On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:38:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
reopen 388695
thanks
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:18:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:10:22AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey Steinar,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 09:12:04AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:38:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
If this bug allows a user of sarge to install individual packages from etch
in an inconsistent an unusable configuration, then it is RC.
Yup, I was wrong. Sorry for
Hey Steinar,
I'm curious why you re-opened #388695. It all *seems* fixed, and there's
no comment from you to explain why it should be re-opened...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C++ ate my sanity -- Jon Rabone
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:10:22AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey Steinar,
I'm curious why you re-opened #388695. It all *seems* fixed, and there's
no comment from you to explain why it should be re-opened...
Hi Steve,
It's
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey Steinar,
I'm curious why you re-opened #388695. It all *seems* fixed, and there's
no comment from you to explain why it should be re-opened...
Hi Steve,
It's working now (matching versions are in testing) but a fix is
reopen 388695
thanks
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:18:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:10:22AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey Steinar,
I'm curious why you re-opened #388695. It all *seems* fixed, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 388695
Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem
Bug#389154: geda-gschem: gschem crashing after start and gschem don't work
properly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
7 matches
Mail list logo