On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Andreas Barth wrote: > 4. While I see reasons to consider the udev solution nicer if it > would be available, I fail to see a reason why it would be better to > have users creating their own startup scripts then to include > sensible defaults in ours.
What is the reason for not including these scripts in the package by default and removing them/disabling them when the necessary udev improvements have been made? From reading the bug report and a brief discussion on IRC, this is the major issue which is unclear to me. Finally, do we have a tested patch available to re-enable the necessary scripts? Don Armstrong -- Something the junk advertisers don't seem to understand: we live in an information super-saturated world. If I don't want to buy something, no amount of shouting or propagandizing will budge me; all it will do is get me annoyed. On the other hand, if I have a need for your product, I can seek it out in an eyeblink. -- Charles Stross "Toast: A Con Report" in _Toast_ p136 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
