Bug#854727: Removal from stretch?

I was contacted by someone at SUSE that is working on fixing the security bugs - but even if successful, I don't know how good the quality will be or how much testing will be able to get done before stretch is released. Removal might be safest option

Bug#822709: cgminer now builds with gcc 6

Hi - I can't reproduce this anymore, and reproducible builds have been able to compile cgminer with the new gcc default: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/cgminer.html Maybe something changed somewhere else? Closing for now. Thanks

Bug#804531: eagle: cannot be rebuilt against libssl1.0.2

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebast...@breakpoint.cc> wrote: > On 2016-05-10 18:19:02 [-0400], Scott Howard wrote: >> I agree with this assessment. I'll raise the issue upstream. It's >> non-free, so not too high on my priority list (and not m

Bug#804531: eagle: cannot be rebuilt against libssl1.0.2

Thank you Sebastian, On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-04-22 00:19:58 [+0200], Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Since the only API/ABI difference between libssl1.0.0 and libssl1.0.2 is >> the removal of some symbols, you could try the

Bug#797165: freeimage: fixing CVE hints

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello - Freeimage > 1.5.4 (that is, the current sid version) requires OpenJPEG 2.1.0, which is not in Debian. I wasted some time trying to make freeimage 1.7 work with openjpeg 1.5, but it's taking a bit too much time. At this moment, the best

Bug#796902: python-scipy: FTBFS: dh: unable to load addon sphinxdoc

Fix appears to be in SVN http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules?view=revisionrevision=33993

Bug#791209: Patched muparser for gcc 5 transitio

tags 791209 patch user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791209 + transition block 791209 by 790756 reassign 791209 release.debian.org thanks Hello, Package renamed to libmuparser2v5. See patch:

Bug#790403: build still fails, bitcoin 0.10.2

reopen 790403 thanks Failed again, even with xvfb-run -a dh_auto_test I can't reproduce the build failure, so I'd appreciate any tips. I'll next try xvfb-run -a make check ~Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#767379: eagle: don't depend on libjpeg62 nor libpng anymore

severity 767379 serious thanks In testing/sid: eagle depends on libjpeg62-dev which is now a virtual package. Also, libpng-dev dependency can be dropped as well. In wheezy, the dependency on libjpeg62 was deprecated, so you're right - that warning/error doesn't matter for stable and the programs

Bug#767379: eagle: don't depend on libjpeg62 nor libpng anymore

fixed 767379 6.3.0-1 thanks Upon further investigation, eagle in unstable and testing does not depend on libjpeg62 nor libpng - this was fixed in 6.3.0-1. Also, the bug mentioned here appears to only occur if someone tries to install the wheezy eagle package on the jessie system system jessie

Bug#754682: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#754682: cgminer: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: expected '=', ',', '; ', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'transfer_callback'

Thanks, On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*: This is due to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749157 We can easily do a work around until the above patch is fixed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#718272: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#718272:

Thank you, Chris. I think you articulated the situation well and the options. On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Chris Bainbridge chris.bainbri...@gmail.com wrote: This is not necessary as the debian-installer already enables stable-updates by default. stable-updates is enabled by default, but

Bug#718272: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#718272:

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, Chris. I think you articulated the situation well and the options. one more thing: debian is discussion dropping libdb (the db the node, but not the wallet, uses). That might force our hand as well: either ship

Bug#718272: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#718272:

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Luke Dashjr l...@dashjr.org wrote: On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:53:57 PM Scott Howard wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, Chris. I think you articulated the situation well and the options. one more

Bug#718272: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#718272: Bug#718272: Bug#718272: Bitcoin still not ready for stable release in Debian

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote: Hi Scott, For your information I have a case that you might find interesting: Zabbix did not meet release criteria and was removed from testing just before release of Wheezy. Ever since yours truly was maintaining it

Bug#743299: arduino: block migration to testing, jssc/bossac/libastylej validation

Source: arduino Version: 1:1.5.6.2+dfsg2-1 Severity: serious block migration to testing. Need to have more testing on: jssc (new serial implementation) bossac (upload to avr32 devices) astyle/libastylej (autoformating of code) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#742418: astyle FTBFS on s390x: use -fPIC instead of -fpic when building shared libraries

