Bug#800291: jade: Please migrate a supported debhelper compat level

[Neil Roeth]

Thanks, Tobias.

I have finished filing bugs against all packages with reverse
dependencies on jade and sp.  All are blockers on the tracking bugs.  I
will follow up and/or NMU as necessary.

On 10/16/2016 05:26 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> sorry for the late reply... Been busy recenently.
>
> Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth:
>> Hi, Tobi,
>>
>> The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming
>> along.   Openjade1.3
>> is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more
>> dependencies on it.  I was focusing recently on the sp binary
>> package,
>> and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp.  Jade is
>> next.
>>
>> There are tracking bugs already, 811310 and 811312.
> ok
>
>> Aboot and iputils have bugs with patches open to change sp to opensp.
>>
>> Can you explain the output below?  I guess "dak rm jade" means remove
>> jade, while the -n means not to actually do it (no act).  What does
>> -R
>> mean?  Does the command apply to the jade source package or the
>> binary
>> package?  I'm guessing source since sp appears in the list and it is
>> a
>> binary package built from the jade source package.
> The command checks what would happen if you remove jade from the
> archives, a convenient way to check reverse dependencies you have on
> jade.
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On 09/25/2016 07:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> Hi Neil,
>>>
>>> how is the removal going?
>>> I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the
>>> status
>>> of the progess? What do you think? 
>>>
>>>
>>> A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to:
>>>
>>>
>>> # Broken Depends:
>>> xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev
>>>
>>> # Broken Build-Depends:
>>> aboot: sp
>>> alex: jade
>>> datapacker: jade
>>> dejagnu: jade
>>> gnome-packagekit: sp
>>> gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1)
>>> iputils: sp
>>> kannel: jade
>>> libetpan: jade
>>> lprng-doc: jade
>>> mozart: sp
>>> pyepl: jade
>>> scons-doc: jade
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> tobi 
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth 
>>> wrote:
 I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update
>>> it.  The
 Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file
 bugs
 against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time
 to
>>> be
 updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade.
  
 -- 
 Neil Roeth
  
  
  
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Neil Roeth

Bug#800291: jade: Please migrate a supported debhelper compat level

[Tobias Frost]

Hi Neil,

sorry for the late reply... Been busy recenently.

Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth:
> Hi, Tobi,
> 
> The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming
> along.   Openjade1.3
> is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more
> dependencies on it.  I was focusing recently on the sp binary
> package,
> and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp.  Jade is
> next.
> 
> There are tracking bugs already, 811310 and 811312.

ok

> Aboot and iputils have bugs with patches open to change sp to opensp.
> 
> Can you explain the output below?  I guess "dak rm jade" means remove
> jade, while the -n means not to actually do it (no act).  What does
> -R
> mean?  Does the command apply to the jade source package or the
> binary
> package?  I'm guessing source since sp appears in the list and it is
> a
> binary package built from the jade source package.

The command checks what would happen if you remove jade from the
archives, a convenient way to check reverse dependencies you have on
jade.

> Thanks.
> 
> On 09/25/2016 07:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> > 
> > how is the removal going?
> > I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the
> > status
> > of the progess? What do you think? 
> > 
> > 
> > A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to:
> > 
> > 
> > # Broken Depends:
> > xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev
> > 
> > # Broken Build-Depends:
> > aboot: sp
> > alex: jade
> > datapacker: jade
> > dejagnu: jade
> > gnome-packagekit: sp
> > gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1)
> > iputils: sp
> > kannel: jade
> > libetpan: jade
> > lprng-doc: jade
> > mozart: sp
> > pyepl: jade
> > scons-doc: jade
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > tobi 
> > 
> > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth 
> > wrote:
> > > I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update
> > 
> > it.  The
> > > Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file
> > > bugs
> > > against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time
> > > to
> > 
> > be
> > > updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade.
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > Neil Roeth
> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> 
> 
> 
> 

Bug#800291: jade: Please migrate a supported debhelper compat level

[Neil Roeth]

Hi, Tobi,

The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming along.   Openjade1.3
is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more
dependencies on it.  I was focusing recently on the sp binary package,
and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp.  Jade is next.

There are tracking bugs already, 811310 and 811312.

Aboot and iputils have bugs with patches open to change sp to opensp.

Can you explain the output below?  I guess "dak rm jade" means remove
jade, while the -n means not to actually do it (no act).  What does -R
mean?  Does the command apply to the jade source package or the binary
package?  I'm guessing source since sp appears in the list and it is a
binary package built from the jade source package.

Thanks.

On 09/25/2016 07:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> how is the removal going?
> I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the status
> of the progess? What do you think? 
>
>
> A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to:
>
>
> # Broken Depends:
> xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev
>
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> aboot: sp
> alex: jade
> datapacker: jade
> dejagnu: jade
> gnome-packagekit: sp
> gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1)
> iputils: sp
> kannel: jade
> libetpan: jade
> lprng-doc: jade
> mozart: sp
> pyepl: jade
> scons-doc: jade
>
>
> --
> tobi 
>
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth  wrote:
>> I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update
> it.  The
>> Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file bugs
>> against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time to
> be
>> updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade.
>>  
>> -- 
>> Neil Roeth
>>  
>>  
>>  


-- 
Neil Roeth

Bug#800291: jade: Please migrate a supported debhelper compat level

[Tobias Frost]

Hi Neil,

how is the removal going?
I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the status
of the progess? What do you think? 


A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to:


# Broken Depends:
xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev

# Broken Build-Depends:
aboot: sp
alex: jade
datapacker: jade
dejagnu: jade
gnome-packagekit: sp
gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1)
iputils: sp
kannel: jade
libetpan: jade
lprng-doc: jade
mozart: sp
pyepl: jade
scons-doc: jade


--
tobi 

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth  wrote:
> I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update
it.  The
> Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file bugs
> against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time to
be
> updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade.
> 
> -- 
> Neil Roeth
> 
> 
>