Bug#899613: mokomaze: Invalid maintainer address pkg-fso-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Christoph Biedl wrote: > This affects your package mokomaze since the list address > pkg-fso-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org used in the Maintainer: field was > not transferred to the alioth-lists service that provides a > continuation for the lists in the @

Bug#905816: xul-ext-form-history-control: rename to webext-form-history-control, set correct dependencies

Control: severity -1 important On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:23:26 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > Since the package no longer works with Firefox ESR 52 This release of Firefox ESR is no longer in Debian unstable. > rename it to webext-form-history-control This still needs to happen. > Rig

Bug#906869: xul-ext-uppity no longer works with firefox-esr 60

Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:27:13 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-uppity > XUL addons are no longer supported. Upstream has rewritten it as a WebExtension: https://github.com/arantius/uppity -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc

Bug#906870: xul-ext-certificatepatrol no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:31:45 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-certificatepatrol > Severity: serious > > XUL addons are no longer supported. Mozilla are still discussing if WebExtensions or NSS extensions are going to be allowed to access and modify TLS validation results: https://bug

Bug#881894: xul-ext-cookie-monster: dead upstream, broken in FF57

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:21:56 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Package: xul-ext-cookie-monster > > Seems this addon is dead upstream (at least: > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cookie-monster/ > says "This add-on has been removed by its author."). > > Also it won't work wit

Bug#906859: xul-ext-dom-inspector no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:11:16 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-dom-inspector > > XUL addons are no longer supported. The native Firefox developer tools are almost a replacement, so I think this package can just be removed from Debian. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#906841: xul-ext-firebug no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:01:17 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-firebug > > XUL addons are no longer supported. The native Firefox developer tools were written to replace Firebug so I think this package can just be removed from Debian. https://getfirebug.com/ https://developer.mozilla.

Bug#827174: xul-ext-https-finder is broken

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:49:06 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote: > HTTPS Finder does not seem to find any HTTPS pages. > To reproduce, go to . This site has a valid HTTPS > version, but HTTPS Finder doesn't find it. I think it should be removed from Debian in favour of one of these: http

Bug#906831: xul-ext-iceweasel-branding no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 19:10:39 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-iceweasel-branding > > XUL addons are no longer supported. Apparently Parabola has kept their package working (untested): https://notabug.org/desktopd/iceweasel-branding/issues/3 https://git.parabola.nu/packages/iceweasel-

Bug#906858: xul-ext-livehttpheaders no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:10:27 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-livehttpheaders > > XUL addons are no longer supported. The native Firefox developer tools are almost a replacement, so I think this package can just be removed from Debian. The only missing thing is the headers tab in the

Bug#769441: Does not work with Iceweasel 33

On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:33:24 +0200 Arto Jantunen wrote: > Package: xul-ext-monkeysphere > > Starting with Iceweasel 33 the monkeysphere extension no longer works. No > error messages are shown, but a cert that validates fine with msva-query-agent > is not accepted by Iceweasel. In addition, sinc

Bug#906862: xul-ext-openinbrowser no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:15:00 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-openinbrowser > > XUL addons are no longer supported. I think it should be removed from Debian in favour of this: https://github.com/Rob--W/open-in-browser -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc

Bug#906865: xul-ext-refcontrol no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:19:52 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-refcontrol > > XUL addons are no longer supported. I think it should be removed from Debian in favour of this: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/referer-modifier/ -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWi

Bug#906864: xul-ext-perspectives no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:18:04 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: xul-ext-perspectives > > XUL addons are no longer supported. Mozilla are still discussing if WebExtensions or NSS extensions are going to be allowed to access and modify TLS validation results: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bu

Bug#853992: xul-ext-requestpolicy: update requestpolicy to 1.0 beta12.4 - compatibility with web extensions

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/RequestPolicyContinued/requestpolicy/issues/704 Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream # partially On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:00:02 +0530 shirish शिरीष wrote: > First of all thank you for taking care of xul-ext-requestpolicy for so > long. Was just browsing today a

Bug#881904: xul-ext-useragentswitcher: does not work with modern versions of Firefox

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 01:05:32 -0800 Ian Bruce wrote: > Please replace it with one of the following: > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher-revived/ > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/custom-user-agent-revived/ I note that both of these are *very* diff

Bug#908678: security-tracker - Breaks salsa.d.o

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Do you have any hints at us on what we could look at to faciliate/help > more salsa maintainers? I think I read on IRC that the main thing is that the design of git is not optimised for having large and growing files that change on ev

Bug#906865: xul-ext-refcontrol no longer works with firefox-esr 60

On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 15:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I think it should be removed from Debian in favour of this: > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/referer-modifier/ FYI upstream has imported that into a git repository here: https://github.com/airtower-luna/re

Bug#881395: gedit-plugin-dashboard: traceback when opening new tabs: AttributeError: 'Image' object has no attribute 'get_children'

Package: gedit-plugin-dashboard Version: 3.22.0-3 Severity: serious File: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gedit/plugins/dashboard/__init__.py Usertags: crash When I open a new tab in gedit, I get this traceback on the terminal where I ran gedit. Filing at serious because I guess this means the plugin pa

Bug#878549: uprightdiff FTBFS with OpenCV 3.2

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 23:45:28 -0700 Kunal Mehta wrote: > I've asked my sponsor to review and upload the new version. You might want to submit a public sponsorship request: https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: T

Bug#882538: outguess: missing source for jpeg-6b-steg/configure

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:21:35 -0200 Eriberto wrote: > It not seems a code without a source code. The code can't be > regenerated from a configure.ac but it can be modified to work if it > is necessary. It is similar to a traditional configure file, made by > hand. I can't see a real problem here. I

Bug#823004: gplaycli: sensitive information in config file

On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I suggest this bug report be closed wontfix. This bug has now caused gplaycli to be removed from Debian stretch. Is there any progress to report? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This i

Bug#855788: needrestart-dbus-session: Failed to setup environment correctly

Package: needrestart-session Version: 0.3-3 Severity: serious When I login I noticed that I get this in my user systemd journal: Feb 19 21:29:18 chianamo needrestart-dbus-session[2355]: terminated Feb 19 21:29:18 chianamo needrestart-dbus-session[2355]: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.FailedToS

Bug#855788: 855788 severity

On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 23:30 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > FWIW, no such problem here. Is that high severity really warranted ? The package is not working for me at all. I assumed that the reason no-one else reported the same issue was that no-one else was using the package and verifying that it wor

Bug#855788: 855788 severity

On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 23:24 +0100, Thomas Liske wrote: > the package's core functionally is the needrestart-session command - does > it working for you? When I run needrestart as a user, I get a lot of processes that need restarting but when I run needrestart-session, it says this: Nothing found

Bug#855788: 855788 severity

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 00:29 +0100, Thomas Liske wrote: > could you please verify if there is a user named "needrestart-dbus"? The > package seems no creating the required user. Maybe this report is a > duplicate of #857077. There is no needrestart-dbus user on my system. -- bye, pabs https://w

Bug#838671: openchangeproxy: uninstallable in jessie, broken by samba

Control: tags 838671 + patch On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:58:22 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > openchange also FTBFS in stable: FYI, I've a patch from upstream, waiting on release team approval: https://bugs.debian.org/851678 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Descripti

Bug#905816: xul-ext-form-history-control: rename to webext-form-history-control, set correct dependencies

Package: xul-ext-form-history-control Version: 2.0.3.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Since the package no longer works with Firefox ESR 52 from Debian unstable and earlier, please rename it to webext-form-history-control and set the dependencies to prevent installing it with Firefox ESR 52. Right now

Bug#905816: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#905816: xul-ext-form-history-control: rename to webext-form-history-control, set correct dependencies

On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 10:24 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I doubt it magically becomes a web extension just because we rename the > package. I haven't checked this particular extension, but if it has not > been redone as a web extension it cane be removed. If it has, though, > it needs to be upda

Bug#905877: regression in 1.4: upgrades random packages from testing to experimental (doesn't respect pinning?)

Package: unattended-upgrades Version: 1.4 Severity: serious Recently I have had unattended-upgrades upgrade random packages from testing to experimental. If I downgrade the packages upgraded, I won't get the same packages upgraded the next day. I run apt-show-versions daily and save the output to

Bug#905877: regression in 1.4: upgrades random packages from testing to experimental (doesn't respect pinning?)

On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 14:28 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > I proposed [2] a candidate adjustment fix which includes picking only > lower versions of packages originally offered by apt's resolver which > I believe would help in not upgrading packages to experimental. Why is u-u selecting the candid

Bug#918323: unattended-upgrades: tried to upgrade package with conffile prompt

Package: unattended-upgrades Version: 1.9 Severity: serious unattended-upgrades tried to upgrade a package (lvm2) with a conffile prompt and failed because conffile prompts require user input. This meant that the upgrade of lvm2 failed and was the system was left in a partially broken state. Norma

Bug#905877: regression in 1.4: upgrades random packages from testing to experimental (doesn't respect pinning?)

Package: unattended-upgrades Version: 1.9 On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 10:40:33 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > Recently I have had unattended-upgrades upgrade random packages from > testing to experimental. I thought this had been fixed but recently I got git upgraded to experimental for some reason

Bug#905877: regression in 1.4: upgrades random packages from testing to experimental (doesn't respect pinning?)

Control: found -1 unattended-upgrades/1.10 On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 11:24:42 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > I thought this had been fixed but recently I got git upgraded to > experimental for some reason. I've included the full debug log below. This happened again with 1.10. I can add the lo

Bug#851109: emscripten: violates font license

Source: emscripten Version: 1.22.1-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: tests/freetype/LiberationSansBold.ttf This looks to be from here:

Bug#851110: freedink: violates font license

Source: freedink Version: 108.4-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: share/freedink/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf This looks to be from here:

Bug#851112: gcstar: violates font license

Source: gcstar Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: share/gcstar/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf This looks to be from her

Bug#851111: gargoyle-free: violates font license

Source: gargoyle-free Version: 2011.1a-3.1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.ttf fonts/LiberationMono-Bold

Bug#851114: minetest: violates font license

Source: minetest Version: 0.4.15+repack-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: fonts/liberationsans.ttf This looks to be from here: https:/

Bug#851113: manaplus: violates font license

Source: manaplus Version: 1.7.1.7-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: data/fonts/liberationsans.ttf data/fonts/liberationsansmono.ttf data

Bug#851116: zygrib: violates font license

Source: zygrib Version: 8.0.1-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: data/fonts/liberation-fonts/LiberationSans-BoldItalic.ttf data/fonts/lib

Bug#851115: pcs: violates font license

Source: pcs Version: 0.9.155-3 Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: license-violation X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Your source package contains an GPL/LGPL font: pcsd/public/css/LiberationSans-BoldItalic.ttf pcsd/public/css/LiberationS

Bug#851113: manaplus: violates font license

On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 16:25 +0300, Andrei Karas wrote: > I will add dejavu and liberation fonts sources from debian source > packages into data/fonts/src/ It would be better to remove the embedded font copies from the upstream source. You can then distribute the font source tarball and the source

Bug#851339: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#851339: Bug#851339: fonts-firacode: package in Debian with non-Debian build dependencies

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > thank you very much for your bug report. However, I believe you are wrong > with applying RC severity to this issue and I have added FTP-Masters to CC > in the hope for clarification. I agree with Ben on this issue. > I don't think that

Bug#851339: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: fonts-firacode: package in Debian with non-Debian build dependencies

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > But the OTF format itself is just as suitable a source format for fonts as > any other format. Why is it so important what upstream has chosen? It is > not that font composition is a human-readable-to-binary-one-way-road like > compilatio

Bug#851339: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: fonts-firacode: package in Debian with non-Debian build dependencies

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Please note that the "preferred form for modification" is a term > exclusive to the GPL, it does not necessarily apply to fonts licensed > under any other license. Also, I am not sure if this is really exactly > what is meant by the "missi

Bug#851934: date: regression in 8.26-1: conversion from one timezone to another TZ no longer works

Package: coreutils Version: 8.26-1 Severity: serious User: coreut...@packages.debian.org Usertags: date There is a regression from jessie, it is no longer possible to choose the TZ of the output date when providing a TZ for the input date, which means I can no longer use date to convert between ti

Bug#851113: Re[2]: Bug#851113: manaplus: violates font license

On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 23:21 +0300, Andrei Karas wrote: > New manaplus version released. With fonts sources in tarball. > This mean next package version will include fonts sources. > > Binary package not using any fonts from source tarball. I strongly suggest removing all embedded font copies (bo

Bug#851339: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#851339: fonts-firacode: package in Debian with non-Debian build dependencies

On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 12:39 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > I find this by far the most convincing argument, although I still find > it difficult to accept that it should make a difference for Debian as a > mere downstream distributor. We provide many packages with fonts in OTF > format and while

Bug#851339: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: fonts-firacode: package in Debian with non-Debian build dependencies

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Guys, thanks for taking the time to discuss this issue with me. Thanks for your patience, I hope the thread was interesting :) > Since I am the one who sponsored the 1.204-1 upload, I will also do the > next one. I will just re-upload th

Bug#851339: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: Bug#851339: fonts-firacode: package in Debian with non-Debian build dependencies

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > https://github.com/googlei18n/glyphsLib/issues/74 Wasn't aware of glyphsLib/fontmake, thanks for the link! -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#1037974: ddcci-dkms: code fails to build and package fails to install with Linux 6.3 headers

Package: ddcci-dkms Version: 0.4.2-4 Severity: serious When I try to install ddcci-dkms with the Linux 6.3 headers installed, the build of the code fails and then the install of the package fails. I think there are two problems here:  * The code needs to be adapted to the latest Linux kernel ver

Bug#1034582: opencpn: broken symlinks: MathJax.js highlight.min.js due to missing dependencies

Package: opencpn Version: 5.8.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious File: /usr/share/opencpn/plugins/chartdldr_pi/data/doc/MathJax.js File: /usr/share/opencpn/plugins/chartdldr_pi/data/doc/highlight.min.js User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: adequate broken-symlink opencpn 5.8.0+dfsg-1 introduced two

Bug#1028697: marked as pending in pydispatcher

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1028697 in pydispatcher reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pydispatcher/-/commit/e80bfbc79

Bug#1029481: yq: unmodified incorrect package description from debmake template

Package: yq Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: serious The current description of the yq package is rather bogus. It appears that the debmake template was not modified. $ apt-cache show yq | grep-dctrl -s Description-en . Description-en: auto-generated package by debmake This Debian binary pack

Bug#1029481: fixed with version 3.1.0-2

On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 11:21 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: > The other lines reported with > > dgrep -A5 'auto-generated' debmake > > are false-positives since they are files from the debmake package and > not from yq. That was just an illustration of where the yq package description that was c

Bug#1029749: pypi2deb: crashes with Python 3.11: AttributeError: module 'asyncio' has no attribute 'coroutine'. Did you mean: 'coroutines'?

Package: pypi2deb Version: 3.20220721 Severity: serious Usertags: crash User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.11 With Python 3.11 in a clean sid chroot, both py2dsp and pypi2debian crash with an error about the asyncio module attributes. This can also be seen on a mixed bookworm/s

Bug#1030004: itinerary: missing dependency on qml-module-qt-labs-qmlmodels

Package: itinerary Version: 22.08.2-1+b1 Severity: serious itinerary just hangs on start under GNOME, after I installed the qml-module-qt-labs-qmlmodels package then the GUI showed up. $ itinerary QSocketNotifier: Can only be used with threads started with QThread org.kde.kpublictranspo

Bug#1039613: nmap breaks udptunnel autopkgtest: UDPTunnel communication failed

On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 21:40:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: nmap, udptunnel > Control: found -1 nmap/7.94+dfsg1-1 > Control: found -1 udptunnel/1.1-9 ... > With a recent upload of nmap the autopkgtest of udptunnel fails in > testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of nma

Bug#1026624: mpv-mpris: FTBFS: mpris.c:1:10: fatal error: gio/gio.h: No such file or directory

Control: reassign -1 libmpv-dev Control: affects -1 src:mpv-mpris Control: retitle -1 libmpv-dev: missing dependency on wayland-protocols On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 18:16 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > [mpv-mpris] failed to build on amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): ... > > Package wayland-protoc

Bug#1026781: pkgconf: breaks adequate missing-pkgconfig-dependency check due to behaviour change in: pkg-config --exists --print-errors

Package: pkgconf Severity: serious When a pkg doesn't have its dependencies satisfied, pkgconf --cflags etc all print an error message and return a failure exit code. With pkg-config, --exists does this check too, exits with an error and with --print-errors present, prints the same error as --cfl

Bug#1025661: rust-plotters: invalid Uploaders field: missing comma between Jelmer Vernooij and Blair Noctis

Source: rust-plotters Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: serious rust-plotters 0.3.4-1 introduced an invalid Uploaders field, that is missing a comma between Jelmer Vernooij and Blair Noctis. $ apt-cache showsrc rust-plotters | grep -E '^$|^Version|^Uploaders' Version: 0.3.4-1 Uploaders: Jelmer V

Bug#1024106: traceshark: QCustomPlot transition

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:58:37 + Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > I think this should not have "Severity: serious" yet. The qcustomplot > transition has not yet started. imho, It will start when Sebastian > confirms and its uploaded to unstable and then these are serious > severity. The transition has

Bug#1025739: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source

On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 10:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > So far for the actual case (bug report in CC). > > For the general case I somehow understand the consensus here on the list > that a missing configure.ac can be considered a bug but the severity > serious is not really rectified.  If I und

Bug#987448: webkit2gtk regression: liferea: CSS for the posts is broken

Package: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 Version: 2.32.0-2 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 liferea X-Debbugs-CC: life...@packages.debian.org The recent upgrade to webkit2gtk 2.32.0-2 broke the CSS that the liferea RSS reader uses to style the HTML it injects for post metadata. By default liferea looks

Bug#987504: imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS'

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 23:20:43 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Options are either reverting the imagemagick change or fixing > the packages that got broken in bullseye and buster. For foxtrotgps, I committed upstream a change that makes writing the EPS images only happen when creating the DVI/PS documen

Bug#987448: fixed in liferea 1.13.5-2

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 19:03 +, Paul Gevers wrote: >    * Add patch to work with latest webgit2gkt: > 34d26be00328a68d2f1625c78b54dc168da0648e.patch (Closes: #987448) I confirm that this change has fixed the issue that I reported. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signatu

Bug#964511: Tests are failing, need to depends on the svg loader

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 21:29:07 +0200 Ondřej Tůma wrote: > thank's for report. I'm working now on version 1.4.3, which is last > upstream stable version. So I apply patch to new version too. It is now too late to get 1.4.3 into bullseye and the bug is now going to cause formiko to be removed from bul

Bug#964511: Tests are failing, need to depends on the svg loader

On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 16:24 +0200, Ondřej Tůma wrote: > I'm waiting for Ondrej N. now. For future reference, if your usual sponsor doesn't have time, you can file a request for sponsoring, details are available here:    https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers > I was prepare new Debian 1.3

Bug#964511: Tests are failing, need to depends on the svg loader

On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 11:00 +0200, Ondřej Tůma wrote: > Here is fixed package in mentors, i hope right fixed... > https://mentors.debian.net/package/formiko/ That looks good to me. > And here is unblock request > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989643 I see the

Bug#989193: fixed in apparmor-profiles-extra 1.34

On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 07:18:32 + intrigeri wrote: >* apt-cacher-ng: allow link operations on the contents of the cache > directory > (Closes: #989193). Thanks to Eduard Bloch for the patch. Here is a little bump to postpone the autoremoval so the fix gets into testing. -- bye, pabs

Bug#957127: ddccontrol: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ddccontrol/ddccontrol/issues/74 https://github.com/ddccontrol/ddccontrol/pull/80 Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:58:40 + Matthias Klose wrote: > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-1

Bug#962203: NMU

On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:23:08 -0500 Calum McConnell wrote: > I have prepared an NMU for this package. It is currently at > https://mentors.debian.net/package/debdelta/ . While I need a sponsor to > get it into Debian, I am now reaching out to ment...@lists.debian.org to > see if I can expedite th

Bug#962203: NMU

On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 21:50 -0500, Calum McConnell wrote: > Yeah, when I tried to build it locally, it failed due to files that > are present in the source package but missing from Git. There are more changes than just the documentation build things though. > I eventually gave up and just includ

Bug#979283: ddccontrol FTBFS with current glibc

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ddccontrol/ddccontrol/issues/88 On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:22:52 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: > ddccontrol fails to build from source on arm architectures I filed the above upstream bug about this. > I see basically two options: > * Make the relevant functiona

Bug#962203: NMU

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 10:55:39 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > Maybe lets wait for A Mennucc1 to do a maintainer upload, and if it > gets close to the next autoremoval date, do a more minimal NMU. The next autoremoval date is getting closer, so it looks like A Mennucc1 does not have time to fi

Bug#962203: NMU

On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 13:32 +0100, A Mennucc1 wrote: > Dear all, sorry for being MIA so long; No worries, I'm sure you had good reason, it is more important to take care of yourself than to contribute to Debian and other FLOSS projects. > I have added the NMU to the GIT repository. a. Thanks fo

Bug#962203: NMU

On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 10:12 +0100, A Mennucc1 wrote: > Il 11/01/21 01:28, Paul Wise ha scritto: > > A Mennucc1, would you be interested in having assistance with the > > codebase and the service? > > that's OK for me Excellent! > What is the best debian-ish way to

Bug#979283: ddccontrol FTBFS with current glibc

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:22:52 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: > ddccontrol fails to build from source on arm architectures Since we are very close to the bullseye freeze and there is no sign of a fix coming, I've requested removal (#980081) of the armel/armhf binaries and will downgrade this bug once th

Bug#977081: fixed in pytest-rerunfailures 9.1.1-1

On Mon, 04 Jan 2021 04:49:07 + Paul Wise wrote: >* New upstream release. > - Increases pytest requirement to 5.0 > - Fixes FTBFS with pytest 6 (Closes: #977081) This hasn't migrated yet because of the pytest transition. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debia

Bug#981146: loggedfs: fails: fusermount: unknown option 'nonempty'

Package: loggedfs Version: 0.9+ds-2 Severity: serious When I try to use loggedfs I get an error, presumably because loggedfs wants fuse rather than fuse3, but I can't install fuse because other things I have installed want fuse3 instead of fuse. $ dir=$(mktemp --directory tmp-XX) $

Bug#981147: loggedfs: missing dependency on fuse/fuse3 for fusermount binary

Package: loggedfs Version: 0.9+ds-2 Severity: serious When I try to run loggedfs on a system without fuse/fuse3 installed I get an error because the fusermount binary is not found. $ dir=$(mktemp --directory tmp-XX) $ loggedfs -f `pwd`/$dir 2021-01-27 07:14:50,851 INFO [default]

Bug#981146: loggedfs: fails: fusermount: unknown option 'nonempty'

On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 13:10 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Unfortunately this would be rather difficult to fix in loggedfs itself. Ugh, sorry for the bugs then. I did strings on loggedfs, saw fusermount and nonempty in the output so presumed it was coming from loggedfs. I'll leave it up to you to c

Bug#983433: libemail-outlook-message-perl: msgconvert: missing dependency on libemail-message-perl

Package: libemail-outlook-message-perl Version: 0.920-1 Severity: serious Control: found -1 0.919-4~bpo10+1 X-Debbugs-CC: Olly Betts Due to a change in msgconvert, libemail-outlook-message-perl is missing a dependency on libemail-message-perl in bullseye and buster-backports, but not in Debian bu

Bug#983433: marked as pending in libemail-outlook-message-perl

On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 15:14 +, Axel Beckert wrote: > Add missing Recommends on libemail-address-perl for msgconvert script Any particular reason you went with Recommends instead of Depends? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe

Bug#985245: src:ppmd: reintroduced with lower version number, different project?

On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 18:34 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Per Policy 3.2.2 this is actually RC, and there is no length of time > after which it's Policy-compliant to reuse package name--version pairs: > "the version numbers which a binary package must not reuse includes the > version numbers of any

Bug#985245: src:ppmd: reintroduced with lower version number, different project?

On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:44 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > but other paragraphs do (i think) :) Ah, I see! > there's no guarantee (althought i find it highly unlikely) that > src:ppmd will not reach the same version of the old ppmd that used to > be present in the archive a decade ago. The require

Bug#971061: updated version

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:49:48 -0500 "Full Name" wrote: > Confirmed that cloning SDL works fine, but I'm getting out of memory > errors from fast-import when fetching updates. I just tried upstream git-remote-hg 1.0.2.1 and I cannot reproduce this issue using your steps. Can you retry the issue w

Bug#971061: git-remote-hg: Mercurial no longer supports Python 2

On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 02:07 -0400, Full Name wrote: > TL;DR As of git 1:2.30.2-1, git-remote-hg 1.0.2.1 appears to be working > on Bullseye. Thanks for confirming the OOM was a git issue not git-remote-hg. Jonas, would you be willing to merge Simon's changes and make a new upload of git-remote-h

Bug#972744: openstack-debian-images: bullseye: /updates -> -security

Package: openstack-debian-images Version: 1.47 Severity: serious File: /usr/sbin/build-openstack-debian-image User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: bullseye-security With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bulls

Bug#972745: openstack-tempest-ci: bullseye: /updates -> -security

Package: openstack-tempest-ci Version: 0.30 Severity: serious File: /usr/sbin/build-openstack-debian-image User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: bullseye-security With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye

Bug#972747: sbuild: bullseye: /updates -> -security

Package: sbuild Version: 0.80.0 Severity: serious File: /usr/share/sbuild/create-chroot User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: bullseye-security With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye/updates. The abov

Bug#972749: xen-tools: bullseye: /updates -> -security

Package: xen-tools Version: 4.8-1 Severity: serious File: /usr/share/xen-tools/debian.d/20-setup-apt User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: bullseye-security With the release of Debian bullseye and later, security updates are provided in the bullseye-security suite instead of bullseye/updat

Bug#972749: xen-tools: bullseye: /updates -> -security

On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 08:05 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Ack. Just have to think how I make that separation properly. Either by > listing all supported previous release names (or maybe just those not > yet archived) and defaulting to the new scheme to be comaptible with > all future releases. Tha

Bug#972802: rust-webpki-roots: duplicates ca-certificates, remove from Debian?

Source: rust-webpki-roots Severity: serious Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team , kpcyrd Usertags: embed rust-webpki-roots is essentially a duplicate of ca-certificates. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ca-certificates https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCopies AFAICT, rebuilding the p

Bug#972802: rust-webpki-roots: duplicates ca-certificates, remove from Debian?

On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 03:06 +, kpcyrd wrote: > Yes, running the build.py script would cause reproducible builds issues > because it's used to take snapshots of Mozilla's trusted root CA > certificates. Hmm, I assume that is because it would build from the current snapshot each time it is run?

Bug#969273: gnome-shell-extension-weather: fails to load: TypeError: this.actor.reparent is not a function

On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 12:37 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > updating from the latest HEAD of: > https://gitlab.com/jenslody/gnome-shell-extension-openweather I do see it > working but I get exclamation mark with the icons as in the attached > screenshot. Not sure if this is what is expected. I can

Bug#957439: libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10

On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 11:18 -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Thanks for your upload. Real life took over again. :-( No worries. Debian should definitely be lower priority than real life :) > Want to take over the package? :-) I don't have time to take over another package, sorry. :( -- bye,

Bug#972802: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#972802: rust-webpki-roots: duplicates ca-certificates, remove from Debian?

On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 20:45 +, kpcyrd wrote: > It's more complicated than that, there's rustls-native-certs to use the > local certificate store, but the patch would be so invasive that debian > would effectively maintain a fork. At the time of writing webpki-roots > has 85 reverse dependencie

Bug#972802: Removed package(s) from unstable

On Sun, 2020-11-08 at 21:42 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following > package(s) have been removed from unstable: > > librust-webpki-roots-dev | 0.20.0-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386 > rust-webpki-roots | 0.20.0-1 | source > w

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >