Package: pdudaemon
Version: 0.0.8.58.g597052b-1
Severity: serious
Attempting to use pdudaemon without python3-aiohttp installed results in
a traceback:
# pdudaemon
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/pdudaemon", line 33, in
sys.exit(load_entry_point('pdudaemon==0.1',
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:14:44PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> BURP wrong zlib version check in the failing test - this could be NMUed
> DOLFIN has a single test failure, that is odd and unrelated as well - this
> could be NMUed
For non-technical reasons I can't do these NMUs myself if they're
clone 1059165 -1
reassign -1 nodejs
retitle -1 autopkgtest failures on i386
found -1 18.19.0+dfsg-6
block 1059165 by -1
kthxbye
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:15:31PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and
> unstable for more than 30
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 09:00:09PM +0200, vollan...@gmail.com wrote:
> There is no licence on this code, it is juste free!!
If that's the goal they should have a clear statement that they're in
the public domain, without an explicit license grant of some kind the
default is that things are
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:54:13PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 11.07.22 um 18:40 schrieb Mark Brown:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:16:31PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > > I have uploaded zlib 1.2.12.dfsg-0.1 with the changes attached to
> > > DELAYE
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:16:31PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> I have uploaded zlib 1.2.12.dfsg-0.1 with the changes attached to DELAYED/3.
Why? Please drop this.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:50:51PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Here is a preliminary debdiff to address this.
Thanks, that's roughly what I uploaded - it looks like your mail
raced with my own update.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:51:43PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> In order have some activity on this bug and to avoid autoremoval of
> dependencies, this is a reminder of outstanding things to do ...
Please don't send content free pings, they just add noise and make it
likely that it's going
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> are you already working on an update of mm and zlib? Or do you need some
> help?
They're utterly trivial, I'll get round to them at some point when I do
a batch run through all my packages. It'd be more effort to integrate
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:38:48PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Source: xemacs21-packages
> Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.2-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch buster bullseye sid
...
> The file
> xemacs-packages/jde/java/src/jde/debugger/expr/LValue.java
> incorporates a non-free license, stating
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 02:22:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/xemacs-packages/edit-utils'
Not sure how these are generated but there's over 1000 lines of
log here, most of it irrelevant. This makes it hard to both find
the
te: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 11:04:27 -0500
> > From: Rob Browning
> > Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Given new policy and emacsXY unversioning drop shared
> > dirs
> > To: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
> > Cc: Mark Brown
> >
> > ---
> > debian/00debian.el | 7
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 03:01:23PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> hi,
>
> It is a feature you need to depends on extra package
It would have been rather more helpful if you were to mention which
package this is. It would also have been helpful to have made some
effort to communicate this
clone 897551 -1
reassign -1 imagemagick
retitle -1 imagemagic: Errors converting SVG to PNG causing build failures
thanks
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:55:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>'
> > convert -geometry $(basename $(dirname $(dirname
> >
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:27:03PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 28/03/18 02:56, Mark Brown wrote:
> > bugs are useful for keeping it out of releases.
> I emailed the BTS with the diff on Thursday last week. The BTS says it
> forwarded the email to you:
> https://bugs.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:51:30PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* debian/patches:
> - Add patch to fix FTBFS with GCC 7. (Closes: #853714)
> - Add patch to fix FTBFS on architectures with strict alignment
>requirements. (Closes: #836021)
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:15:51AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> multiarch is not yet ready; you can't build it on the buildds, you can't
> depend
> on foreign architectures on the buildds. If you want to spend some time
> working
> on this, it would be appreciated, but until then I think
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 05.12.2016 18:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> > As we have been discussing it is still not clear to me if I should fix
> > or remove the multilib packages since it is still not clear to me that
> > there is a sensi
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:24:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 05.12.2016 18:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I am suggesting that since nothing except for the multlib D runtime
> > packages needs a multilib zlib and there seems to be a very limited use
> > case for them it
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:40:29PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 05.12.2016 11:29, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:31:59PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> it's available in the GCC packages for a while now.
