Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be wrote:
According to recent discussions, there should be a 0.48.5 pending.
We may also want to wait for it (IIRC that was the original plan).
OK. Will the license change be backported to 0.48? That would avoid
repackaging the tarball.
I've been told so:
Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be wrote:
The inkscape upload in experimental contains the newer version, which
contains the new license, and thus fixes this bug. I don't know if
this version is expected to go to unstable soon, but if not, it might
be nice to have this fix backported.
No,
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote:
Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be wrote:
Matteo, are you planning to repacking the orig tarball in for 0.48 in
unstable, or do you prefer an NMU for this?
According to recent discussions,
Processing control commands:
tags -1 patch pending
Bug #720618 {Done: Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be} [inkscape] non-free
license statement in /usr/share/inkscape/icons/inkscape.svg
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
720618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720618
Debian
I think this is fixed upstream... all CC 2.0/2.5 licenses have been
removed from Inkscape trunk [1]. Can a patch be backported?
AV
[1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514
On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25,
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change might
be retroactive?
Thanks erryboddy!
T
On Sep 14, 2013 10:07 AM, Alex Valavanis valavanisa...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is fixed upstream... all CC 2.0/2.5 licenses have been
removed from Inkscape trunk [1]. Can a
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change
might be retroactive?
They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to
deb patch or a backport. We have a critical Ahaaa![1] to backport
anyway.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:35:33AM -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change
might be retroactive?
They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to
deb
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote:
Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they
intended GPL-2 anyway...
I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally
under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778
Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they
intended GPL-2 anyway...
I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally
under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778
Severity: serious
that the Inkscape icon contains a statement
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.48.4-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
I just found by chance (because the inkscape icon is incorporated in the Sozi
icon, https://github.com/senshu/Sozi/blob/master/editors/inkscape/sozi/icon.svg)
that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its license is
11 matches
Mail list logo
