Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 02:58:09PM +0100]: > === Resolution === > > The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap > maintainers. > > Furthermore, using its §6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical > Committee considers that the desirable solution at the time of `bullseye` is: > > * W: `weak`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with classical directory schemes (or in such > chroots) > > * M: `middle`: both directory schemes are allowed, and packages (including >official packages) can be built on hosts with either classical >or "merged `/usr`" directory schemes > > * H: `hard`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with "merged `/usr`" directory schemes (or in > such chroots) > > * FD: Further Discussion > > === End Resolution === My vote is: H > M > FD > W signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes: > === Resolution === > > The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap > maintainers. > > Furthermore, using its §6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical > Committee considers that the desirable solution at the time of `bullseye` is: > > * W: `weak`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with classical directory schemes (or in such > chroots) > > * M: `middle`: both directory schemes are allowed, and packages (including >official packages) can be built on hosts with either classical >or "merged `/usr`" directory schemes > > * H: `hard`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with "merged `/usr`" directory schemes (or in > such chroots) > > * FD: Further Discussion > > === End Resolution === I vote M > W > H > FD signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?
Le lundi, 25 février 2019, 14.58:09 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > === Resolution === > > The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap > maintainers. > > Furthermore, using its §6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical > Committee considers that the desirable solution at the time of `bullseye` > is: > > * W: `weak`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with classical directory schemes (or in such > chroots) > > * M: `middle`: both directory schemes are allowed, and packages (including >official packages) can be built on hosts with either >classical or "merged `/usr`" directory schemes > > * H: `hard`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with "merged `/usr`" directory schemes (or in > such chroots) > > * FD: Further Discussion > > === End Resolution === I vote: H > M > W > FD OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
