g else) for AMIs.
[1] https://www.debian.org/News/2017/20170114
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key
on't
need it but I have mixed feelings about removing it, maybe just do it and wait
for sky to fall on our heads?
Hopefully it won't happened but ... .
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0|
ng as I have to admit that I'm lazy and don't want to start from
scratch but I'm willing to put some effort into building those (GCE) images
with FAI on debian-cd infra.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei"
| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| ---- kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to be a reasonable resolution.
But if people know betters solution I'm keen to learn it.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| ---- kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.
it and go with it as without fixing this issue IMO images are partly
broken.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --re
On 10 February 2018 03:09:45 GMT, "Gero Müller" wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Could you increase the disk size of the debian/stretch64 and
>debian/contrib-stretch64 boxes? Added disk or resizing disks in not
>easy
>enough and ~7GB is not much to work with nowadays (building RaspberryPi
or
> times outside of 10:00 to 22:00 UTC
I also prefer to avoid weekends.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.ed
|
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t;Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
now if anybody is using them at all?
I was going to ask the same question.
Also can somebody shade some light on which clouds/openstack installation
support this arch?
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei"
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 17 August 2019 21:47:23 BST, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
snip
>New regions on old AWS account: need root account for that.
Above is not fully correct but anyway it's been sorted and Debian cloud images
thanks to Noah should be now available in the new regions as well.
rfectly well most of
the time.
If you're interested in Debian for educational purposes have a look at
Skolelinux/Debian-Edu (https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/) I'm pretty sure that
team in there will appreciate help.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0|
gs will become RC and
removal for all py2 packages is going to be compulsory?
I personally am ok with both.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2019-09-03 13:50:41, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0100, kuLa wrote:
> > > on my side I would have no objections with a removal.
> >
> > Should we actively ask for removal or wait till normal bugs will become RC
> > and
> > r
On 4 August 2019 21:15:32 BST, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 19:55 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
>> On 2019-07-23 00:01:20, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
>> > Last year, during sprint, we decided that regular
>> > (altough virtual) team meeting would be beneficial.
>> >
>> > It did not work
On 4 August 2019 16:27:48 BST, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
>Although I mentioned this to folks at DebConf and in the cloud team
>sessions there, I realise I haven't announced it more widely yet...
>
>Since I was delegated last year, I've taken on more commitments
>elsewhere in Debian (and
outside
> of work hours, so earliest is 16:00 UTC (i.e. 18:00 CEST).
>
> Can we set up to 17:00 UTC on 2019-08-14 (Wednesday)?
Fine with me.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0|
at case would be added to EC2 class.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
|
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
't
> > tested there.
>
> I'll take a look later. None of the instances I tested showed this
> behaviour.
Thank Waldi.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| --
On 2020-06-15 19:06:46, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per the subject line, I've done it.
Thx Zigo
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa
T who are interested in
> > these packages to continue working on them after the transition.
> >
> > What do folks think of this?
I agree that this looks like a good idea.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei"
On 6 June 2020 18:59:28 BST, Thomas Lange wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 19:35:45 +0200, Bastian Blank
> said:
>
>> Now the remaining question is: GNU or BSD style checksum files?
>Let's use the same as our installer images use. This is GNU style.
>We should keep a common style on our
portant security updates, users are encouraged to
> migrate to a newer image before the end of the LTS period.
Make sense to me
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
ance where we have delegated people working
for cloud providers (various) alongside somebody who is not employed by any of
them.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa -
those
changes.
--
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Panta rei" |
|0|0|0| kuLa |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x686930DD58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B
On 4 December 2023 16:05:15 GMT, Kevin Truong wrote:
>Hello,
Hi
>I am looking to contact the folks responsible for Debian GNU/Linux 9 (Stretch)
>charges on AWS. Is this the correct email?
As far a I know Debian on AWS is offered free of charge. If somebody is
charging you for the images
Package: sponsorship-requests
Version: 1.0.15-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-fysom
* Package name: python-fysom
Version : 1.0.15-1
Upstream Author : Mansour Behabadi mans...@oxplot.com,
Jake Gordon
31 matches
Mail list logo