Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-20 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1166604470 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote: Well, actually, we get nearer to release of Etch, and we need to get rid of the remaining RC bugs *now*. Also, there hasn't been progress on this bug during the recent days. I don't like that fix either - but hey, it fixes the problem (and of

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-20 Thread Andreas Barth
* Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061215 11:41]: At 1166184631 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote: Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch? That sounds ugly. You'll have to force me to, even if I can't fix it without hw/access to hw. Well, actually, we get nearer to release

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-20 Thread Andreas Barth
* Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 09:53]: Nevertheless, I'll fix it today. Thanks. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-15 Thread Andreas Barth
* Dimitri Puzin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061205 10:05]: Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!? Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch? Cheersm Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-15 Thread Andreas Barth
* Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061215 20:06]: At 1166184631 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote: Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch? That sounds ugly. You'll have to force me to, even if I can't fix it without hw/access to hw. Well, I'm not saying it is an optimal

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-15 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1166184631 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote: Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch? That sounds ugly. You'll have to force me to, even if I can't fix it without hw/access to hw. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `'

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-05 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote: Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!? If you need more information, please let me know. Could you try to (gdb) print index (gdb) print inq.ProductIdentification[index] (gdb) print *tmp Is there any chance I could get

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-05 Thread Dimitri Puzin
Hi, I've compiled varmon again with -ggdb from vanilla source. Here is the progress: hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make clean rm -f *.o core varmon hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make varmon gcc -o varmon varmon.c -Wall -lncurses -ggdb varmon.c: In function ‘get_backplane_info’: varmon.c:166: warning:

Bug#401236: backtrace from varmon

2006-12-05 Thread Dimitri Puzin
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote: Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!? If you need more information, please let me know. Could you try to (gdb) print index $1 = 2108 (gdb) print