Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that the way add-bin-doc currently detects a dedication is going
to fail as soon as we release 2.2 r2 -- then DEBVERSION will be 2.2_r2,
and the test will fail.
Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1?
Just thought we should sort this out before it happens. Is
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 11:45:06PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
I think that the way add-bin-doc currently detects a dedication is going
to fail as soon as we release 2.2 r2 -- then DEBVERSION will be 2.2_r2,
and the test will fail.
Maybe it should be called dedication-potato.txt?
--
Previously Philip Hands wrote:
Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1?
The first revision will be 2.2r1, but we'll do a second revision
as well at some point.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience
Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 11:45:06PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
I think that the way add-bin-doc currently detects a dedication is going
to fail as soon as we release 2.2 r2 -- then DEBVERSION will be 2.2_r2,
and the test will fail.
Maybe it should be called
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Philip Hands wrote:
Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1?
The first revision will be 2.2r1
That's interesting -- there was no 2.1r1. See
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/ChangeLog which begins with
2.1r2.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On 31 Jul 2000, Philip Hands wrote:
Mattias Wadenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We would also be happy to run a mirror for the potato ISOs provided there
is a someone we could rsync towards, since we have much bandwidth and not
that
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Philip Hands wrote:
Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1?
The first revision will be 2.2r1
That's interesting -- there was no 2.1r1. See
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/ChangeLog which begins with
2.1r2.
Would the iso image file for slink (2.1r4, I believe) be close enough to
do an rsync directly with it? Or should I scrap it and do the full
pseudo image process?
Thanks,
--
Bob McGowan
Staff Software Quality Engineer
VERITAS Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On 31 Jul 2000, Philip Hands wrote:
Mattias Wadenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We would also be happy to run a mirror for the potato ISOs provided there
is a someone we could rsync towards,
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 10:55:09PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Philip Hands wrote:
Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1?
The first revision will be 2.2r1
That's
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion I
am in the process of creating. We may mean the "r" to mean "revision",
but many people would interpret it as "release" and so would see 2.2 as
being identical with 2.2r1.
11 matches
Mail list logo
