n detected.
I'll mark this on the todo page. For the short term, you can use the
netinst image instead.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
builds
[2]). It has a very complex structure (up to 5 levels deep) and offers
many similar options in the sub menus.
Is this intentional?
Expected:
The GRUB menu for arm64 is identical to or only slightly different from
the amd64 netinst image.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[1] https
showed that (at least for
the live-build images) GRUB is able to use the graphical mode correctly.
As a side note, the graphical installer also shows properly, so there
appears to be no problem in using the graphical mode.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
---
[1] https://openqa.debian.net/tests
Hello Cyril, list,
On 21/03/2024 15:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/03/msg00102.html
The diagram shows nicely that the t64-transition is affecting the
installer, with currently 1 major bottleneck, libpng16-16t64-udeb:
ally seen that for Debian Edu, the installer
fails with the message that libaio.1.so is missing, so some udeb is
probably also requiring an update.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e building (reproducibly) again. The
tests in OpenQA also look good.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is the 12.3 release day).
I think that this ticket could be re-assigned (or cloned) to live-build
for the implementation of the fix.
If needed, could a 12.3.1 live image be released, with just this fix,
instead of waiting for 12.4?
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature.asc
machines?
** The workload on osuosl3-amd64.d.n is already rather high
That's already a lot for a single mail,
with kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[1] https://jenkins.debian.net/view/live/
[2] https://openqa.debian.net/group_overview/10
[3]
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian=testing
Hello Debian-cd Team,
now that 12.1 has been released, is a push to the git repository at
Salsa missing?
The file `available/CONF.sh.bookworm_release` still mentions 12.0.0
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ninstalled and
it is not possible the boot the system.
This was also reported in #1039710, but diagnosis is hindered by an
empty syslog which needs to be resolved first.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Debian-Images team,
(and reply to self for the second time) :-)
On 12/04/2023 17:03, Roland Clobus wrote:
On 08/04/2023 10:48, Roland Clobus wrote:
I've tested the .zsync files on [1].
They currently don't work, because the original filename
(live-image-amd64.hybrid.iso) is embedded
On 08/04/2023 10:48, Roland Clobus wrote:
Hello Debian-Images team,
I've tested the .zsync files on [1].
They currently don't work, because the original filename
(live-image-amd64.hybrid.iso) is embedded in those files.
As a fix, I see several possibilities, which do you prefer?
1) Turn off
Hello Cyril, list,
On 10/04/2023 10:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Roland Clobus (2023-04-10):
It turns out that the package 'live-installer' (which is a udeb-only
package) in Bookworm still is at version 57 [2], while the fix was
released at version 58.
Could the package be unblocked?
...
I
was
released at version 58.
Could the package be unblocked? (And/Or will there be an installer RC2?)
The new version of live-installer is working correctly, as can be seen
by a sid build of the live image on openQA [4].
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[1] https://openqa.debian.net/tests/139702#step
.hybrid.iso`. This is different from the
current names on [1].
If we go for option 2, it will need (small) changes in the `live-build`,
`live-setup` and `jenkins.debian.net` git repos.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[1] https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid
ges; I expect there might be some more
work needed there yet, but I'd love to be proven wrong. :-)
This weekend I've written the missing parts, non-free-firmware images
are now generated by default by live-build, and the ISO images are still
bit-for-bit reproducible.
With kind regards,
Rola
-line
installation [A5]
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[A1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/11/msg00221.html
[A2] https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/2
[A3]
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/localechooser/-/merge_requests/7
[A4]
https
.
FYI: win32-loader has also been dropped from live-build images.
https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/commit/6908dfd6df69c9e9cd2458d9987b40b06bf1cfd3
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ebian Wiki pages, Debian Local
Groups.
I have created a small example of a Debian Desktop live system.
https://salsa.debian.org/StefanKropp/debian-desktop-live-system/
The 'Welcome to Debian' is a separate topic. I'll respond later.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
black"
with
selected_item_color = "white"
in boot/grub/theme/1 inside my netinst image.
The original file that is used is:
https://sources.debian.org/src/debian-cd/3.1.35/data/bullseye/grub-
theme.in/?hl=58#L58
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
Hello Debian-cd list,
I've collected my thoughts and have published a summary about live CD
generation for Bookworm (and sid), updated to the state of today.
https://rclobus.nl/blog/?p=286
It is now about 2 years ago that I wrote about the live image
generation, perhaps it will be in time
d in live-build in the last couple of years, I
would recommend to use live-build. You can take a look at the Wiki [1]
page that details some command line examples for e.g. building a GNOME
live image, and the documentation [2].
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Reprodu
ider using live-build again?
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2020/11/msg1.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2020/03/msg00225.html
[3] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleInstalls/LiveImages
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Jeroen and list,
Now that I'm able to reproducibly build images with live-build, I'm
looking at missing features in live-build.
On 17/11/2020 11:03, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
> On 17/11/2020 10:44 Luca Boccassi wrote:
>> On 11/11/202 11:54 Roland Clobus wrote:
>>> live-bui
uld not be merged to the git repository of live-build
* The git repo [4] has 2 commits which start with 'HACK'
** Only needed to make the image more similar to the live-wrapper image
-> should not be merged to the git repository of live-build
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
--- Appendix: Addi
of
> ACNG in a couple of days anyway. Do you also need it in backports?
If you still would like to include the patch, I think that the content
listing of a directory should always be considered volatile.
But, as said, I think that the bug should be reassigned to the
live-wrapper package.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sted today images? how to generates for debian 9
> and debian 8 live? and cd/dvd 1 set?
You are perhaps looking for the archive?
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
un-30live-wrapper mentions wheezy and jessie, so it is rather old
I would like to add to the live-manual the steps to build an image from
the current stable and testing versions of Debian. Do you have
hints/ideas how I can proceed?
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
--- Commands
This is the list o
28 matches
Mail list logo
