Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread chrysn
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:45:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Will let you know when I'm through with those and all is pushed to > > alioth again. The current master passes build in a cowbuilder that has access to python3-ratelimiter, and lintian's only serious complaints are the privacy

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:35:53PM +0100, chrysn wrote: > I've got them all down locally; it'll need some cleaning up (and > possibly upstreaming) of patches, and I have yet to run it in a pbuilder > to see which build dependencies popped up that are undeclared so far, > but I don't expect any

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread chrysn
> The problem is that when trying to build this I get a lot of errors in > the build time tests. Is there any volunteer to have a look? I've got them all down locally; it'll need some cleaning up (and possibly upstreaming) of patches, and I have yet to run it in a pbuilder to see which build

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-10 Thread chrysn
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:18:42AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > The problem is that when trying to build this I get a lot of errors in > the build time tests. Is there any volunteer to have a look? I've started with the tests more or less at random, and the second seems to be promising to solve

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:49:57AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > I've upgraded snakemake in Git to latest upstream but its featuring the > > same issue. I'm pretty sure you Python people know a simple answer for > > this issue. > Did you see this part? > > > > The problem is the the

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:14:45PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I've upgraded snakemake in Git to latest upstream but its featuring the > same issue. I'm pretty sure you Python people know a simple answer for > this issue. Did you see this part? > > The

Processed: Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #878498 [src:snakemake] snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default Added tag(s) help. -- 878498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878498 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-06 Thread Andreas Tille
control: tags -1 help Hi, I've upgraded snakemake in Git to latest upstream but its featuring the same issue. I'm pretty sure you Python people know a simple answer for this issue. Any help would be welcome Andreas. On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 05:33:22AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source:

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-04 Thread chrysn
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Ping? sorry, I thought I had already done that: my latest WIP state is now pushed; it includes a patch that disables rate limiting for sake of being able to work on the main issue, but I haven't made any progress there yet.

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Ping? On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 09:43:58AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Chrysn, > > since nobody raised any veto and we finally will follow upstream anyway: > Could you please push your changes to latest upstream version and than > we try to work together from there? For instance it will help

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-11-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Chrysn, since nobody raised any veto and we finally will follow upstream anyway: Could you please push your changes to latest upstream version and than we try to work together from there? For instance it will help to contact upstream when refering to the latest upstream version. Kind regards

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-11-03 Thread chrysn
Package: src:snakemake Followup-For: Bug #878498 The test also fails with the 3.13.3 version in the team repository. I've had a short look at whether upgrading to 4.3.0 helps (minimal patch refreshing and new build dependency on python3-configargparse as well as the unpackaged ratelimiter

Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-10-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: snakemake Version: 3.10.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/snakemake.html ... == ERROR: Failure: Exception (snakemake not in PATH. For testing,