On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 04:17:29PM -0400, nick black wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o left as an exercise for the reader:
> > whatever that means), I suspect there will be various Linux newbie or
> > FAQ's, external to Debian, that will warn users that the using the
> > "free" installer will just cause them
Paul Wise dijo [Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:21:07AM +0800]:
In practice almost everyone has non-free in their sources.list due to
most firmware being non-free. Also most developers will have non-free
in their sources.list due to various GNU documentation being in
non-free.
Don't know. In my case
Hi,
On Friday 19 September 2008 15:21, cobaco wrote:
Censorship is nothing more or less then banning/prohibiting certain speach
in a certain forum
So if you go to a party, drink all the booze, puke in the kitchen on the food
and then get kicked out by the hosts, because they cant stand you
that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this
prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the
holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
this is clearly non-free material. Can we please
- remove those
On 2006-08-06 Andrew Vaughan wrote:
But Debian has also made a promise that main will be free. And the
kernel breaks that.
Ok. Looks like we need to move the kernel to non-free. Good thing nothing
important depends on it.
Let's silently migrate to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD :)
bye
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:00:06AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
On 2006-08-06 Andrew Vaughan wrote:
But Debian has also made a promise that main will be free. And the
kernel breaks that.
Ok. Looks like we need to move the kernel to non-free. Good thing nothing
important depends
On 2006-08-07, Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's silently migrate to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD :)
Which also has non-free drivers in the upstream kernel source -- but,
they've been removed from the kernel images.
--
Robert Edmonds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
that depends if anyone ever sues, which is
indeed unlikely.
But Debian has also made a promise that main will be free. And the
kernel breaks that.
Ok. Looks like we need to move the kernel to non-free. Good thing nothing
important depends on it.
Cheers
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Therefore, all GPL'd programs will have to go to non-free.
Q.E.D.
Is this a correct interpretation of what will happen after the release
of sarge or is there any mistake in my proof?
The problem you have identified is not new, or unique to free software
9 matches
Mail list logo