Package: astyle Version: 2.03-1.1 Severity: serious build log: obj/astyle_main_sj.o: In function `Java_AStyleInterface_AStyleGetVersion': /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/gcc/../../src/astyle_main.cpp:3103:(.text+0x35c): relocation truncated to fit: R_390_GOT12 against symbol `astyle::g_version' defined in

Bug#742418: NMU for astyle FTBFS on s390x

tags 742418 patch pending thanks Hello all, See NMU at: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/astyle.git;a=commitdiff;h=40043eca6053949a6bfbfb98eb5fecb18988edef has been uploaded to DELAYED/0. Let me know if you need anything else. ~Scott

Bug#735847: closed by Scott Howard show...@debian.org (Bug#735847: fixed in freeimage 3.15.4-3)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: great, using system tiff is the best fix, thanks for going the extra mile! skimage now works again. great to hear - thanks for helping! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#735847: freeimage: builds wrong tiff, broken 32 bit

Thanks for the report, Checking over the package, I don't think it's a problem of not updating the patch. The previous version of the package and patches didn't touch anything related to TIFF and used freeimage's included libtiff. The current version also doesn't touches anything involving

Bug#735847: freeimage: builds wrong tiff, broken 32 bit

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: I disagree, all three issues found do seem like independent issues with little relation (on amd64 at least). Ok, so there are three bugs: 1) the exif tag truncation is very unlikely cause the complete data

Bug#718272: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#718272: Bitcoin still not ready for stable release in Debian

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote: I agree with Scott's assessment, although I would note that Debian *does* have a suite that addresses the needs of Bitcoin: stable-updates. Mandatory protocol rule changes would seem to fall within the broken by the flow of time

Bug#718272: Bitcoin still not ready for stable release in Debian

Below is my opinion, and is open for debate: Although there are mechanisms for supporting security updates in stable debian releases, and luke-jr's work of porting fixes is great and exactly what is needed, updates to network protocols would not classify as a security update and would only be

Bug#718272: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#718272: backport branches are available

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote: This isn't correct. We do support backported/stable versions in a separate git repository: https://gitorious.org/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable/ Debian is welcome to choose a branch and I will do what I can to ensure it

Bug#718454: thansk for arduino-mk NMU

Thanks for the NMU, I just got around to seeing it. Upstream was in the middle of a transition between lead developers and there has been significant changes to the code base. I'm going to upload a new version that will include some of your changes. Some, however, have been dropped (e.g.,

Bug#718272: upstream does not support stable releases (block migration to testing)

Source: bitcoin Severity: serious The bitcoin network requires on strict adherence to consensus between nodes. Small changes to underlying libraries, even justified security changes, threaten to break consensus and could possible cause accidental forks. For example, it is possible for bug fix in

Bug#707736: qtiplot no longer can edit columns with ne libmuparser

severity 707736 serious tags 707736 help thanks This is important enough to prevent migrating to testing. I'm really busy with grants for a few weeks, so if anyone wants to look at it I'd appreciate it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#708584: versioning system/package name allows for binary incompatible libraries

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote: Hi Scott, I have uploaded the 3.7.0-5 version into DELAYED/5 queue. Feel free to cancel/reschedule or just let me know, if you find some issues in this version. Best regards, Anton Looks good, I've been traveling so I

Bug#708584: versioning system/package name allows for binary incompatible libraries

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have done this upload, sorry if I broke something or offended somebody. I'm the one that should apologize, I saw that you did contact me on April 26, but I failed to respond. Ok, if you want, I will create

Bug#708584: versioning system/package name allows for binary incompatible libraries

Package: alglib Version: 3.7.0-1~exp1 Severity: serious the version of alglib is 3.7.0. Debian now is assigning a SONAME version of 3. This is incorrect as it implies all 3.x.x libraries are binary compatible, which they are not. Upstream changelog explicitly states that not binary 3.7.0 and

