There are several changes in debian-cd CVS that are needed to work with
current d-i, and I doubt d-i will be changing any more before release.
So perhaps it's a good time to upload a new version of debian-cd?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:48:02PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Steve McIntyre]
If we want to get a vaguely useable version of debian-cd into sarge
for the release, we need to do it soon. I'm about to checkin the
couple of tiny changes that I have locally on normal debian-cd. If
anybody
Quoting Steve McIntyre:
If we want to get a vaguely useable version of debian-cd into sarge
for the release, we need to do it soon. I'm about to checkin the
couple of tiny changes that I have locally on normal debian-cd. If
anybody else has stuff to go in, do it ASAP please. I'm planning to do
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 08:37:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Quoting Steve McIntyre:
If we want to get a vaguely useable version of debian-cd into sarge
for the release, we need to do it soon. I'm about to checkin the
couple of tiny changes that I have locally on normal debian-cd
[Steve McIntyre]
If we want to get a vaguely useable version of debian-cd into sarge
for the release, we need to do it soon. I'm about to checkin the
couple of tiny changes that I have locally on normal debian-cd. If
anybody else has stuff to go in, do it ASAP please. I'm planning to do
[Jan Kesten]
Using ISOLINUX boot-disks image on CD1
/mirror2/debian-cd/tools/boot/sarge/boot-i386: line 184: syntax
error: unexpected end of file
make: *** [/ftp/tmp/sarge-i386/bootable-stamp] Error 2
- -- SNIP --
My local mirror was synced this morning, debian-cd is the CVS
Have a look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi Petter!
| Have a look at line 184 in the shell script available from
| /mirror2/debian-cd/tools/boot/sarge/boot-i386 on your machine, and see
| if you can find the syntax error. Perhaps some CVS merge conflict?
I can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
| I'm able to build on woody. I'm not aware of any issues which should
| make debian-cd break on woody.
It works fine again - I think there was an error in my local mirror
or the mirror I rsync from. Don't really know what
[Jan Kesten]
Any hint's? Or sould I try to build it under sarge/sid instead of my
woody system (but this works quite a long time now...)
I'm able to build on woody. I'm not aware of any issues which should
make debian-cd break on woody.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
Since yesterday I'm unable to create sarge images with debian-cd
(CVS version from yesterday) out of my local mirror (rsync from
ftp.de.debian.org - also yesterday). I got an error message like this:
/usr/bin/mkisofs: Uh oh, I cant find
The (Win32/Netsky.D.Worm) virus was detected in (zfinoc\your_archive.pif)
and was sent by ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Action: (File was not Cured,
Renaming.).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Steve McIntyre:
I'd like to create a branch in debian-cd CVS to check this lot in so
other people can test this out - comments?
I see no problem with that, but maybe it would be even better if you
could make the debian-cd code generic ?
if mkisofs --support-jigdo; then
...
else
://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo/i386/sarge-i386-1.template
which is obviously incorrect. I'd just output
Template=sarge-i386-1.template
by default, jigdo-lite groks relatve URLs for the Template= argument.
BTW, I'd distribute your changes to debian-cd simply as a patch - CVS
branching always makes me feel
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:54:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Quoting Steve McIntyre:
I'd like to create a branch in debian-cd CVS to check this lot in so
other people can test this out - comments?
I see no problem with that, but maybe it would be even better if you
could make the debian-cd
changes to debian-cd simply as a patch - CVS
branching always makes me feel uncomfortable. ;)
Wuss! :-) I use it all the time at work, and it's much easier to
maintain code this way IMHO.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You lock the door
And throw
Richard Atterer wrote:
jigdo-mirror is intended for this job.
Thanks Richard, but there is something I didn't quite catch about
jigdo-mirror:
Does it check for already downloaded debs in a particular directory? Or does
it mount -o loop any ISO image it finds? Or does it fetch the full ISO
of debian-cd locally to use my new code to create
bootable DVD images as jigdo files. On my home system sledge (1.7GHz
Athlon, 512MB RAM, fast SCSI disks) I can do the whole debian-cd run
to create these DVD jigdo files in about 25 minutes per architecture.
A full run of CDs will take about the same
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Lucio Crusca wrote:
Does it check for already downloaded debs in a particular directory? Or
does it mount -o loop any ISO image it finds?
Neither one - it assumes you either have a full Debian mirror on your hard
disc or in your LAN.
Or does it fetch
the 13 ISO images. Then I found
a file, namely README.CD-manufacture, on one of the mirrors. This file tells
to use the debian-cd package which seems to have nothing to do with jigdo.
