Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-18 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dimecres 16 Juliol 2008, Reinhard Tartler va escriure: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We cannot remove the img_convert patch because that will instantly break vlc and other packages that use the old swscaler API. The fact that the debian-multimedia package doesn't include

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-16 Thread Christian Marillat
Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Please don't add extra logic in Debian packages to conflict against packages outside Debian. This is not scalable for a start, anyone can start asking for more conflicts. The other way around is scalable and logical: add conflicts in packages

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Please don't add extra logic in Debian packages to conflict against packages outside Debian. This is not scalable for a start, anyone can start asking for more conflicts. The other way around is

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-16 Thread Christian Marillat
Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Compatiblity may change if debian update ffmpeg to a more recent version. The curent package is 5 months old. Stop to do ugly hack like the img_convert

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We cannot remove the img_convert patch because that will instantly break vlc and other packages that use the old swscaler API. The fact that the debian-multimedia package doesn't include this patch while providing the same binary name has caused us

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-16 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Reinhard Tartler schrieb: Yes, epochs are very, very nasty. BTW, should we introduce one to keep the interdiff with ubuntu smaller? -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT) Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134 D-44780

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-15 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hello Luk et al, allright, thanks for your comment. I'll copy this discussion over to Christian Marillat. Cheers, Fabian Luk Claes schrieb: Reinhard Tartler wrote: Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reinhard Tartler schrieb: should we add Conflicts against libav* ( 3:20080706) to

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Reinhard, should we add Conflicts against libav* ( 3:20080706) to all our library packages or is this a crazy idea? Cheers, Fabian Christophe Mutricy schrieb: Le Fri 11 Jul 08 � 22:23 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a �crit : but I don't think that the bug is closed. vlc complains about:

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: should we add Conflicts against libav* ( 3:20080706) to all our library packages or is this a crazy idea? no, this won't work. we cannot conflict against our own packages. We could only introduce an epoch of 4:, but then marillat would increase to 5:

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Reinhard Tartler schrieb: should we add Conflicts against libav* ( 3:20080706) to all our library packages or is this a crazy idea? no, this won't work. we cannot conflict against our own packages. Sure, but how about our libavutil pakage Conflicting against all of Marillat's packages except

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reinhard Tartler schrieb: should we add Conflicts against libav* ( 3:20080706) to all our library packages or is this a crazy idea? no, this won't work. we cannot conflict against our own packages. Sure, but how about our libavutil pakage

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Reinhard Tartler schrieb: I think this will result in uninstallable packages, unless I didn't misunderstood your proposal. Maybe my idea is whole crap and I don't see it at the moment: Debian's libavutil49 (0.svn20080206-10) could conflict against libavcodec51, libavdevice52, libpostproc51,

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reinhard Tartler schrieb: I think this will result in uninstallable packages, unless I didn't misunderstood your proposal. Maybe my idea is whole crap and I don't see it at the moment: Debian's libavutil49 (0.svn20080206-10) could conflict against

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Reinhard Tartler schrieb: This means that the other binaries produced by the ffmpeg-debian package are affected by this conflict as well and will be tried to removed on upgrades, AFAIUI. Even if we only conflict against packages (= 3:20050427)? Moreover if we find some way to break the

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reinhard Tartler schrieb: This means that the other binaries produced by the ffmpeg-debian package are affected by this conflict as well and will be tried to removed on upgrades, AFAIUI. Even if we only conflict against packages (= 3:20050427)?

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-14 Thread Luk Claes
Reinhard Tartler wrote: Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reinhard Tartler schrieb: should we add Conflicts against libav* ( 3:20080706) to all our library packages or is this a crazy idea? no, this won't work. we cannot conflict against our own packages. Sure, but how about our

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-11 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Sorry, but I don't think that the bug is closed. vlc complains about: ... [0001] main private warning: cannot load module `/usr/lib/vlc/codec/libffmpeg_plugin.so' (/usr/lib/vlc/codec/libffmpeg_plugin.so: undefined symbol: img_resample) so is searching img_resample in the

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-11 Thread Christophe Mutricy
Le Fri 11 Jul 08 � 22:23 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a �crit : but I don't think that the bug is closed. vlc complains about: I'm using: ii ffmpeg 3:20080706-0.2 audio/video encoder, streaming server audi ii libavdevice52

Bug#482894: Please, open again the bug

2008-07-11 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 11 Juliol 2008, Christophe Mutricy va escriure: Le Fri 11 Jul 08 � 22:23 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a �crit : but I don't think that the bug is closed. vlc complains about: I'm using: ii ffmpeg 3:20080706-0.2 audio/video encoder, streaming