Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important - ballot proposal

2016-12-26 Thread Margarita Manterola
> I believe the TC should rule on this issue and I propose the following ballot: > > A: The blends-tasks package should be dropped and its contents integrated into > tasksel. > Z: Further discussion > > (...) > My vote for the above mentioned ballot, then:

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important - ballot proposal

2016-12-26 Thread Margarita Manterola
Hola Ole Streicher! First let me start by saying that I'm sorry that you felt accused. It was not my intention to turn this into some kind of finger pointing, and I'm genuinely sorry of my choice of language, as it clearly wasn't good enough to show that. Let me assure you that the only thing I

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important - ballot proposal

2016-12-26 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Margarita, On 26.12.2016 14:43, Margarita Manterola wrote: > While it's great that there is a possibly better solution in the works for the > tasksel screen, there's still the issue at hand that blends-tasks has used the > severity of the package as a way of circumventing collaboration with

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important - ballot proposal

2016-12-26 Thread Margarita Manterola
Hi, I was supposed to do this last week, but Christmas got in the way. Apologies for the delay. While it's great that there is a possibly better solution in the works for the tasksel screen, there's still the issue at hand that blends-tasks has used the severity of the package as a way of