-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivo Marino wrote:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
It appears as though anyone who has an account can upload any package they
like. While this isn't a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The development of jNethack goes jnethack.sourceforge.jp, but I haven't
make a enough time to follow and maintain.
Current package is based on 1.1.5, but CVS version is 3.4.1-0.1.
Instead of dropping GTK+ mode support,
Title: Welcome to Adobe GoLive 6
LA CUARESMA TERMINO,
PERO SIEMPRE HABRA VIENTO PARA VOLAR ESTAS UNICAS E INCREIBLES
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
+1000:
*very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
put in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Denis Barbier wrote:
In this thread we were told to change the French translation because
Apache maintainers did not like its layout. I will come back to this
issue below, but here is a better example of the problem I want to
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
---
Debian Mentors Project
The mentors core-team is:
Christoph Haas (ChrisH)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivo Marino (eim) [EMAIL
Hi,
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:58:53PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 08:36:18PM +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
I've written a short comparison before per host concurrency limits were
added, see here if you're interested:
Hi;
[I reply to this message, since I am the guy who translates the
Description]
On tue 13 may 2003 at 06:57 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
[...]
Now Apache maintainers are telling us that they chose another layout
and we are bound to it.
Yes because the official maintainer is
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
pckage is signed by a key which is signed by a real debian developer.
Surely getting that signature
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-13
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: valgrind-caltree
Version : 0.2.95
Upstream Author : Josef Weidendorfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://kcachegrind.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description :
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Pierre Machard wrote:
Hi;
[I reply to this message, since I am the guy who translates the
Description]
On tue 13 may 2003 at 06:57 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
[...]
Now Apache maintainers are telling us that they chose another layout
and we are bound to
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 06:57:45AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
(...)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2003/debian-l10n-french-200305/msg00121.html
The first post to the mailing list is the result of the only mail in which
i was asking Michael Bramer how to behave in the
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
---
Debian Mentors Project
The mentors core-team is:
Christoph Haas (ChrisH)
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 06:57:45AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Denis Barbier wrote:
In this thread we were told to change the French translation because
Apache maintainers did not like its layout. I will come
Hi, Anthony...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Uh, as far as I can tell, of the above only Daniel is even in the
n-m queue; Christoph, Ivo and Christoph appear to not be developers,
applicants, or even sponsored maintainers of any packages in the archive.
You
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 06:57:45AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
(...)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2003/debian-l10n-french-200305/msg00121.html
The first post to the mailing list is the result of the only
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:30:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
pckage is signed by a key which is
Dear Debian fellows,
In France, we have an expression that says a storm in a glass of
water. I sincerely think we are in such a case.
Let me summarise what happened, according to what I read on the
debian-l10-french list.
Once, there was a description for the Apache package
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[...]
First, thanks to Denis work, projects like DDTP are possible. Without his
po-debconf half of the DDTP would be unmanagable. Please take time to know
who you are you talking with.
[...]
Not really, I did not
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Daniel K. Gebhart (con-fuse) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph Siess (CHS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are we giving debian.net addresses to people who don't want to go
through the pain of authenticating themselves to
Hi !
Le 2003-05-13 09:42:16 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto écrivait :
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Pierre Machard wrote:
just an examoke:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-pkg-desc
The long description should consist of full and complete
But how can I protect _myself_ from _myself_?
I seem to recall in past UNIXes things weren't this bad.
$ id
uid=1000(jidanni) gid=1000(jidanni) ...
$ chmod -w -R ee
$ find ee|xargs touch -d 'next year'
$ find ee|xargs ls -ld
dr-xr-xr-x3 jidanni jidanni 1024 2004-05-13 16:43 ee
-r--r--r--
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Please bear with me but from what I was told by a number of package
maintainers it is a really long way until one has become a DD. Just
because Daniel was assigned an AM does not mean there is a guarantee he
will get his DD access
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:01:49AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Yes we are since in the first place we asked nicely to change the layout
back to the original one (as it was before this translation) and then you
(..)
Maintainers or developers do not have a say on how
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:34:08AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Please bear with me but from what I was told by a number of package
maintainers it is a really long way until one has become a DD. Just
Hi!
I've just wrote a script which generates a /etc/mc/mc.ext file using
information from mime.types and mailcap files.
I found it very useful. It takes a list of extensions from mime.types
then check if in mailcap we've got support for that extension.
If yes it put this extension do mc.ext and
On ti, 2003-05-13 at 05:42, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Yes, perhaps yes. I really don't think adding default icons is The Right
Thing, but I still think that'd be better than nothing. It's a matter
of taste and opinion, I guess. I think the debian swirl is ok as a default
icon on my gnome
On 13 May 2003, mcINEK wrote:
I think, it's very good to automate generating mc.ext file.