Bug#708240: qtiplot FTBFS with new minizip.c

The minizip.c that ships with the new version of zlib has changed significantly and is no longer compatible with what qtiplot uses. We can now just use minizip.c that comes with qtiplot (todo: include the license in debian/copyright, drop the build dependency on zlib, fix get-orig-source rule to

Bug#672524: bitcoin: FTBFS[any-i386]: testsuite errors

Somehow the path is getting botched in kfreebsd-i386: On amd64 [1] (and similarly on all other architectures except *i386) we pass -DTEST_DATA_DIR=/build/buildd-bitcoin_0.8.1-2-amd64-bLPEbz/bitcoin-0.8.1/src/test/data and the debug output says Trying to open

Bug#704719: FTBFS on visp

This post can help: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2012-01/008.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#703213: Manditory upgrade of bitcoin versions = 0.7.2

Source: bitcoin Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: serious From upstream: http://bitcoin.org/may15.html The most recent accidental fork is forcing an upgrade. We either should get bitcoin 0.8.1 in to unstable or add some wrapper to bitcoind and bitocin-qt to create a DB_CONFIG file. Summary below: 15

Bug#672524: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#672524: upload of bitcoin package

Uploaded, thanks so much for your help! Here is the results from the buildlog. Debug output for #672524 pwd /build/buildd-bitcoin_0.7.2-3-kfreebsd-i386-Os85sN/bitcoin-0.7.2 ls -Rl . {SNIP} ./src/test/data: total 96 -rw-r--r-- 1 buildd sbuild 438 Dec 10 14:47 base58_encode_decode.json

Bug#672524: upload of bitcoin package

Hey Petter, Are you still looking for an uploader? There's a typo in debian/rules, btw - the quotes need to be closed on the line: @echo Debug output for #672524 Cheers, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#699351: linux-gd obsolete and lubupnp4

retitle 699351 linux-igd follows old UPnP IGD V1 spec thanks On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS eric2.vale...@orange.com wrote: Look at the CVE that have been filled regarding libupnp6 and the associated bugs. Thanks - they have been fixed in libupnp4 [1]. I've renamed

Bug#699316: libupnp4: Multiple stack buffer overflow vulnerabilities

clone 699316 -1 reassign -1 libupnp4 retitle -1 libupnp4: Multiple stack buffer overflow vulnerabilities thanks From [1], libupnp4 has the same vulnerabilities as described in Bug #688316. Cloning so it's on someone's radar. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699351 -- To

Bug#699459: libupnp4: Multiple stack buffer overflow vulnerabilities

Package: libupnp4 Severity: grave Tags: security More information is available at bug #699316 (including a patch). According to bug #699351, these security problems are also found in libupnp4. Here's the original posting by Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org Hi, the following

Bug#699351: linux-gd obsolete and lubupnp4

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS eric2.vale...@orange.com wrote: Look at the CVE that have been filled regarding libupnp6 and the associated bugs. Thanks, I'll put something on libupnp4's debian BTS so it's on their radar. Are there security problems with linux-igd

Bug#699351: linux-gd obsolete and lubupnp4

Hello Eric, You wrote: Linux-igd is dead code, use very old libpunp version that contains numerous security holes. Besides this version is not compatible with IPV6 as required by UPnP IGD V2 specification. I believe you mean libupnp4 contains numerous security holes - have they been reported in

Bug#672524: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#672524: Bug#672524: bitcoin: FTBFS[any-i386]: testsuite errors

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: [Christoph Egger] We'll see as soon as it builds on the buildds I'd say. Still fail. I am unable to understand why: I have a wild guess

Bug#672524: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#672524: bitcoin: FTBFS[any-i386]: testsuite errors

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: [Christoph Egger] We'll see as soon as it builds on the buildds I'd say. Still fail. I am unable to understand why: I can't reproduce this either in pbuilder, i386 sid. I'm forwarding this to the pkg-bitcoin ML to

Bug#696262: bitcoin FTBFS: tests fail assuming a RW $HOME

Package: src:bitcoin Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Several build failures on multiple archs because buildd machines don't have writable /home/buildd. This affects test suites. Exact failure: Test

Bug#695928: [eagle] unable to run: error loading libssl.so.0.9.8

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Arthur Magill arthur.mag...@epfl.ch wrote: Package: eagle Version: 5.10.0-2 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Until this week, I have been happily running Eagle. Clearly something changed with a recent upgrade. When I try to

Bug#688813: bitcoind: CVE-2012-4683 and CVE-2012-4682, fixed in 0.7r1

Fixed in version 0.7r1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104173.70;wap2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#683021: fparser removed from archive

fparser removed from archive See: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fparser/news/20120904T152959Z.html We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: fparser | 4.3-4 | source fparser |4.5-0.1 | source libfparser-4.3 |

Bug#686173: ld segfaults when linking uncomforming ELF

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Hakan Ardo ha...@debian.org wrote: Thanx! I'm uploading a new version binutils-avr with this patch. Please verify that it solves the problem. Verified on a wheezy machine, thanks Hakan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#683021: Help with bug 683021

tags 683021 help thanks I've been playing with the code, trying to massage it to compile on arm* with no luck. If anyone else can help, I'd appreciate it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#684748: Arduino Ethernet library fix, needs testing

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Marco Righi marco.ri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Scott, I have installed the last version of Debian ISO in a Virtual box and the Arduino environment (after your .a8 patch) compiles with success the Ethernet code! Great - was that the 32 bit or 64 bit virtual box?

Bug#684748: Arduino Ethernet library fix, needs testing

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Marco Righi marco.ri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Scott, you are welcome. I use Debian 64 bit. Command 37 of 4 $avr-ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.1.20100303 Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute

Bug#684748: Arduino Ethernet library fix, needs testing

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Marco Righi marco.ri...@gmail.com wrote: do you ask about this? Command 36 of 1 $avr-gcc --verbose Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=avr-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.7.0

Bug#684748: Arduino Ethernet library fix, needs testing

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Marco Righi marco.ri...@gmail.com wrote: do you ask about this? Command 36 of 1 $avr-gcc --verbose Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=avr-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.7.0/lto-wrapper Target: avr Configured with: ../src/configure -v

Bug#684748: Arduino Ethernet library fix, needs testing

Hello, I got the library to compile but don't have the hardware to test it. Could you please edit the following file and let me know if it works? /usr/share/arduino/libraries/Ethernet/Ethernet.cpp Change: W5100.setIPAddress(local_ip._address); W5100.setGatewayIp(gateway._address);

Bug#684748: Arduino Ethernet library fix, needs testing

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Marco Righi marco.ri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am sorry but this change is not enougth. If I try to compile (I attach the modified file) I got a segmentation error or segmentation fault (the displayed error is [Errore di segmentazione]). collect2: error: ld

Bug#684748: [arduino] unable to use ethernet library

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Marco Righi marco.ri...@gmail.com wrote: Package: arduino Version: 1:1.0.1+dfsg-4 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, I try to compile the Arduino example #include Ethernet.h #include SPI.h // the media access control

Bug#684748: [arduino] unable to use ethernet library

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: Using the Arduino compiler under VirtualBOX I compile successfully the code meanwhile using the Debian package I got the followings errors: It looks like a problem with gcc 4.7.0 that Debian recently switched to [1, 2

Bug#679182: logkeys: FTBFS on mips*: braces around scalar initializer for type 'unsigned int'

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/27/2012 10:33 PM, Scott Howard wrote: It still FTBFS with the new package from mentors/svn: upload.cc:87:30: error: braces around scalar initializer for type ‘unsigned int’ logkeys.cc:154:30: error: braces

Bug#679182: logkeys: FTBFS on mips*: braces around scalar initializer for type 'unsigned int'

It still FTBFS with the new package from mentors/svn: /usr/bin/make all-recursive make[2]: Entering directory `/home/showard/logkeys-0.1.1a+svn20120529' Making all in src make[3]: Entering directory `/home/showard/logkeys-0.1.1a+svn20120529/src' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Bug#673545: sandboxgamemaker FTBFS pending

tags 673545 pending thanks i committed the fix to our VCS [1]. I'll take care of hardening and upload it soon Thanks! [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/sandboxgamemaker.git;a=commitdiff;h=62476042d2063b9a93b35c6984e7ecd0426c2b4e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#667168: Thanks re: fparser bug

