
> Sorry, just to be clear: I did already have the package libmysqlclient16
> installed. The error goes away only after installing package
>
> libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.41-3)
Ah, I see. Upstream strikes again by looking for .so
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:14:05PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote:
> The file is in the package
> libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.41-3)
> which I did not have installed and was not a dependency (I suppose it
> shouldn't be, being a -dev).
Yeah, as said in the other mail upstrema has the habit of relyin
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:23:38PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:29:03 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > > diff -u /tmp/muttprint =muttprint
> > > --- /tmp/muttprint 2010-06-15 14:42:37.711037595 +0200
> > > +++ /usr/bin/muttprint 2010-06-15 14:42:44.591037171
tag 551543 + pending
severity 551543 important
thanks
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:29:03PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft [2010.06.15.1443 +0200]:
> > diff -u /tmp/muttprint =muttprint
> > --- /tmp/muttprint 2010-06-15 14:42:37.711037595 +0200
> > +++ /usr/bin/mut
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 09:07:39PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> However, libtextcat source package also generates libtextcat-data-utf8 and
> if libtextcat0 can depend on libtextcat-data-utf8, this problem will be
> solved.
> I'm not sure, but can we set it libtextcat0's dependency as belo
tag 607390 - patch
thanks
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:17:59PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Here's a proposed patch (2nd), discard previous one.
As said in my first reply, no, wrong.
> And this would fix Bug#607517 as well.
True, but that's the only thing it does, it doesn't fix anything from
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:42:22PM +0100, Sebastian Steinhuber wrote:
> Package: pinot
> Version: all
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I am not pinots maintainer (but OOos/LibOs), but this is nonsense.
> it depends on libtextcat-data, which conflicts with libreoffice an
severity 607390 important
merge 593897 607390
thanks
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 01:17:39AM +0200, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals wrote:
> I'd like to use libtextcat0 in an application I'm developing, but I
> can't seem to install it without removing OpenOffice.org since the
> later depends on libtex
Package: libneon27-gnutls
Version: 0.29.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
$ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libneon27-gnutls.shlibs
libneon-gnutls 27 libneon27-gnutls \
(>= 0.29.3-3)
which reaks dpkg-shlibdeps (sorry, german):
dpkg-shlibdeps: Warnung: Abhängigkeit libneon27-gnutls \ kann nicht ausgewerte
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libneon27-gnutls.shlibs
> libneon-gnutls 27 libneon27-gnutls \
> (>= 0.29.3-3)
>
> which reaks dpkg-shlibdeps (sorry, german):
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: Warnung: Abhängigkeit libne
found 607873 1:3.0.1-3
retitle 607873 FTBFS: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing
Suggests field" when more, different libdb-dev existing.
thanks
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:42:31PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Source: openoffice.org
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Po
tag 607873 + pending
thanks
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> ... and the above works unless someone has such a broken mix (what has
> "stable"
> to do here?!) which results in two different libdb-devs pointing to different
> lidbX.Ys on his
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:06:36PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I don't see how my system is broken and/or misconfigured. At the end
> of the email, you seem to imply that the "broken, misconfigured" part
> is that I'm mixing stable and testing/unstable. My understanding is
No, I am imp
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> When libreoffice-gcj is installed, but the version of the
> Java-RTE-like interface of gcj (package gcj-jre or java-gcj-compat)
> that is installed is not the right one, and LibreOffice is configured
> to use gcj, LibreOffice abo
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-gcj
> Version: 1:3.3.0~rc2-3
> Severity: serious
Oh, and you really think this is a basis to block LibreOffice from entering
Debian testing unless forced in? (BTW, openoffice.org-gcj has the exact same
probl
severity 584322 important
tag 584322 + unreproducible
tag 584322 + moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:23:40AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-writer
> Version: 1:3.2.0-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
That means 3.2.0-9 from testing works?. (That's what those infos sa
Package: libgcj-bc
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: serious
I was just testing OpenOffice.org 1:3.2.1-1 (built on uptodate sid):
r...@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/openoffice.org$ sudo dpkg -i
openoffice.org-gcj_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
Selecting previously deselected package openoffice.org-gcj.
(Reading database .
