.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from declaring it was spoofed. Only it
didn't see that the mailserver that contact it was only relaying the
message and was not the one I used. Only way to work around that for me:
remove SPF records from DNS again.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things
spammers,
but that's not the same thing as eliminating spam.
Also some of use don't control where we send mail from and can't enable
SPF.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
the dpkg maintainers.
Even though personally I would prefer x86-64 I can't argue with the
arguments made in the discussion, so this gets my vote as well.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things
plenty of offers).
Perhaps it can be done as a daemon to which you submit a message with a
little bit of context (name of the list should be enough). That way
you only need to work a little tool to submit the post which prevents
the startup costs.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED
away.
It runs from procmail, so basically:
* receive the post on stdin
* return accept/bounce flag via returncode
oh, and I doubt haskell is available on murphy ;)
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard
(used for debian-devel-announce and
debian-security-announce) why not just use that?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
and debian-security-private and the signal/spam
ratio there is extremely low. For debian-security-private we'll probably
see 20 spams for every valid mail, if not worse. So I don't think the
current filtering comes close to being good enough.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
Is it straightforward to make the list software use a different
keyring for certain lists ?
It's been a while since I looked at that tool but iirc it has a
commandline option you can just point at a keyring file.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED
install pam_console for example)
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
That's also what I think, but since some upstream people complain about
this solution... I want the Technical Committee to take a decision.
What are the arguments from the upstream people?
From your description it might make sense to consider GNOME 2 a
Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
See below for the full text, and my last message for my views.
(Wichert said he wanted until at least the 5th and hasn't said
anything more, so ...)
So I'm here.
I hereby call for a vote on this resolution. We'll vote on the whole
lot on one ballot -
Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
I therefore hereby propose the following two alternative versions of a
resolution for this issue:
Can we please wait with a vote until July 5? I'm afraid I'm currently
really swamped with both work, Debian security and SPI tasks.
Wichert.
--
Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
Is there any software on lists.debian.org that could bounce all HTML
mail sent to debian-ctte ? debian-ctte is getting a hideous amount of
spam.
stick this in the procmailrc filters on murphy:
:0
* ^Content-Type: *text/html.*
/dev/null
--
Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
If I don't hear from anyone soon (and if Raul or the new chairman
don't get to it first) I'll ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
unmoderate the list.
Very much agreed.
* Wichert and I have volunteered to be chairman. No-one else has.
Shall we have a vote ?
I'll
Previously Raul Miller wrote:
Oddly enough, I never got Wichert's message at all.
I did a list-reply so that would suggest you're not actually
subscribed to debian-ctte. I also note that this message from you
also never made it to the list due to a missing Approved-By
header :(
Wichert.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
