Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Previously Philip Hands wrote: > > > Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1? > > > > The first revision will be 2.2r1 > > That's interesting -- there was no 2.1r1. See > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/ChangeLog which begins with > 2.1r2. Exactly. This is the mistake I thought I'd try and make sure we didn't repeat, hence my mail. So just to make this clear, we're calling the releases as follows: 2.2 The thing that's definitely happening in a couple of weeks ;-) 2.2r1 The first revision, after the initial release 2.2r2 etc. Right? Cheers, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Hands
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Wichert Akkerman
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Joey Hess
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Hands
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Ben Collins
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Charles
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Ben Collins
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Charles
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedicat... Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Martin Schulze
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Charles
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Brooks R. Robinson
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedicat... Wichert Akkerman
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Jens M�ller