> > Sure, but there's a bunch more stuff n
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:31:59PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 30.11.2016 13:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Well, there's a bunch of questions there - people seem generally
> > negative on x32 and the use cases for multilib with tooling for early
> > boot and so on don't
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:00:48PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 28.11.2016 19:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Which apparently changed at some point in the toolchain, probably quite
> > some time ago, but fort
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 06:39:22PM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote:
> It seems to me that Mark is saying that this is not even supposed to
> work with lib32z1-dev installed, but rather you should have
> zlib1g-dev:i386 installed (and not doing so is user error).
Right, that's now the expected way for
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 26.11.2016 20:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:52:26PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 26.11.2016 19:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 03:56:21
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:52:26PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 26.11.2016 19:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Please allow at least a little time for a response, I've no real idea
> > what you're even asking
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:06:29AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 23, Mark Brown <broo...@debian.org> wrote:
> > I'd have expected to at least have seen something going round saying
> > that the transition was mostly complete and that there were only a few
> >
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:18:54AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 23, Mark Brown <broo...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Which was uploaded yesterday without warning which isn't exactly
> > helpful, there's not even been a proposal from anyone working on this
> > for how
severity 812532 serious
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:36:18AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Control: severity -1 grave
Please don't play severity games, it's not at all helpful.
> On Jan 24, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > which have the same name of file installed by the hostname
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 21/10/16 at 16:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Bug #837712 [src:xemacs21] xemacs21: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
> > > Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> > I've still not s
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:08:47PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Bug #837712 [src:xemacs21] xemacs21: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
> Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
I've still not seen any usable reproduction instructions.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 09:30:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
FFS, why did this suddenly break and if it's due to the perl include
transition why did it not get reported in the mass bug filing for this?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:47:36PM -0800, Nye Liu wrote:
> > It should eventually figure things out?
> No, but I have a patch for nis script, attached...
I can't tell what this patch is supposed to do, sorry.
> --- dist/nis2016-01-20 16:18:24.171239577 -0800
> +++ nis 2016-01-22
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2016-02-17 17:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Right, but I do think AICCU can deal better with this situation. Not
> > dealing with it makes system integration much harder as there are a
> > range of op
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:03:22PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2016-02-17 13:47, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Let me try to provide that... We now no longer have the problems in the
> > original report with the boot hanging but we still don't have AICCU
> > coming up rel
Hi,
There's a bug open in Debian about AICCU not starting when used with
systemd (though it's most likely not that specifically). One of the
last things in the bug log is:
| Actually, a concise problem statement would be a good thing to have, as
| it seems completely lost in the bug report.
reassign 812371 rpcbind
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:03:00PM -0800, Nye Liu wrote:
> Package: nis
> Version: 3.17-34
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> For some reason, even though $portmap is mentioned in /etc/init.d/nis as a
> start prereq, ypbind is started BEFORE
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:59:42PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I believe the attached patch will solve this issue.
The packaging is being redone with separate packages matching the
upstream release. Since there seems to be quite a bit of latency
through new at the minute I'm currently
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:31:55PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Any progress of this bug?
> It blocks some packages in to build for mips64el port.
I'm part way through upgrading to the latest upstream version.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
clone 799326 -1
reassign minizip -1
kthxbye
Assigining a copy to minizip which is the package containing minizip in
current distributions, not deleting context as a result.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:27:36PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Package: zlib-bin
> Version: 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
> Severity:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
In what way does it change the semantics - this seems like a very
surprising and
tag 778180 - patch
kthxbye
--- xemacs21-21.4.22.orig/configure.in
+++ xemacs21-21.4.22/configure.in
@@ -1941,6 +1941,8 @@ if test $cflags_specified = no; then
CFLAGS=-g -O3 -Wall -Wno-switch -Winline -Wmissing-prototypes
dnl Yuck, bad compares have been worth at least 3 crashes!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:33:36AM -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Mark Brown broo...@debian.org [2015-08-13 12:51]:
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
In what way does it change
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:39:09AM -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
I agree that it would be better to make the change in the packaging,
rather than in configure.in. If you've already done this, would you
mind submitting a patch?
