Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes: > As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this > resolution (text below). > > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD > > Thanks, > Ian. > > -- resolution text begins > > The issue of init system support re

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:54:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this > resolution (text below). > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD > Thanks, > Ian. > -- resolution text begins > >

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:54:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD I vote Y FD. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140626 20:54]: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > > I hereby propose the resolution below. I intend to call for a vote no > > earlier than after the conclusion of the relevant agenda item in > > tomorrow's IRC meeti

Re: Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140626 20:57]: > As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this > resolution (text below). > > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD Voting Y, FD. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Ian Jackson wrote: > As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this > resolution (text below). > > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD I vote Y FD. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarms

Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > > I hereby propose the resolution below. I intend to call for a vote no > > earlier than after the conclusion of the relevant agenda item in > > tomorrow's IRC meeting. > > As agreed on IR

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes: > As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this > resolution (text below). > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD I vote Y, FD. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes: > As agreed on IRC, I hereby call for votes on the rsolution below. > There options are: > A libjpeg-turbo to become default libjpeg implementaton (1:1) > B libjpeg8/9 to remain default libjpeg implementaton (1:1) > FD I vote A, B, FD. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.

Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > > I hereby propose the resolution below. I intend to call for a vote no > > earlier than after the conclusion of the relevant agenda item in > > tomorrow's IRC meeting.

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution"): > As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this > resolution (text below). > > There are two options >Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support >FD I vote Y, FD Ian. -- To UNSUB

Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > > I hereby propose the resolution below. I intend to call for a vote no > > earlier than after the conclusion of the relevant agenda item in > > tomorrow's IRC meet

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

As discussed at the meeting, I hereby call for votes on this resolution (text below). There are two options Y Issue statement about (multiple) init system support FD Thanks, Ian. -- resolution text begins The issue of init system support recently came to the Technical Committee's

Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution"): > I hereby propose the resolution below. I intend to call for a vote no > earlier than after the conclusion of the relevant agenda item in > tomorrow's IRC meeting. As agreed on IRC, I hereby call for votes on the rsolution below.

Bug#741573: Two menu systems

(Sorry I missed the meeting today. I'm away on vacation and my schedule ended up not aligning properly.) Colin Watson writes: > I think this is really overstated. .desktop files are in a > long-standing and popular basic file format for which plenty of parsing > libraries in various languages

Bug#741573: Two menu systems

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:50:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I see Keith has committed a draft to git. As discussed, I disagree > with this approach. This amounts to nonconsensually abolishing > someone's work when it is still being maintained, and the global cost > is minimal. My feelings on

Bug#741573: Two menu systems

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#741573: Two menu systems"): > But I'd like to make some specific comments too. (I'm reading > 24f00b5:741573_menu_systems/keithp_draft.txt, of which I attach a > copy.) ... Oh, and: Fourthly: It makes no provision for the translation into the new regime of the carefu

Bug#741573: Two menu systems

I see Keith has committed a draft to git. As discussed, I disagree with this approach. This amounts to nonconsensually abolishing someone's work when it is still being maintained, and the global cost is minimal. But I'd like to make some specific comments too. (I'm reading 24f00b5:741573_menu_s

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

On 2014-06-26 16:00, Bdale Garbee wrote: Ian Jackson writes: Here is the resolution text that I think we agreed at the last meeting. I formally propose this text: The issue of init system support recently came to the Technical Committee's attention again.[1] For the record, the

Bug#636783: TC chair appointment

I mentioned this on IRC but forgot to get it into the agenda: The TC chair arrangements have what is arguably a bug, which is that the TC cannot change a sitting chair other than by the chair resigning or leaving the committee. I think the TC chair should be reappointed regularly (annually?), and

Bug#746715: Init system fallout draft resolution

Ian Jackson writes: > Here is the resolution text that I think we agreed at the last > meeting. I formally propose this text: > > The issue of init system support recently came to the Technical > Committee's attention again.[1] > > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to contin