All I need is to have working official Sarge ISO images up to date. The
questions:
1 - What should I use
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 03:16:17PM +0200, Lucio Crusca wrote:
1 - What should I use, debian-cd or jigdo?
jigdo. :)
1.1 - Just in case the answer is jigdo, is there a way to make the process
of updating images less interactive (not interactive at all) so that
jigdo-lite can be put
Package: debian-cd
Severity: normal
Hey everyone,
Otavio Salvador recommended that I report this jigdo file bug here. Feel
free to refile it if I've assigned it to the wrong place.
The Jigdo files for Sarge at:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/
do
Quoting Jan Kesten:
I had problems building sarge cd images from my local mirror
yesterday and today. I didn't change anything and used the latest
cvs version of debian-cd.
Can you show the CONF.sh file that you're using ?
It looks like there's a problem with your EXCLUDE variable
(Forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well for the links)
Cheers,
Pasc
-Forwarded Message-
From: SWITCHmirror Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-cd mirror on Swiss SunSITE moved to SWITCHmirror
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 05:52:22 -0500
Hello
SWITCHmirror
SWITCHmirror replaces the mirror service on Swiss SunSITE.
I already fixed this a couple of days ago.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
unset INSTALLER_CD || true
unset DI_CODENAME || true
# The debian-cd dir
# Where I am (hoping I'm in the debian-cd dir)
export BASEDIR=`pwd`
# Building woody cd set ...
export CODENAME=sarge
# By default use Debian installer packages from $CODENAME
if [ ! $DI_CODENAME ]
then
export
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
otavio is responsible for that change, maybe he can sort it out ? :)
I bet that we could replace -n with -e and have a better test. Or we
should at least add quotes around $(EXCLUDE) in the test itself.
I changed it already. Please can you and Jan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador wrote:
I changed it already. Please can you and Jan check if works now?
I tried to change this here too, and it seems to work now - if the run
completes I'll let you know. Thank you for looking!
Cheers,
Jan
- --
GPG-KeyID: 82201FC4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kesten wrote:
I changed it already. Please can you and Jan check if works now?
I tried seems very good - thanks again!
Was there anything changed recently at this point, because it worked a
long time?
Cheers,
Jan
- --
GPG-KeyID: 82201FC4
Jan Kesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried seems very good - thanks again!
Good.
Was there anything changed recently at this point, because it worked a
long time?
I've included the possibility to pre-process the exclude file like was
did in task. So, you exclude can include another files,
http://www.jonnyblair.co.uk/debian/
OK, added to http://www.debian.org/CD/artwork/. Jonny, can you please add a
note about what people are permitted to do with this artwork?
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net |
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Jonny Blair Design wrote:
Hi Folks,
I've just put together some artwork that you may be interested in using
for Debian Woody cds, available at:
http://www.jonnyblair.co.uk/debian/
Wow, I really like those covers. Will certainly use them if someone asks
me for burn Woody
[ cc: debian-www, soory for the tofu ]
IIRC there is somewhere a webpage, where such stuff is linked. I
definitly think, your artwork should be linked there.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
* Jonny Blair Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040504 18:24]:
Hi Folks,
I've just put together some artwork
* Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040504 23:54]:
IIRC there is somewhere a webpage, where such stuff is linked. I
definitly think, your artwork should be linked there.
http://www.jonnyblair.co.uk/debian/
I meant http://www.debian.org/CD/artwork/ .
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
selam
scak olan ne
hi,
who translate the german cd images? there are some bugs, so I would
translate it again, if it´s okay?
greetings benedikt
--
GNOME Deutschland - http://www.gnome.de
Benedikt Christopeit- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
-- Virus Warning Message (on vw2)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Q in file msg14252.pif
The file msg14252.pif is moved to /etc/iscan/virus/virAWA.HaOXa.
- Hokkaido University VirusWall -
Delivery Agent - Translation failed
- failed message -
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:21:57PM -0800, a b wrote:
On http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#why-jigdo it says:
Why should I use this jigdo program? I prefer a simple HTTP or FTP
download!
[...]
Do not be afraid to try out jigdo! The complex process of generating
the CD image is completely
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:21:57PM -0800, a b wrote:
On http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#why-jigdo it says:
Why should I use this jigdo program? I prefer a simple HTTP or FTP
download!
[...]
Do not be afraid to try out jigdo! The complex process of generating
the CD image is completely
I previously posted that I found discrepancies in the MD5s with 3.0 r2
ISO contents:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2004/debian-cd-200401/msg00089.html
I haven't seen any follow-up or any notes added to
http://www.debian.org/CD/ on this matter.
Having successfully completed a few
I previously posted that I found discrepancies in the MD5s with 3.0 r2
ISO contents:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2004/debian-cd-200401/msg00089.html
I haven't seen any follow-up or any notes added to
http://www.debian.org/CD/ on this matter.
Having successfully completed a few
OK, artwork added - as Jesper tells me, his Info page mentions that the
images are released under the Artistic license.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Jesper Schultz wrote:
Hi
I know this is the second mail I'm sending you, but I just wanted to be sure that you got it :-). I have created a Debian cd-cover and thought it might was interesting for your cd artwork page.
You can find the covers here :
http://www.schultz-net.dk/cdcovers.html
I
OK, artwork added - as Jesper tells me, his Info page mentions that the
images are released under the Artistic license.
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
Jesper Schultz wrote:
Hi
I know this is the second mail I'm sending you, but I just wanted to be sure
that you got it :-). I have created a Debian cd-cover and thought it might was
interesting for your cd artwork page.
You can find the covers here :
http://www.schultz-net.dk/cdcovers.html
I
a Debian cd-cover and thought it might was interesting for
your cd artwork page.
You can find the covers here :
http://www.schultz-net.dk/cdcovers.html
Thanks! The only thing missing is a short notice about what people are
allowed to do with the images - e.g. you may use these images freely
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from lists.debian.org [211.245.200.193] by diogenius.org with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.00) id AAD1CB1026E; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:54:09 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Transaction Failed
Date: Thu, 12
a Debian cd-cover and thought it might was interesting for
your cd artwork page.
You can find the covers here :
http://www.schultz-net.dk/cdcovers.html
Thanks! The only thing missing is a short notice about what people are
allowed to do with the images - e.g. you may use these images freely
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Received: from lists.debian.org [211.245.200.193] by diogenius.org with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.00) id AAD1CB1026E; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:54:09 +0100
From: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
To: list@tb-303.org
Subject: Mail Transaction Failed
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from lists.debian.org [218.18.196.195] by usindo.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id A61D7D60156; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:04:13 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:52:00 +0800
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Received: from lists.debian.org [218.18.196.195] by usindo.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id A61D7D60156; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:04:13 -0800
From: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
To: debritto@debritto.net
Subject:
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004
Dear *,
our Debian CD mirror http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/debian-cd/
is now closed. The side is rewrite to http://ftp.leo.org/debian-cd/ .
So please correct our Web-Sides.
http://www.de.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
because Leo (Deutschland: ftp.leo.org: FTP HTTP) mirrors the debian-cd
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:20:28PM +0100, Ralph Simmler wrote:
our Debian CD mirror http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/debian-cd/
is now closed. The side is rewrite to http://ftp.leo.org/debian-cd/ .
So please correct our Web-Sides.
http://www.de.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
OK, done
Dear *,
our Debian CD mirror http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/debian-cd/
is now closed. The side is rewrite to http://ftp.leo.org/debian-cd/ .
So please correct our Web-Sides.
http://www.de.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
because Leo (Deutschland: ftp.leo.org: FTP HTTP) mirrors the debian-cd
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:20:28PM +0100, Ralph Simmler wrote:
our Debian CD mirror http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/debian-cd/
is now closed. The side is rewrite to http://ftp.leo.org/debian-cd/ .
So please correct our Web-Sides.
http://www.de.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
OK, done
Hello Joey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my opinion is this: any mail with attachments to any Debian list
should be eliminated without comment. There is no point in sending
mail with attachments to a Debian mailing list.
Debian mailing lists are used for development, this includes
Hello Joey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my opinion is this: any mail with attachments to any Debian list
should be eliminated without comment. There is no point in sending
mail with attachments to a Debian mailing list.
Debian mailing lists are used for development, this includes
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:11:14 -0500
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my opinion is this: any mail with attachments to any Debian list
should be eliminated without comment. There is no point in sending
mail with attachments to a Debian mailing list.
Debian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my opinion is this: any mail with attachments to any Debian list
should be eliminated without comment. There is no point in sending
mail with attachments to a Debian mailing list.
Debian mailing lists are used for development, this includes
distribution of patches.
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:11:14 -0500
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my opinion is this: any mail with attachments to any Debian list
should be eliminated without comment. There is no point in sending
mail with attachments to a Debian mailing list.
Debian
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Non-conforming ASCII characters (ANSI bombs) and things like
that should be removed without comment.
So anything that doesn't fall within the US-ASCII encoding is thrown out
the window, sending us back into the character set stone age?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:18:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any mail in HTML format should be *automatically* converted to
plain text format, links deactivated or at least all tags removed.
I think something like this already happens; the HTML part of
multipart/alternative mails
Hello to everyone,
I know, this discussion is a bit off topic, but in my eyes it is
necesarry.
Today I received at laest 5 viruses through debian-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. So the server delivering the messages sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] must be checked for viruses before
delivery to the individual
Martin,
my opinion is this: any mail with attachments to any Debian list
should be eliminated without comment. There is no point in sending
mail with attachments to a Debian mailing list.
Any mail in HTML format should be *automatically* converted to
plain text format, links deactivated or at
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Non-conforming ASCII characters (ANSI bombs) and things like
that should be removed without comment.
So anything that doesn't fall within the US-ASCII encoding is thrown out
the window, sending us back into the character set stone age?
Hello to everyone,
I know, this discussion is a bit off topic, but in my eyes it is
necesarry.
Today I received at laest 5 viruses through debian-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. So the server delivering the messages sent to
debian-cd@lists.debian.org must be checked for viruses before
delivery
eyes it is
necesarry.
Today I received at laest 5 viruses through debian-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. So the server delivering the messages sent to
debian-cd@lists.debian.org must be checked for viruses before
delivery to the individual reccipients.
What is your opinion about this?
I'll
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Non-conforming ASCII characters (ANSI bombs) and things like
that should be removed without comment.
So anything that doesn't fall within the US-ASCII encoding is thrown out
the window, sending us back into the character set stone age?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:18:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any mail in HTML format should be *automatically* converted to
plain text format, links deactivated or at least all tags removed.
I think something like this already happens; the HTML part of
multipart/alternative mails is
body link=#ff vlink=#ff text=ff alink=#00 leftmargin=0
topmargin=0 bgcolor=eecenter
table cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=494 border=0
trtd bgcolor=99 width=116 height=20 align=center valign=top
nbsp;/td
td bgcolor= width=600 height=18 align=center
body link=#ff vlink=#ff text=ff alink=#00 leftmargin=0
topmargin=0 bgcolor=eecenter
table cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=494 border=0
trtd bgcolor=99 width=116 height=20 align=center valign=top
nbsp;/td
td bgcolor= width=600 height=18 align=center
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 18:47, Jan Kesten wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
bid Since debian-cd is no longer available to the public, it is very
bid difficult to test currently. Maybe someone could provide a
bid current .deb package for testing or unstable
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 18:47, Jan Kesten wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
bid Since debian-cd is no longer available to the public, it is very
bid difficult to test currently. Maybe someone could provide a
bid current .deb package for testing or unstable
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[ ccing debian-cd instead of -boot since that's the list mostly
concerned by this mail ]
Oops, sorry.
Le Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:51:21PM -0500, Jeff Licquia écrivait:
It's been brought to my attention that there's some dissatisfaction with
debian-cd within Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Bug report concerning already generated CD images should go to
# virtual package cdimage.debian.org
reassign 228091 cdimage.debian.org
Bug#228091: Package Flightgear fail with MD5SUM perfect ISO.
Bug reassigned from package `debian-cd
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[ ccing debian-cd instead of -boot since that's the list mostly
concerned by this mail ]
Oops, sorry.
Le Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:51:21PM -0500, Jeff Licquia écrivait:
It's been brought to my attention that there's some dissatisfaction with
debian-cd within Debian, that some
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Thank you but I already received many critics for debian-cd and I never
felt offensed. After all debian-cd is working since slink (even if it
was not yet official at that time) and it has far outreached its initial
goal. But it suffers from other
Hello,
FYI, this has been posted to -devel and -boot. It concerns a possible
replacement of debian-cd.
I haven't yet looked at it. Feel free to try it out and make a
review on this list, I'd be interested in user feedback and I'm sure
Jeff would be interested in it as well.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Thank you but I already received many critics for debian-cd and I never
felt offensed. After all debian-cd is working since slink (even if it
was not yet official at that time) and it has far outreached its initial
goal. But it suffers from other
Hello everybody,
I took a few notes yesterday everning about how I would see the build of
an image with a rewrite of debian-cd ... it's in the text file attached.
Comments are welcome (as well as patch if you feel the need to extend
what I wrote) !
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:06:55PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Something that Phil and I discussed a while ago - it should be
feasible to produce jigdo images of CDs directly from Packages,
jigdo needs each file's md5sum and another, special checksum of the first
1k of data of each file. Those
Hello everybody,
I took a few notes yesterday everning about how I would see the build of
an image with a rewrite of debian-cd ... it's in the text file attached.
Comments are welcome (as well as patch if you feel the need to extend
what I wrote) !
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:06:55PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Something that Phil and I discussed a while ago - it should be
feasible to produce jigdo images of CDs directly from Packages,
jigdo needs each file's md5sum and another, special checksum of the first
1k of data of each file. Those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Steve,
Thursday, January 8, 2004, 12:06:55 AM, hast Du geschrieben:
SM Something that Phil and I discussed a while ago - it should be
SM feasible to produce jigdo images of CDs directly from Packages,
SM Release and/or Sources files without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
TFH I don't think the python code here looks better at all. It's
TFH possible to write both readable and unreadable python or perl.
you're right :-) In any language you can write ugly code, but I found
it a bit easier to wirte readable (what
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since debian-cd is no longer available to the public, it is very
difficult to test currently. Maybe someone could provide a current .deb
package for testing or unstable, so people can actually try out the most
recent version
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 15:16, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello everyone,
many of you already noticed that debian-cd is a bit complicated.
And it tends to get worse since we keep doing small modifications
everywhere without a global logic.
Thus I think that debian-cd needs to be partially
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Steve,
Thursday, January 8, 2004, 12:06:55 AM, hast Du geschrieben:
SM Something that Phil and I discussed a while ago - it should be
SM feasible to produce jigdo images of CDs directly from Packages,
SM Release and/or Sources files without
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since debian-cd is no longer available to the public, it is very
difficult to test currently. Maybe someone could provide a current .deb
package for testing or unstable, so people can actually try out the most
recent version
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 15:16, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello everyone,
many of you already noticed that debian-cd is a bit complicated.
And it tends to get worse since we keep doing small modifications
everywhere without a global logic.
Thus I think that debian-cd needs to be partially
Hello everyone,
many of you already noticed that debian-cd is a bit complicated.
And it tends to get worse since we keep doing small modifications
everywhere without a global logic.
Thus I think that debian-cd needs to be partially rewritten.
Here are the main critics that I have
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:16:39PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- complicated shell code in Makefile is ugly, it was supposed to
not need to be modified, and in fact many parts of the Makefile
were modified for various purposes
I think the idea of using a Makefile at all wasn't that good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
bid Since debian-cd is no longer available to the public, it is very
bid difficult to test currently. Maybe someone could provide a
bid current .deb package for testing or unstable, so people can
bid actually try out the most recent version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
bid Well, I always had my doubts about Python. Of course, I have done
bid next to nothing with Python and quite some code in Perl, so quite
bid different experiences ;)
bid Of course Perl has other problems like readability of code and
bid
[ I cced [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my initial mail in order to have a paragraph
about debian-cd in DWN next week - no need to continue CCing them even
if my Mail-Followup-To included them ]
Le Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:59:52PM +0100, Richard Atterer écrivait:
I think the idea of using a Makefile
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:00:51PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
# Datei lesen
open DATEI, $dateiname or die $dateiname laesst sich nicht oeffnen\n;
Use the $! variable (man perlvar; perldoc perlvar; www.perldoc.com):
open DATEI, $dateiname or die Datei `$dateiname' laesst sich nicht oeffnen:
* Jan Kesten
| Here is the perl way of opening a file, reading it and sorting the
| lines into a new file:
#! /usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $file = shift;
open IN, $file or die Can't open $file: $!;
open OUT, $file.sorted or die Can't open $file.sorted: $!;
print OUT sort IN;
This is
to download (u)debs. debian-cd would also need
to use wget or something for the non-deb components, but it should be
possible to use it with nothing but a network connection, and caching.
Something that Phil and I discussed a while ago - it should be
feasible to produce jigdo images of CDs directly from
Hello everyone,
many of you already noticed that debian-cd is a bit complicated.
And it tends to get worse since we keep doing small modifications
everywhere without a global logic.
Thus I think that debian-cd needs to be partially rewritten.
Here are the main critics that I have
Now, I'd like to hear from you :
- what are your (constructive) critics against debian-cd ?
Since debian-cd is no longer available to the public, it is very difficult
to test currently. Maybe someone could provide a current .deb package for
testing or unstable, so people can actually try out
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Here are the main critics that I have :
Let me add my main problem:
- Requires a full debian mirror to work.
IMHO, it would be much better to follow the lead of how d-i builds its
boot images, by using apt to download (u)debs. debian-cd would also need
to use wget
901 - 1000 of 1507 matches
Mail list logo
