Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org> writes: > === Resolution === > > The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap > maintainers. > > Furthermore, using its ยง6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical > Committee considers that the desirable solution at the time of `bullseye` is: > > * W: `weak`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with classical directory schemes (or in such > chroots) > > * M: `middle`: both directory schemes are allowed, and packages (including > official packages) can be built on hosts with either classical > or "merged `/usr`" directory schemes > > * H: `hard`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with "merged `/usr`" directory schemes (or in > such chroots) > > * FD: Further Discussion > > === End Resolution ===
I vote M > W > H > FD
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
