Bug#389128: gdesklets-data: non-free Firefox icon included

Package: gdesklets-data Version: 0.35.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 gdesklets-data's copyright file indicates that the package is under the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/gnomebar/gfx/firefox.png. Additionally, gdesklets-data is in

Bug#389127: fvwm-crystal: non-free Firefox icon included

Package: fvwm-crystal Version: 3.0.3-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 fvwm-crystal's copyright file indicates that the package is under the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in usr/share/fvwm-crystal/fvwm-crystal/fvwm/icons/Default/22x22/apps/firefox.png (and others).

Bug#385665: fluidsynth needs non-free midi sound bank to function

Eric, On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:46:17PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:27:10AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: Swami for example uses fluidsynth as its synthesizer engine and works perfectly without external sound banks. That's new information to me;

Bug#388662: marked as done (dvipdfmx: purging the package fails (update-texmf unavailable))

Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:32:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388662: fixed in dvipdfmx 1:20050831-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#389130: cl-s-utils: fails to compile

Package: cl-s-utils Version: 20060511-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: patch When loading s-utils, the form (defparameter +us-day-names+ ...) fails to compile because it is wrapped in some excess 'v' and '^' characters. A number of other parameters used for date

Bug#389126: gnome-session: hangs at login with xorg 7.1

Hi, On Sun, Sep 24, 2006, Stephen Touset wrote: I recently upgraded to Xorg 7.1. Since doing so, logging into GNOME produces my background, and dark-grey where the gnome-panel should be. Probably a program which used to be start synchronously in your session doesn't start anymore.

Bug#384593: xterm: allowWindowOps should be disabled by default

On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 12:04:10PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: There are some concerns with the window operations that XTerm emulates. CSI 21t (report window title) in particular, because since OSC 0/1/2 ST let you decide of the window title, one can decide what CSI 21t returns, which might

Bug#389130: cl-s-utils: fails to compile

Sorry, forgot to attach the patch for utils.lisp. --- /usr/share/common-lisp/source/s-utils/src/utils.lisp 2006-05-21 02:58:01.0 +1000 +++ utils.lisp 2006-09-24 12:57:35.0 +1000 @@ -71,27 +71,19 @@ ;; time/date formatting -v v v v v v v (defparameter +us-day-names+ -^ ^ ^ ^

Bug#389128: marked as done (gdesklets-data: non-free Firefox icon included)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389128: fixed in gdesklets-data 0.35.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Re: Bug#389104: Galeon copyright information incorrect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 389104 + confirmed pending Bug#389104: Galeon copyright information incorrect There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#389104: Galeon copyright information incorrect

tag 389104 + confirmed pending stop Hi, On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Crispin Flowerday wrote: Please alter the claim to just state GPL v2 Thanks for reporting this bug, I've reworked the copyright file, it could probably be enhanced to cover more of the dual-licensed files, but I think

Bug#389104: Galeon copyright information incorrect

Thanks that new copyright file looks fine to me. Crispin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#389104: marked as done (Galeon copyright information incorrect)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389104: fixed in galeon 2.0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: New upstream releases

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 388264 grave Bug#388264: New upstream releases Severity set to `grave' from `normal' tags 388264 +sid Bug#388264: New upstream releases There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#389150: packagesearch_2.1.1(unstable/sparc/spontini): broken build depends

Package: packagesearch Version: 2.1.1 Severity: serious Build-Depends-Indep are not satisifed when debian/rules build is run. docbook-to-man should be in build-depends. | Automatic build of packagesearch_2.1.1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85 | Build started at 20060924-0321

Bug#389024: marked as done (libapache-mod-mono: Broken debconf template: Package fails to configure)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:02:37 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389024: fixed in mod-mono 1.1.17-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#387783: [Debburn-devel] [PATCH] fix debburn/cdrkit GPL violation

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:32:57 +0200 Kai Wb. wrote: [...] Hi, only a short question: Is there some good reason why we should not integrate the proposed patch (by Albert Cahalan on debburn-devel [1] or [2]) which would fix the license problems? [...] [1]

Bug#389114: marked as done (guessnet --help does not work)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:32:26 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389114: fixed in guessnet 0.41-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#389154: geda-gschem: gschem crashing after start and gschem don't work properly

Package: geda-gschem Version: 20060123-1 Severity: critical gschem don't work properly, it's crashing after start. In terminal or status window in gschem this text -- Status gEDA/gschem version 20060123 gEDA/gschem comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details. This is free

Bug#388556: marked as done (beagle_0.2.9-1: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency on libgalago-cil)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:47:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388556: fixed in beagle 0.2.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#386773: Is this bug blocking migration of 2.6.17 prebuilt modules into testing ?

There seem to be prebuilt modules for 2.6.17 in sid ready to migrate into testing, at least according to the Why is package X not in testing yet? page, but the way I read it they're being blocked by a release critical bug on nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386, which is presumably this grave

Bug#387783: [Debburn-devel] License of cdrkit - GPLv2 + additional restrictions

Le vendredi 15 septembre 2006 à 23:51 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit : Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We do no longer return schily author ID, etc. You no longer return schily, but it seems that noone is allowed to create a modified version of cdrkit that

Bug#311838: marked as done (XSS problems, unescaped input/output, etc..)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:01:33 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Fwd: Bug#368099 closed by Debian Archive Maintenance [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#368099: fixed)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#387183: marked as done (ctn: Cannot open ANY dicom file on AMD64)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:02:19 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#387183: fixed in ctn 3.0.6-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#295595: etch-backports

Hi! Although etch hasn't been released, there are people using it (like me). Please could you consider putting vegastrike in etch-backports already? Thanks -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get

Processed: retitle

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 375830 on first load, fglrx starts with a broken configuration and overwrites xorg.conf with broken EnableMonitor setting, preventing further loads Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI Changed Bug

Bug#389154: geda-gschem: gschem crashing after start and gschem don't work properly

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:50:59PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: geda-gschem Version: 20060123-1 Severity: critical gEDA/gschem version 20060123 Versions of packages geda-gschem depends on: ii geda-symbols20060906-1 Symbols for GNU EDA -- Electronics Hi,

Bug#386773: Is this bug blocking migration of 2.6.17 prebuilt modules into testing ?

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Tim Day wrote: There seem to be prebuilt modules for 2.6.17 in sid ready to migrate into testing, at least according to the Why is package X not in testing yet? page, but the way I read it they're being blocked by a release critical bug on

Processed: remove blocker on debian-edu-config

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 311188 by 370338 Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with conffiles of other packages Was blocked by: 370324 370332 370337 370338 370339 370342 370343 370344 370346 370347 370348 370349 370350 370351 370393 Blocking bugs of

Bug#389164: fetchmailconf: not installable in sid

Package: fetchmailconf Version: 6.3.4-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install fetchmailconf Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an

Bug#389166: grubconf: depends on unavailable libdbus-1-2

Package: grubconf Version: 0.5.1-4+b2 Severity: serious Justification: dependency problem Hello, grubconf depends on libdbus-1-2 but libdbus-1-2 is removed from sid. libdbus-1-3 is now there. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600,

Bug#389173: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on python2.4-dbus

Package: gnome-osd Severity: serious Version: 0.11.2-3 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on python2.4-dbus which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to update the dependency to python-dbus. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key

Bug#389171: ndiswrapper-source: doesn't compile on 2.6.17-1 and 2.6.17-2

Package: ndiswrapper-source Version: 1.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Building this module fails on 2.6.17-1 and 2.6.17-2 giving me this errors: In file included from /usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper/ndis.c:2665:▒ │

Bug#389167: libpt-plugins-avc: depends on unavailable libraw1394-5

Package: libpt-plugins-avc Version: 1.10.1.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: dependency problem Hello, libpt-plugins-avc depends on libraw1394-5 but libraw1394-5 is removed from sid. There is now libraw1394-8. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable

Processed: issue changed: reload must not start not-running apache

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 316321 reload must not start not-running apache Bug#316321: apache2-common: 'reload' init target should not restart server Changed Bug title. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: mime-types are added

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 311188 by 370344 Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with conffiles of other packages Was blocked by: 370324 370332 370337 370339 370342 370343 370344 370346 370347 370348 370349 370350 370351 370393 Blocking bugs of 311188

Processed: unblock fixed bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 311188 by 370350 Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with conffiles of other packages Was blocked by: 370324 370332 370337 370339 370342 370343 370346 370347 370348 370349 370350 370351 370393 Blocking bugs of 311188

Processed: unblock

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 311188 by 370344 Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with conffiles of other packages Was blocked by: 370324 370332 370337 370339 370342 370343 370346 370347 370348 370349 370350 370351 370393 Blocking bugs of 311188

Bug#375830: a bit more info

Hi, Just to explicate this bit - the card is: (--) Chipset RADEON X1600 XT (RV530 71C0) found (--) fglrx(0): Chipset: RADEON X1600 XT (RV530 71C0) (Chipset = 0x71c0) (--) fglrx(0): (PciSubVendor = 0x1043, PciSubDevice = 0x0130) (--) fglrx(0): board vendor info: third party graphics adapter - NOT

Bug#388115: fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.

Hello, I have the described problem on my machine, too. So if you need some files/tests/output for this problem I can help you.;) -- Noèl Köthe noel debian.org Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Processed: unblock fixed bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 311188 by 370393 Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with conffiles of other packages Was blocked by: 370324 370332 370337 370339 370342 370343 370346 370347 370348 370349 370351 370393 Blocking bugs of 311188 removed:

Processed: Re: Bug#385004: Info received (apache-ssl: I get this too)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 385004 openssl,apache-ssl Bug#385004: apache-ssl: segfault when upgrading to 1.3.34-4 Bug reassigned from package `apache-ssl' to `openssl,apache-ssl'. * Philip Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060918 14:57]: Unknown command or malformed arguments

Bug#389189: FTBFS: bad build dependency on libc6-dev

Package: ltp Version: 20060822-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ltp does not build on alpha or ia64, because the libc package is called libc6.1-dev there. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=ltparch=alphaver=20060822-1stamp=1158136553file=log You do not need

Bug#389171: ndiswrapper-source: doesn't compile on 2.6.17-1 and 2.6.17-2

On Sunday 24 September 2006 23:28, ste wrote: Package: ndiswrapper-source Version: 1.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable IMHO, this is not grave, but lets not worry about arguing that point . . . Building this module fails on 2.6.17-1 and 2.6.17-2 giving me this

Bug#389191: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on cmap-adobe-korea1 | cmap-adobe-cns1 | cmap-adobe-gb1 | cmap-adobe-japan1 | cmap-adobe-japan2

Package: latex-hangul-ucs-trivcj Severity: serious Version: 1:3.0.2-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on cmap-adobe-korea1 | cmap-adobe-cns1 | cmap-adobe-gb1 | cmap-adobe-japan1 | cmap-adobe-japan2 which are not available in unstable/main. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes -

Bug#388861: marked as done (apt-listchanges: consistently fails with traceback in DebianControlParser.py line 19)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:32:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388861: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#385004: #385004: apache-ssl: segfault when upgrading

Hi, I really don't have anything to look at now, and will need some more information. You say this crashed in the libssl library? Can you show me the backtrace? Please install the libssl0.9.8-dbg package, which should give you more debug information for the backtrace. Can you generate a

Processed: setting package to apt-listchanges, tagging 386807, tagging 386808, tagging 387223, tagging 388861

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 package apt-listchanges Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt-listchanges tags 386807 + pending Bug#386807: apt-listchanges: [INTL:fr] French program translation update Tags were: patch

Bug#388264: New upstream releases

severity 388264 wishlist thanks Daniel Baumann wrote: Since the current locales do not work with the thunderbird version in unstable, I'm raising the severity to grave. Huh?! What makes you think they don't work? The German locale package works perfectly fine for me. Note that its

Bug#386361: marked as done (binary blob in asterisk-classic package)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:47:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#386361: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.12.1.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

Hi, Thanks Jan for collecting feedback on this and debugging things, as well as thanks for all users for interest in getting it to work. I guess any variable clockrates very common in laptops and recent AMD64 cpu's will also not work. I implemented --nordtsc and --slow options, and put

Bug#386773: Is this bug blocking migration of 2.6.17 prebuilt modules into testing ?

On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 05:43 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Tim Day wrote: [A load of nonsense about nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.17 packages deleted] nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy (1.0.7174-4 to 1.0.7184-2) Maintainer: Randall Donald

Processed: severity of 388376 is serious, merging 388376 388407

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 388376 serious Bug#388376: latex-ucs-doc: installs files into /usr/share/texmf/doc against Debian TeX policy Severity set to `serious' from `important' merge 388376 388407

Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem

On 9/22/06, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote: (here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)Thanks. geda-gschem 20060906 should be in etch in a day or two. Can youtry it again then and see if the problem is solved? I

Bug#387610: [PATCH] apr_atomic_cas broken in 0.9.x

Philip Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Port some of the atomic code from 1.2.x to 0.9.x, in particular make mutex operations that fail cause an abort and make the generic C implementation of apr_atomic_cas work on 64 bit platforms. A less radical change to the code is simply to truncate the

Bug#389236: gforth_0.6.2-7(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: broken hppa assembly

Package: gforth Version: 0.6.2-7 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: The fic instruction requires a space id. For linux, it can simply be changed to have a 4, after the left paren. For hp-ux compatibility, and to not be depending on the way parisc linux

Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?

Package: beagle Version: 0.2.10-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of beagle_0.2.10-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060924-1258 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper

Bug#389228: chiark-tcl_1.0.0(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: bad include

Package: chiark-tcl Version: 1.0.0 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Since tcl8.4-dev gets installed, trying to include tcl-8.3/tcl.h is bad. Automatic build of chiark-tcl_1.0.0 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060922-0749 [...]

Bug#389164: [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#389164: fetchmailconf: not installable in sid

Hi, * Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-24 18:35]: here is the problem: # apt-get install fetchmailconf Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are

Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version: 2.6.17+2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux

Bug#389234: genesis_2.2.1-8(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: no rule to make tools/toollib.o

Package: genesis Version: 2.2.1-8 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of genesis_2.2.1-8 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060922-2347 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (=

Bug#389233: fireflier_1.1.6-2+b2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: configure errors

Package: fireflier Version: 1.1.6-2+b2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of fireflier_1.1.6-2+b2 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060921-1801 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends:

Bug#389231: defrag_0.73pjm1-8(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: cast increases required alignment of target type

Package: defrag Version: 0.73pjm1-8 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of defrag_0.73pjm1-8 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060922-0805 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends:

Bug#389238: asterisk-chan-capi: fails to load with asterisk-bristuff

Package: asterisk-chan-capi Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I cant load it with asterisk-bristuff (1.2.11.dfsg-1). I get this error: [chan_capi.so]Sep 24 19:41:33 WARNING[30578]: loader.c:325 __load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_capi.so:

Bug#389171: ndiswrapper-source: doesn't compile on 2.6.17-1 and 2.6.17-2

cd /usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper make distclean Does that help? *_exports.h *may* exist if timestamps are out of whack. So using 'distclean' instead of 'clean' in debian/rules may avoid this in the future. Yes now build fine. If you plan to change this in debian/rules you could close

Bug#389226: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?

reassign 389226 cli-common-dev thanks On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 10:52 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't locate XML/DOM.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8

Bug#389242: eog: version from experimental is uninstallable

Package: eog Version: 2.16.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package eog from experimental is uninstallable due to dependancy on unavailable libc6 (= 2.4-1). -- With best wishes Dmitry -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers

Bug#366620: marked as done (initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs, 2.6.15-1-powerpc works)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:55 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375035: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#375035: marked as done (Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running initramfs init)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:55 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375035: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#375035: marked as done (Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running initramfs init)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:49 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366620: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#379846: libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal isn't anymore (was Re: Bug#379846: Patch for NMU )

This patch causes libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal to use mit gssapi libraries, becoming equivalent to libsasl2-gssapi-mit. if this build-depends change is the only way to make building cyrus-sasl2 work, then it should probably be arranged that libsasl2-gssapi-mit is built from the cyrus-sasl2

Processed: Re: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 389226 cli-common-dev Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep? Bug reassigned from package `beagle' to `cli-common-dev'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#389246: spong-www: sarge to etch upgrade fails

Package: spong-www Version: 2.7.7-12 Severity: serious Hello Clément, There is an error when upgrading spong-www from sarge to etch, Setting up spong-common (2.7.7-12) ... sed: can't read /etc/spong/spong.conf.zeta3: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing spong-common

Bug#366620: marked as done (initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs, 2.6.15-1-powerpc works)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:49 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366620: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: upgrading

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 381112 serious Bug#381112: muine 0.8.5-1+b1 seems to depend on gstreamer0.8-misc Severity set to `serious' from `important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#389247: gnome-keyring-manager: version from experimental is uninstallable

Package: gnome-keyring-manager Version: 2.16.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package gnome-keyring-manager from experimental is uninstallable due to dependancy on unavailable libc6 (= 2.4-1). -- With best wishes Dmitry Baryshkov -- System Information: Debian

Processed: retitle

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 389226 Can't locate XML/DOM.pm Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep? Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#389255: xserver-xfree86: Graphical session does not start.

Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 Severity: critical *** Please type your report below this line *** Install done on iMac DV (Slot Loading) Specs here: http://support.apple.com/specs/imac/iMac_Slot_Loading.html IIRC, this worked with Debain 3.1r2. I'm using the 3.1r3

Bug#389226: marked as done (Can't locate XML/DOM.pm)

(administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: beagle Version: 0.2.10-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of beagle_0.2.10-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060924-1258 [...] ** Using build

Bug#384940: marked as done (zope-ttwtype: uninstallable; zope-cmf1.4 not in sid)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:50:03 +0200 (CEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378712: fixed (fwd) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#383344: closing with right version

On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:29:28PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: close 385071 1.5-4 close 383344 1.5-4 thanks 1.5-4 1.5.0.5-1, so this is effectively a no-op. Is the bug closed or not? The bug log is rather confusing... p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or

Bug#389238: asterisk-chan-capi: fails to load with asterisk-bristuff

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 07:42:04PM +0200, Christoph Kaminski wrote: Package: asterisk-chan-capi Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I cant load it with asterisk-bristuff (1.2.11.dfsg-1). I get this error: [chan_capi.so]Sep 24 19:41:33

Bug#388300: marked as done (udev does not provide/create /dev/MAKEDEV symlink)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:34:01 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388300: fixed in udev 0.100-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#389231: defrag_0.73pjm1-8(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: cast increases required alignment of target type

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: defrag Version: 0.73pjm1-8 Severity: serious Severity for FTBFS which never build before is important only. Not an RC bug. Adjusting. There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: I am aware of the alignment errors but don't know what to do

Processed: This needs to be updated or should be removed from Etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329907 grave Bug#329907: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: please add support for 2.6.13 Severity set to `grave' from `wishlist' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: severity of 389231 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 389231 important Bug#389231: defrag_0.73pjm1-8(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: cast increases required alignment of target type Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#383344: closing with right version

close 383344 1.5.0.5-1 thanks On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 08:23:03PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:29:28PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: close 385071 1.5-4 close 383344 1.5-4 thanks 1.5-4 1.5.0.5-1, so this is effectively a no-op. Is the

Bug#383344: closing with right version

reopen 383344 close 383344 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:17:08PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: 1.5-4 1.5.0.5-1, so this is effectively a no-op. Is the bug closed or not? The bug log is rather confusing... Urgh ... looks like I did something completely wrong here. Anyway: This bug is closed ...

Processed: This needs to be adapted to 2.6.17/2.6.18 or removed from Etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 383738 grave Bug#383738: ppscsi-source: cannot compile with 2.6.17-2 kernel/headers Severity set to `grave' from `important' severity 290300 grave Bug#290300: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.6: ppscsi does not function properly on 2.6.10 Severity set

Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

Let's add XFS team in CC. On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version: 2.6.17+2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system More details, please. What happend before this boot? Why ext3 is recovering? raid1: raid set md1

Processed: Re: closing with right version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 383344 1.5.0.5-1 Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5.0.5-1, send any further explanations to Leszek Koltunski [EMAIL

Processed: Re: closing with right version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 383344 Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. close 383344 Bug#383344:

Processed: tagging 388376

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 388376 pending Bug#388376: latex-ucs-doc: installs files into /usr/share/texmf/doc against Debian TeX policy There were no tags set. Bug#388407: tex-common: Trying to overwrite

Processed: License does not explicitly permit modification and distribution, but....

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 388691 serious Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues Severity set to `serious' from `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#389269: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k: Shouldn't ship with Etch: 2.2 patch, not a release arch

Package: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This patch shouldn't be included in Etch, which will be kernel 2.6 only. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Bug#389267: CVE-2006-4294: Directory traversal vulnerability in TWiki

Package: twiki Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole A vulnerability has been found in twiki: Directory traversal vulnerability in viewfile in TWiki 4.0.0 through 4.0.4 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the filename parameter. I

Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

Dne Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Oleg Verych napsal: Let's add XFS team in CC. There isn't On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version: 2.6.17+2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system More details, please.

Processed: Re: Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 389232 linux-2.6 Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#389265: kernel-patch-relayfs: Obsolete, keep it out of Etch

Package: kernel-patch-relayfs Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This kernel patch has been filed for removal in sid. As processing of ftp.debian.org removal bugs can take some time I'm filing a bug to keep it out of Etch before the freeze. #386811 - RM: kernel-patch-relayfs

Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:19:07PM +0200, Dan Ohnesorg wrote: Dne Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Oleg Verych napsal: Let's add XFS team in CC. There isn't Yes, my MUA... On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 Version:

  1   2   >