Hello,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:10:33AM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 22 December 2016 at 11:05, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > We are very close to a point where docker will not be part of stretch.
> > Is there any chance this gets fixed before that?
>
> If someone were
On 22 December 2016 at 11:05, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> We are very close to a point where docker will not be part of stretch.
> Is there any chance this gets fixed before that?
If someone were to come up with a patch which fixes this, I'd be happy
to test it, but I can't
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:39:11 -0800 Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 03:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> ---> Making bundle: dynbinary (in bundles/1.11.2/dynbinary)
> >> Building: bundles/1.11.2/dynbinary/docker-1.11.2
> >> #
On 28 August 2016 at 03:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> ---> Making bundle: dynbinary (in bundles/1.11.2/dynbinary)
>> Building: bundles/1.11.2/dynbinary/docker-1.11.2
>> # github.com/docker/containerd/api/grpc/types
>>
Source: docker.io
Version: 1.11.2~ds1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
5 matches
Mail list logo