On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 21:58 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > As a follow-up with the discussion about agent inside VMs, I wonder
> > if
> > we should install qemu-guest-agent inside our images. Normally, it
> > provides what Ted was
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As a follow-up with the discussion about agent inside VMs, I wonder if
> we should install qemu-guest-agent inside our images. Normally, it
> provides what Ted was talking about: hooks for freezing filesystem,
> mysql, etc.
In
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As a follow-up with the discussion about agent inside VMs, I wonder if
> we should install qemu-guest-agent inside our images. Normally, it
> provides what Ted was talking about: hooks for freezing filesystem,
> mysql, etc.
I don't
On Feb 07, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As a follow-up with the discussion about agent inside VMs, I wonder if
> we should install qemu-guest-agent inside our images. Normally, it
> provides what Ted was talking about: hooks for freezing filesystem,
> mysql, etc.
>
> Thoughts anyone?
I am in favour:
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 10:17 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a follow-up with the discussion about agent inside VMs, I wonder
> if
> we should install qemu-guest-agent inside our images. Normally, it
> provides what Ted was talking about: hooks for freezing filesystem,
> mysql, etc.
>
>
