On 23 November 2014 at 11:23, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 08:51:41PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 22 November 2014 at 16:21, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
Dimitri wrote:
Thus multiarch cross tooling is not so relevant for fresh bootstraps,
and/or targeting non
On 21 November 2014 at 19:21, Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote:
Dimitri == Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org writes:
Dimitri Comparing squeeze and jessies - have things regressed? if
Dimitri yes, how? As far as I expect, the way one uses debian
Dimitri source packaging
On 22 November 2014 at 16:21, Ron r...@debian.org wrote:
Dimitri wrote:
Thus multiarch cross tooling is not so relevant for fresh bootstraps,
and/or targeting non-debian architectures, or otherwise incomplete
systems (e.g. those that do not have compatible set of pre-compiled
binaries that
Reading this bug report title history, it is very misleading.
Building cross-toolchains, and cross-toolchains that are multiarch
compatible has been possible to do before (stable) and is possible in
current planned release (testing).
I have provided the documentation links to that in
Comparing squeeze and jessies - have things regressed? if yes, how?
As far as I expect, the way one uses debian source packaging to
produce cross toolchains has not changed, nor has been affected by
changes in jessie, in comparison to squeeze.
Multiarch cross-building - a brand new set of
On 29 October 2014 06:32, Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de wrote:
Matthias contended that the default method to build a gcc cross compiler
works with multiarch:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766708#73
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 03:50:59PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Why is
On 3 May 2014 09:31, Daniel Baumann
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net wrote:
Steve,
first of all: why haven't you just talked to me? you know more then well
that i've kindly and quickly responded to all your bug reports, on and
offline. #746715 sounds like shooting with a nuclear
On 10 February 2014 11:37, Craig Bransworth craigbranswo...@aim.com wrote:
Please a GR to override this ...
The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone.
No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we
welcome you. We welcome contributions from
On 4 January 2014 15:46, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le samedi 04 janvier 2014 à 12:47 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
Uoti Urpala writes (Bug#727708: init system discussion status):
Your earlier wording sounds
like it was talking about the former (installable) and Ian's proposal
On 4 January 2014 23:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 06:59:46PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Also it is sad that systemd upstream is actively promoting for
everyone to execute runtime checks of is systemd-init pid1,...
This is done public
On 5 January 2014 00:07, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi writes:
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 20:26 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Clint Adams cl...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:02:01AM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
or alternatively
4.
On 4 January 2014 23:13, Sjoerd Simons sjo...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 09:56 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Sjoerd Simons sjo...@debian.org writes:
Not having the logind interface is a lot harder to cope with and
something that will not only impact Gnome. So essentially the most
On 4 January 2014 19:42, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Dimitri John Ledkov
Also which upstream are staying with? systemd upstream git history[4]
has only one branch, which is linear with linear version number
increments, without any stable release branches or other indications
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libnih.la
Version : 1.0.4 (git snapshot)
Upstream Author : Dimitri John Ledkov (DD), Scott James Remnant (DD)
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/xnox/libnih/tree/kfreebsd
http
14 matches
Mail list logo