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> So the .shlibs adds a dependency on a non-existing version and thus
> makes built -gcj packages uninstallable.
Thankfully any upload of gcc-defaults would most probably automagically
fix this, but I'd still prefe
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:02:25PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
>I have reassigned this bug to hunspell based on the discussion I have just
>had with Ari Pollak on IRC.
Aha. And what was this discussion about? Can you please mention it here
and why you and/or Ari think it's a hunspell b
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:23:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:02:25PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> >I have reassigned this bug to hunspell based on the discussion I have
> > just
> >had with Ari Pollak on IRC.
>
> Aha. A
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
>1245.24 ari: OK. It seems that's not a bug in
>pidgin-facebookchat. See the
>comments in the bug report. Any idea to which package I should reassign
>it?
>1259.08 iulian: the problem is in hunspel
>1336.
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
>1259.08 iulian: the problem is in hunspell
>1336.54 ari: Alright... how did you find out?
>1344.18 iulian: [2]google.com/codesearch.. maybe you should ask him
>to get a backtrace
OK, ari probably means google.co
[ please ALWAYS CC the bug so that stuff is recorded in the BTS ]
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> >>1259.08 iulian: the problem is in hunspel
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> >> Rene Engelhard writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> >> >>1259.08
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> I have now installed hunspell-hu (and removed automatically myspell-hu).
> I run 'gdb pidgin' command and wait until my HDD stop and Pidgins window
> never come visible. At that moment I hit Ctrl-C and get BackTrace:
So you have ex
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> >> I have now installed hunspell-hu (and removed automatically myspell-hu).
> >> I run 'gdb pidgin'
,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:02:14AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
> > >> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > >>
> > >> > On
severity 585979 wishlist
tag 585979 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:34:37PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-thesaurus-fr
> Version: 3.2.0~rc2-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
And why on earth is this a grave bug? Correct, it is not.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:35:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Just because I built it in my normal sid chroot, which already
> has 4.0 stuff installed. sigh.
>
> Will rebuild tonight.
Fixed in 1:3.6.5~rc2-1+b1.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:29:37AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> ...
> and the last lines repeat ad infinitum (or at least until the log occupies
> several gigabytes, which is when I noticed this happening and stopped the
> build process).
When I applied the patch from #594036 and built it
reassign 595881 xulrunner-dev
found 595881 1.9.1.11-2
tag 595881 + squeeze
retitle 595881 Package 'Mozilla Plug-In API' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but
version of NSPR is 4.8.4
thanks
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:37:42AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1:3.2.1-6
> Sev
Package: apt-rpm
Version: 0.5.15lorg3.2-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
[...]
checking for pkg-config... no
checking for LIBXML2... configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be
found or is to old. Make sure it
is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full
path to pkg-con
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:39:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hmm. Interesting. It works in my "normal" sid, but neither in a i386 chroot
> nor
> in a amd64 one (I get warnings about dbus and kded though).
And the 3.3 which worked in my "normal" sid does
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:48:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Othewise: simply no idea, and as long as it doesn't happen on "normal"
> systems (asked SuSE to try it too
> and it worked for them too) I would just tag this + unreproducible...
That said I got this whe
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:58:46AM +0200, rpnpif wrote:
> Open
> http://media.eduscol.education.fr/file/seminaire_STI2D/56/7/STI2D_BacSTI2D_157567.odp
> Export in PDF/A-1a.
> The message "export to PDF" is displaying in status bar and OOo freezes with
> an high
> CPU activity.
> After some m
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:19:07AM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Package: src:libreoffice
> Version: 3.3.0~beta2-2
> Severity: serious
Strictly speaking, no. (LibreOffice never built on armel yet)
Anyways... ;)
> Your package FTBFS on armel
[...]
> patch -p1 <
> /build/buildd-libre
severity 601741 important
thanks
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:27:10AM +0100, Alain Rpnpif wrote:
> Le 31 octobre 2010, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> > Does that happen with all documents? (I doubt that), because I would
> > not want to handle this as a grave bug (and thuis eve
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:54:33PM +0100, Nicolas DEGAND wrote:
> I forgot to mention that this is a regression from OpenOffice.org 3.2.1
It can't be a regression. There was no LibreOffice 3.2.1.
