Processed: Re: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #846002 [tech-ctte] blends-tasks must not be priority:important Bug 846002 cloned as bug 847132 > reassign -2 src:blends Bug #847132 [tech-ctte] blends-tasks must not be priority:important Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'src:blends'.

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 src:blends Control: block -2 by -1 On Mon, 05 Dec 2016, Holger Levsen wrote: > And yes, I still think it's really really wrong to have blends-tasks have > "priority: important" which makes it getting installed by each and every > debootstrap run by

blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

control: reassign -1 tech-ctte control: retitle -1 blends-tasks must not be priority:important thanks On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:43:18AM -0600, Don Armstrong wrote: > if either of you disagree (or anyone else on the CTTE > disagrees) and still want the CTTE to resolve this (slowly), feel free >

Bug#841294: Overrule maitainer of "global" to package a new upstream version

Ron writes: ... > I'm not insisting that's what we should do. But it's certainly an > option, and it dodges the bullet of having to say "Sucks to be you" > without any notice at all. And it doesn't take anything away from > the people who want "new upstream or bust" for

agreed (Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > Can you explain why the TC is so reluctant to depose or overrule > > maintainers ? > > Because I generally find it's generally the wrong tool for the job. If > I can come up with a good explanation for why somebody should take

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016, Sam Hartman wrote: > So, what impact does having blends-tasks have besides wasting disk > space. It results in multiple extra tasks listed in the task selection screen without describing the tasks or putting them into a submenu or similar. [The screen shot Holger linked to

blends-dev must not be "priority: important" - was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity

reassign 846002 tech-ctte thanks On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:58:03AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Control: Severity -1 normal src:blends 0.6.93 uploaded on 09 Apr 2016 introduced a new binary package, blends-dev, with "priority: important", causing it to be installed on *all* systems by

Processed: blends-dev must not be "priority: important" - was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 846002 tech-ctte Bug #846002 [blends-tasks] blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu Bug reassigned from package 'blends-tasks' to 'tech-ctte'. No longer marked as found in versions blends/0.6.94.

Bug#846002: Lowering severity

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:34:56PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I am quite angry about this: You basically opened this bug by stating > that you will do an NMU within 4-5 days, but you already knew that you > would not have time to discuss the bug before you planned this to happen. I didnt knew

Re: Maintainership

Le vendredi, 2 décembre 2016, 16.00:36 h CET Ian Jackson a écrit : > On debian-project I posted a suggestion in respose to Zach in the > thread about maintaintainership. See below. I've answered to parts of the debian-project thread. > Do the TC think a resolution such as that below would pass

Bug#846002: Lowering severity

Hi Holger, On 05.12.2016 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'm sorry that I failed to respond yet. I am quite angry about this: You basically opened this bug by stating that you will do an NMU within 4-5 days, but you already knew that you would not have time to discuss the bug before you planned

Processed: Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:blends Bug #846002 [tech-ctte] blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'src:blends'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #846002 to the same values

Bug#846002: Lowering severity

Control: reassign -1 src:blends On Mon, 05 Dec 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 05.12.2016 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I'm sorry that I failed to respond yet. > > I would prefer to have the arguments discussed first instead of just > re-assigning to tech-ctte (which you did while I writing