Philip Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my customized CD set I have moved the 1.2 floppies to the last CD.
Even the oldest 386s will probably have 1.44 FDDs by now.
It's been pointed out that this will cause the images to be
significantly different from TC3, which will mean that rsyncing
Are the Official images starting to circulate yet?
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Abbotsford, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
reopen 68477
reassign 68477 debian-cd
thanks
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:39:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
apt-cdrom deliberately chooses [unstable,frozen,stable] above all other
duplicated names on the CD. This is to indicate to the user the status of
the disc. The CD label should (and does generally) contain the release
version.
Ok, if it is
The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org.
At present, I'm not happy about the alpha sparc images, so until the
images get linked to the 2.2_rev0 directory tree treat them as
pre-release still.
The rest seemed to build fine though, and even if the alpha or sparc
CDs change, they
On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote:
If you are running a mirror, then please use the pseudo-image-kit if
at all possible, and if it's not possible then use a mirror that has
more bandwidth (like sunsite.org.uk for example, who already have the
binary-i386-1 and 1_NONUS images available)
We
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org.
If people could mention when they've got copies of the images, so that
others can start mirroring from them, it might help spread the load
more (cdimage.d.o is only a P166, so cannot stand too
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 04:57:33PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
ARM Problems:
There are no Release files --- does anyone care?
A problem with the non-us stuff - The scripts seem to rely on the non-us
stuff to be in the original tree which isnt true for most mirrors - They
seperatly mirror
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are no Release files --- does anyone care?
Fixed, FWIW.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jason andrade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote:
The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org.
At present, I'm not happy about the alpha sparc images, so until the
images get linked to the 2.2_rev0 directory tree treat them as
pre-release
David Huggins-Daines [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ALPHA Problems:
tools/boot/potato/post-boot-alpha was not executable, so I'm
rebuilding that now.
Let me know if it breaks unexpectedly, too - I made some changes to
support bootable CDs on
Topic says it all, others will appear there later.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo