Bug#1052243: dkms: Signature keys unexpectedly overridden

2023-09-28 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + upstream Control: severity -1 normal On 28/09/2023 17.05, Tobias Bossert wrote: > Did both files exist? Indeed, in my case the `.key` existed while the one meant for the certificate had a different extension...So as you confirmed, the observed "overwriting"

Bug#1052243: dkms: Signature keys unexpectedly overridden

2023-09-28 Thread Tobias Bossert
Hi Andreas > Did both files exist? Indeed, in my case the `.key` existed while the one meant for the certificate had a different extension...So as you confirmed, the observed "overwriting" behavior is intended. However, I think my point  about not expecting this is still valid -  as the

Bug#1052243: dkms: Signature keys unexpectedly overridden

2023-09-28 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:37:01 +0200 Tobias Bossert wrote: Package: dkms Version: 3.0.11-3 Enrolled my own secureboot key chain (PK, KEK, db) and wanted dkms to sign kernel modules automatically. I tried to reproduce that in a sid chroot by setting

Bug#1052243: dkms: Signature keys unexpectedly overridden

2023-09-19 Thread Tobias Bossert
Package: dkms Version: 3.0.11-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Enrolled my own secureboot key chain (PK, KEK, db) and wanted dkms to sign kernel modules automatically. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was