|| On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 12:58:48 +0200
|| Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that every body is trying to avoid
handling configuration files and usually they are the best place to do this
kind of things... i.e. what happens if the branding
|| On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 12:48:15 +0200
|| Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pr SLX Debian Labs would probably be interested to sponsor this, but it
pr would be good to find more sponsors to keep the load on SLX Debian
pr Labs at a reasonable level. Assuming flight prizes on the
|| On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:03:11 +0200
|| Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as otavio, i agree fully with you: pre-seeding (and powerfull
as postinstall scripts allowing for versatile configuration of the
as package) are the wave of the future.
tl No. Try to create all questions you like to
|| On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:32:26 +0200
|| Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fe I wrote a very simple test script which can handful for CDDs. It can
fe be installed, for example, in /usr/share/tasksel/tests/standard.
Sure, this works but by now I don't see how use it since tasksel don't
|| On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 14:44:14 +0200
|| Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OS I not sure if this can be included on sarge. We will need to have new
OS templates and translators will need to deal with it but if it is not
OS problem we can do it. (joeyh, what you think?)
fe Uhm, the way I
|| On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:11:33 +0200
|| Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pr [Free Ekanayaka]
what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
finish item of base-config?
pr The version of xdebconfigurator in unstable already have a base-config
pr menu entry, and I
Hello everyone,
I and Marco (zufus) are starting to write an application to make more
easy the construct of an iso image for some CDD. This application will
be called cdd-cdtool.
I think the right place to this tool is the CDD project since this
tool will be generic.
Is possible provide CVS
|| On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:08:32 +0200
|| Cosimo Alfarano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ca On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:15:42PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'm interested in knowing if all people here agree with changing our
repository to Subversion. I recommend Subversion
|| On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:57:24 -0300
|| Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ba On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 17:33, Otavio Salvador wrote:
branches/
tags/
trunk/
ba Each of these have special meaning in Subversion and/or are
ba conventional? Perhaps you could explain a bit, comparing with how
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at doc/
at cdd/
at ...
at med/
at ...
at ...
at which would fail in matching the logic above but a separation between cdd
and
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:42:31 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
To me, the cdd-doc need be build together with the core package
since it document a picture of the package and because of this
should be release
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:52:42 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Is not possible build the control file in configure target, before the
build?
That won't help, since a source package should on rebuild not be
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:37:21 +0200
|| Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gvb Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:26:33 -0300
|| Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ba On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:01, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Fell free to ask
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:48:41 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
But this will be used to build the cdd-* packages. Not to built the
#CDD#-doc package. If the user need one documentation package he
should choose what he like
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:25:52 -0300
|| Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:52:42 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Is not possible build the control file in configure target, before
|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:55:43 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
at Sure, but it should prepare a ready to run debian/control file for
at *all* CDDs to keep necessary editing as low as possible for
at meta package builders
|| On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Andreas Tille wrote:
Many thanks for your efforts. I've just seen tha changes. Would
you be so kind to help a simple minded person like me to post the
line I have to type to check
|| On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 15:52:03 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
To me, the doc merge is the right thing to do.
at While I'm not really convinced I would follow your suggestions but
at I think we are now facing two problems
|| On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:47:39 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Always when we stop to work in one stable version, like 0.3.x versions
and start to work in one new grant version we should make a
branch. With this, we can
|| On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:19:12 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sl By controlling the reset switch with a serial port controlled
sl relay module, and a dhcp/tftp server, this allowed me to bring up
sl machines from scratch and do a full install if needed.
Did you tried the FAI?
|| On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:24:44 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sl Otavio Salvador wrote:
|| On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:19:12 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sl By controlling the
reset switch with a serial port controlled
sl relay module, and a dhcp/tftp server
|| On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:35:56 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sl Otavio Salvador wrote:
|| On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:24:44 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sl Otavio Salvador
wrote:
|| On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:19:12 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED
|| On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 22:23:52 +0100
|| Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing you can do is change the initial step to have the
network-console module
sl This is the bit I'm stuch on
You need initialy hack the files inside of
installer/build/pkg-lists/...
If you need
|| On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:22:12 +0300
|| Ali ASLANDAS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aa Hi,
aaRecently, i decided to build a custom debian based linux distro. i
aa download d-i from svn, and compiled it with
aa build_cdrom_isolinux option, now i have a vmlinuz and a
aa initrd.gz, i tried to
|| On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:34:30 +0200
|| Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pr [Andreas Tille]
- tasksel
Well, I definitely think that tasksel should be enhanced in several ways
but I do not have an idea how we can help her using cdd-dev.
pr Joey Hess recently modified the
|| On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:27:14 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at Hi,
at I'm working on my talk for the CDD related conference in Florence next week.
at It would be great if we would have more than one experience with cdd
packaging
at stuff than Debian-Med. Any project
|| On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:38:23 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
If anyone wants to help us to allow this to be finished ASAP his is
welcome. I really wants help to deal with Display manager since the
base structure
|| On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:21:18 +0100 (CET)
|| Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, David Schmitt wrote:
I'm smelling a little misunderstanding here. If I got it correctly,
python would be needed to _build_ a CDD, not to run the installed image.
at The misunderstanding
|| On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:16:52 +0800
|| Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ez On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Niall Young wrote:
A single CDD Tool is definitly the way to go, I've been saying this for
years but no-one listens ;-)
Ups,
Hello folks,
I talked with Joey Hess today and he agreed about we start to use
branches for CDD related development for both: tasksel and
base-config.