Who would I submit a patch for the packaging to?!
signature.asc
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:09:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
unarchive 775733
Bug #775733 {Done: Mark Brown broo...@debian.org}
[src:xemacs21,xemacs21-gnome-mule,xemacs21-gnome-nomule,xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn]
xemacs21-gnome-*: hangs during upgrade from squeeze - wheezy
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:56:03PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2015-06-06 09:59, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2015-04-27 14:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2015-04-26 10:43, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#775733: xemacs21-gnome-*: hangs during upgrade from squeeze - wheezy -
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 01:20:37PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
xemacs21-support needs to ship the empty directory /usr/lib/xemacs-21.4.22
Ship, don't mkdir!
This is what the circular dependency was for wasn't it (dpkg didn't used
to cope I believe)?
Again, *please* provide reproduction
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:58:01PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:18:44 -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
Actually having opened the logs I'm not seeing the command lines, the
logs appear to start with displaying output from the commend.
And the output shows the used command
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:41:56AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2015-03-17 11:21, Mark Brown wrote:
OK, thanks for the command lines. How about the analysis for the patch?
I'm not keen on just applying random changes without understanding.
Actually having opened the logs I'm
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:56:34AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package:
src:xemacs21,xemacs21-gnome-mule,xemacs21-gnome-nomule,xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn
Followup-For: Bug #775733
Attached are two new piuparts logs:
* failure due to deadlock and timeout
* success after patching
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 04:27:48PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I can deterministically reproduce this bug in piuparts, haven't tried
other means to get it reproduced.
Please check the bug log for details and a patch.
https://bugs.debian.org/775733
I can't see instructions for reproducing
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:31:19AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 11:39 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
Neither of these appears to have disrupted the
boot partition though so I'm not sure what's been doing that :/ .
Does dpkg-reconfigure grub-efi-amd64 or apt-get install
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:25:52AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 14:21 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
This sounds, if I'm interpreting the paths correctly, like it relates
somehow to the stuff Steve was doing in #708430, in as much as it sounds
like your system is one which would
Package: grub-efi-amd64-bin
Version: 2.02~beta2-20
Severity: critical
On a couple of occasions recently my system has been updated to remove
boot/bootx86.efi from the EFI boot partition, and on a new install on a
separate machine this file was not installed at all. Instead
debian/grubx86.efi was
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +, Steven Capper wrote:
we have had no discussion
over #773359; your response is effectively placing words in my mouth
and I will not tolerate that. To confound matters, I wasn't even
severity 721737 normal
kthxbye
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:18:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Not being able to change the password is a security problem. Raising severity
to grave.
Please don't inflate severities pointlessly; there are simple solutions
to this like changing passwords
tag 768669 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:17:54AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
# bind (error-data)
retitle 763566 horst: Build dep on sparse which has not yet moved from non-free
block 763566 524319
kthxbye
Horst has a build dependency on sparse which is currently in non-free so
creating a RC bug in horst until it is moved to contrib. However sparse
has been relicensed under a MIT license so
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.3-2
Severity: serious
The staging driver r8723au is enabled in the kernel but there appear to
be very good reasons why it's in staging - when it loads it routinely
locks up my system (hard with no output unfortunately). It seems to
make sense to disable the
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'm filing this as a serious bug to make sure it's tracked, either by
kicad maintainers or by zlib maintainers (in x-debbugs-cc). Looking at
kicad's BTS page, it looks like there might have been some lack of
coordination, but
reassign 747719 mkvtoolnix
found 747719 6.9.1-1
severity 747719 serious
kthxbye
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 03:46:08PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org writes:
Control: affects 747719 mkvtoolnix
severity 747719 normal
I must disagree with this severity
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:41:38AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
This bug is still present in the current version of xemacs21 in the
archives, therefore re-opening.
