On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Andreas Barth wrote:
> 4. While I see reasons to consider the udev solution nicer if it
> would be available, I fail to see a reason why it would be better to
> have users creating their own startup scripts then to include
> sensible defaults in ours.
What is the reason for no
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Daniel Baumann (05/02/2013):
> > or:
> >
> > * apply the following tested and working patch from #699742 in
> > debian-installer, […]
>
> Except that this “tested and working patch” doesn't fix anything. Same
> issue, as seen by Michael and mys
Daniel Baumann (05/02/2013):
> or:
>
> * apply the following tested and working patch from #699742 in
> debian-installer, […]
Except that this “tested and working patch” doesn't fix anything. Same
issue, as seen by Michael and myself.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
or:
* apply the following tested and working patch from #699742 in
debian-installer, consisting of this ('trimmed' output rather than
full-diff):
---snip---
+if [ -e /usr/lib/syslinux/ldlinux.c32 ]; then \
+ mcopy -i$(TEMP_BOOT) /usr/lib/syslinux/ldlinux.c32 ::ldlinux.c32; \
+
Package: tech-ctte
[cc to syslinux maintainer, debian-release, debian-boot, leader]
Hi,
the background for this request can be found in bug#699382. Here are
the highlights:
- the debian-installer source package, which builds the installer images
for debian's releases, build-depends on syslinu
5 matches
Mail list logo
