On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:26:04 +0100, Simon McVittie s...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 at 00:20:37 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:01:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
Matthias, to help upgrades this will still need a Breaks statement in
binutils -
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 at 00:20:37 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:01:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
Matthias, to help upgrades this will still need a Breaks statement in
binutils - presumably binutils-mingw-w64 ( 2.23.52.20130612-1+3).
Of course that's
Package: binutils-mingw-w64-i686
Version: 2.22-8+2+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.4
Dear Maintainer,
binutils-mingw-w64-i686 is uninstallable on Sid, i386 architecture due
to conflicting with the native binutils:
Unpacking binutils-mingw-w64-i686 (from
Hi everyone,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:02:33 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont courmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
binutils-mingw-w64-i686 is uninstallable on Sid, i386 architecture due
to conflicting with the native binutils:
Unpacking binutils-mingw-w64-i686
(from
Hi again,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:01:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
Matthias, to help upgrades this will still need a Breaks statement in
binutils - presumably binutils-mingw-w64 ( 2.23.52.20130612-1+3).
Of course that's binutils-mingw-w64-i686 ( 2.23.52.20130612-1+3),
5 matches
Mail list logo