You've reopened several bugs, have you verified all of them are actually
present?
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:10:30PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
In particular, xemacs21 still hasn't properly made the libpng
transition, the piuparts bug which showed xemacs21-nomule removing
files which belong to xemacs21-support is still present and several
other issues in the
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
I guess you might be thinking of stuff like the patch system which is
definitely annoying but isn't really a control file thing?
Oh, actually I did fix the patch system but left the build dep hanging.
Ho hum.
signature.asc
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:25:30PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 04/08/2014 02:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Could you be more specific as to what you believe the issues in the
control file are? Is it just the hard coded architectures thing, that's
the only reported issue
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:40:54PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
To fix this, you need to add a dummy empty prerm script like this:
#/bin/sh
set -e
# dummy empty prerm to ensure clean upgrades from wheezy, see #xx
# this file can be reoved after jessie was released
Package: pulseaudio
Version: 1.1-3.2
Severity: serious
Attempting to upgrade PulseAudio I get:
(Reading database ... 323691 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace pulseaudio 1.1-3.2 (using .../pulseaudio_2.0-3_amd64.deb)
...
/etc/init.d/pulseaudio: 23: .: Can't open
reassign 681747 systemd
kthxbye
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:02:51AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Attempting to upgrade PulseAudio I get:
(Reading database ... 323691 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace pulseaudio 1.1-3.2 (using
.../pulseaudio_2.0-3_amd64.deb
I think if it's just a case of adding extra include paths that ought to
be trivial to fix... generally all these issues have been pretty basic
and easy to update for.
(notice how the total lack of context makes it harder to understand the
mail?)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
reassign 678511 libc6-dev
kthxbye
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:12:25PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Your package FTBFS on s390x. s390x is now a release architecture [1], hence
the
RC status.
Please make *some* effort to read the buildd logs when reporting bugs
like this.
If you'd looked
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 12:22:39AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 7 de mar?? de 2012 21:40, Mark Brown broo...@debian.org ha escrit:
Where is that?
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/x86info/
Is there anywhere one can actually download the source of the package,
perhaps even somewhere which
Where is that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
gcc -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wshadow -Wextra -Wmissing-declarations
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wredundant-decls -c -o mtrr.o mtrr.c
mtrr.c:11:22: fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
tag 662658 - wheezy
tag 662658 + help
kthxbye
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
gcc -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wshadow -Wextra -Wmissing-declarations
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wredundant-decls -c
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:09:27PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Assigning to zlib, maintainers of zlib, what is your plan here?
Should we patch xetex (and probably many other packages have to be
fixed, too), or do you intend to fix this misbehaviour?
I've no intention to diverge from
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:00:39AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 13 Feb 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
that the TeX upstream appears to have already changed their code for the
new zlib upstream it seems like they're not expecting any change in zlib
and will be updated to use the new
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:49:29AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 13 Feb 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
I was thinking for the case where someone upgrades zlib but for whatever
reason doesn't upgrade TeX at all - it's not exactly going to be common
but it's simple enough to do.
Ok, yeah
Package: pcscd
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Attempting to configure pcscd fails for me with no useful diagnostic
output being produced:
| Setting up pcscd (1.8.1-1) ...
| dpkg: error processing pcscd (--configure):
| subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:21:04PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
What is the output of:
$ apt-cache policy systemd
and of:
$ systemctl status pcscd.socket
I'm not actually running systemd now, I just happen to have it
installed.
$ apt-cache policy systemd
systemd:
Installed: 37-1
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:56:54AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
/home/packages/tmp/u/tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/libtdf/abstract.pl
tld: Error: cannot open library file 'target_tok': No such file or directory
tld: Error: cannot open library file 'ansi': No such file or directory
make[1]: ***
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 07:00:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Hopefully the patch below is better? It's also available from
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/tendra.git which also has some
minor lintian fixes as separate commits.
Yes, that's a lot less hideous. I've actually got an
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 07:00:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Hopefully the patch below is better? It's also available from
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/tendra.git which also has some
minor lintian fixes as separate commits.
