Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com writes:
From your other message I was under the impression that you thought it
was ok to remove Upstart support, but now you agree that if there was
interest, then it should be kept (as long as it does not cause
issues).
Under the circumstances, I
On 05/06/2014 11:11 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
For instance, to date, we still don't have a newer syslinux in unstable
while he was eager to push syslinux 5 in unstable during the former
freeze
1. syslinux 6 prior 6.02 was not usable because the efi things caused
regressions in the non-efi
Daniel Baumann writes (Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on
init systems):
1. syslinux [etc.]
lxc [etc]
Daniel, I appreciate that you feel the need to rebut the criticisms
that have been made of you. I don't think that's unreasonable. But,
I think we should draw a line under
3 matches
Mail list logo
