On 2020-11-21 Stephan Lachnit wrote:
[...]
> Because the library was designed for embedded use cases where every
> little bit of performance matters, the runtime patch was refused
> upstream. Dropping the runtime patch from Debian actually isn't
> problem, no reverse dependency of libinih uses com
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #975381 [tech-ctte] Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
975381: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Dear Stephan,
On Sat 21 Nov 2020 at 12:20PM GMT, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> Currently the package libinih uses some heavy patches, which aren't upstream
> and aren't used by any other distro. I'm in favor of dropping this, but the
> current maintainer disagrees and we we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: wishlist
Currently the package libinih uses some heavy patches, which aren't upstream
and aren't used by any other distro. I'm in favor of dropping this, but the
current maintainer disagrees and we weren't able to make a
Stephan Lachnit 于2020年11月21日周六 下午8:20写道：
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Package: tech-ctte
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Currently the package libinih uses some heavy patches, which aren't upstream
> and aren't used by any other distro. I'm in favor of dropping this, but the
5 matches
Mail list logo