Thanks Matthias, yes it's ok to upload. The version of Librecad in wheezy uses it, and I don't know if they'll release a stable version without fparser before it is released, so I can keep on maintaining it for now. ~Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#670565: WProgram.h header included by Arduino.mk

thanks for using and testing the arduino-mk package. What you're seeing isn't a bug. According to the manual (included in the package and available here [1]) Note: If you're using version 1.0 of the Arduino software, you'll need to make sure that the sketch's name ends in .ino and not .pde. If

Bug#655776: scidavis: diff for NMU version 0.2.4-3.1

as const when it is not (Closes: #655776) +debian/patches/graph_const.diff + * Recommends on qt-assistant-compat (Closes: #624752) + + -- Scott Howard show...@debian.org Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:14:34 -0500 + scidavis (0.2.4-3) unstable; urgency=low * Add Build-Depends on libqtassistantclient

Bug#647161:

notfound 647161 5.0.3-1+b1 thanks closing per reporter's comments -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#554665: gnome-u2ps: diff for NMU version 0.0.4-4.2

to Mahyuddin Susanto) + + -- Scott Howard show...@debian.org Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:11:17 -0500 + gnome-u2ps (0.0.4-4.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. only in patch2: unchanged: --- gnome-u2ps-0.0.4.orig/debian/patches/02_binutils_gold.patch +++ gnome-u2ps-0.0.4/debian/patches

Bug#654162: Arduino 1.0 and MJO Makefile

Hi Martin, I got a bug on Debian about using the files from 1.0 with your makefile. He included a breakdown of what doesn't work with 1.0 and a patch for the makefile. If you reply, could you keep the debian bug in the CC: please (this way we log it there so others can see it). @Andrea: The

Bug#654524: wmaker FTBFS on all architectures when building only arch packages

Source: wmaker Severity: serious Version: 0.95.0+20111028-1 thanks FTBFS on this line in debian/rules: # Fix perms for /usr/share/WindowMaker/*sh chmod +x debian/wmaker-common/usr/share/WindowMaker/autostart.sh chmod: cannot access `debian/wmaker-common/usr/share/WindowMaker/autostart.sh': No

Bug#651331: setting ovito FTBFS to wishlist until muparser is in unstable

severity 651331 wishlist thanks muparser isn't in unstable yet. I'll promote to RC when it is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651331: ovito FTBFS: libmuparser transition

Package: ovito Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid upstream muparser has released a new version of muparser which now follows standard library naming conventions. Also, the include files in Debian have moved from /usr/include/muParser to /usr/include. Ovito FTBFS because of a #include

Bug#627435: merging bugs caused by V4L1 API

reassign 627435 xawtv forcemerge 627435 644761 thanks merging these two bug reports since they both are caused by V4L1 API, no longer supported by Linux. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680813 Can be fixed by upgrading to 3.100. Also applying Fedora's patches may help with this

Bug#646030: bug to halt transition to testing

Package: qcad Version: 2.0.5.0-1+090318.1-2 Severity: serious librecad doesn't have the new fonts yet, don't force it on users until it's ready -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers oneiric-updates APT policy: (500, 'oneiric-updates'), (500, 'oneiric-security'),

Bug#375252: partlibrary removed from unstable

partlibrary has been removed, bug has been filed against release.debian.org to remove it from squeeze and lenny There has been some discussion about bringing it back as a contrib package that downloads it from the Internet, but that is a little shady since still no one has a license to distribute

Bug#375252: we do not have a license to distribute partlibrary

reopen 375252 severity 375252 serious thanks http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/partlibrary/current/copyright is incorrect, no where in the package does it say it is GPL; and no where on the website does it say it has any license at all. In fact, upstream (qcad) doesn't have the

Bug#644786: qcad documentation and fonts are non free

I'm acking this bug. I'll be uploading a qcad source package removing it from unstable and recommending librecad because of this and bug: 604595 I'll also move to remove qcad-doc from stable/testing distributions. Lisandro, just confirming - upstream says the fonts are non-free too, is that