BTW, some things regarding the git tree:
- You need to
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:48:38PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Or, better, stop using dh_installmanpages. It's been deprecated for over
6 years for very good reasons.
It wasn't visibly deprecated immediately, I think the warnings have only
been on for this release or something.
See the
useful to look at the man page and figure out how to
tune it to make file happy as that's likely to involve figuring out the
ultimate bug with file.
In any case, I'll look at this tomorrow.
On 31 Dec 2010, at 17:36, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
tag 608179 patch
thanks
Mark Brown broo
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:31:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
tendra fails to build from source in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of
the build log:
It would be helpful to provide the full build log; in general when
reporting build issues you should always link to the full build log in
the
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:59:17PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Mark Brown broo...@debian.org, 2010-12-28, 15:25:
It would be helpful to provide the full build log
Attached.
Thanks. This looks like debhelper messed up and hasn't copied the man
page for the compiler in.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:56:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
forwarded 589896 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2124
forwarded 589896 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=4426
thanks
Thoughts from the ALSA/VoIP teams?
There are already bugs in
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:11:44PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
forwarded 589896 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2124
tags 589896 + patch
thanks
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 at 19:07:03 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I suggested removing the call to snd_dlobj_cache_cleanup();
On 17 Aug 2010, at 20:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I've talked with upstream on #gnash (irc.freenode.net), and they had a
look at URL: http://www.last.fm/user/broonie to try to reproduce
this. There is no media player on this page when upstream and me test
it. Do one need to log in to be
On 17 Aug 2010, at 20:48, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Mark Brown]
You may need to be logged in. Presumably any last.fm user account
will have a player, though in the considerable time between me
reporting this bug and now it appears that last.fm have changed
their player so perhaps other web
severity 589821 important
kthxbye
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:07:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Package: nis
Version: 3.17-17
Severity: critical
Please be realistic in the severity of your reports; this is a fairly
obscure use case (it's been present for something in the region of ten
Package: gnash
Version: 0.8.7-2
Severity: critical
With current versions of gnash there appears to be a very severe memory
leak when running with at least some sites (I believe including the
media player on last.fm user pages such as http://www.last.fm/user/broonie
which appears to leak at
severity 568518 important
kthxbye
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 01:51:18PM +0100,
thomas.lefringhau...@witte-automotive.de wrote:
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Please file bugs with realistic severities, inflating the severity is
unhelpful. In this case the problem only
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:45:27PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that
nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at
least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't
have two things claiming
reassign 565823 libxml2
kthxbye
On 19 Jan 2010, at 00:20, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Package: zlib1g
Version: 1:1.2.3.5.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: ABI break?
Hi,
context: kfreebsd-* experimental buildds were not properly configured
and pulled more stuff from
state
but none of them seem to have a summary of what the intention is - does
anyone have any information here?
Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org
doodle (U)
Mark Brown broo...@debian.org
nis
Tim Cutts t...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
am-utils
Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
unfs3
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:33:05AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If, in a clean minimal chroot, I install zlib1g from testing first, then
install man-db, it works fine.
My guess is that it is related to the fixing of #301283.
As far as I can tell zlib is performing correctly here, the man-db
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 06:41:16PM +0100, Joern Heissler wrote:
you can reproduce the problem with this little program, more or less copied
from man-db source.
That's one of the tests I used (plus using man-db itself).
Upgrading to zlib_1.2.3.4.dfsg-2 seems *NOT* to fix the problem.
Works
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 03:05:12PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
As far as I can tell zlib is performing correctly here, the man-db
process doing the decompression exits correctly having detected EOF and
closed the file, then exits. The read() that's spinning with zero bytes
is certainly
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 08:16:26PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
To show the severity of the issue, this is from my sparc box during a
regular upgrade (last one was 2 months ago):
9630 man 20 0 5448 1960 680 R 98.8 0.2 54:11.05 mandb
And no idea how much longer it's going to take.
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo