Followup-For: Bug #969907
Control: tag -1 patch
https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/poppler/-/merge_requests/14
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/inkscape/-/merge_requests/4
Andreas
What about this solution:
In src:poppler provide a virtual package
Package: libpoppler-glibYY
Provides: libpopplerXX-glibYY (= ${binary:Version})
(where XX and YY are the sonames of the respective packages)
and in src:inkscape (and maybe others) add some sed
manipulation to d/rules:
#
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 05:14:31PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hello,
> is there any progress on this [bug]?
I kinda lost track of it after I handled it in inkscape (since it's not
effectively out of my concerns).
Are there any other affected packages? If so, they probably ought to
tighten
Hello,
is there any progress on this [bug]?
I've just re-read all the bug log, and I acknowledge that the issue is
not easy to deal with.
But, whatever the decision, I think that the bug should be somehow
fixed, in the poppler packages, or in the other packages depending on
the library.
Please
Hi Mattia,
On 4/14/21 8:18 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
So, if that's what you think, should I upload an inkscape with a manual
dependency on libpoppler-glib8 >= 20.09.0?
Yes, that would be useful.
I've just uploaded a new
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > So, if that's what you think, should I upload an inkscape with a manual
> > dependency on libpoppler-glib8 >= 20.09.0?
>
> Yes, that would be useful.
I've just uploaded a new inkscape with this as its only change.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:53:55PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:02:20PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > There is a theoretical and a practical aspect to this issue. From a
> > theoretical point of view, the dependency relations should not be stricter
> > than
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:02:20PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> There is a theoretical and a practical aspect to this issue. From a
> theoretical point of view, the dependency relations should not be stricter
> than necessary, to allow partial upgrades and to avoid complicating
> migration to
Hi Simon,
There is a theoretical and a practical aspect to this issue. From a
theoretical point of view, the dependency relations should not be
stricter than necessary, to allow partial upgrades and to avoid
complicating migration to testing of library transitions.
On 4/11/21 12:37 PM,
Control: retitle -1 inkscape, etc. crashing with mismatched libpoppler102 and
libpoppler-glib8
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 22:13:13 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Install inkscape on a buster system. The pdf David attached can be opened
> without issue. Upgrade only inkscape to bullseye (letting apt
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 inkscape, etc. crashing with mismatched libpoppler102 and
> libpoppler-glib8
Bug #969907 [libpoppler-glib8] epdfinfo crashing with mismatched libpoppler102
and libpoppler-glib8
Changed Bug title to 'inkscape, etc. crashing with mismatched libpopp
11 matches
Mail list logo