Very good idea.
Please, share with me with your opinions.
If I would be you I would file a wishlist bug against mc package and
tag it patch by providing your script.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I won't discuss that. It probably was not nice switching to other language
but Denis was, in my point of view, asking the rest of the team (which
might not be fluent in english)
Let's stop any discussion that is not focused on the
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:42:16AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
If you really believe that the apache description should be improved than
you file a bug against apache asking to changing layout, proposing the
better one so that everyone can be alligned to it.
If I understand well,
W licie z wto, 13-05-2003, godz. 12:43, Andreas Tille pisze:
Please, share with me with your opinions.
If I would be you I would file a wishlist bug against mc package and
tag it patch by providing your script.
But first I wanna know if it what I done is good ;)
So, I will wait for opinions.
Hi,
I'm trying to build the latest version of XML::LibXML from CVS, but it
won't pass the tests. At least, that depends on how I ran them:
- perl Mekefile.PL; make; make test = no problem
- fakeroot debian/rules clean; debian/rules build = again no problem
- fakeroot
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:42:16AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
If you really believe that the apache description should be improved than
you file a bug against apache asking to changing layout, proposing the
better one so that everyone
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:33:50PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
Appropos of this and Colin's statement, my suggestion is to make only a
deb-src URL available on the site, and to only host source packages. For
packages destined for the Debian archive, it's critical that they be
reviewed as
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
---
Debian Mentors Project
The mentors core-team is:
Christoph Haas (ChrisH)
Hi !
Apologies are due for the thread in french in which you were not cc'ed.
So impolite as it may seems, though, you adressed to the french
translation team as a whole, and I think every people who jumped in this
thread were willing to adopt a common standpoint on this issue before
you would be
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:59:24PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
But how can I protect _myself_ from _myself_?
you cant, since you always can change the permissions of the file back to
writeable.
Protection from yourself, especially if you are root are extended Unix
features (like for example
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:37:46PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
If I understand well, you are bored because you think that the layout used
in french could be good in all languages, but the french translators sort of
kept it for themselves.
But we didn't do that because we don't think that
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
You are right. I do plan to apply in a few weeks. However the service
was created especially for people who e.g. have written an application
themselves and do not care about becoming a DD.
Is that such a good thing? It might get
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
[...]
The mentors core-team is:
[...]
the debian mentors core-team
core team? So, when can we expect expulsions? :)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Please Cc: unless you mail -devel.
On Tue, 13 May 2003 21:53, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:59:24PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
But how can I protect _myself_ from _myself_?
Protection from yourself, especially if you are root are extended Unix
features (like for example immutable and append only files,
I found better solution. Don't generate a mc.ext file, just use
run-mailcap for default action for every file. And also we can keep a
few special treating files, like ie. archives.
I've attached my proposition of mc.ext and I'm going to add this to a
wishlist.
Regards.
Marcin
--
.---,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
[...]
Regardless, I actually think it's a wonderful scaleability measure to
provide some infrastructure that allows DDs to delegate some of the
packaging work to NMs in the queue, who can prove that they are worth
their salt, or
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However the service
was created especially for people who e.g. have written an application
themselves and do not care about becoming a DD.
I object to the conept of people who do not care about
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can only do that if you have write permissions to the directory the
file is in; if not:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr$ touch -d 'next year' doc; ls -ld doc .
touch: setting times of `doc': Operation not permitted
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root
On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
signed by (one of) their key(s) in unstable and then excluding from
that anyone who had been
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:48:49AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
[...]
Regardless, I actually think it's a wonderful scaleability measure
to provide some infrastructure that allows DDs to delegate some of
James Troup wrote:
Jay Kominek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I happen to know of a machine Jay logged into yesterday, so I have emailed
him at that account. I have mailed Nathan too, though he seems to be in
the middle of a job change and move.
My, a lot of folks I hate to
Bonjour,
I am french and I don't regard the 'Imprimerie Nationale' rules as binding.
We are still a free country.
Do we have such standard document for the original english description ?
No, and there is no dedicated team to review them.
I think we should focus on provided accurate description
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Paul Jarc wrote:
No, the file's metadata is stored in its own inode. But its
permission bits affect access only to its data, not to its metadata.
Metadata is always writable by the owner - otherwise you wouldn't be
able to restore your own write access after removing it.
[James Troup]
On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
signed by (one of) their key(s) in unstable and then excluding from
that anyone
On Monday 12 May 2003 04:40 pm, Brian May wrote:
Also, just blindly purging packages can be dangerous, in some cases old
packages will purge files used by newer packages that are still used by
the system.
I'm pretty sure that would be a bug. You should report this behavior if you
see it.