OpenOffice.org is an other product.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GN
severity 603402 important
forwarded 603402 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31606
tag 603402 + upstream
thanks
[ please format your mail sanely, especially wrap your lines sanely after
72 chars to that it can be quoted sanely. Yes, that's your job, not
the MUAs ]
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13,
tag 603538 + moreinfo
severity 603538 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:52:27AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-core
> Version: 1:3.2.1-8
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Wrong. It's an install failure, so it's serious per definition (s
reassign 603538 ure
retitle 603538 OOo binfilter registration failure with LibreOffice 3.3 ure
tag 603538 - moreinfo
tag 603538 + confirmed
tag 603538 + wontfix
severity 603538 important
severity 603549 important
merge 603538 603549
thanks
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Rene Engelhard
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:02:17AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> >And the obvious notice: In -8 nothing in that place changed.
> >
> >>ii ttf-opensymbol 2:2.3.9+LibO3.3.0~beta2-2 OpenSymbol TrueType font
> >>ii ure1.7.0+LibO3.3.0~beta2-2 LibreOffice UNO runtime
> >>environmen
>
severity 604128 important
reassign 604128 perl
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 03:27:44PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from library name
> > `libvclplug_genl3.so'
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from librar
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 07:50:19PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tags 551543 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for muttprint (versioned as 0.73-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
No problem with t
found 677146 1:3.4.6-2
thanks
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:01:20PM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Package: python-uno
> Version: 1:3.5.3-5
> Severity: serious
It would have been nice if you could have marked it sanely so that it would
not block this with other RC and security fixes from migrating:
found 677146 1:3.5.4-3
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It would have been nice if you could have marked it sanely so that it would
> not block this with other RC and security fixes from migrating:
Ah, nevermind, 3.5.3-5 is an "branch&
>wheezy dist-upgrade issue
tag 677146 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > This file seems to come from the libreoffice-core pacakge. According
>
> No, it comes from -common.
[...]
> Seriously I'd like to avoid this.
Because:
-common: unopkg (calls unop
tag 678532 + moreinfo
tag 678532 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:57:07PM +0800, clayton wrote:
> Now running the latest version from unstable.
What did you run before? 1:3.5.4-4?
> This happens every time on startup:
>
> $ libreoffice
> terminate called after throwing an
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 08:51:36AM +0800, Clayton wrote:
> > What did you run before? 1:3.5.4-4?
>
> Not sure right off-hand, I normally follow testing, and upgrade a
> couple times a week. So it would have been a really fresh version in
> testing, as of yesterday.
Hrm, OK. 3.5.4-4 migrated
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:29:56PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is missing a Breaks
> or Conflicts relation with libgraphite2-2.0.0.
No, IMHO it isn't. Read the policy 7.6 again.[1]
Replaces: is fully correct for replacing files in older
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 06:59:15PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:29:56PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is missing a Breaks
> >> or Conflicts relation with libgraphite2-2.0.0.
> >
> > No, IMHO it isn't. Re
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 06:59:15PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> 0m46.5s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
> >> /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.2.0.0
> >
> > Then that's a bug in the checking. Of course the new package replaces
> > the old file with a symlink.
>
> Th
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 06:05:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> And libgraphite2-3 Provides: libgraphite-2.0.0, so a Breaks:/Conflicts: would
> need to be versioned, given the whole point of this symlink and the Provides:
> is
> to save a tansition for a library which didn't
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:10:09PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-10-06 19:44, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I added a Breaks: libgraphite2-2.0.0 and get this:
> >
> > rene@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/graphite2$ sudo dpkg -i
> > libgraphite2-3_1.2.0-2_amd64.deb
>
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:23:32PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> But crippled A without B still fulfills the dependencies of the
> rdepends. But they don't work. A is now RC because of B.
But either you have the real A or the (crippled) A with B where B
the fullfills the dependency and con
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:23:32PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-10-06 19:17, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> after
> install A
> install B
> remove B
>
> >> That package is now non-functional, so we *need* a Breaks or similar.
> >
> > The
reopen 689813
tag 689813 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 07:45:49PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Closing... It's a non-bug.
sigh. it's probably easier to just do it and not argue more. I
still don't buy the reasons. And if people do broken things...
