On 9/4/19 7:23 AM, kuLa wrote:
> On 2019-09-03 13:50:41, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0100, kuLa wrote:
on my side I would have no objections with a removal.
>>>
>>> Should we actively ask for removal or wait till normal bugs will become RC
>>> and
>>> removal
On 2019-09-03 13:50:41, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0100, kuLa wrote:
> > > on my side I would have no objections with a removal.
> >
> > Should we actively ask for removal or wait till normal bugs will become RC
> > and
> > removal for all py2 packages is going
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0100, kuLa wrote:
> > on my side I would have no objections with a removal.
>
> Should we actively ask for removal or wait till normal bugs will become RC and
> removal for all py2 packages is going to be compulsory?
> I personally am ok with both.
In my
On 2019-09-02 07:58:47, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:33:55PM +, Jeremy Stanley a écrit :
> > On 2019-09-01 14:17:21 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> > > I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and
> > > noticed that https://github.com/eucalyptus/
Le Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 04:33:55PM +, Jeremy Stanley a écrit :
> On 2019-09-01 14:17:21 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> > I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and
> > noticed that https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead
>
> The https://eucalyptus.cloud/
On 2019-09-01 14:17:21 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and
> noticed that https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead I
> went through a few repos in there and it looks like most of them
> had last commits 2-3 years ago.
The
Hi all,
I'm looking into our tooling in regards of python2 removal and noticed that
https://github.com/eucalyptus/ looks basically dead I went through a few repos
in there and it looks like most of them had last commits 2-3 years ago.
Are here any people who can claim to the contrary