On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> Top level README's are generated at ISO build time. However, yes, we do
> need to regenerate ISO's upon release. Mainly because we did not want to
> take a chance of having bad ISO's out there that were labeled as "release"
will the "release" isos be gene
>
> Do we need to update the top level README's and create
> new .iso sets before the release ?
>
Top level README's are generated at ISO build time. However, yes, we do
need to regenerate ISO's upon release. Mainly because we did not want to
take a chance of having bad ISO's out there that
Humm,
I see that version 2.2 will be released next week ..
(ref: http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/ )
Currently ALL images on cdimage.d.o are labled:
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 "Potato" - test-cycle-3 {ARCH} Binary-
And ALL the README
If I want to create each image after the other with "make bin-image" the
command fails with the following error message:
make bin-image CD=1
Uh oh, I cant find the boot image!
make: *** [bin-image] Error 1
If I use "make bin-images" everything is okay except that I don't have
enough space for al
I got the following error message when I used the "make bin-image"
command:
make bin-image CD=1
Uh oh, I cant find the boot image!
make: *** [bin-image] Error 1
If I use "make bin-images" (all CD's at once) everything is okay, but I
can't create each one after the other. Could it be that the "bi
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> > Nothing seems to be broken by the current situation, so don't try to fix it.
>
> Not true. Currently, you can't change an APT-CDROM line in
> /etc/apt/sources.list by changing the beginning of it so that
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > > For a given architecture, at a given time, any given distribution
> > > (potato, woody, etc.) is either stable, frozen or unstable, but never
> > > two or
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> Nothing seems to be broken by the current situation, so don't try to fix it.
Not true. Currently, you can't change an APT-CDROM line in
/etc/apt/sources.list by changing the beginning of it so that it
points to an FTP mirror, because this would make it
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > For a given architecture, at a given time, any given distribution
> > (potato, woody, etc.) is either stable, frozen or unstable, but never
> > two or three different things among stable, frozen and unstable
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'd like to have some input about this bug report. Should I do that or
> > should I reassign the bug to apt because it chooses unstable before stable
> > when all 3 links are available ?
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'd like to have some input about this bug report. Should I do that or
> should I reassign the bug to apt because it chooses unstable before stable
> when all 3 links are available ?
>
> Keep in mind that I want to be able to generate CD
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'd like to have some input about this bug report. Should I do that or
> should I reassign the bug to apt because it chooses unstable before stable
> when all 3 links are available ?
>
> Keep in mind that I want to be able to generate CDs
Hi,
I've been having reliability problems with open.hands.com, in that
it's been crashing with increasing regularity, especially when
building CD images.
My current theory is that this is due to some RAM that was added a few
weeks ago, so I'm going to go in to the co-lo site in about 3 hours,
te
13 matches
Mail list logo
