?
For reference there's still a couple of packages that're causing delays,
so we're not quite ready yet, but hopefully in a day or two.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings
/disks-powerpc/
2.2.16-2000-07-26 current
Actually, they seem to have made it to ftp.d.o, so you should have a
decent chance.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject
though.
And what's with the "unlike some people like you to believe" nonsence?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
,
FWIW. The Packages/Sources files may or may not end up pointing at
the symlinks rather than the pool. This will probably first happen
sometime after the changeover, but will definitely happen during
2.2r2.
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I d
might like to add urls for non-US in other places too.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:34:05AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 09:14:11PM +0100, Nils Lohner wrote:
[ any more comments? IMO its ready to go out when the release is made.
--nils ]
Which should be finished now. If the CD
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:34:05AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
pool/non-US/main/f/fsh/ is drw-rw-r--. Checked on two separate rsync-mirroring
mirrors. Interestingly,
http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/f/fsh/
works just fine.
One
with the above, and also does clever
caching stuff too. apt-ftparchive is only available as part of the
(unreleased) apt 0.4 stuff though. There should be debs somewhere under
http://people.debian.org/~jgg/
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak
, but otherwise work fine...
The other upside is that just copying Packages files is probably a lot
easier and quicker than using dpkg-scanpackages or apt-ftparchive. :)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail
Jason: wassup with apt-cdrom and dists/woody/Release and such?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:45:58AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 01:05:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns crivait:
For this to work, the Release and Release.gpg files should be verbatim
This is not a problem, we
the Release file to work out what Packages files and such
to download (and was going to use the md5sums in it to ensure the Packages
file wasn't corrupt, too :-/)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail
the same scripts with
appropriate tweaks and end up with a CD#1'ish subset of Debian that's
equally "secure" as the official CD#1.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any
CDs" anyway, so that's not a problem.
That's not going to stop you from having your own signature on it
though. All you'll need to do is create your own Release file and sign
it yourself.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone sav
the Packages file appropriately?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't
echo " $m2 $s2";
fi
fi
done
)
Call it with:
$ chkrel.sh woody/Release woody
and look for any E:'s or W:'s it might spit out.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself.
been burnt
or if it's not quite official)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or
in
dist-upgrade compared to the version in potato, eg. Likewise with dpkg,
I suspect.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
of the stupid /usr/lib/debootstrap/arch file, and (b) for --print-debs'
benefit. Nothing more.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit
-debian-mirror, or just
plain /target/var/*/apt/ would be more sensible.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:41:24PM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
Any chance of someone generating ISO images for non-i386 architectures for
woody on a semi-regular basis? (bi-weekly maybe?) [0]
however since the unofficial ISO's for i386 woody take
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
can't deal
,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
The daffodils are coming. Are you?
linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
--- http://linux.conf.au
. This seems a
reasonably sensible way of distinguishing components that should be used
from ones that shouldn't without doing too much hardcoding, but it also
means that debian-cd should probably rename it's local component from
local to local/main.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 02:52:22PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 02:10:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns ?crivait:
So, debootstrap these days will accept packages from any component called
main or */main that's mentioned in the Release file. This seems a
reasonably sensible
seen so far weren't a collective fantasy.
debian-cd has exactly one goal right now: make sure we're ready to produce
official CDs that include the entire archive and let you get started on
an install.
Cheers,
aj (woody release manager)
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:45:21AM -0800, Jim Westveer wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2002 01:00, Anthony Towns wrote:
GUYS, _STOP IT_.
NOW IS _NOT_ THE TIME TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE WAY THE INSTALL WORKS.
I am not suggesting changing anything in how the install
works, or anything to do
months
like usually happens :)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
msg03362/pgp0.pgp
?
We need a main-only CD. I'm not really sure there's a huge need for
a non-US/main CD. (Or, at least, whether there will be once mozilla and
postgresql and a hanful of others propogate to woody/main, which will be
over the next couple of days)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
Uh,
It's been two weeks since I asked for a run of woody CDs and nothing
seems to have happened. What's broken?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again
,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
msg03504/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 95016 2002/04/17 21:51:33 woody-i386-1_NONUS.jigdo
There's not much point having both on the mirrors.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:18:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Yes, read the CVS log. The latest boot-floppies will have this file.
Uh, what are these latest boot-floppies of which you speak?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:40:35AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 05:56:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:18:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Yes, read the CVS log. The latest boot-floppies will have this file.
Uh, what are these latest boot
moving (which is probably big, but no
promises as to whether it'll actually go into main for woody or not),
and various other things, if you want to wait 'til then to see what
happens. But most of that list isn't going to be changed.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
it to be on CD #1, lots of very
popular packages will end up being in CD #2.
The freeze?
Tweaking the contents of the tasks are okay, it's only redoing the task
mechanism (to have core packages for a task and auxiliary packages,
eg) that's not an option for woody at this point.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony
with a couple of GB RAM and a hefty chunk of bandwidth)
Especially if you only mirror the jigdo files, or if you construct any
CD images you have using jigdo, this should be completely trivial.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save
too, but it does need it atm)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
msg04000/pgp0.pgp
it.
Cheers,
_/\_ --- release manager hat
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
msg04051/pgp0
.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
msg04379/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
an even worse job installing sid
than sarge. I'm not seeing why this is a show stopper?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do
are so they
can be fixed. Getting CDs out ASAP is important if we're going to get
off on the right foot for releasing sarge any time soon.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:04:48PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 08:26, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 12:30:34PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
OK -- I'll sort out an automated thing for sarge on open, just as soon
as I've got my act together and worked out
uptime than that. :)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
msg04693/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:57:33AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:21:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns ?crivait:
and use that to make the CDs bootable (probably the latter?). It might
be necessary to munge the files by hand (to pull out the kernel and
initrd?) to plug
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
msg04739/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
3.0_r0; ln -s .. 3.0_r0/i386 # or something.
Getting a standardised mirror structure is a much bigger win than saving
a few users a few keystrokes.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred
the netinst image become official
sooner rather than later. Pointing to images we don't control is bad,
recommending them above what we do provide smacks of incompetence.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed
available and are sufficient.
If people can make unofficial ones, why can't we make official ones?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations
for woody -- it ought to be standard on ia64
since gcc on ia64 depends on it, but shouldn't be standard anywhere else.
The plan is to use the extra overrides file for this, but apt-ftparchive
doesn't support it yet.
FWIW, etc.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Mon, den 22.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 07:59:
Anthony Towns wrote:
Yes, that is the answer I want. How about pcmcia-cs?
Same story, hw-detect apt-installs it if it sees that the machine has a
pcmcia bus, and later
available and are sufficient.
If people can make unofficial ones, why can't we make official ones?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations
for woody -- it ought to be standard on ia64
since gcc on ia64 depends on it, but shouldn't be standard anywhere else.
The plan is to use the extra overrides file for this, but apt-ftparchive
doesn't support it yet.
FWIW, etc.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Mon, den 22.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 07:59:
Anthony Towns wrote:
Yes, that is the answer I want. How about pcmcia-cs?
Same story, hw-detect apt-installs it if it sees that the machine has a
pcmcia bus, and later
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:39:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[ /me sets the Reply-To: to debian-cd again... ]
But not Mail-Followup-To:...
At a bare minimum:
- installer - downloadable (business card)
- installer+base - downloadable (netinst)
- CD - disk 1
55 matches
Mail list logo