Whats wrong here? something in the Packages files or on my machine?
---
Get:1 ftp://ftp.fi.debian.org unstable/main Packages [2484kB]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.dk.debian.org unstable/main Packages [2481kB]
Get:3 ftp://ftp.fi.debian.org unstable/main Release [82B]
Get:4 ftp://ftp.dk.debian.org unstable/main
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:11:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[snip]
Joost Kooij
xbat
[snip]
FWIW, Joost responded to me last Nov (gee, has it been that long ago
already? :-/) for NMU'ing xbat. If he still fails to respond, I could take
over the package.
T
--
Uhh, I'm still not here. --
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:00:23AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
Over the last few weeks, I have talked to several developers who are
involved in important areas of Debian. I will continue to do this in order
to get a clear picture of where help is needed.
[security
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:41:49PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
signed by (one of) their key(s) in
On Tue, May 13, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats wrong here? something in the Packages files or on my machine?
Something in apt. See #192439 and others.
--
Sam.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:45:30PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
(a) Repackaging lm-sensors 2.6.5, which would just have libsensors1
1:2.6.5-1, which in turn would Conflict: with any packages that
have compiled against libsensors1 2.7.0 (AFAIK,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:41:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
That's not mutually exclusive. Also, you ask who would ever wish to
delegate the maintainership of a package. I think the answer is every DD
who has filed a RFA on a package.
RFA is a Request For Adoption, not a delegation.
Greetings James,
I note that Yasuhiro Take ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not listed in your
missive. He is maintainer for the Defoma package which has a large
number of bug reports some of which have apparently been corrected
by NMU's but not closed. There is a recent critical bug (#181749, 82
days old)
Hi,
[ the following assumes the packages being orphaned ]
Joey Hess wrote:
Luis Francisco Gonzalez
tcsh
tcsh-i18n
tcsh-kanji
uuh, tcsh is an OpenOffice.org Build-Dependency
I wouldn't take it because I don't use it, but we need it...
Tor Slettnes
mindi
* Fielder George Dowding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-05-13 09:34]:
I note that Yasuhiro Take ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not listed in your
missive.
Yes, because the criteria outlined in the first paragraph of James'
message don't apply to him. However, we are also checking for other
inactive people,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:10:26PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Bernd is correct. It's a kernel issue.
SE Linux allows you [...]
SE Linux allows control [...]
Russell, you are such a pimp. ;-)
--
G. Branden Robinson| To stay young requires unceasing
Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:14:33AM +0200, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
In France, we have an expression that says a storm in a glass of
water.
We have a similar expression in (American) English. It's a tempest in
a teapot.
[1] http://www.quinion.com/words/qa/qa-tem1.htm
--
G. Branden
I'm glad to see this service.
The Developer's Reference lists
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ as being a place to
co-ordinate the sponsoring of packages. Currently it's unavailable to me
(down?). Other problems I have with it include: no place to upload
packages and it's for
First off, great work! Now I can remove the retirement item off my
old todo list. [1]
On Tue, 13 May 2003, James Troup wrote:
On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
looking first at all maintainers
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:27:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
We have a similar expression in (American) English. It's a tempest in
a teapot.
Storm in a teacup for British English.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
pgpI2L6hffi5p.pgp
Description:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Bonjour,
I am french and I don't regard the 'Imprimerie Nationale' rules as binding.
We are still a free country.
Do we have such standard document for the original english description ?
No, and there is no dedicated team to
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
We are very proud to announce the opening of the mentors project. We
have been working very hard[1] on this project since beginning of 2003.
Now the time has come to test and use it!
Really nice job but the first side effect is
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:04:43PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Do we have such standard document for the original english description ?
No, and there is no dedicated team to review them.
debian-l10n-english
There have been no
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:42:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Luis Francisco Gonzalez
tcsh
tcsh-i18n
tcsh-kanji
uuh, tcsh is an OpenOffice.org Build-Dependency
I wouldn't take it because I don't use it, but we need it...
tcsh as a build-dependency?
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:51:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:41:49PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
reach any of the people listed in [1] and [2] below, please feel free
to contact them and get them to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a mnemonic for that?
Hi, Fabio...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
Package: icaclient
Thanks for the hint. That was a test package I was uploading to stress
test the dupload process on the server. It wasn't really
Hi,
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
Package: icaclient
Version: 6.30-2
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Depends: libxaw7
And that looks like it is f*cked. Is this Depends: done
Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
echelon in this context meaning the mailing lists? As described in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2000/debian-project-21/msg7.html
?
I guess so, yes. I don't know of any other echelon in Debian.
page).