Could be really good if who have interesting changes in both tools
share them with us. We can start to merge them back on that branch and
then,
|| On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:51:03 +0100
|| Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OS Comments are welcome :-)
fe That's a good initiative :) I've filed a few bugs against those
fe packages, some of which are still pending. I'll be glad to join the
fe effort. Please addme to the
sto == Sergio Talens-Oliag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sto I've translated the current program and put it on:
sto http://cdd-devcamp.debian.net/wiki/
sto I hope to have time to add more things on the WIKI about
sto the CDD DevCamp, any help will be appreciated (I'm
andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
andreas Hi, I guess the issue that SVN commit mails are not
andreas sended is not solved until now or did somebody decide to
andreas stop this?
oh!
andreas I commited some changes to cdd-doc and debian-med
andreas
andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
andreas On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote: ANy expert
andreas outside to fix this?
I'm not an expert
andreas But at least you reached a higher level than me ... ;-)
I just learned it before you, only
list of the tools:
cdd-dev pkg: ???
debpartial-mirror: Otavio Salvador (04/05/2005 until 10/05/2005)
debtags: Enrico Zini
simple-cdd: Vagrant Cascadian?
FAI: ???
Ciao Ciao
Marco Otavio
petter == Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
petter [Otavio Salvador]
We would like to dedicate 2 or 3 hours to discuss about the
tools actually available for the CDD.
petter Good idea. We should try to compile some kind of
petter schedule. Unless someone else
andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
andreas On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Enrico Zini wrote:
somebody will join me for Debian-Med. But we might think
about a general CDD table explaining CDD philosophy etc. I
guess that Debian-Edu people will be completely occupied by
andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I really want to meet you Andreas :(
andreas We will meet in HEL for sure! Do you also come to
andreas Karlsruhe? It would be sad if I would miss you there,
andreas but be assured that I'll be in Helsinki because this
Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
Hi,
So far I've been unable to find a simple debian tool to get a list of
packages and their dependencies. So here's a small wrapper around
apt-get/apt-cache/aptitude to use a separate tree. This lets me use
'apt-get -d' to get all the missing
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it requires debpartial-mirror from debian unstable (0.2.10), or the
development version from subversion (currently broken).
my fault.
I'm working on it for release it near.
Vagrant, thanks for
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
another mailing list would be counterproductive. As a temporary
measure, we agreed to use the debian-custom list for the initial
discussions; it would be a good idea to decide if we need to find a new
place for this, or if there are better ideas for
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Duplicated ids among each group of files listed here:
client/.arch-ids/ltsp-client-setup.id E_Vagrant_Cascadian_[EMAIL
PROTECTED]_Sat_Aug__6_21:53:32_2005_4870.0
debian/.arch-ids/ltsp-client.ltsp-client-setup.default.id
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example, your sample bug, 323262, relates particularly to thin
clients, something which is of general interest to some, but not all,
debian-custom members. Thus, you might tag it thin-client. Another
bug might relate to live CDs, and therefore you
Matheus Morais [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I want to build that customization with linux kernel 2.6.x and the base
Debian packages like dpkg, etc. I don't want build the
distribution with unnecessary packages. So I want the Debian base system and
install/build others packages separately.
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as I've discovered, a few months ago, that CDD distributions are usually
making ugly hacks to override the GConf defaults in Debian packages, I
have changed the GConf and debhelper packages to make it easily
possible. I'd like everyone to stop
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2006 à 05:31 -0200, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Would be good if you could provide a list of affected packages that
need upgrade since sarge to have it working there so if someone want
to have it available could backport
Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now I am working in a solution with small scripts and patchs files,
and using dpatch. I know dpatch is to apply patches into upstream
sources, but I have made it work, using --workdir /, and a fake
debian dir inside /etc/package. The
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2/6/06, Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
if using debpartial-mirror 0.2.11, it won't re-download everything- it
should check the existing packages against the mirror and only download
files that don't match. i tend to use it in
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i've toyed with the idea of using python-cdd to create something similar
to apt-proxy, but it's probably over my head :)
Hopefully I'll find the need time to worn on apt-proxy and fix it ...