Bug#621947: cdkxdb2 FTBFS: seems to be a gtk issue

block 621947 by 622195 thanks Seems to be a gtk issue, see [1, 2], and many others (e.g. Bug#621949, Bug#622044) the location of gdk-pixbuf.h was recently moved and causing lots of FTBFS. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621950 [1]

Bug#611131: libmuparser SONAME renaming

I put muparser in git [1] and made a branch [2] so we can work on this bug. The diff is up at [3]. Gudjon: could you take a look at it and let me know what you think? Feel free to edit it/upload it or give me the OK and I'll Team upload it. The other change I made was to use git vcs so we can use

Bug#611131: [muparser] Upstream will reversion starting at 2.0.0

Just got this note from upstream: The next Version will reset the version number to 2.0.0 in order to allow for soname compliant version numbers in the future. So it will be fixed in the future, for now we can use the temporary 0debian1.0.0 work around -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#606120: [libmuparser] ABI change without soname bump

Upstream releases all libraries as 0.0.0, which is quite a problem. We can, for the time being, release libraries as libmuparser.so.0debian1.0.0 and bump the debian revision with the ABI changes. not proper patches, but here's a summary: --- Makefile.in

Bug#620431: [qtexengine] working on arch dependent symbols fo;e

Thanks - I'm currently working on it. Have all archs and ports except mips and hppa done. Cheers, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#327894: vdkxdb2: diff for NMU version 2.4.0-3.2

) + + -- Scott Howard show...@debian.org Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:25:57 -0500 + vdkxdb2 (2.4.0-3.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru vdkxdb2-2.4.0/debian/compat vdkxdb2-2.4.0/debian/compat --- vdkxdb2-2.4.0/debian/compat 2011-02-20 16:07:42.0 -0500 +++ vdkxdb2-2.4.0

Bug#611119: eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8

Thanks - I actually have an upload ready to go. Since these packages are non-free, I build it on both i386 and amd64 using pbuilder and upload the binary packages - that's why we haven't seen this bug before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#609152: Java application depending on binary dependent packages

Since this is currently classified as an RC bug and we are close to squeeze release, I'll post updates as they come along The package in testing/unstable builds on powerpc [1]. However, previous uploads before I adopted these packages FTBFS on powerpc and thus was removed. I've filed to have it

Bug#609152: Java application depending on binary dependent packages

Hello Java team, Looking at bug #609152 [1]: There is a Java application which depends on a JNI library which is only built on a subset of architectures. A bug has been filed against the java package because it is un-installable on the architectures that the JNI library does not exist (since it

Bug#327894:

This package is not in good shape. It should be orphaned or fixed up and maintained. I prepared a QA upload to fix many of the lintian errors/warnings as well as this and another FTBFS bug. It can be found: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vdkxdb2 - Source repository: deb-src

Bug#599629: sandboxgamemaker: FTBFS: error: member stats endianswap(T) […] not allowed in union

tags 599629 patch tags 599629 upstream forwarded 599629 http://forum.sandboxgamemaker.com/tracker.php?p=3t=63 thanks Will need some testing, but here's a patch from upstream: Index: src/rpggame/rpgio.cpp === ---

Bug#592544:

I don't know when it was changed, but I got that from upstream (libevas upstream) here [1]. Debian unstable has the version with the new license [2,3], they just haven't updated their debian/copyright file yet even though unstable has the new license. To be clear, libevas' license changed, not

Bug#592544: New license

Upstream has changed their license [1]. They no longer require the advertising clause: In addition publicly documented acknowledgment must be given that this software has been used if no source code of this software is made available publicly. Does GPL's requiring that the source code be publicly

Bug#566967: Eagle crashes when opening files, moving wires, etc.

Package: eagle Version: 5.7.0-1 Tags: patch Severity: grave From Shaun Jackman: There's a bug in the debian/bin/eagle script. If you install upgrade from Eagle 5.6 to Eagle 5.7, it crashes when you try to move a wire. A patch follows. I've uploaded 5.7.0-1 with this patch. Cheers, Shaun ---