Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 at 11:20:41 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > autoremoval won't happen due to popcon, but since everyone seems to be > in agreement regarding removal in bullseye let's document that with RC > severity. Thanks, that makes sense. There are only two surviving rdeps. kannel-sqlbox is not in testing (it would probably only need a binNMU, except it has an unrelated FTBFS bug), while golang-gosqlite-dev is due for autoremoval on 2020-12-10 and has no rdeps. I'll ask the release team to remove golang-gosqlite-dev and sqlite from testing. smcv
Processed: Re: Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #607969 [sqlite] sqlite: removal of sqlite 2 is really overdue Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags -1 - jessie buster stretch Bug #607969 [sqlite] sqlite: removal of sqlite 2 is really overdue Removed tag(s) stretch, jessie, and buster. -- 607969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607969 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
Hi, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Hi, I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not compile in some new ports. Raising severity so at the very least it gets auto-removed from testing and thus it does not get included in the next stable release (it already was included in the last, despite opinions in this bug about the contrary). I guess that it's better to just ask FTP masters to remove the package, but I'll leave that to other people, since they were interested in doing that in the past (all in copy now). Filing bugs against reverse dependencies to migrate to sqlite 3 would be a better start IMO. Probably it is too late to convert everything for Jessie: $ apt-cache rdepends sqlite sqlite Reverse Depends: phpbb3 |movabletype-opensource sqlite:i386 sqlite-doc qsf phpbb3 lire imms-common csync2 beancounter Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie? Cheers, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33:32 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie? The only way I can see us not shipping it is if we remove it along with the remaining rdeps. Now is not the time to migrate them over to sqlite3 in jessie. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not compile in some new ports. It should compile on all of them by now. The buildd archive shows that arm64 and ppc64el are fine, even mips and sparc. I guess that it's better to just ask FTP masters to remove the package, but I'll leave that to other people, since they were interested in doing that in the past (all in copy now). Yes, I was about to ask its removal as upstream no longer supports it. But it works correctly and I got personal mails that they would still use it on low-end (embedded?) machines where sqlite3 would require more CPU and/or memory. Filing bugs against reverse dependencies to migrate to sqlite 3 would be a better start IMO. I've mailed all of them some years ago, but there are still some use it. Probably it is too late to convert everything for Jessie: It is late. Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie? I'm open for everything, but please do note that the removal would mean removing the dependent packages as well. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
Hi Julien, 2014-10-29 10:48 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33:32 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie? The only way I can see us not shipping it is if we remove it along with the remaining rdeps. Now is not the time to migrate them over to sqlite3 in jessie. I fully agree. How about marking this bug jessie-ignore or decreasing the severity? I periodically look for RC bugs to fix (like hopefully many others :-)) and those would make that bug stop appearing on the list. Cheers, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
Hi Laszlo, On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:52:02 +0100 =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= g...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not compile in some new ports. It should compile on all of them by now. The buildd archive shows that arm64 and ppc64el are fine, even mips and sparc. I guess that it's better to just ask FTP masters to remove the package, but I'll leave that to other people, since they were interested in doing that in the past (all in copy now). Yes, I was about to ask its removal as upstream no longer supports it. But it works correctly and I got personal mails that they would still use it on low-end (embedded?) machines where sqlite3 would require more CPU and/or memory. In this case I think this bug could be simply closed by answering the question (Yes.). :-) Having reverse dependencies is actually useful to keep the code tested. Cheers, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607969: sqlite: Still useful?
Control: severity -1 serious Hi, I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not compile in some new ports. Raising severity so at the very least it gets auto-removed from testing and thus it does not get included in the next stable release (it already was included in the last, despite opinions in this bug about the contrary). I guess that it's better to just ask FTP masters to remove the package, but I'll leave that to other people, since they were interested in doing that in the past (all in copy now). Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