I think would be good if you took a look in apt-cacher in
Darrin Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was encouraged to introduce myself to this list and explain my cdd
project. I'm Darrin Thompson and I work for Progeny.
Good to see that going well. Be welcome to our CDD effort :-D
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Darrin Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 08:56 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
BTW: do you use the Debian Installer or Anaconda?
d-i works best out of the box. There is code to make Anaconda installers
work also, but it will need some love before it works well.
How is PDK
Sergio Talens-Oliag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Debian Custom people,
First, for the ones that don't read planet.debian.org, let me announce here
that I've left the LliureX Project, so I'm no longer going to be paid to work
on CDD related things in the near future (unless I can find a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
= debpartial-mirror 0.2.90 ready for testing =
We're glad to announce an improved version of debpartial-mirror.
It comes with a lot of new (amazing) features and it is easier to
use.
This release is based on the python-cdd library[1], which is an
Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice. Is there some documentation on that?
I basically need:
1. A local mirror that has a number of packages from my
local repository with all of their dependencies from the local
repository and/or Sarge.
You can do to that. You might use two mirror
MarioDebian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Muekow create a debootstrap chroot and serve it with nfs with a lot of
things that terminal don't need. Terminal need only some binaries and
his linked libraries TCOS have only binaries and libs (based on info
of ldd) and some conf files.
Not really
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on the down side, repeated troubles with debpartial-mirror have me
looking at other mirroring tools. largely reprepro for packages, and
rsync for the other files(docs, debian-installer images, etc). it
requires implementing dependency resolution, as
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
having read the report about i18n meeting in Extremadura at dda
I wonder how the status of a proposed CDD meeting or Debian science
meeting in Extremadura is? I vanished a little bit from the
scene in the first half of this year and thus I'm
Tristan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It also appears to be trying to download the dependencies from the local
repository rather than from sid.
I'll check it but looks like it's guessing that the files will be
available instead of using the sid source to get it. Could you please
report a
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi list,
I'm working on with Vagrant on simple-cdd[0] for etch. I've a problem
here and maybe you've a hint for me.
Basically the installer' kernel version doesn't match with what
generate_di-list and generate_di+k-list (debian-cd stuff) puts on the
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/21/06, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It depends from where you're grabbing it from.
Hi Otavio,
rsync'ed from ftp.us.d.o as cited above. It's clearly outdated. I bet
that the d-i etch
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi, i would like to create a mailing list for simple-cdd development as
part of the alioth cdd project(to facilitate group maintenance), since i
am already hosting simple-cdd's bzr branches as part of the cdd project.
otavio suggested adding me to
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2/26/07, Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
331431 extents written (647 MB)
The image is bootable, but i've a problem that need your input
Vagrant. Introducing the call below to copy the extra files breaks
invoking the preseed using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like the mirror-tools/ thing and hate they way we install additional
packages through extra stuff, maybe we could integrate the profiles
with tasksel in a transparent manner for the users.
i'm open to ideas. i played around with tasksel some and that seems
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Tille wrote:
Yes, you are right and I'm even doing this in the med-common package.
But I do not really regard this as a really nice solution if those
extra tasks are mixed with the default Debian tasks.
Note that you can hide the debian tasks by
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Or even install a package that provides tasksel-data before installing
tasksel. So you'll end up with a complete new set of tasks.
... which is orthogonal to what I really want. Otavio, what
works for you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
Op 27-04-2007 om 20:43 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
so, after sitting in the NEW queue for a few weeks, simple-cdd 0.3.0
finally hit experimental. yay!
so now you can add to your sources.list:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian experimental
Ernesto Hernandez-Novich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apparently the list of packages to be installed by the profile is not
taken into account while calculating the progress of the installation
process. Is this a bug, or am I missing some parameter?
It's a bug. I had a patch long time ago that
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Integrated Debian Distribution (IDD)? hm... seems pretty direct
and to the point, with little room for confusion- dare i propose IDD as
a real contender? :)
+1
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
W. Martin Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like Debian remix, partly because Ubuntu already uses it, so
it is well-known. As far as I understand the concepts, we would
use the word remix slightly different. Is this a problem?
As spot by Vagrant, remix doesn't suggests it is integrated or
Paras pradhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Paras pradhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if this is right place to ask but I am assuming this is.
I have extracted rootskel-gtk udeb , made some changes and recreated the
udeb file. Now where do
Paras pradhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Copied and modified rootskel-gtk-1.15_i386.udeb from
builder/installer/apt-udeb
3) Placed the modified udeb file to installer/build/localudebs
4) Then run fakeroot make netboot-gtk again
Not coming up...
Also the pointer relating to this
71 matches
Mail list logo
