On 04.12.2016 14:14, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
>> But on how to fix this. Given [0] you seem to be just passing out the
>> pointer to your internal buffer written without padding out to the user
>> via zmq_msg_data (?)
>>
>> The documentation of that function states that you must not access
>>
Hello,
I just opened a bug for tango
https://github.com/tango-controls/cppTango/issues/312
what is the deadline where we can take the decision to upload or not zeromq
4.2.0 into Debian testing ?
This will let also some time in order to check if this 4.2.0 do not have other
size effect of
Hi Picca, Luca,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:25 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>> This is very unfortunate, but as explained on the mailing list, this
>> behaviour was an unintentional internal side effect. I didn't quite
>> realise it was there,
Hello Luca
> This is very unfortunate, but as explained on the mailing list, this
> behaviour was an unintentional internal side effect. I didn't quite
> realise it was there, and so most other devs.
I understand, I just wanted to point that the synchrotron community invest a
lot of efforts in
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:55:47 +0100 picca wrote:
> Source: zeromq3
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It seems that zeromq 4.2.0 brakes the tango package.
> this is why I fill an important bug in orer to block migration testing.
>
> You can have a look
5 matches
Mail list logo