Am Do., 18. Mai 2023 um 20:39 Uhr schrieb Luca Boccassi :
> [...]
> We heard so much in the past couple of weeks about how important it is
> for the project not to cause issues for derivatives and
> cross-compatibility use cases, even speculatively. This is not even
> speculative, it is certain to
Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 17:39 Uhr schrieb Marco d'Itri :
>
> On Dec 29, Ansgar wrote:
>
> > as suggested in [1], I would like to see Debian to move to support
> > only the merged-usr filesystem layout. This would simplfy things for
> > the future and also address the problem with installing file
Am Mi., 29. Jan. 2020 um 20:39 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie :
> [...]
> I think there are three categories of systems that it might make sense
> to consider separately here. In ascending order of "amount of systemd":
>
> - non-Linux ports to which systemd does not intend to be portable (and
> I thi
2014-11-29 22:25 GMT+01:00 Svante Signell :
> On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 22:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On 2014-11-29 21:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > Debian releases when it's ready. If large numbers of our users are
>> > going to
>> > have a bad experience with jessie as a result of being switc
2014-11-12 12:28 GMT+01:00 Andreas Barth :
> * Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [141105 17:39]:
>> I am calling for votes on the text below:
>> Y (override, swap dependencies, requires >>3:1)
>> FD
>
> I vote Y, FD (with the remark that Y doesn't make a decision on "does
> debi
2014-05-03 19:53 GMT+02:00 Ian Jackson :
> Thomas Goirand writes ("Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
>> I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
>> accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
>> wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
>
>
2014-04-09 15:13 GMT+02:00 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud :
> Le mercredi, 9 avril 2014, 12.21:28 Ian Jackson a écrit :
>> You have missed my key point about differences of goals between the
>> two menu systems. The trad menu explicitly has the goal of providing
>> a menu item for every invokable thing; whe
Am 10.02.2014 13:18 schrieb "Joerg Jaspert" :
>
> Hi
>
> please consider ENTIRELY disallowing any mail to that bug, except for the
few
> CTTE members, no exceptions.
> Nothing there currently is of any help, nor providing any new information.
I second that, at least for some time doing that will be
2014-01-31 Keith Packard :
> Sergey B Kirpichev writes:
> [...]
>> Where is the list of problems for sysvinit we intend to solve?
>
> For X, the problem is running X as a user other than root, which should
> provide for increased system security as we'll be reducing the amount of
> root code subst
2014-01-30 Thorsten Glaser :
> Matthias Klumpp dixit:
>
>>2014-01-30 ChaosEsque Team :
>>> [bullshit]
>
> This was actually *not* bullshit. The delivery of most of the
> content could use some polishing, but the content is a(n inconvenient)
> truth.
>
>&
2014-01-30 ChaosEsque Team :
> [bullshit]
Wasn't there some kind of a ban applied here?
I am confused.
Cheers,
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debi
2014-01-29 Adrian Bunk :
> [...]
> I do fully acknowledge that there are issues with ConsoleKit being
> unmaintained and many non-systemd codepath in GNOME being unmaintained
> and with GNOME missing some non-basic functionality without systemd.
>
> But claims that even basic functionality in GNOME
Ian Jackson writes:
>
> Don Armstrong writes ("Bug#727708: Thoughts on Init System Debate"):
>> However, moving to a single supported init system with a defined
>interface is something that I would like to see.
>
> If you want that, and you want to keep the non-Linux ports, then I
> think you have
13 matches
Mail list logo