Regar
tag 690066 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:07:41PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-writer
> Version: 1:3.5.4+dfsg-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
oh, no. And that for that docx
"Thankfully" we had #620137 once and so this
tag 690066 - confirmed
tag 690066 - moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Have some example file? I thankfully don't have docx'es here...
Hrm. Obvuiously I missed the attachment.
And yes, it even happens with 3.7 git master from
forwarded 690066 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55820
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> And yes, it even happens with 3.7 git master from some days
> ago (20120927) :/
Filed upstream: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:38:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> severity 679717 serious
To explain this a bit:
This is because it violates policy. It even can be argued to be
grave or critical, since due to unopkgs side-effects this can
(and will in some circumstances!) cause LO to not st
ripts
+(closes: #679717)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:53:57 +0200
+
accessodf (0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst
--- accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst 2012-04-10 00:36:53.0
severity 691937 wishlist
tag 691937 + wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:07:08AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The main archive area
[...]
>
> Note: This is not RC bug for wheezy per release policy
> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt
Ah, and neverth
dreas Beckmann
+(closes: #679717)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:32:50 +0100
+
accessodf (0.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst
--- accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst 2012-10-23 19:48:18.0
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:36:54PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> You closed the bug, and it appears closed only in experimental. If I
I closed it versioned with an upload because the call to unopkg is gone in
experimental.
> understood your mails correctly you state that bug is not-exi
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:17:17PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> I can reproduce with libreoffice 1:3.5.4+dfsg-2 on amd64.
Oh, seriously? ;)
(Note it was filed against *exact that* version and I even saw it
myself and tagged it confirmed.)
This doesn't change the fact that this bug is forw
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:18:06PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Just looking at the libreoffice-core.preinst, I was wondering why it
> needs a pre-depends on ure?
Probably some old upgrade bugfix and we inherited that from the OOo
packages:
$ apt-cache show libreoffice-core | grep Pre-
Pre-
tag 693626 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:46:21AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> A smaller testcase without requiring installing all of GNOME:
>
> debootstrap squeeze /squeeze
> mount -o bind /sys/ /squeeze/sys/
> mount -o bind /dev /squeeze/dev
> mount -t proc none /squee
tag 693626 - unreproducible
tag 693626 + pending
thanks
Hi again,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:36:33AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I just tried this (ok, -jdk instead of -jre because I thinko'ed
> but that shouldn't matter..) and:
Apparently it *does* matter
tag 695025 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +0800, Michael Tsang wrote:
> I have found Libreoffice consistently crashing on my machine, with makes all
> the new documents lost. My system is a fully updated wheezy system, with KDE
> desktop. After I create a new document, u
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 11:11:16PM +0800, Michael Tsang wrote:
> I have libreoffice-kde installed. I use the oxygen theme.
OK. Did you try to use the LO dialogs instead of the KDE ones?
(see Tools->Options->General)?
I didn't ask this just for fun, please answer. Because here (though under
G
reassign 695025 libreoffice-kde
thanks
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:59:17AM +0800, Michael Tsang wrote:
> It crashes with KDE open/save box but not the LibreOffice box when I press
> ctrl-
> s. Moreover, it mean the same document.
Ok, thanks. So we can at least reassign this to the correct package
severity 620422 important
severity 695025 important
retitle 695025 libreoffice-kde: crashes when saving a new document with ctrl-s
when scim enabled
thanks
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:59:25PM +0800, Michael Tsang wrote:
> I am going to clarify the situation again:
again?
This is the first real c
close 620137 1:3.3.0-1
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:03:30AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Just to post this information, I tried opening, saving and reopening the
> document "bug-test.docx" provided by the original bug reporter above,
> and the problem does not seem to occur in libreoffi
forwarded 576665 t...@openoffice.org
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Since 1:3.2.0-5 OOo crashes when opening a presentation document. I tried
> several
> of my documents but it happens with all of them, nevertheless I don't know
> whether
tag 576665 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ disclaimer, didn't try yet ]
Happens here, too with the test doc...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:24:36PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >$ apt-cache show libmodern-perl
> >Package: libmodern-perl
> >(snip)
> >Homepage: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Modern-Perl/
>
> and
>
> >$ apt-cache show libmodern-perl-perl
> >Package: libmodern-perl-perl
> >(snip)
> >Homepag
reassign 578251 openoffice.org-core
retitle 578251 depends on non-existant yet (OOo 3.2.1) ure version
close 578251
thanks
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 02:50:39AM -0700, Jonathan A. wrote:
> Package: ure
> Version: 1.6.0
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
Wrong.
>
Package: gcj-4.4-jdk
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
Seen this on the s390 build of openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-9
(https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.org&arch=s390&ver=1%3A3.2.0-9&stamp=1272919681&file=log&as=raw):
[...]
AOT_MAKEFLAGS=-j1 aot-compile -L /usr/lib/gcj/openo
Hi,
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:07:10PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Seen this on the s390 build of openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-9
> (https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.org&arch=s390&ver=1%3A3.2.0-9&stamp=1272919681&file=log&as=raw):
>
> [...]
>
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tag 580148 + moreinfo
> thanks
Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently
running testbuild for an other thing is over.
> according to
> http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=li
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tag 580148 + moreinfo
> > thanks
>
> Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently
> running testbu
severity 580148 serious
thanks
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:45:25PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > tag 580148 + morein
retitle 580148 gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
thanks
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:53:16PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> I do not have access to those boxes, but IMHO gcj does not find
> libgcj.spec because gcj from gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-1 looks for
> /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4.4/libgcj
Package: libgcj-bc
Version: 4.4.5-7
Severity: serious
(sid)root@frodo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libgcj-bc
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed,
tag 624997 - wheezy
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: writerperfect
> Version: 0.8.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
No. gcc 4.6 is not in wheezy. If you find gcc 4.6 FTBFSes please take
care on where and when this stuff actually takes place
tag 625118 - wheezy
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:39:42PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: wps2odt
> Version: 0.2.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
No. gcc 4.6 is not in wheezy. If you find gcc 4.6 FTBFSes please take
care on where and when this stuff actually takes place.
Grü
tag 616011 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:58:49PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
> Trying to export a document to a MediaWiki server results in an error:
> The MediaWiki export filter cannot be found. Choose 'Tools-XML Filter
> Settings'
> to install the filter, or use the setup to
tag 616011 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:25:58PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
> Also note that for raising that error, you don't need to connect to
> any mediawiki server.
> Simply selecting "Send/To MediaWiki..." will raise the error.
Mmh, OK.
Then it's unreproducible he
Hi again,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > ii openjdk-6-jre [java5-runtim 6b18-1.8.5-1 OpenJDK Java runtime, using
> > Hotspo
> > ii sun-java6-jre [java5-runtim 6.24-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime
> > Environment (
>
> Just out
tag 616093 + unreproducible
tag 616093 + moreinfo
severity 616093 grave
thanks
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:3.3.1-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Bullshit. Read the bug severities again. If
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:04:17AM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
> As soon as I get back to work (on Thursday), I'll try the obvious i.e.
> reinstall the package and make sure libreoffice is restarted.
> (I doubt the latter is the issue as the command appeared in the menu
> (Send/To MediaWiki...)
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:55:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > on the file open dialog libre office get stuck and the whole system gets
> > frozen
> > no user interaction is possible any more
> > mous is moving but every otner action is no more possible
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:48:48PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
> It's a possibility; I can not rule that out.
> If I understand correctly, doing a reinstall on all installed
> libreoffice packages should fix things?
I don't know. Worth a try, though.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
> I opened a terminal with the syslog open and than started libreoffice
> and i didn't see anything abnormal there.
Of course not, LibO doesn't write to syslog, neither does X.
> Is there a log to post?
A log for a GUI app?
>
Hi again,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:47:48PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
> > I opened a terminal with the syslog open and than started libreoffice
> > and i didn't see anything abnormal there.
>
> O
severity 616093 important
reassign 616093 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau,linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64
affects 616093 libreoffice
thanks
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
> on my system this bug is reproducable.
>
> How can i provide further information.
He wrote me a pri
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:26:25PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
> However, doing things this way, libreoffice-wiki-publisher got
> installed before python-uno and thus I don't see it getting registered
> (missing predepend there?).
A Java thing doesn't need the python API bindings.
(And no, th
901 - 1000 of 1322 matches
Mail list logo