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:05:07PM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
Reminds me of a bug in the old Icon systems that the schools used
in the early 80's or so. The immutable(+i) flag couldn't be removed,
even by the superuser because then you'd be modifying the file, which
wasn't allowed cause of
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
page). What happened to the qa MIA database? The code's at
http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa but I can't find anything online.
The code is setup on qa.debian.org, just
Hi Joey,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:11:16 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Pavel Tcholakov
hylafax-client
hylafax-doc
hylafax-server
Pavel responded a few days ago here to the hylafax thread (as kay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and to a private mail I sent him last tuesday
containing fixes
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I think upload must be moderated somehow. Even the uploader himself claim
that he is unsure about licence of the product.
Well, if the packages can only be downloaded by registered DDs, then the
problem's solved I'd
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:59:25PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:42:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
uuh, tcsh is an OpenOffice.org Build-Dependency
I wouldn't take it because I don't use it, but we need it...
tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in
On Wed, 14 May 2003 04:21, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:10:26PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Bernd is correct. It's a kernel issue.
SE Linux allows you [...]
SE Linux allows control [...]
Russell, you are such a pimp. ;-)
I was provoked. ;)
Anyway are you
First of all, it seems to me that the French translation is clearly
correctly formatted, for French. Nice to learn about how list layout
works in French. However --
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
The official maintainer is in _no_ way responsible for the _translated_
description of a
On Wed, 14 May 2003 06:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in openoffice. That should
be fixed regardless of whether we keep tcsh.
Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to depend on one of the many
script interpreters in Debian?
If the upstream
On Tue, 13 May 2003 16:59:25 -0400
MZ == Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MZ
MZ On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:42:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Luis Francisco Gonzalez
tcsh
tcsh-i18n
tcsh-kanji
uuh, tcsh is an OpenOffice.org Build-Dependency
I
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:21:14PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
page). What happened to the qa MIA database? The code's at
http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa but I
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:26:42PM +0200, Nicolas Kratz wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:59:25PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in openoffice. That
should be fixed regardless of whether we keep tcsh.
ISTR that lots of the upstream build
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:40:01AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2003 06:59, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
tcsh as a build-dependency? Seems like a bug in openoffice. That
should be fixed regardless of whether we keep tcsh.
Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to depend
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:36:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:04:43PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Do we have such standard document for the original english description ?
No, and there is no
i added
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
to sources.list
however, after i got updated, i got such an error. Is it because of my
utility's version or
a general problem?
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing python2.2-imaging-tk
reopen 181862
reopen 188902
reopen 125614
reopen 190924
reopen 117828
thanks
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:47:10PM -0400, Andrea Fanfani wrote:
[...]
Source: cdrtoaster
[...]
Version: 1.12-2
[...]
Changes:
cdrtoaster (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upload. No upstream release.
James Troup said:
snip
[2]
No reply
-
Alexander Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I have another email address for Alex, and have forwarded your email to
him. Unfortunately, he's not in the country right now, so quicker
contact is difficult. :(
--
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Bonjour,
I am french and I don't regard the 'Imprimerie Nationale' rules as binding.
We are still a free country.
Do we have such standard document for the original english description ?
No, and there is no dedicated
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:25:22AM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote:
i added
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
to sources.list
however, after i got updated, i got such an error. Is it because of my
utility's version or
a general problem?
E: Dynamic MMap
Folks,
Things have finally settled down, and I once again have some spare
time to devote to Debian after a 2-year absence
The new sysadmin job is going well. The new child is growing up.
The new house is now home. The Everquest Addiction(tm) has faded. Etc. :^)
For the time being, I am
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:40:04PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
If I may make a suggestion, a user should only be able to upload a
package that either:
a) doesn't appear in the repository
- -or-
b) already has the uploader as maintainer
- -or-
c) has a RFA/O bug filed in WNPP
Folks,
Things have finally settled down, and I once again have some spare
time to devote to Debian after a 2-year absence
The new sysadmin job is going well. The new child is growing up.
The new house is now home. The Everquest Addiction(tm) has faded. Etc. :^)
For the time being, I am
Why is it a bug for the compilation of a program to depend on one of the many
script interpreters in Debian?
If the upstream authors want to write shell code that can only be interpreted
by tcsh in their build scripts then it shouldn't be a bug in the Debian
package as long as the tcsh
On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 19:23, Adam Heath wrote:
This is a bug that exists in *stable*, and does *not* exist in
unstable(upstream requires the user to explicitly set a file to use, and
doesn't pick one itself). It was only filed this week. The other RC bug has
been fixed. Please mark kaffe
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:05:38PM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
And please don't be offended by the .sig.
That .sig is problematic beyond just its content; it is 12 lines long and
adds almost 1kb to each of your messages (probably longer than the contents
of many messages). Refer to RFC 1855 or
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
